Fully Stressed Design of Frame Structures and Multiple Load Paths

Fully stressed design is an optimization heuristic that is widely practiced for member sizing of frame structures. When performed iteratively, such as with the stress-ratio method, it usually converges rapidly and yields a reasonable structural design. A previous paper has demonstrated that some fra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2002-06, Vol.128 (6), p.806-814
Hauptverfasser: Mueller, Keith M, Liu, Min, Burns, Scott A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 814
container_issue 6
container_start_page 806
container_title Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 128
creator Mueller, Keith M
Liu, Min
Burns, Scott A
description Fully stressed design is an optimization heuristic that is widely practiced for member sizing of frame structures. When performed iteratively, such as with the stress-ratio method, it usually converges rapidly and yields a reasonable structural design. A previous paper has demonstrated that some frame structures are capable of being proportioned in many different ways, each of which is a distinct fully stressed design with a unique load path. Furthermore, many of these fully stressed designs are unstable fixed points under the stress-ratio iteration, and are consequently unobtainable by conventional methodology. This paper relates this behavior to Hardy Cross's notion of normal, hybrid, and participatory action. Parameter studies reveal that certain combinations of lateral-to-gravity load ratios and height-to-width ratios tend to produce a greater multiplicity of fully stressed designs. The multiple designs are classified according to eight commonly observed material distribution patterns, and their load paths are examined. The eight structural types are shown to have relative advantages in terms of material economy and resistance to sidesway. Practical construction-related issues are addressed by linking the sizes of multiple members through a common design variable.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(806)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27161869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27117216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-dfa587ebedc8df2e1f76ff463add1670e79436adc129aee406058d199b72a0c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1PwyAUhonRxDn9D71Rt4vqgbbQemGyzM1p5kcyTXZHsBy0pmsntBf-e6nz485IAiScJy-HB0KOKZxQ4PR0MFqMJ0MQURRmcZwMGAAbUpae8UEKfLhFejSLozCJ6XKb9H64XbLn3CsAiISmPTKatmX5Hiwai86hDi7QFc9VUJtgatUKu0KbN62vBqrSwU1bNsW6xGBeKx3cq-bF7ZMdo0qHB197nzxOJw_jWTi_u7waj-ahSkA0oTYqSQU-oc5TbRhSI7gxMY-U1pQLQOG75UrnlGUKMQYOSapplj0JpiCPoz452uSubf3WomvkqnA5lqWqsG6dZIJymvLsPyAVjHIPnm_A3NbOWTRybYuVsu-SguwcS9k5lp072bmTnWPpHUsuvWMfcPh1k3K5Ko1VVV6435SY-Tcx8Nxyw3kM5Wvd2sqbkteLye3FzH-FT4RucD_Tz9Wffffwdwsfj0WUlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27117216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fully Stressed Design of Frame Structures and Multiple Load Paths</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Mueller, Keith M ; Liu, Min ; Burns, Scott A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Keith M ; Liu, Min ; Burns, Scott A</creatorcontrib><description>Fully stressed design is an optimization heuristic that is widely practiced for member sizing of frame structures. When performed iteratively, such as with the stress-ratio method, it usually converges rapidly and yields a reasonable structural design. A previous paper has demonstrated that some frame structures are capable of being proportioned in many different ways, each of which is a distinct fully stressed design with a unique load path. Furthermore, many of these fully stressed designs are unstable fixed points under the stress-ratio iteration, and are consequently unobtainable by conventional methodology. This paper relates this behavior to Hardy Cross's notion of normal, hybrid, and participatory action. Parameter studies reveal that certain combinations of lateral-to-gravity load ratios and height-to-width ratios tend to produce a greater multiplicity of fully stressed designs. The multiple designs are classified according to eight commonly observed material distribution patterns, and their load paths are examined. The eight structural types are shown to have relative advantages in terms of material economy and resistance to sidesway. Practical construction-related issues are addressed by linking the sizes of multiple members through a common design variable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(806)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSENDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Exact sciences and technology ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2002-06, Vol.128 (6), p.806-814</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-dfa587ebedc8df2e1f76ff463add1670e79436adc129aee406058d199b72a0c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-dfa587ebedc8df2e1f76ff463add1670e79436adc129aee406058d199b72a0c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(806)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(806)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14294320$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Keith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Scott A</creatorcontrib><title>Fully Stressed Design of Frame