Support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements in the United States: The role of exemption policies
In the United States (U.S.), only five states or territories require human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for school attendance, even though almost all U.S. jurisdictions have debated adopting this type of policy. In this U.S. based study, we sought to estimate the level of support for HPV vaccine...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2022-12, Vol.40 (51), p.7426-7432 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7432 |
---|---|
container_issue | 51 |
container_start_page | 7426 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Calo, William A. Lennon, Robert P. Ruffin IV, Mack T. Keller, Chelsea Spanos, Katherine D'Souza, Gail Kraschnewski, Jennifer L. |
description | In the United States (U.S.), only five states or territories require human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for school attendance, even though almost all U.S. jurisdictions have debated adopting this type of policy. In this U.S. based study, we sought to estimate the level of support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements with varying exemption policies and documentation procedures to obtain exemptions. Between July and August 2019, we conducted a web-based survey with a national sample of 1,109 U.S. parents of 11- to 17-year-olds. The survey assessed support for four school-entry vaccine requirement policies: without exemption or with exemption for medical, religious or philosophical reasons. Analyses used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of support for each policy. Overall, 38% of parents agreed with laws requiring HPV vaccination for school attendance without exemptions. When including exemption provisions, agreement increased to 45% for philosophical reasons, 50% for religious reasons, and 59% for medical reasons. Parents more often agreed on requirements without any exemptions if they were female (OR = 1.37, 95% CI:1.01–1.87), their child had initiated HPV vaccination (OR = 2.05, 95% CI:1.50–2.87), reported high levels of vaccine confidence (OR = 2.41, 95% CI:1.77–3.27), or reported having values similar to those of the people in their community (OR = 1.85, 95% CI:1.39–2.47). Parents more often agreed with requirements that included religious or philosophical exemptions if they reported having values similar to their community or high levels of psychological reactance (all p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718362282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X22009835</els_id><sourcerecordid>2718362282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-ba4c312fb0b49bc7fb465314a629a6d5d8dd80393823db28da501bebfd0521073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9CErAjZsZb_7MTMaNSFErFBTairuQSe7QPGYm0yRT7Lc35T1duOkqJPzOuTfnEPKaQc2Ate_39Z2x1i9Yc-C8BlUD65-QHVOdqHjD1FOyA97KSjL4dUJepLQHgEaw_jk5ES0IYLzZkfFyW9cQMx1DpOc_ftKjK032JoSpwiXHexrxdvMR53JL1C803yC9XnxGRy-zyZg-0KvyFMOENIwUf-O8Zh8WuobJW4_pJXk2minhq-N5Sq6_fL46O68uvn_9dvbporKyE7kajLSC8XGAQfaD7cZBtmVlaVrem9Y1TjmnQPRCceEGrpxpgA04jA4azqATp-TdwXeN4XbDlPXsk8VpMguGLWneMSVazov-cRS6lpXBbUHf_ofuwxaX8pFCSSGVEkwUqjlQNoaUIo56jX428V4z0A-d6b0-pqsfOtOgdOms6N4c3bdhRvdP9bekAnw8AFiSu_MYdSqZLhZd6cRm7YJ_ZMQfmayp0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2743488313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements in the United States: The role of exemption policies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Calo, William A. ; Lennon, Robert P. ; Ruffin IV, Mack T. ; Keller, Chelsea ; Spanos, Katherine ; D'Souza, Gail ; Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calo, William A. ; Lennon, Robert P. ; Ruffin IV, Mack T. ; Keller, Chelsea ; Spanos, Katherine ; D'Souza, Gail ; Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States (U.S.), only five states or territories require human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for school attendance, even though almost all U.S. jurisdictions have debated adopting this type of policy. In this U.S. based study, we sought to estimate the level of support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements with varying exemption policies and documentation procedures to obtain exemptions. Between July and August 2019, we conducted a web-based survey with a national sample of 1,109 U.S. parents of 11- to 17-year-olds. The survey assessed support for four school-entry vaccine requirement policies: without exemption or with exemption for medical, religious or philosophical reasons. Analyses used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of support for each policy. Overall, 38% of parents agreed with laws requiring HPV vaccination for school attendance without exemptions. When including exemption provisions, agreement increased to 45% for philosophical reasons, 50% for religious reasons, and 59% for medical reasons. Parents more often agreed on requirements without any exemptions if they were female (OR = 1.37, 95% CI:1.01–1.87), their child had initiated HPV vaccination (OR = 2.05, 95% CI:1.50–2.87), reported high levels of vaccine confidence (OR = 2.41, 95% CI:1.77–3.27), or reported having values similar to those of the people in their community (OR = 1.85, 95% CI:1.39–2.47). Parents more often agreed with requirements that included religious or philosophical exemptions if they reported having values similar to their community or high levels of psychological reactance (all p <.05). Many parents also supported requiring a written notice signed by a health care provider (40%) or religious