Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model

Objective To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) signature for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 612 patients with pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training coh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2023-03, Vol.33 (3), p.1949-1962
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Xiaoling, Xia, Liming, Chen, Jun, Wan, Weijia, Zhou, Wen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1962
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1949
container_title European radiology
container_volume 33
creator Ma, Xiaoling
Xia, Liming
Chen, Jun
Wan, Weijia
Zhou, Wen
description Objective To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) signature for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 612 patients with pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training cohort ( n = 489) and internal validation cohort ( n = 123). Besides, 108 patients were enrolled and constituted an independent test cohort ( n = 108). Patients’ clinical characteristics and CT semantic features were collected. The radiomics features were derived from contrast-enhanced CT images. The clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature were built to predict LN metastasis. Furthermore, Swin Transformer was adopted to develop a DL signature predictive of LN metastasis. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. The comparisons of AUC were conducted by the DeLong test. Results The proposed DL signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts, significantly superior to both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature (all p < 0.05). The calibration curves show that DL signature predicted probabilities fit well the actual observed probabilities of LN metastasis. DL signature gained a higher net benefit than both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature. The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors failed to reveal an incremental value over the DL signature. Conclusions The proposed DL signature based on Swin Transformer achieved a promising performance in predicting LN metastasis and could confer important information in noninvasive mediastinal LN staging and individualized therapeutic options. Key Points • Accurate prediction for lymph node metastasis is crucial to formulate individualized therapeutic options for patients with lung adenocarcinoma. • The deep learning signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts in predicting lymph node metastasis, superior to both radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model. • The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors into deep learning signature failed to reveal an incremental value over deep learning signature.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-022-09153-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718962768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718962768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-67e418152a2ec09f6180d78d8c2c04af8937f5c0eb4add52243b22cbeba97cc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFjEQhYMozkVfwIUE3LhpzaU76XYno6PCgBtdN9VJ9T8ZcmmT7pGZ5_IBze8_6uBCCFTgfHVOwSHkGWevOGP6dWFMStYwIRo28E42tw_IMW-laDjr24f3_kfkpJQrxirW6sfkSCquBjXwY_LjHV6jT0vAuFKIll6DdxZWlyJNMwVqERfqEXJ0cUeL20VYt4x0TpkuGa0z617wN2G5pDFZpAFXKPW5Ql2kfqsqWIzJQDYupgBvqElhgexKDfnu1kuawboUnCn3AvbHGO-iM-CbggHi6gwNNcE_IY9m8AWf3s1T8vX8_Zezj83F5w-fzt5eNEbqbm2Uxpb3vBMg0LBhVrxnVve2N8KwFuZ-kHruDMOpBWs7IVo5CWEmnGDQxnB5Sl4efJecvm1Y1jG4YtB7iJi2MgrN-0EJrfqKvvgHvUpbjvW6SmnNlWiVqJQ4UCanUjLO45JdgHwzcjbuOx0PnY610_FXp-NtXXp-Z71NAe2fld8lVkAegFKluMP8N_s_tj8BoLOxvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777162462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ma, Xiaoling ; Xia, Liming ; Chen, Jun ; Wan, Weijia ; Zhou, Wen</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaoling ; Xia, Liming ; Chen, Jun ; Wan, Weijia ; Zhou, Wen</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) signature for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 612 patients with pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training cohort ( n = 489) and internal validation cohort ( n = 123). Besides, 108 patients were enrolled and constituted an independent test cohort ( n = 108). Patients’ clinical characteristics and CT semantic features were collected. The radiomics features were derived from contrast-enhanced CT images. The clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature were built to predict LN metastasis. Furthermore, Swin Transformer was adopted to develop a DL signature predictive of LN metastasis. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. The comparisons of AUC were conducted by the DeLong test. Results The proposed DL signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts, significantly superior to both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature (all p &lt; 0.05). The calibration curves show that DL signature predicted probabilities fit well the actual observed probabilities of LN metastasis. DL signature gained a higher net benefit than both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature. The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors failed to reveal an incremental value over the DL signature. Conclusions The proposed DL signature based on Swin Transformer achieved a promising performance in predicting LN metastasis and could confer important information in noninvasive mediastinal LN staging and individualized therapeutic options. Key Points • Accurate prediction for lymph node metastasis is crucial to formulate individualized therapeutic options for patients with lung adenocarcinoma. • The deep learning signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts in predicting lymph node metastasis, superior to both radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model. • The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors into deep learning signature failed to reveal an incremental value over deep learning signature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09153-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36169691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma of Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Calibration ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Decision analysis ; Deep Learning ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Humans ; Image contrast ; Image enhancement ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lungs ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Lymphatic system ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Neuroradiology ; Oncology ; Performance evaluation ; Performance prediction ; Radiology ; Radiomics ; Retrospective Studies ; Semantics ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Transformers ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2023-03, Vol.33 (3), p.1949-1962</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-67e418152a2ec09f6180d78d8c2c04af8937f5c0eb4add52243b22cbeba97cc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-67e418152a2ec09f6180d78d8c2c04af8937f5c0eb4add52243b22cbeba97cc13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-022-09153-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-022-09153-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Weijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wen</creatorcontrib><title>Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) signature for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 612 patients with pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training cohort ( n = 489) and internal validation cohort ( n = 123). Besides, 108 patients were enrolled and constituted an independent test cohort ( n = 108). Patients’ clinical characteristics and CT semantic features were collected. The radiomics features were derived from contrast-enhanced CT images. The clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature were built to predict LN metastasis. Furthermore, Swin Transformer was adopted to develop a DL signature predictive of LN metastasis. