The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children
Aim This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian, Haavikko, and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a sample of children with permanent dentition in Croatia. Material and methods The study consisted of a sample of 1576 panoramic radiog...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of legal medicine 2022-11, Vol.136 (6), p.1685-1696 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1696 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1685 |
| container_title | International journal of legal medicine |
| container_volume | 136 |
| creator | Brkić, Hrvoje Galić, Ivan Vodanović, Marin Dumančić, Jelena Mehdi, Fuad Anić Milošević, Sandra |
| description | Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian, Haavikko, and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a sample of children with permanent dentition in Croatia.
Material and methods
The study consisted of a sample of 1576 panoramic radiographs; a sub-sample of 84 OPGs, in which all first seven mandibular teeth were maturated, was excluded from the study. A final sample of 1492 (704 males and 788 females) aged 6.0 to 13.9 years was evaluated. Seven mandibular teeth from the left side of the mandible were analyzed, and dental age (DA) was determined by the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian method from 1976, Haavikko, and Willems methods and compared to chronological age (CA). In addition, the mean age difference (DA-CA), the mean absolute error (MAE) between dental and chronological age, the percentage of the individuals of dental age within ± 0.25 to ± 2 years of chronological age, and intra-observer and inter-observer statistics were calculated.
Results
The Cameriere European formula estimated the best dental age compared to the chronological age; the mean underestimation was − 0.4 years for both sexes, Haavikko underestimated by − 0.17 years, while Demirjian and Willems overestimated by 1.02 years and 0.48 years, respectively. The most significant difference showed the Demirjian method in 11-year-old and 12-year-old females. The MAE were 0.50 years, 1.01 years, 0.61 years, and 0.78 years in males and 0.51 years, 1.18 years, 0.61 years, and 0.70 years in females for the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, Willems, and Demirjian methods, respectively. Furthermore, the Cameriere European formula showed the highest proportions of individuals with DA within ± 0.5 year difference of the CA, 61.5% in males and 59.6% in females. In addition, the Cameriere method showed the best intra-observer and inter-observer agreements.
Conclusions
Although the Demirjian method was used previously in Croatian children for legal, medical, and clinical purposes, the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, and Willems were more accurate in the tested sample. According to our findings, the Cameriere European formula showed the best accuracy and precision in dental age assessment in Croatian children following Haavikko, and we recommend it as the method of the first choice in forensic and clinical analyses. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2716934948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2725448811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-41146ea0e465e0dee928a3972f80014aadf6a11092378035ee769f3ee71597483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWB9_wFXAjYuO5jWTyVLqo0LBTcVluMzcadPOTGoyFfz3pq0guHBxOXfxncO9HEKuOLvljOm7yJjiKmNCpCkNz_gRGXEldcZzUxyTETNpN6XQp-QsxhVjXBc6H5FuvkQ6gQ6Dw4BjOgX4dOu1H9MH7FxYOejHFPqavru2xS7SDoelryNtfKBD8kKMGGOH_UB9Q-uk0FJYIHU9nQQPQ0qg1dK1dcD-gpw00Ea8_NFz8vb0OJ9Ms9nr88vkfpZVMhdDpjhXBQJDVeTIakQjSpBGi6ZMhyuAuimAc2aE1CWTOaIuTCOTpG-1KuU5uTnkboL_2GIcbOdihW0LPfpttELzwkhl9uj1H3Tlt6FP1yVK5EqVJeeJEgeqCj7GgI3dBNdB-LKc2V0D9tCATQ3YfQN2Z5IHU0xwv8DwG_2P6xsTLodS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725448811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Brkić, Hrvoje ; Galić, Ivan ; Vodanović, Marin ; Dumančić, Jelena ; Mehdi, Fuad ; Anić Milošević, Sandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Brkić, Hrvoje ; Galić, Ivan ; Vodanović, Marin ; Dumančić, Jelena ; Mehdi, Fuad ; Anić Milošević, Sandra</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian, Haavikko, and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a sample of children with permanent dentition in Croatia.
Material and methods
The study consisted of a sample of 1576 panoramic radiographs; a sub-sample of 84 OPGs, in which all first seven mandibular teeth were maturated, was excluded from the study. A final sample of 1492 (704 males and 788 females) aged 6.0 to 13.9 years was evaluated. Seven mandibular teeth from the left side of the mandible were analyzed, and dental age (DA) was determined by the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian method from 1976, Haavikko, and Willems methods and compared to chronological age (CA). In addition, the mean age difference (DA-CA), the mean absolute error (MAE) between dental and chronological age, the percentage of the individuals of dental age within ± 0.25 to ± 2 years of chronological age, and intra-observer and inter-observer statistics were calculated.