leader (49%) to obtain a medical or religious exemption, respectively. In conclusion, exemption policies greatly increase parent support of school-entry requirements for HPV vaccination but may decrease their impact in practice. A large number of U.S. parents support strict documentation to obtain exemptions, signaling a promising area of policymaking to strengthen vaccine policies for school attendance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36030125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>adolescents ; Child ; children ; Children & youth ; Demography ; Documentation ; Ethnicity ; Female ; females ; Girls ; health care workers ; HPV vaccine ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Immunization ; Internet ; issues and policy ; Jurisdiction ; Legislation ; Male ; Papillomaviridae ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control ; Papillomavirus Vaccines ; Parent attitudes ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Policies ; Policy ; Race ; Reactance ; regression analysis ; Religion ; Response rates ; School vaccination requirements ; Schools ; Surveys ; United States ; Vaccination ; Vaccine exemption policies ; Vaccines ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2022-12, Vol.40 (51), p.7426-7432</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-ba4c312fb0b49bc7fb465314a629a6d5d8dd80393823db28da501bebfd0521073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-ba4c312fb0b49bc7fb465314a629a6d5d8dd80393823db28da501bebfd0521073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22009835$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36030125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calo, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffin IV, Mack T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanos, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Souza, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><title>Support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements in the United States: The role of exemption policies</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>In the United States (U.S.), only five states or territories require human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for school attendance, even though almost all U.S. jurisdictions have debated adopting this type of policy. In this U.S. based study, we sought to estimate the level of support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements with varying exemption policies and documentation procedures to obtain exemptions. Between July and August 2019, we conducted a web-based survey with a national sample of 1,109 U.S. parents of 11- to 17-year-olds. The survey assessed support for four school-entry vaccine requirement policies: without exemption or with exemption for medical, religious or philosophical reasons. Analyses used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of support for each policy. Overall, 38% of parents agreed with laws requiring HPV vaccination for school attendance without exemptions. When including exemption provisions, agreement increased to 45% for philosophical reasons, 50% for religious reasons, and 59% for medical reasons. Parents more often agreed on requirements without any exemptions if they were female (OR = 1.37, 95% CI:1.01–1.87), their child had initiated HPV vaccination (OR = 2.05, 95% CI:1.50–2.87), reported high levels of vaccine confidence (OR = 2.41, 95% CI:1.77–3.27), or reported having values similar to those of the people in their community (OR = 1.85, 95% CI:1.39–2.47). Parents more often agreed with requirements that included religious or philosophical exemptions if they reported having values similar to their community or high levels of psychological reactance (all p <.05). Many parents also supported requiring a written notice signed by a health care provider (40%) or religious leader (49%) to obtain a medical or religious exemption, respectively. In conclusion, exemption policies greatly increase parent support of school-entry requirements for HPV vaccination but may decrease their impact in practice. A large number of U.S. parents support strict documentation to obtain exemptions, signaling a promising area of policymaking to strengthen vaccine policies for school attendance.</description><subject>adolescents</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>health care workers</subject><subject>HPV vaccine</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Papillomaviridae</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines</subject><subject>Parent attitudes</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Reactance</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>School vaccination requirements</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine exemption policies</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9CErAjZsZb_7MTMaNSFErFBTairuQSe7QPGYm0yRT7Lc35T1duOkqJPzOuTfnEPKaQc2Ate_39Z2x1i9Yc-C8BlUD65-QHVOdqHjD1FOyA97KSjL4dUJepLQHgEaw_jk5ES0IYLzZkfFyW9cQMx1DpOc_ftKjK032JoSpwiXHexrxdvMR53JL1C803yC9XnxGRy-zyZg-0KvyFMOENIwUf-O8Zh8WuobJW4_pJXk2minhq-N5Sq6_fL46O68uvn_9dvbporKyE7kajLSC8XGAQfaD7cZBtmVlaVrem9Y1TjmnQPRCceEGrpxpgA04jA4azqATp-TdwXeN4XbDlPXsk8VpMguGLWneMSVazov-cRS6lpXBbUHf_ofuwxaX8pFCSSGVEkwUqjlQNoaUIo56jX428V4z0A-d6b0-pqsfOtOgdOms6N4c3bdhRvdP9bekAnw8AFiSu_MYdSqZLhZd6cRm7YJ_ZMQfmayp0g</recordid><startdate>20221205</startdate><enddate>20221205</enddate><creator>Calo, William A.</creator><creator>Lennon, Robert P.</creator><creator>Ruffin IV, Mack T.