Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report

The traditional approach in combined liver-kidney transplantation involves 2 separate and sequential incisions. We describe a modification of the standard Mercedes incision that allows a single-incision operation while providing and maintaining adequate exposure to enable safe dual-allograft transpl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2022-10, Vol.54 (8), p.2248-2253
Hauptverfasser: Saucedo-Crespo, Hector, Hardie, Kyler, Sakpal, Sujit Vijay, Auvenshine, Christopher, Steers, Jeffery
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2253
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2248
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 54
creator Saucedo-Crespo, Hector
Hardie, Kyler
Sakpal, Sujit Vijay
Auvenshine, Christopher
Steers, Jeffery
description The traditional approach in combined liver-kidney transplantation involves 2 separate and sequential incisions. We describe a modification of the standard Mercedes incision that allows a single-incision operation while providing and maintaining adequate exposure to enable safe dual-allograft transplantation. Modification of the standard Mercedes incision includes bilateral, subcostal, muscle splitting incision 4 fingerbreadths below the rib edge with a midline, cephalad incision and inferior ± medial ipsilateral extension on the side of intended iliac fossa laterality for renovascular and ureteroneocystostomy anastomosis. Five consecutive patients (3 women/2 men; mean age, 49 years; median body mass index, 29.8 kg/m2) underwent combined liver-kidney transplantation for end-stage liver disease and progressive hepatorenal syndrome via a modified Mercedes single-incision approach (at a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 37) without an additional kidney transplant incision, extraperitoneal exposure, or addition of wound retractors. Two out of the 5 patients experienced postoperative wound complications, including 1 with delayed wound healing and 1 with superficial dehiscence. All patients have normal dual-allograft function at or beyond 6 months posttransplantation. The modified Mercedes single-incision technique is safe and feasible. Lowering the subcostal incisions with unilateral, inferomedial extension allows adequate visualization of the lower abdominopelvic area without compromising exposure of the upper abdomen for both renal and liver allograft implantation. Further studies are needed to prove the theoretical benefits of this technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718960117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134522005103</els_id><sourcerecordid>2718960117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-5c0335072ce0a2e90adb3e1d1477470309b6ecad61d3f1cc3410719f87d3aab13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-h-DJy64zyXaz603qJ7YIftyEkCazktJuarIW_O-N1oNHT8PAe2_m_Rg7QSgRsD5blEM0fVrHYIlcKUCIEpoSoN1hI2yULEQt5C4bAVRYoKzG--wgpQXkXVRyxF5nwfnOk-MzipYcJf7k-7cl8bve-uRDz7sQ-SSs5r7PqqnfUOT33vX0yZ9_bi9NP5zzCz4xifgTRZ8zHmkd4nDE9jqzTHT8Ow_Zy_XV8-S2mD7c3E0upoUVEoZibEHKMShhCYygFoybS0KHlVKVAgntvCZrXI1OdmitrBAUtl2jnDRmjvKQnW5zM4f3D0qDXvlkaZk_o_CRtFDYtDUgqiw930ptDClF6vQ6-pWJnxpBfyPVC_0Xqf5GqqHRGWk2X27NlMtsPEWdrKc-Y_OR7KBd8P-J-QKlpIZ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718960117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector ; Hardie, Kyler ; Sakpal, Sujit Vijay ; Auvenshine, Christopher ; Steers, Jeffery</creator><creatorcontrib>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector ; Hardie, Kyler ; Sakpal, Sujit Vijay ; Auvenshine, Christopher ; Steers, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional approach in combined liver-kidney transplantation involves 2 separate and sequential incisions. We describe a modification of the standard Mercedes incision that allows a single-incision operation while providing and maintaining adequate exposure to enable safe dual-allograft transplantation. Modification of the standard Mercedes incision includes bilateral, subcostal, muscle splitting incision 4 fingerbreadths below the rib edge with a midline, cephalad incision and inferior ± medial ipsilateral extension on the side of intended iliac fossa laterality for renovascular and ureteroneocystostomy anastomosis. Five consecutive patients (3 women/2 men; mean age, 49 years; median body mass index, 29.8 kg/m2) underwent combined liver-kidney transplantation for end-stage liver disease and progressive hepatorenal syndrome via a modified Mercedes single-incision approach (at a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 37) without an additional kidney transplant incision, extraperitoneal exposure, or addition of wound retractors. Two out of the 5 patients experienced postoperative wound complications, including 1 with delayed wound healing and 1 with superficial dehiscence. All patients have normal dual-allograft function at or beyond 6 months posttransplantation. The modified Mercedes single-incision technique is safe and feasible. Lowering the subcostal incisions with unilateral, inferomedial extension allows adequate visualization of the lower abdominopelvic area without compromising exposure of the upper abdomen for both renal and liver allograft implantation. Further studies are needed to prove the theoretical benefits of this technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2022-10, Vol.54 (8), p.2248-2253</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-5c0335072ce0a2e90adb3e1d1477470309b6ecad61d3f1cc3410719f87d3aab13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5077-1810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134522005103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardie, Kyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakpal, Sujit Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvenshine, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steers, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><title>Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><description>The