Full production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet composition

Using germ cell-free (GCF), sterile, dnd-knockout salmon for farming could solve the problems associated with precocious maturation and genetic introgression of farmed breeds into wild populations. However, prior to using GCF fish in the salmon farming industry, it is crucial to understand if, or ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture 2022-11, Vol.560, p.738456, Article 738456
Hauptverfasser: Kleppe, L., Fjelldal, P.G., Andersson, E., Hansen, T., Sanden, M., Bruvik, A., Skaftnesmo, K.O., Furmanek, T., Kjærner-Semb, E., Crespo, D., Flavell, S., Pedersen, A.Ø., Vogelsang, P., Torsvik, A., Kvestad, K.A., Olausson, S., Norberg, B., Schulz, R.W., Bogerd, J., Santi, N., Edvardsen, R.B., Wargelius, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 738456
container_title Aquaculture
container_volume 560
creator Kleppe, L.
Fjelldal, P.G.
Andersson, E.
Hansen, T.
Sanden, M.
Bruvik, A.
Skaftnesmo, K.O.
Furmanek, T.
Kjærner-Semb, E.
Crespo, D.
Flavell, S.
Pedersen, A.Ø.
Vogelsang, P.
Torsvik, A.
Kvestad, K.A.
Olausson, S.
Norberg, B.
Schulz, R.W.
Bogerd, J.
Santi, N.
Edvardsen, R.B.
Wargelius, A.
description Using germ cell-free (GCF), sterile, dnd-knockout salmon for farming could solve the problems associated with precocious maturation and genetic introgression of farmed breeds into wild populations. However, prior to using GCF fish in the salmon farming industry, it is crucial to understand if, or how, the GCF phenotype differs from wild type (WT) counterparts in terms of growth and welfare. To characterize the GCF phenotype throughout a production cycle, we reared GCF and WT salmon in indoor common garden tanks for 3 years, until harvest size. Regarding body size, smoltification markers (mRNA levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase [NKA] subunits), plasma stress indicators (pH, glucose, sodium, chloride, calcium), relative heart size, prevalence of vertebra deformities and fillet proximate composition, GCF fish could not be distinguished from WTs. Transient differences were detected in plasma concentrations of lactate and osmolality, and only a few genes were differentially expressed in WT and GCF transcriptomes of muscle and pituitary. At harvest, fillets from GCF and WT salmon contained the same amount of omega-3 fatty acids, however the relative content of omega-3 fatty acids was higher in GCF compared to WT males. Towards harvest size, body growth rate, condition factor and relative liver size were significantly higher in WT than in GCF fish, probably relating to initiation of puberty in WTs. Since GCF salmon never become sexually mature, it is possible to postpone the time of harvest to exploit the growth potential uninhibited by sexual maturation. In conclusion, GCF salmon performed to a large extent similarly to their WT counterparts but had the clear advantage of never maturing. •Long-term performance of dnd-KO, GCF, sterile Atlantic salmon was described.•Most welfare markers, and body size, displayed similar values in GCF and WT groups.•Very few DEGs were detected in postsmolt WT vs. GCF muscle and pituitary.•Relative content of EPA and DHA were higher in GCF compared to WT male fillets.•GCF salmon never became sexually mature.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738456
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718240657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0044848622005725</els_id><sourcerecordid>2718240657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-27ee6891bbe1892aa3586df80156c3666528a218feae1008ed2b466e6726c8f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1OAyEUhYnRxFp9B9y5cCowMwxdmsa_xMSNrgmFS6VhhhYYjQ_hO8ukLly6Irn5zkk-DkKXlCwoofxmu1D7UenR5zHCghHGFl0tmpYfoRkVXV21nLFjNCOkaSrRCH6KzlLaEkI4b-kMfd-P3uNdDGbU2YUB6y_tAe8g2hB7NWjAweINDFCBcRnMNU4ZoivMbfZqyE7jpHxfkhXexPCZ3wvRB5-ddVpNldf4E7xVEbAbzHQLMWE1GGyd95CxDv0uJDeh5-jEKp_g4vedo7f7u9fVY_X88vC0un2udEPaXLEOgIslXa-BiiVTqm4FN1YQ2nJd82LGhGJUWFBACRFg2LrhHHjHuBaW1nN0degt4vsRUpa9Sxp8EYIwJsk6KlhDeNsVdHlAdQwpRbByF12v4pekRE4TyK38M4GcJpCHCUp2dchCcflwEGXSDsqfGhdBZ2mC-0fLDyl6mNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718240657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Full production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet composition</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kleppe, L. ; Fjelldal, P.G. ; Andersson, E. ; Hansen, T. ; Sanden, M. ; Bruvik, A. ; Skaftnesmo, K.O. ; Furmanek, T. ; Kjærner-Semb, E. ; Crespo, D. ; Flavell, S. ; Pedersen, A.Ø. ; Vogelsang, P. ; Torsvik, A. ; Kvestad, K.A. ; Olausson, S. ; Norberg, B. ; Schulz, R.W. ; Bogerd, J. ; Santi, N. ; Edvardsen, R.B. ; Wargelius, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kleppe, L. ; Fjelldal, P.G. ; Andersson, E. ; Hansen, T. ; Sanden, M. ; Bruvik, A. ; Skaftnesmo, K.O. ; Furmanek, T. ; Kjærner-Semb, E. ; Crespo, D. ; Flavell, S. ; Pedersen, A.