Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies
Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear. The p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-09, Vol.132 (3), p.520-527 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 527 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 520 |
| container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
| container_volume | 132 |
| creator | Pitman, Jeremy Van Craenenbroeck, Maja Glibert, Maarten Christiaens, Véronique |
| description | Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effect of angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants on prosthetic screw loosening.
This manuscript followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Searches were performed through 31 December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with no year limit targeting in vitro studies evaluating the effect of angulation correction components on screw loosening.
A total of 460 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, 306 titles were screened. Nine of the remaining 36 articles selected for full-text analysis met the selection criteria. The qualitative analysis used data from 394 implants. All studies featured straight abutments as the control group, and, in 8 studies, the angle correction component was included on the level of the abutment. Only in 1 study was the angle correction component at the level of the implant. The angle correction of the prosthetic component varied from 0 degrees in all studies up to a maximum correction of 30 degrees. Statistically significant increases in screw loosening with increasing abutment angle correction were reported by multiple authors (P.05). The only study investigating angle correction at the implant level found significantly less screw loosening (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715790853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391322004838</els_id><sourcerecordid>2715790853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d0829cf346532f20cf1c3bc4aab9b29a8d4e412930ea3b0b99ec176e8ed72ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9O3DAQxi1UBAvlFVCOvSSM7WwS91SEyh8JqQe4W44zQV4l9mI7VLxNn4UnY7YLvfYy1uj75pvxj7FzDhUH3lxsqm0MaUCfKwFCVNBVAPKArTiotmy6mn9hKyCllIrLY3aS0gYAunXLj9ixbDhv1JqvmH-wEX8XUwgJvfNPhfOF8U_LZLILvrQhRrR5JyQqExZu3k7G5yJiyiH-daXvxWWRXlPGmXpL0oujzDBS2NufF5djKFJeBofpKzsczZTw7OM9ZY_XPx-vbsv7Xzd3V5f3pRWqy-UAnVB2lHWzlmIUYEduZW9rY3rVC2W6ocaaCyUBjeyhVwotbxvscGiFNfKUfdvHEqTnhS7Vs0sWJ7ocw5K0aPm6VURDkrXZWy3xTBFHvY1uNvFVc9A71HqjP1HrHWoNnSbUNHj-sWPpZxz-jX2yJcOPvQHpo0Qk6mQdeouD2zHVQ3D_2_EOGyuXZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715790853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pitman, Jeremy ; Van Craenenbroeck, Maja ; Glibert, Maarten ; Christiaens, Véronique</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Jeremy ; Van Craenenbroeck, Maja ; Glibert, Maarten ; Christiaens, Véronique</creatorcontrib><description>Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effect of angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants on prosthetic screw loosening.
This manuscript followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Searches were performed through 31 December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with no year limit targeting in vitro studies evaluating the effect of angulation correction components on screw loosening.
A total of 460 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, 306 titles were screened. Nine of the remaining 36 articles selected for full-text analysis met the selection criteria. The qualitative analysis used data from 394 implants. All studies featured straight abutments as the control group, and, in 8 studies, the angle correction component was included on the level of the abutment. Only in 1 study was the angle correction component at the level of the implant. The angle correction of the prosthetic component varied from 0 degrees in all studies up to a maximum correction of 30 degrees. Statistically significant increases in screw loosening with increasing abutment angle correction were reported by multiple authors (P<.05). However, other articles reported nonsignificant differences in screw loosening because of angulation after cyclic loading (P>.05). The only study investigating angle correction at the implant level found significantly less screw loosening (P<.05) in the angled implant group compared with the nonangled implant group.
Several options are available to correct discrepancies between the surgical axis and the ideal prosthetic axis for rehabilitations supported by dental implants. The current evidence does not clearly indicate the superiority of any single solution for minimizing screw loosening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36116951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone Screws ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-09, Vol.132 (3), p.520-527</ispartof><rights>2022 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d0829cf346532f20cf1c3bc4aab9b29a8d4e412930ea3b0b99ec176e8ed72ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d0829cf346532f20cf1c3bc4aab9b29a8d4e412930ea3b0b99ec176e8ed72ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8585-1036 ; 0000-0003-0647-6985 ; 0000-0002-0938-8887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391322004838$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36116951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Craenenbroeck, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glibert, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiaens, Véronique</creatorcontrib><title>Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effect of angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants on prosthetic screw loosening.
This manuscript followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Searches were performed through 31 December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with no year limit targeting in vitro studies evaluating the effect of angulation correction components on screw loosening.