traditional approach in combined liver-kidney transplantation involves 2 separate and sequential incisions. We describe a modification of the standard Mercedes incision that allows a single-incision operation while providing and maintaining adequate exposure to enable safe dual-allograft transplantation. Modification of the standard Mercedes incision includes bilateral, subcostal, muscle splitting incision 4 fingerbreadths below the rib edge with a midline, cephalad incision and inferior ± medial ipsilateral extension on the side of intended iliac fossa laterality for renovascular and ureteroneocystostomy anastomosis. Five consecutive patients (3 women/2 men; mean age, 49 years; median body mass index, 29.8 kg/m2) underwent combined liver-kidney transplantation for end-stage liver disease and progressive hepatorenal syndrome via a modified Mercedes single-incision approach (at a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 37) without an additional kidney transplant incision, extraperitoneal exposure, or addition of wound retractors. Two out of the 5 patients experienced postoperative wound complications, including 1 with delayed wound healing and 1 with superficial dehiscence. All patients have normal dual-allograft function at or beyond 6 months posttransplantation. The modified Mercedes single-incision technique is safe and feasible. Lowering the subcostal incisions with unilateral, inferomedial extension allows adequate visualization of the lower abdominopelvic area without compromising exposure of the upper abdomen for both renal and liver allograft implantation. Further studies are needed to prove the theoretical benefits of this technique.</description><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-h-DJy64zyXaz603qJ7YIftyEkCazktJuarIW_O-N1oNHT8PAe2_m_Rg7QSgRsD5blEM0fVrHYIlcKUCIEpoSoN1hI2yULEQt5C4bAVRYoKzG--wgpQXkXVRyxF5nwfnOk-MzipYcJf7k-7cl8bve-uRDz7sQ-SSs5r7PqqnfUOT33vX0yZ9_bi9NP5zzCz4xifgTRZ8zHmkd4nDE9jqzTHT8Ow_Zy_XV8-S2mD7c3E0upoUVEoZibEHKMShhCYygFoybS0KHlVKVAgntvCZrXI1OdmitrBAUtl2jnDRmjvKQnW5zM4f3D0qDXvlkaZk_o_CRtFDYtDUgqiw930ptDClF6vQ6-pWJnxpBfyPVC_0Xqf5GqqHRGWk2X27NlMtsPEWdrKc-Y_OR7KBd8P-J-QKlpIZ1</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector</creator><creator>Hardie, Kyler</creator><creator>Sakpal, Sujit Vijay</creator><creator>Auvenshine, Christopher</creator><creator>Steers, Jeffery</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-1810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report</title><author>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector ; Hardie, Kyler ; Sakpal, Sujit Vijay ; Auvenshine, Christopher ; Steers, Jeffery</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-5c0335072ce0a2e90adb3e1d1477470309b6ecad61d3f1cc3410719f87d3aab13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardie, Kyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakpal, Sujit Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvenshine, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steers, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saucedo-Crespo, Hector</au><au>Hardie, Kyler</au><au>Sakpal, Sujit Vijay</au><au>Auvenshine, Christopher</au><au>Steers, Jeffery</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2248</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2248-2253</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>The traditional approach in combined liver-kidney transplantation involves 2 separate and sequential incisions. We describe a modification of the standard Mercedes incision that allows a single-incision operation while providing and maintaining adequate exposure to enable safe dual-allograft transplantation. Modification of the standard Mercedes incision includes bilateral, subcostal, muscle splitting incision 4 fingerbreadths below the rib edge with a midline, cephalad incision and inferior ± medial ipsilateral extension on the side of intended iliac fossa laterality for renovascular and ureteroneocystostomy anastomosis. Five consecutive patients (3 women/2 men; mean age, 49 years; median body mass index, 29.8 kg/m2) underwent combined liver-kidney transplantation for end-stage liver disease and progressive hepatorenal syndrome via a modified Mercedes single-incision approach (at a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 37) without an additional kidney transplant incision, extraperitoneal exposure, or addition of wound retractors. Two out of the 5 patients experienced postoperative wound complications, including 1 with delayed wound healing and 1 with superficial dehiscence. All patients have normal dual-allograft function at or beyond 6 months posttransplantation. The modified Mercedes single-incision technique is safe and feasible. Lowering the subcostal incisions with unilateral, inferomedial extension allows adequate visualization of the lower abdominopelvic area without compromising exposure of the upper abdomen for both renal and liver allograft implantation. Further studies are needed to prove the theoretical benefits of this technique.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.009</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-1810</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2022-10, Vol.54 (8), p.2248-2253
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718960117
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A53%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modified%20Mercedes%20Single%20Incision%20for%20Combined%20Liver%20Kidney%20Transplant:%20A%20Case%20Series%20Report&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Saucedo-Crespo,%20Hector&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2248&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2248-2253&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718960117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718960117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0041134522005103&rfr_iscdi=true