Ø. ; Vogelsang, P. ; Torsvik, A. ; Kvestad, K.A. ; Olausson, S. ; Norberg, B. ; Schulz, R.W. ; Bogerd, J. ; Santi, N. ; Edvardsen, R.B. ; Wargelius, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Using germ cell-free (GCF), sterile, dnd-knockout salmon for farming could solve the problems associated with precocious maturation and genetic introgression of farmed breeds into wild populations. However, prior to using GCF fish in the salmon farming industry, it is crucial to understand if, or how, the GCF phenotype differs from wild type (WT) counterparts in terms of growth and welfare. To characterize the GCF phenotype throughout a production cycle, we reared GCF and WT salmon in indoor common garden tanks for 3 years, until harvest size. Regarding body size, smoltification markers (mRNA levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase [NKA] subunits), plasma stress indicators (pH, glucose, sodium, chloride, calcium), relative heart size, prevalence of vertebra deformities and fillet proximate composition, GCF fish could not be distinguished from WTs. Transient differences were detected in plasma concentrations of lactate and osmolality, and only a few genes were differentially expressed in WT and GCF transcriptomes of muscle and pituitary. At harvest, fillets from GCF and WT salmon contained the same amount of omega-3 fatty acids, however the relative content of omega-3 fatty acids was higher in GCF compared to WT males. Towards harvest size, body growth rate, condition factor and relative liver size were significantly higher in WT than in GCF fish, probably relating to initiation of puberty in WTs. Since GCF salmon never become sexually mature, it is possible to postpone the time of harvest to exploit the growth potential uninhibited by sexual maturation. In conclusion, GCF salmon performed to a large extent similarly to their WT counterparts but had the clear advantage of never maturing. •Long-term performance of dnd-KO, GCF, sterile Atlantic salmon was described.•Most welfare markers, and body size, displayed similar values in GCF and WT groups.•Very few DEGs were detected in postsmolt WT vs. GCF muscle and pituitary.•Relative content of EPA and DHA were higher in GCF compared to WT male fillets.•GCF salmon never became sexually mature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Atlantic salmon ; body size ; calcium ; chlorides ; condition factor ; dnd-knockout ; fillets ; glucose ; Growth ; harvest date ; heart ; industry ; introgression ; lactic acid ; liver ; muscles ; osmolality ; phenotype ; proximate composition ; puberty ; Salmo salar ; salmon ; Sexual maturation ; smoltification ; sodium ; Sterility ; transcriptome ; vertebrae ; Welfare indicators</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, 2022-11, Vol.560, p.738456, Article 738456</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-27ee6891bbe1892aa3586df80156c3666528a218feae1008ed2b466e6726c8f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-27ee6891bbe1892aa3586df80156c3666528a218feae1008ed2b466e6726c8f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848622005725$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kleppe, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjelldal, P.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanden, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruvik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skaftnesmo, K.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furmanek, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjærner-Semb, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flavell, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, A.Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogelsang, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torsvik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvestad, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olausson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norberg, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogerd, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edvardsen, R.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wargelius, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Full production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet composition</title><title>Aquaculture</title><description>Using germ cell-free (GCF), sterile, dnd-knockout salmon for farming could solve the problems associated with precocious maturation and genetic introgression of farmed breeds into wild populations. However, prior to using GCF fish in the salmon farming industry, it is crucial to understand if, or how, the GCF phenotype differs from wild type (WT) counterparts in terms of growth and welfare. To characterize the GCF phenotype throughout a production cycle, we reared GCF and WT salmon in indoor common garden tanks for 3 years, until harvest size. Regarding body size, smoltification markers (mRNA levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase [NKA] subunits), plasma stress indicators (pH, glucose, sodium, chloride, calcium), relative heart size, prevalence of vertebra deformities and fillet proximate composition, GCF fish could not be distinguished from WTs. Transient differences were detected in plasma concentrations