Structures and Multiple Load Paths</title><title>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Fully stressed design is an optimization heuristic that is widely practiced for member sizing of frame structures. When performed iteratively, such as with the stress-ratio method, it usually converges rapidly and yields a reasonable structural design. A previous paper has demonstrated that some frame structures are capable of being proportioned in many different ways, each of which is a distinct fully stressed design with a unique load path. Furthermore, many of these fully stressed designs are unstable fixed points under the stress-ratio iteration, and are consequently unobtainable by conventional methodology. This paper relates this behavior to Hardy Cross's notion of normal, hybrid, and participatory action. Parameter studies reveal that certain combinations of lateral-to-gravity load ratios and height-to-width ratios tend to produce a greater multiplicity of fully stressed designs. The multiple designs are classified according to eight commonly observed material distribution patterns, and their load paths are examined. The eight structural types are shown to have relative advantages in terms of material economy and resistance to sidesway. Practical construction-related issues are addressed by linking the sizes of multiple members through a common design variable.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9445</issn><issn>1943-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1PwyAUhonRxDn9D71Rt4vqgbbQemGyzM1p5kcyTXZHsBy0pmsntBf-e6nz485IAiScJy-HB0KOKZxQ4PR0MFqMJ0MQURRmcZwMGAAbUpae8UEKfLhFejSLozCJ6XKb9H64XbLn3CsAiISmPTKatmX5Hiwai86hDi7QFc9VUJtgatUKu0KbN62vBqrSwU1bNsW6xGBeKx3cq-bF7ZMdo0qHB197nzxOJw_jWTi_u7waj-ahSkA0oTYqSQU-oc5TbRhSI7gxMY-U1pQLQOG75UrnlGUKMQYOSapplj0JpiCPoz452uSubf3WomvkqnA5lqWqsG6dZIJymvLsPyAVjHIPnm_A3NbOWTRybYuVsu-SguwcS9k5lp072bmTnWPpHUsuvWMfcPh1k3K5Ko1VVV6435SY-Tcx8Nxyw3kM5Wvd2sqbkteLye3FzH-FT4RucD_Tz9Wffffwdwsfj0WUlw</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Mueller, Keith M</creator><creator>Liu, Min</creator><creator>Burns, Scott A</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Fully Stressed Design of Frame Structures and Multiple Load Paths</title><author>Mueller, Keith M ; Liu, Min ; Burns, Scott A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-dfa587ebedc8df2e1f76ff463add1670e79436adc129aee406058d199b72a0c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Keith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Scott A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mueller, Keith M</au><au>Liu, Min</au><au>Burns, Scott A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fully Stressed Design of Frame Structures and Multiple Load Paths</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>806</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>806-814</pages><issn>0733-9445</issn><eissn>1943-541X</eissn><coden>JSENDH</coden><abstract>Fully stressed design is an optimization heuristic that is widely practiced for member sizing of frame structures. When performed iteratively, such as with the stress-ratio method, it usually converges rapidly and yields a reasonable structural design. A previous paper has demonstrated that some frame structures are capable of being proportioned in many different ways, each of which is a distinct fully stressed design with a unique load path. Furthermore, many of these fully stressed designs are unstable fixed points under the stress-ratio iteration, and are consequently unobtainable by conventional methodology. This paper relates this behavior to Hardy Cross's notion of normal, hybrid, and participatory action. Parameter studies reveal that certain combinations of lateral-to-gravity load ratios and height-to-width ratios tend to produce a greater multiplicity of fully stressed designs. The multiple designs are classified according to eight commonly observed material distribution patterns, and their load paths are examined. The eight structural types are shown to have relative advantages in terms of material economy and resistance to sidesway. Practical construction-related issues are addressed by linking the sizes of multiple members through a common design variable.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(806)</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9445
ispartof Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2002-06, Vol.128 (6), p.806-814
issn 0733-9445
1943-541X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27161869
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Exact sciences and technology
Structural analysis. Stresses
TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Fully Stressed Design of Frame Structures and Multiple Load Paths
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fully%20Stressed%20Design%20of%20Frame%20Structures%20and%20Multiple%20Load%20Paths&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Mueller,%20Keith%20M&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=806&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=806-814&rft.issn=0733-9445&rft.eissn=1943-541X&rft.coden=JSENDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(806)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27117216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27117216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true