A total of 460 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, 306 titles were screened. Nine of the remaining 36 articles selected for full-text analysis met the selection criteria. The qualitative analysis used data from 394 implants. All studies featured straight abutments as the control group, and, in 8 studies, the angle correction component was included on the level of the abutment. Only in 1 study was the angle correction component at the level of the implant. The angle correction of the prosthetic component varied from 0 degrees in all studies up to a maximum correction of 30 degrees. Statistically significant increases in screw loosening with increasing abutment angle correction were reported by multiple authors (P<.05). However, other articles reported nonsignificant differences in screw loosening because of angulation after cyclic loading (P>.05). The only study investigating angle correction at the implant level found significantly less screw loosening (P<.05) in the angled implant group compared with the nonangled implant group.
Several options are available to correct discrepancies between the surgical axis and the ideal prosthetic axis for rehabilitations supported by dental implants. The current evidence does not clearly indicate the superiority of any single solution for minimizing screw loosening.</description><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</subject><subject>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9O3DAQxi1UBAvlFVCOvSSM7WwS91SEyh8JqQe4W44zQV4l9mI7VLxNn4UnY7YLvfYy1uj75pvxj7FzDhUH3lxsqm0MaUCfKwFCVNBVAPKArTiotmy6mn9hKyCllIrLY3aS0gYAunXLj9ixbDhv1JqvmH-wEX8XUwgJvfNPhfOF8U_LZLILvrQhRrR5JyQqExZu3k7G5yJiyiH-daXvxWWRXlPGmXpL0oujzDBS2NufF5djKFJeBofpKzsczZTw7OM9ZY_XPx-vbsv7Xzd3V5f3pRWqy-UAnVB2lHWzlmIUYEduZW9rY3rVC2W6ocaaCyUBjeyhVwotbxvscGiFNfKUfdvHEqTnhS7Vs0sWJ7ocw5K0aPm6VURDkrXZWy3xTBFHvY1uNvFVc9A71HqjP1HrHWoNnSbUNHj-sWPpZxz-jX2yJcOPvQHpo0Qk6mQdeouD2zHVQ3D_2_EOGyuXZw</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Pitman, Jeremy</creator><creator>Van Craenenbroeck, Maja</creator><creator>Glibert, Maarten</creator><creator>Christiaens, Véronique</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-1036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-6985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-8887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies</title><author>Pitman, Jeremy ; Van Craenenbroeck, Maja ; Glibert, Maarten ; Christiaens, Véronique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d0829cf346532f20cf1c3bc4aab9b29a8d4e412930ea3b0b99ec176e8ed72ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</topic><topic>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Craenenbroeck, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glibert, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiaens, Véronique</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitman, Jeremy</au><au>Van Craenenbroeck, Maja</au><au>Glibert, Maarten</au><au>Christiaens, Véronique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>520-527</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effect of angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants on prosthetic screw loosening.
This manuscript followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Searches were performed through 31 December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with no year limit targeting in vitro studies evaluating the effect of angulation correction components on screw loosening.
A total of 460 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, 306 titles were screened. Nine of the remaining 36 articles selected for full-text analysis met the selection criteria. The qualitative analysis used data from 394 implants. All studies featured straight abutments as the control group, and, in 8 studies, the angle correction component was included on the level of the abutment. Only in 1 study was the angle correction component at the level of the implant. The angle correction of the prosthetic component varied from 0 degrees in all studies up to a maximum correction of 30 degrees. Statistically significant increases in screw loosening with increasing abutment angle correction were reported by multiple authors (P<.05). However, other articles reported nonsignificant differences in screw loosening because of angulation after cyclic loading (P>.05). The only study investigating angle correction at the implant level found significantly less screw loosening (P<.05) in the angled implant group compared with the nonangled implant group.
Several options are available to correct discrepancies between the surgical axis and the ideal prosthetic axis for rehabilitations supported by dental implants. The current evidence does not clearly indicate the superiority of any single solution for minimizing screw loosening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36116951</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-1036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-6985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-8887</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
| ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-09, Vol.132 (3), p.520-527 |
| issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 1097-6841 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715790853 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Bone Screws Dental Abutments Dental Implant-Abutment Design Dental Implants, Single-Tooth Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Dental Restoration Failure Humans In Vitro Techniques |
| title | Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screw%20loosening%20in%20angulation-correcting%20single%20implant%20restorations:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20in%C2%A0vitro%20studies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Pitman,%20Jeremy&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=520-527&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715790853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715790853&rft_id=info:pmid/36116951&rft_els_id=S0022391322004838&rfr_iscdi=true |