of lactate and osmolality, and only a few genes were differentially expressed in WT and GCF transcriptomes of muscle and pituitary. At harvest, fillets from GCF and WT salmon contained the same amount of omega-3 fatty acids, however the relative content of omega-3 fatty acids was higher in GCF compared to WT males. Towards harvest size, body growth rate, condition factor and relative liver size were significantly higher in WT than in GCF fish, probably relating to initiation of puberty in WTs. Since GCF salmon never become sexually mature, it is possible to postpone the time of harvest to exploit the growth potential uninhibited by sexual maturation. In conclusion, GCF salmon performed to a large extent similarly to their WT counterparts but had the clear advantage of never maturing. •Long-term performance of dnd-KO, GCF, sterile Atlantic salmon was described.•Most welfare markers, and body size, displayed similar values in GCF and WT groups.•Very few DEGs were detected in postsmolt WT vs. GCF muscle and pituitary.•Relative content of EPA and DHA were higher in GCF compared to WT male fillets.•GCF salmon never became sexually mature.</description><subject>Atlantic salmon</subject><subject>body size</subject><subject>calcium</subject><subject>chlorides</subject><subject>condition factor</subject><subject>dnd-knockout</subject><subject>fillets</subject><subject>glucose</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>harvest date</subject><subject>heart</subject><subject>industry</subject><subject>introgression</subject><subject>lactic acid</subject><subject>liver</subject><subject>muscles</subject><subject>osmolality</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>proximate composition</subject><subject>puberty</subject><subject>Salmo salar</subject><subject>salmon</subject><subject>Sexual maturation</subject><subject>smoltification</subject><subject>sodium</subject><subject>Sterility</subject><subject>transcriptome</subject><subject>vertebrae</subject><subject>Welfare indicators</subject><issn>0044-8486</issn><issn>1873-5622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1OAyEUhYnRxFp9B9y5cCowMwxdmsa_xMSNrgmFS6VhhhYYjQ_hO8ukLly6Irn5zkk-DkKXlCwoofxmu1D7UenR5zHCghHGFl0tmpYfoRkVXV21nLFjNCOkaSrRCH6KzlLaEkI4b-kMfd-P3uNdDGbU2YUB6y_tAe8g2hB7NWjAweINDFCBcRnMNU4ZoivMbfZqyE7jpHxfkhXexPCZ3wvRB5-ddVpNldf4E7xVEbAbzHQLMWE1GGyd95CxDv0uJDeh5-jEKp_g4vedo7f7u9fVY_X88vC0un2udEPaXLEOgIslXa-BiiVTqm4FN1YQ2nJd82LGhGJUWFBACRFg2LrhHHjHuBaW1nN0degt4vsRUpa9Sxp8EYIwJsk6KlhDeNsVdHlAdQwpRbByF12v4pekRE4TyK38M4GcJpCHCUp2dchCcflwEGXSDsqfGhdBZ2mC-0fLDyl6mNE</recordid><startdate>20221115</startdate><enddate>20221115</enddate><creator>Kleppe, L.</creator><creator>Fjelldal, P.G.</creator><creator>Andersson, E.</creator><creator>Hansen, T.</creator><creator>Sanden, M.</creator><creator>Bruvik, A.</creator><creator>Skaftnesmo, K.O.</creator><creator>Furmanek, T.</creator><creator>Kjærner-Semb, E.</creator><creator>Crespo, D.</creator><creator>Flavell, S.</creator><creator>Pedersen, A.Ø.</creator><creator>Vogelsang, P.</creator><creator>Torsvik, A.</creator><creator>Kvestad, K.A.</creator><creator>Olausson, S.</creator><creator>Norberg, B.</creator><creator>Schulz, R.W.</creator><creator>Bogerd, J.</creator><creator>Santi, N.</creator><creator>Edvardsen, R.B.</creator><creator>Wargelius, A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221115</creationdate><title>Full production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet composition</title><author>Kleppe, L. ; Fjelldal, P.G. ; Andersson, E. ; Hansen, T. ; Sanden, M. ; Bruvik, A. ; Skaftnesmo, K.O. ; Furmanek, T. ; Kjærner-Semb, E. ; Crespo, D. ; Flavell, S. ; Pedersen, A.Ø. ; Vogelsang, P. ; Torsvik, A. ; Kvestad, K.A. ; Olausson, S. ; Norberg, B. ; Schulz, R.W. ; Bogerd, J. ; Santi, N. ; Edvardsen, R.B. ; Wargelius, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-27ee6891bbe1892aa3586df80156c3666528a218feae1008ed2b466e6726c8f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Atlantic salmon</topic><topic>body size</topic><topic>calcium</topic><topic>chlorides</topic><topic>condition factor</topic><topic>dnd-knockout</topic><topic>fillets</topic><topic>glucose</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>harvest date</topic><topic>heart</topic><topic>industry</topic><topic>introgression</topic><topic>lactic acid</topic><topic>liver</topic><topic>muscles</topic><topic>osmolality</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>proximate composition</topic><topic>puberty</topic><topic>Salmo salar</topic><topic>salmon</topic><topic>Sexual maturation</topic><topic>smoltification</topic><topic>sodium</topic><topic>Sterility</topic><topic>transcriptome</topic><topic>vertebrae</topic><topic>Welfare indicators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kleppe, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjelldal, P.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanden, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruvik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skaftnesmo, K.