</creator><creator>Keller, Chelsea</creator><creator>Spanos, Katherine</creator><creator>D'Souza, Gail</creator><creator>Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221205</creationdate><title>Support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements in the United States: The role of exemption policies</title><author>Calo, William A. ; Lennon, Robert P. ; Ruffin IV, Mack T. ; Keller, Chelsea ; Spanos, Katherine ; D'Souza, Gail ; Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-ba4c312fb0b49bc7fb465314a629a6d5d8dd80393823db28da501bebfd0521073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>adolescents</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>health care workers</topic><topic>HPV vaccine</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Papillomaviridae</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines</topic><topic>Parent attitudes</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Reactance</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>School vaccination requirements</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine exemption policies</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calo, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffin IV, Mack T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanos, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Souza, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calo, William A.</au><au>Lennon, Robert P.</au><au>Ruffin IV, Mack T.</au><au>Keller, Chelsea</au><au>Spanos, Katherine</au><au>D'Souza, Gail</au><au>Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements in the United States: The role of exemption policies</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2022-12-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>51</issue><spage>7426</spage><epage>7432</epage><pages>7426-7432</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>In the United States (U.S.), only five states or territories require human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for school attendance, even though almost all U.S. jurisdictions have debated adopting this type of policy. In this U.S. based study, we sought to estimate the level of support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements with varying exemption policies and documentation procedures to obtain exemptions. Between July and August 2019, we conducted a web-based survey with a national sample of 1,109 U.S. parents of 11- to 17-year-olds. The survey assessed support for four school-entry vaccine requirement policies: without exemption or with exemption for medical, religious or philosophical reasons. Analyses used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of support for each policy. Overall, 38% of parents agreed with laws requiring HPV vaccination for school attendance without exemptions. When including exemption provisions, agreement increased to 45% for philosophical reasons, 50% for religious reasons, and 59% for medical reasons. Parents more often agreed on requirements without any exemptions if they were female (OR = 1.37, 95% CI:1.01–1.87), their child had initiated HPV vaccination (OR = 2.05, 95% CI:1.50–2.87), reported high levels of vaccine confidence (OR = 2.41, 95% CI:1.77–3.27), or reported having values similar to those of the people in their community (OR = 1.85, 95% CI:1.39–2.47). Parents more often agreed with requirements that included religious or philosophical exemptions if they reported having values similar to their community or high levels of psychological reactance (all p <.05). Many parents also supported requiring a written notice signed by a health care provider (40%) or religious leader (49%) to obtain a medical or religious exemption, respectively. In conclusion, exemption policies greatly increase parent support of school-entry requirements for HPV vaccination but may decrease their impact in practice. A large number of U.S. parents support strict documentation to obtain exemptions, signaling a promising area of policymaking to strengthen vaccine policies for school attendance.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36030125</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2022-12, Vol.40 (51), p.7426-7432 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718362282 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | adolescents Child children Children & youth Demography Documentation Ethnicity Female females Girls health care workers HPV vaccine Human papillomavirus Humans Immunization Internet issues and policy Jurisdiction Legislation Male Papillomaviridae Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control Papillomavirus Vaccines Parent attitudes Parents Parents & parenting Policies Policy Race Reactance regression analysis Religion Response rates School vaccination requirements Schools Surveys United States Vaccination Vaccine exemption policies Vaccines Whooping cough |
title | Support for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements in the United States: The role of exemption policies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A40%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Support%20for%20HPV%20vaccine%20school-entry%20requirements%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20The%20role%20of%20exemption%20policies&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Calo,%20William%20A.&rft.date=2022-12-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=51&rft.spage=7426&rft.epage=7432&rft.pages=7426-7432&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718362282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2743488313&rft_id=info:pmid/36030125&rft_els_id=S0264410X22009835&rfr_iscdi=true |