Results
The Cameriere European formula estimated the best dental age compared to the chronological age; the mean underestimation was − 0.4 years for both sexes, Haavikko underestimated by − 0.17 years, while Demirjian and Willems overestimated by 1.02 years and 0.48 years, respectively. The most significant difference showed the Demirjian method in 11-year-old and 12-year-old females. The MAE were 0.50 years, 1.01 years, 0.61 years, and 0.78 years in males and 0.51 years, 1.18 years, 0.61 years, and 0.70 years in females for the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, Willems, and Demirjian methods, respectively. Furthermore, the Cameriere European formula showed the highest proportions of individuals with DA within ± 0.5 year difference of the CA, 61.5% in males and 59.6% in females. In addition, the Cameriere method showed the best intra-observer and inter-observer agreements.
Conclusions
Although the Demirjian method was used previously in Croatian children for legal, medical, and clinical purposes, the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, and Willems were more accurate in the tested sample. According to our findings, the Cameriere European formula showed the best accuracy and precision in dental age assessment in Croatian children following Haavikko, and we recommend it as the method of the first choice in forensic and clinical analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-9827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-1596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Children & youth ; Chronology ; Evaluation ; Females ; Forensic Medicine ; Forensic odontology ; Males ; Medical Law ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>International journal of legal medicine, 2022-11, Vol.136 (6), p.1685-1696</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-41146ea0e465e0dee928a3972f80014aadf6a11092378035ee769f3ee71597483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-41146ea0e465e0dee928a3972f80014aadf6a11092378035ee769f3ee71597483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0387-9535</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brkić, Hrvoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galić, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vodanović, Marin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumančić, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehdi, Fuad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anić Milošević, Sandra</creatorcontrib><title>The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children</title><title>International journal of legal medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><description>Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian, Haavikko, and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a sample of children with permanent dentition in Croatia.
Material and methods
The study consisted of a sample of 1576 panoramic radiographs; a sub-sample of 84 OPGs, in which all first seven mandibular teeth were maturated, was excluded from the study. A final sample of 1492 (704 males and 788 females) aged 6.0 to 13.9 years was evaluated. Seven mandibular teeth from the left side of the mandible were analyzed, and dental age (DA) was determined by the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian method from 1976, Haavikko, and Willems methods and compared to chronological age (CA). In addition, the mean age difference (DA-CA), the mean absolute error (MAE) between dental and chronological age, the percentage of the individuals of dental age within ± 0.25 to ± 2 years of chronological age, and intra-observer and inter-observer statistics were calculated.
Results
The Cameriere European formula estimated the best dental age compared to the chronological age; the mean underestimation was − 0.4 years for both sexes, Haavikko underestimated by − 0.17 years, while Demirjian and Willems overestimated by 1.02 years and 0.48 years, respectively. The most significant difference showed the Demirjian method in 11-year-old and 12-year-old females. The MAE were 0.50 years, 1.01 years, 0.61 years, and 0.78 years in males and 0.51 years, 1.18 years, 0.61 years, and 0.70 years in females for the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, Willems, and Demirjian methods, respectively. Furthermore, the Cameriere European formula showed the highest proportions of individuals with DA within ± 0.5 year difference of the CA, 61.5% in males and 59.6% in females. In addition, the Cameriere method showed the best intra-observer and inter-observer agreements.
