Is the intra-operative morphology of the cochlear nerve a good predictor of the results of simultaneous ipsilateral cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma surgery?
There are currently no guidelines for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma surgery and cochlear implantation. This paper therefore provides our experience and our results regarding predictive parameters of good hearing. Morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve after tumour resection was used as...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of laryngology and otology 2023-06, Vol.137 (6), p.637-642 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 642 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 637 |
| container_title | Journal of laryngology and otology |
| container_volume | 137 |
| creator | Marchioni, D Bisi, N Francoli, P Rubini, A |
| description | There are currently no guidelines for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma surgery and cochlear implantation. This paper therefore provides our experience and our results regarding predictive parameters of good hearing.
Morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve after tumour resection was used as the main criterion for implantation in the case series. Patients were then divided into responders and non-responders to cochlear implantation, and potential outcome predicting factors were evaluated in the two groups.
Nine of the 16 patients showed a response to cochlear implantation. Pre-surgery serviceable hearing was significantly more common in the responder group, while no difference was found in the two groups for other variables.
This study highlights how the morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve can be useful to predict the hearing outcome and indicates that satisfactory hearing results are closely related to pre-surgery serviceable hearing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022215122002079 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715791382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022215122002079</cupid><sourcerecordid>2822703549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-47f9f099e1a9f0956cb63e01d82acdf180568fc5a934f1a9da92327717a3cecb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVpabZpH6CXIuglFzf6Y1v2qZSQpIFADk3OZiyPdxVky5XkDftMecnI2U0DLT3NiO_3fTNiCPnM2TfOuDr9xZgQghdciNQxVb8hK67yKivykr0lq0XOFv2IfAjhnrFkYuI9OZIl50pKuSKPV4HGDVIzRg-Zm9BDNFukg_PTxlm33lHXPxPa6Y1F8HREnwCga-c6OnnsjI7Ov2Aew2xjWJ7BDKmFEd0cqJmCsRBTvn2NMsNkYYxppBvTCnSLIZp2tkkKevMA4-gGoGH2a_S77x_Jux5swE-HekzuLs5vz35m1zeXV2c_rjMtlYxZrvq6Z3WNHJZalLotJTLeVQJ01_OKFWXV6wJqmfeJ6aAWUijFFUiNupXH5GSfO3n3e04rNYMJGq3df6URiheq5rISCf36F3rvZj-m7RpRCaGYLPI6UXxPae9C8Ng3kzcD-F3DWbNcsvnnksnz5ZA8twN2fxwvp0uAPITC0HrTrfF19v9jnwBuqqvZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822703549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the intra-operative morphology of the cochlear nerve a good predictor of the results of simultaneous ipsilateral cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma surgery?</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Marchioni, D ; Bisi, N ; Francoli, P ; Rubini, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Marchioni, D ; Bisi, N ; Francoli, P ; Rubini, A</creatorcontrib><description>There are currently no guidelines for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma surgery and cochlear implantation. This paper therefore provides our experience and our results regarding predictive parameters of good hearing.
Morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve after tumour resection was used as the main criterion for implantation in the case series. Patients were then divided into responders and non-responders to cochlear implantation, and potential outcome predicting factors were evaluated in the two groups.
Nine of the 16 patients showed a response to cochlear implantation. Pre-surgery serviceable hearing was significantly more common in the responder group, while no difference was found in the two groups for other variables.
This study highlights how the morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve can be useful to predict the hearing outcome and indicates that satisfactory hearing results are closely related to pre-surgery serviceable hearing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022215122002079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36117333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Brain cancer ; Cochlea ; Cochlear implants ; Dissection ; Endoscopy ; Hearing ; Hearing loss ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Main Article ; Morphology ; Patients ; Schwann cells ; Surgery ; Variables ; Vestibular system</subject><ispartof>Journal of laryngology and otology, 2023-06, Vol.137 (6), p.637-642</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-47f9f099e1a9f0956cb63e01d82acdf180568fc5a934f1a9da92327717a3cecb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-47f9f099e1a9f0956cb63e01d82acdf180568fc5a934f1a9da92327717a3cecb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9029-8530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022215122002079/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,782,786,27933,27934,55637</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marchioni, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francoli, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubini, A</creatorcontrib><title>Is the intra-operative morphology of the cochlear nerve a good predictor of the results of simultaneous ipsilateral cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma surgery?</title><title>Journal of laryngology and otology</title><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><description>There are currently no guidelines for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma surgery and cochlear implantation. This paper therefore provides our experience and our results regarding predictive parameters of good hearing.
Morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve after tumour resection was used as the main criterion for implantation in the case series. Patients were then divided into responders and non-responders to cochlear implantation, and potential outcome predicting factors were evaluated in the two groups.
Nine of the 16 patients showed a response to cochlear implantation. Pre-surgery serviceable hearing was significantly more common in the responder group, while no difference was found in the two groups for other variables.
This study highlights how the morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve can be useful to predict the hearing outcome and indicates that satisfactory hearing results are closely related to pre-surgery serviceable hearing.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Main Article</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Schwann cells</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vestibular system</subject><issn>0022-2151</issn><issn>1748-5460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVpabZpH6CXIuglFzf6Y1v2qZSQpIFADk3OZiyPdxVky5XkDftMecnI2U0DLT3NiO_3fTNiCPnM2TfOuDr9xZgQghdciNQxVb8hK67yKivykr0lq0XOFv2IfAjhnrFkYuI9OZIl50pKuSKPV4HGDVIzRg-Zm9BDNFukg_PTxlm33lHXPxPa6Y1F8HREnwCga-c6OnnsjI7Ov2Aew2xjWJ7BDKmFEd0cqJmCsRBTvn2NMsNkYYxppBvTCnSLIZp2tkkKevMA4-gGoGH2a_S77x_Jux5swE-HekzuLs5vz35m1zeXV2c_rjMtlYxZrvq6Z3WNHJZalLotJTLeVQJ01_OKFWXV6wJqmfeJ6aAWUijFFUiNupXH5GSfO3n3e04rNYMJGq3df6URiheq5rISCf36F3rvZj-m7RpRCaGYLPI6UXxPae9C8Ng3kzcD-F3DWbNcsvnnksnz5ZA8twN2fxwvp0uAPITC0HrTrfF19v9jnwBuqqvZ</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Marchioni, D</creator><creator>Bisi, N</creator><creator>Francoli, P</creator><creator>Rubini, A</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-8530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Is the intra-operative morphology of the cochlear nerve a good predictor of the results of simultaneous ipsilateral cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma surgery?</title><author>Marchioni, D ; Bisi, N ; Francoli, P ; Rubini, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-47f9f099e1a9f0956cb63e01d82acdf180568fc5a934f1a9da92327717a3cecb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Main Article</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Schwann cells</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vestibular system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marchioni, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francoli, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubini, A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marchioni, D</au><au>Bisi, N</au><au>Francoli, P</au><au>Rubini, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the intra-operative morphology of the cochlear nerve a good predictor of the results of simultaneous ipsilateral cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma surgery?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>637-642</pages><issn>0022-2151</issn><eissn>1748-5460</eissn><abstract>There are currently no guidelines for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma surgery and cochlear implantation. This paper therefore provides our experience and our results regarding predictive parameters of good hearing.
Morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve after tumour resection was used as the main criterion for implantation in the case series. Patients were then divided into responders and non-responders to cochlear implantation, and potential outcome predicting factors were evaluated in the two groups.
Nine of the 16 patients showed a response to cochlear implantation. Pre-surgery serviceable hearing was significantly more common in the responder group, while no difference was found in the two groups for other variables.
This study highlights how the morphological appearance of the cochlear nerve can be useful to predict the hearing outcome and indicates that satisfactory hearing results are closely related to pre-surgery serviceable hearing.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>36117333</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0022215122002079</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-8530</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2151 |
| ispartof | Journal of laryngology and otology, 2023-06, Vol.137 (6), p.637-642 |
| issn | 0022-2151 1748-5460 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715791382 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Acoustics Brain cancer Cochlea Cochlear implants Dissection Endoscopy Hearing Hearing loss Magnetic resonance imaging Main Article Morphology Patients Schwann cells Surgery Variables Vestibular system |
| title | Is the intra-operative morphology of the cochlear nerve a good predictor of the results of simultaneous ipsilateral cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma surgery? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T05%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20intra-operative%20morphology%20of%20the%20cochlear%20nerve%20a%20good%20predictor%20of%20the%20results%20of%20simultaneous%20ipsilateral%20cochlear%20implantation%20in%20vestibular%20schwannoma%20surgery?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laryngology%20and%20otology&rft.au=Marchioni,%20D&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=637-642&rft.issn=0022-2151&rft.eissn=1748-5460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022215122002079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2822703549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822703549&rft_id=info:pmid/36117333&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022215122002079&rfr_iscdi=true |