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. The comparisons of AUC were conducted by the DeLong test. Results The proposed DL signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts, significantly superior to both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature (all p &lt; 0.05). The calibration curves show that DL signature predicted probabilities fit well the actual observed probabilities of LN metastasis. DL signature gained a higher net benefit than both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature. The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors failed to reveal an incremental value over the DL signature. Conclusions The proposed DL signature based on Swin Transformer achieved a promising performance in predicting LN metastasis and could confer important information in noninvasive mediastinal LN staging and individualized therapeutic options. Key Points • Accurate prediction for lymph node metastasis is crucial to formulate individualized therapeutic options for patients with lung adenocarcinoma. • The deep learning signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts in predicting lymph node metastasis, superior to both radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model. • The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors into deep learning signature failed to reveal an incremental value over deep learning signature.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma of Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Transformers</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1432-1084</issn><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFjEQhYMozkVfwIUE3LhpzaU76XYno6PCgBtdN9VJ9T8ZcmmT7pGZ5_IBze8_6uBCCFTgfHVOwSHkGWevOGP6dWFMStYwIRo28E42tw_IMW-laDjr24f3_kfkpJQrxirW6sfkSCquBjXwY_LjHV6jT0vAuFKIll6DdxZWlyJNMwVqERfqEXJ0cUeL20VYt4x0TpkuGa0z617wN2G5pDFZpAFXKPW5Ql2kfqsqWIzJQDYupgBvqElhgexKDfnu1kuawboUnCn3AvbHGO-iM-CbggHi6gwNNcE_IY9m8AWf3s1T8vX8_Zezj83F5w-fzt5eNEbqbm2Uxpb3vBMg0LBhVrxnVve2N8KwFuZ-kHruDMOpBWs7IVo5CWEmnGDQxnB5Sl4efJecvm1Y1jG4YtB7iJi2MgrN-0EJrfqKvvgHvUpbjvW6SmnNlWiVqJQ4UCanUjLO45JdgHwzcjbuOx0PnY610_FXp-NtXXp-Z71NAe2fld8lVkAegFKluMP8N_s_tj8BoLOxvA</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Ma, Xiaoling</creator><creator>Xia, Liming</creator><creator>Chen, Jun</creator><creator>Wan, Weijia</creator><creator>Zhou, Wen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model</title><author>Ma, Xiaoling ; Xia, Liming ; Chen, Jun ; Wan, Weijia ; Zhou, Wen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-67e418152a2ec09f6180d78d8c2c04af8937f5c0eb4add52243b22cbeba97cc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma of Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Transformers</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Weijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Xiaoling</au><au>Xia, Liming</au><au>Chen, Jun</au><au>Wan, Weijia</au><au>Zhou, Wen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1949</spage><epage>1962</epage><pages>1949-1962</pages><issn>1432-1084</issn><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objective To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) signature for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 612 patients with pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training cohort ( n = 489) and internal validation cohort ( n = 123). Besides, 108 patients were enrolled and constituted an independent test cohort ( n = 108). Patients’ clinical characteristics and CT semantic features were collected. The radiomics features were derived from contrast-enhanced CT images. The clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature were built to predict LN metastasis. Furthermore, Swin Transformer was adopted to develop a DL signature predictive of LN metastasis. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. The comparisons of AUC were conducted by the DeLong test. Results The proposed DL signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts, significantly superior to both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature (all p &lt; 0.05). The calibration curves show that DL signature predicted probabilities fit well the actual observed probabilities of LN metastasis. DL signature gained a higher net benefit than both clinical-semantic model and radiomics signature. The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors failed to reveal an incremental value over the DL signature. Conclusions The proposed DL signature based on Swin Transformer achieved a promising performance in predicting LN metastasis and could confer important information in noninvasive mediastinal LN staging and individualized therapeutic options. Key Points • Accurate prediction for lymph node metastasis is crucial to formulate individualized therapeutic options for patients with lung adenocarcinoma. • The deep learning signature yielded an AUC of 0.948–0.961 across all three cohorts in predicting lymph node metastasis, superior to both radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model. • The incorporation of radiomics signature or clinical-semantic risk predictors into deep learning signature failed to reveal an incremental value over deep learning signature.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36169691</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-022-09153-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-1084
ispartof European radiology, 2023-03, Vol.33 (3), p.1949-1962
issn 1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718962768
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma of Lung - diagnostic imaging
Calibration
Cancer
Computed tomography
Decision analysis
Deep Learning
Diagnostic Radiology
Humans
Image contrast
Image enhancement
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lungs
Lymph Nodes
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphatic system
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Metastasis
Neuroradiology
Oncology
Performance evaluation
Performance prediction
Radiology
Radiomics
Retrospective Studies
Semantics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Transformers
Ultrasound
title Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A04%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20deep%20learning%20signature%20for%20predicting%20lymph%20node%20metastasis%20in%20lung%20adenocarcinoma:%20comparison%20with%20radiomics%20signature%20and%20clinical-semantic%20model&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Ma,%20Xiaoling&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1949&rft.epage=1962&rft.pages=1949-1962&rft.issn=1432-1084&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-022-09153-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718962768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777162462&rft_id=info:pmid/36169691&rfr_iscdi=true