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furmanek, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjærner-Semb, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flavell, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, A.Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogelsang, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torsvik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvestad, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olausson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norberg, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogerd, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edvardsen, R.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wargelius, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kleppe, L.</au><au>Fjelldal, P.G.</au><au>Andersson, E.</au><au>Hansen, T.</au><au>Sanden, M.</au><au>Bruvik, A.</au><au>Skaftnesmo, K.O.</au><au>Furmanek, T.</au><au>Kjærner-Semb, E.</au><au>Crespo, D.</au><au>Flavell, S.</au><au>Pedersen, A.Ø.</au><au>Vogelsang, P.</au><au>Torsvik, A.</au><au>Kvestad, K.A.</au><au>Olausson, S.</au><au>Norberg, B.</au><au>Schulz, R.W.</au><au>Bogerd, J.</au><au>Santi, N.</au><au>Edvardsen, R.B.</au><au>Wargelius, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Full production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet composition</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle><date>2022-11-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>560</volume><spage>738456</spage><pages>738456-</pages><artnum>738456</artnum><issn>0044-8486</issn><eissn>1873-5622</eissn><abstract>Using germ cell-free (GCF), sterile, dnd-knockout salmon for farming could solve the problems associated with precocious maturation and genetic introgression of farmed breeds into wild populations. However, prior to using GCF fish in the salmon farming industry, it is crucial to understand if, or how, the GCF phenotype differs from wild type (WT) counterparts in terms of growth and welfare. To characterize the GCF phenotype throughout a production cycle, we reared GCF and WT salmon in indoor common garden tanks for 3 years, until harvest size. Regarding body size, smoltification markers (mRNA levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase [NKA] subunits), plasma stress indicators (pH, glucose, sodium, chloride, calcium), relative heart size, prevalence of vertebra deformities and fillet proximate composition, GCF fish could not be distinguished from WTs. Transient differences were detected in plasma concentrations of lactate and osmolality, and only a few genes were differentially expressed in WT and GCF transcriptomes of muscle and pituitary. At harvest, fillets from GCF and WT salmon contained the same amount of omega-3 fatty acids, however the relative content of omega-3 fatty acids was higher in GCF compared to WT males. Towards harvest size, body growth rate, condition factor and relative liver size were significantly higher in WT than in GCF fish, probably relating to initiation of puberty in WTs. Since GCF salmon never become sexually mature, it is possible to postpone the time of harvest to exploit the growth potential uninhibited by sexual maturation. In conclusion, GCF salmon performed to a large extent similarly to their WT counterparts but had the clear advantage of never maturing. •Long-term performance of dnd-KO, GCF, sterile Atlantic salmon was described.•Most welfare markers, and body size, displayed similar values in GCF and WT groups.•Very few DEGs were detected in postsmolt WT vs. GCF muscle and pituitary.•Relative content of EPA and DHA were higher in GCF compared to WT male fillets.•GCF salmon never became sexually mature.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738456</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-8486
ispartof Aquaculture, 2022-11, Vol.560, p.738456, Article 738456
issn 0044-8486
1873-5622
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718240657
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Atlantic salmon
body size
calcium
chlorides
condition factor
dnd-knockout
fillets
glucose
Growth
harvest date
heart
industry
introgression
lactic acid
liver
muscles
osmolality
phenotype
proximate composition
puberty
Salmo salar
salmon
Sexual maturation
smoltification
sodium
Sterility
transcriptome
vertebrae
Welfare indicators
title Full production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet composition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A58%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Full%20production%20cycle%20performance%20of%20gene-edited,%20sterile%20Atlantic%20salmon%20-%20growth,%20smoltification,%20welfare%20indicators%20and%20fillet%20composition&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture&rft.au=Kleppe,%20L.&rft.date=2022-11-15&rft.volume=560&rft.spage=738456&rft.pages=738456-&rft.artnum=738456&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft.eissn=1873-5622&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718240657%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718240657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0044848622005725&rfr_iscdi=true