Conclusions
Although the Demirjian method was used previously in Croatian children for legal, medical, and clinical purposes, the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, and Willems were more accurate in the tested sample. According to our findings, the Cameriere European formula showed the best accuracy and precision in dental age assessment in Croatian children following Haavikko, and we recommend it as the method of the first choice in forensic and clinical analyses.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Chronology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Forensic odontology</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>0937-9827</issn><issn>1437-1596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWB9_wFXAjYuO5jWTyVLqo0LBTcVluMzcadPOTGoyFfz3pq0guHBxOXfxncO9HEKuOLvljOm7yJjiKmNCpCkNz_gRGXEldcZzUxyTETNpN6XQp-QsxhVjXBc6H5FuvkQ6gQ6Dw4BjOgX4dOu1H9MH7FxYOejHFPqavru2xS7SDoelryNtfKBD8kKMGGOH_UB9Q-uk0FJYIHU9nQQPQ0qg1dK1dcD-gpw00Ea8_NFz8vb0OJ9Ms9nr88vkfpZVMhdDpjhXBQJDVeTIakQjSpBGi6ZMhyuAuimAc2aE1CWTOaIuTCOTpG-1KuU5uTnkboL_2GIcbOdihW0LPfpttELzwkhl9uj1H3Tlt6FP1yVK5EqVJeeJEgeqCj7GgI3dBNdB-LKc2V0D9tCATQ3YfQN2Z5IHU0xwv8DwG_2P6xsTLodS</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Brkić, Hrvoje</creator><creator>Galić, Ivan</creator><creator>Vodanović, Marin</creator><creator>Dumančić, Jelena</creator><creator>Mehdi, Fuad</creator><creator>Anić Milošević, Sandra</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-9535</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children</title><author>Brkić, Hrvoje ; Galić, Ivan ; Vodanović, Marin ; Dumančić, Jelena ; Mehdi, Fuad ; Anić Milošević, Sandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-41146ea0e465e0dee928a3972f80014aadf6a11092378035ee769f3ee71597483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Chronology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Forensic odontology</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brkić, Hrvoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galić, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vodanović, Marin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumančić, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehdi, Fuad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anić Milošević, Sandra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of legal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brkić, Hrvoje</au><au>Galić, Ivan</au><au>Vodanović, Marin</au><au>Dumančić, Jelena</au><au>Mehdi, Fuad</au><au>Anić Milošević, Sandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children</atitle><jtitle>International journal of legal medicine</jtitle><stitle>Int J Legal Med</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1685</spage><epage>1696</epage><pages>1685-1696</pages><issn>0937-9827</issn><eissn>1437-1596</eissn><abstract>Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian, Haavikko, and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a sample of children with permanent dentition in Croatia.
Material and methods
The study consisted of a sample of 1576 panoramic radiographs; a sub-sample of 84 OPGs, in which all first seven mandibular teeth were maturated, was excluded from the study. A final sample of 1492 (704 males and 788 females) aged 6.0 to 13.9 years was evaluated. Seven mandibular teeth from the left side of the mandible were analyzed, and dental age (DA) was determined by the Cameriere European formula, Demirjian method from 1976, Haavikko, and Willems methods and compared to chronological age (CA). In addition, the mean age difference (DA-CA), the mean absolute error (MAE) between dental and chronological age, the percentage of the individuals of dental age within ± 0.25 to ± 2 years of chronological age, and intra-observer and inter-observer statistics were calculated.
Results
The Cameriere European formula estimated the best dental age compared to the chronological age; the mean underestimation was − 0.4 years for both sexes, Haavikko underestimated by − 0.17 years, while Demirjian and Willems overestimated by 1.02 years and 0.48 years, respectively. The most significant difference showed the Demirjian method in 11-year-old and 12-year-old females. The MAE were 0.50 years, 1.01 years, 0.61 years, and 0.78 years in males and 0.51 years, 1.18 years, 0.61 years, and 0.70 years in females for the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, Willems, and Demirjian methods, respectively. Furthermore, the Cameriere European formula showed the highest proportions of individuals with DA within ± 0.5 year difference of the CA, 61.5% in males and 59.6% in females. In addition, the Cameriere method showed the best intra-observer and inter-observer agreements.
Conclusions
Although the Demirjian method was used previously in Croatian children for legal, medical, and clinical purposes, the Cameriere European formula, Haavikko, and Willems were more accurate in the tested sample. According to our findings, the Cameriere European formula showed the best accuracy and precision in dental age assessment in Croatian children following Haavikko, and we recommend it as the method of the first choice in forensic and clinical analyses.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-9535</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0937-9827 |
| ispartof | International journal of legal medicine, 2022-11, Vol.136 (6), p.1685-1696 |
| issn | 0937-9827 1437-1596 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2716934948 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Age Children & youth Chronology Evaluation Females Forensic Medicine Forensic odontology Males Medical Law Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Original Article |
| title | The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cameriere,%20Haavikko,%20Demirjian,%20and%20Willems%20methods%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20dental%20age%20in%20Croatian%20children&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20legal%20medicine&rft.au=Brki%C4%87,%20Hrvoje&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1685&rft.epage=1696&rft.pages=1685-1696&rft.issn=0937-9827&rft.eissn=1437-1596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2725448811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725448811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |