Priority setting for restoration in surrounding savannic areas of the Brazilian Pantanal based on soil loss risk and agrarian structure

Soil health is at the core of the sustainability agenda. As in many agroecosystems in the tropics, soil erosion is a major issue in poorly managed pasturelands. A noteworthy case is located in the Upper Taquari River Basin (UTRB), as part of the Upper Paraguay Basin on the plateau with drainage wate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2022-12, Vol.323, p.116219-116219, Article 116219
Hauptverfasser: Louzada, Rômullo O., Bergier, Ivan, Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S., Guerra, A., Roque, Fábio de O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116219
container_issue
container_start_page 116219
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 323
creator Louzada, Rômullo O.
Bergier, Ivan
Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S.
Guerra, A.
Roque, Fábio de O.
description Soil health is at the core of the sustainability agenda. As in many agroecosystems in the tropics, soil erosion is a major issue in poorly managed pasturelands. A noteworthy case is located in the Upper Taquari River Basin (UTRB), as part of the Upper Paraguay Basin on the plateau with drainage waters for the Taquari megafan in the Brazilian Pantanal. Here we combine slope (S-factor), erodibility (E-factor), rainfall-rainy day ratio (R-factor), and vegetation and soil indices (C-factor) to locate erosion risk and prioritize eco-engineering interventions via palisades and small dams in UTRB. The method consisted of assessing distinct weights between Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) factors in a GIS platform, providing 35 combinations of classes as low, moderate, high, and very high erosive risk. The validation of the method was based on the ravine and plain ground truths obtained from high-resolution raster data. The best weight of USLE factors aids to locate critical erosive sites and vegetation patterns. Then, erosion risk and interventions were analyzed according to land use and rural property sizes in the government's Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) database. Overall, the natural factors of slope and erodibility in a proportion of 25% and 75% in GIS algebra provided the best mapping accuracy result. About 65% of the UTRB has high or very high erosion risks, and 70% of the available area can be acknowledged as degraded pasturelands. A total of 4744 erosion interventions were recorded, with an accuracy of 65.28% and 61.15% for check dams and palisades interventions, respectively. The number of necessary interventions in areas of native vegetation was almost 50% higher than in pasturelands. Even though micro landowners occupy most of the watershed, large properties have about ten times as many areas at high risk of erosion. The mutual cooperation between properties, independently of size, is supported by governmental public policies like incentives for ecosystem services restoration of critical gullies, with CAR compliance and fiscalization. •Soil loss compromises rural production in the savanna of the Pantanal's headwaters.•A method of soil loss risk to locate areas for recovery priorities is presented.•Highest demands for recovery priorities are found in native vegetation areas.•Micro farms are a majority, but large farms hold the greatest area of soil risk.•Planning actions should balance social engagement and spatial scale gains.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116219
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715442091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479722017923</els_id><sourcerecordid>2715442091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-133c8e20c88ec4648dfeefa900e69561e9396301baca93f720743034de5cbddd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtuFDEQRa0IJIbAJyB5yaYnfvTLKwQREKRIZAFrq8auDh567FDlHin8AL-dHk32rGpxH6p7hHin1VYr3V_tt3vMxwPkrVHGbLXujXYXYqOV65qxt-qF2CirdNMObnglXjPvlVLW6GEj_t1RKpTqo2SsNeV7ORWShFwLQU0ly5QlL0RlyfEkMxwh5xQkEALLMsn6C-Ungr9pTpDlHeQKGWa5A8Yo1wIuaZZzYZaU-LeEHCXcE9DJzZWWUBfCN-LlBDPj2-d7KX5--fzj-qa5_f712_XH2ybY0dVGWxtGNCqMI4a2b8c4IU7glMLedb1GZ906WO8ggLPTYNTQWmXbiF3YxRjtpXh_7n2g8mdZZ_pD4oDzDBnLwt4Mumtbo5xerd3ZGmh9nnDyD5QOQI9eK38C7_f-Gbw_gfdn8GvuwzmH645jQvIcEuaAMRGG6mNJ_2l4Ag-7kjE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715442091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Priority setting for restoration in surrounding savannic areas of the Brazilian Pantanal based on soil loss risk and agrarian structure</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Louzada, Rômullo O. ; Bergier, Ivan ; Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S. ; Guerra, A. ; Roque, Fábio de O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Louzada, Rômullo O. ; Bergier, Ivan ; Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S. ; Guerra, A. ; Roque, Fábio de O.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil health is at the core of the sustainability agenda. As in many agroecosystems in the tropics, soil erosion is a major issue in poorly managed pasturelands. A noteworthy case is located in the Upper Taquari River Basin (UTRB), as part of the Upper Paraguay Basin on the plateau with drainage waters for the Taquari megafan in the Brazilian Pantanal. Here we combine slope (S-factor), erodibility (E-factor), rainfall-rainy day ratio (R-factor), and vegetation and soil indices (C-factor) to locate erosion risk and prioritize eco-engineering interventions via palisades and small dams in UTRB. The method consisted of assessing distinct weights between Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) factors in a GIS platform, providing 35 combinations of classes as low, moderate, high, and very high erosive risk. The validation of the method was based on the ravine and plain ground truths obtained from high-resolution raster data. The best weight of USLE factors aids to locate critical erosive sites and vegetation patterns. Then, erosion risk and interventions were analyzed according to land use and rural property sizes in the government's Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) database. Overall, the natural factors of slope and erodibility in a proportion of 25% and 75% in GIS algebra provided the best mapping accuracy result. About 65% of the UTRB has high or very high erosion risks, and 70% of the available area can be acknowledged as degraded pasturelands. A total of 4744 erosion interventions were recorded, with an accuracy of 65.28% and 61.15% for check dams and palisades interventions, respectively. The number of necessary interventions in areas of native vegetation was almost 50% higher than in pasturelands. Even though micro landowners occupy most of the watershed, large properties have about ten times as many areas at high risk of erosion. The mutual cooperation between properties, independently of size, is supported by governmental public policies like incentives for ecosystem services restoration of critical gullies, with CAR compliance and fiscalization. •Soil loss compromises rural production in the savanna of the Pantanal's headwaters.•A method of soil loss risk to locate areas for recovery priorities is presented.•Highest demands for recovery priorities are found in native vegetation areas.•Micro farms are a majority, but large farms hold the greatest area of soil risk.•Planning actions should balance social engagement and spatial scale gains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agrarian structure ; Check dams ; Gullies ; Palisades ; Soil erosion ; USLE</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-12, Vol.323, p.116219-116219, Article 116219</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-133c8e20c88ec4648dfeefa900e69561e9396301baca93f720743034de5cbddd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-133c8e20c88ec4648dfeefa900e69561e9396301baca93f720743034de5cbddd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3642-7332</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Louzada, Rômullo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergier, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Fábio de O.</creatorcontrib><title>Priority setting for restoration in surrounding savannic areas of the Brazilian Pantanal based on soil loss risk and agrarian structure</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>Soil health is at the core of the sustainability agenda. As in many agroecosystems in the tropics, soil erosion is a major issue in poorly managed pasturelands. A noteworthy case is located in the Upper Taquari River Basin (UTRB), as part of the Upper Paraguay Basin on the plateau with drainage waters for the Taquari megafan in the Brazilian Pantanal. Here we combine slope (S-factor), erodibility (E-factor), rainfall-rainy day ratio (R-factor), and vegetation and soil indices (C-factor) to locate erosion risk and prioritize eco-engineering interventions via palisades and small dams in UTRB. The method consisted of assessing distinct weights between Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) factors in a GIS platform, providing 35 combinations of classes as low, moderate, high, and very high erosive risk. The validation of the method was based on the ravine and plain ground truths obtained from high-resolution raster data. The best weight of USLE factors aids to locate critical erosive sites and vegetation patterns. Then, erosion risk and interventions were analyzed according to land use and rural property sizes in the government's Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) database. Overall, the natural factors of slope and erodibility in a proportion of 25% and 75% in GIS algebra provided the best mapping accuracy result. About 65% of the UTRB has high or very high erosion risks, and 70% of the available area can be acknowledged as degraded pasturelands. A total of 4744 erosion interventions were recorded, with an accuracy of 65.28% and 61.15% for check dams and palisades interventions, respectively. The number of necessary interventions in areas of native vegetation was almost 50% higher than in pasturelands. Even though micro landowners occupy most of the watershed, large properties have about ten times as many areas at high risk of erosion. The mutual cooperation between properties, independently of size, is supported by governmental public policies like incentives for ecosystem services restoration of critical gullies, with CAR compliance and fiscalization. •Soil loss compromises rural production in the savanna of the Pantanal's headwaters.•A method of soil loss risk to locate areas for recovery priorities is presented.•Highest demands for recovery priorities are found in native vegetation areas.•Micro farms are a majority, but large farms hold the greatest area of soil risk.•Planning actions should balance social engagement and spatial scale gains.</description><subject>Agrarian structure</subject><subject>Check dams</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Palisades</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>USLE</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtuFDEQRa0IJIbAJyB5yaYnfvTLKwQREKRIZAFrq8auDh567FDlHin8AL-dHk32rGpxH6p7hHin1VYr3V_tt3vMxwPkrVHGbLXujXYXYqOV65qxt-qF2CirdNMObnglXjPvlVLW6GEj_t1RKpTqo2SsNeV7ORWShFwLQU0ly5QlL0RlyfEkMxwh5xQkEALLMsn6C-Ungr9pTpDlHeQKGWa5A8Yo1wIuaZZzYZaU-LeEHCXcE9DJzZWWUBfCN-LlBDPj2-d7KX5--fzj-qa5_f712_XH2ybY0dVGWxtGNCqMI4a2b8c4IU7glMLedb1GZ906WO8ggLPTYNTQWmXbiF3YxRjtpXh_7n2g8mdZZ_pD4oDzDBnLwt4Mumtbo5xerd3ZGmh9nnDyD5QOQI9eK38C7_f-Gbw_gfdn8GvuwzmH645jQvIcEuaAMRGG6mNJ_2l4Ag-7kjE</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Louzada, Rômullo O.</creator><creator>Bergier, Ivan</creator><creator>Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S.</creator><creator>Guerra, A.</creator><creator>Roque, Fábio de O.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-7332</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Priority setting for restoration in surrounding savannic areas of the Brazilian Pantanal based on soil loss risk and agrarian structure</title><author>Louzada, Rômullo O. ; Bergier, Ivan ; Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S. ; Guerra, A. ; Roque, Fábio de O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-133c8e20c88ec4648dfeefa900e69561e9396301baca93f720743034de5cbddd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agrarian structure</topic><topic>Check dams</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Palisades</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>USLE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Louzada, Rômullo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergier, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Fábio de O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Louzada, Rômullo O.</au><au>Bergier, Ivan</au><au>Diniz, Juliana M.F.de S.</au><au>Guerra, A.</au><au>Roque, Fábio de O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Priority setting for restoration in surrounding savannic areas of the Brazilian Pantanal based on soil loss risk and agrarian structure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>323</volume><spage>116219</spage><epage>116219</epage><pages>116219-116219</pages><artnum>116219</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Soil health is at the core of the sustainability agenda. As in many agroecosystems in the tropics, soil erosion is a major issue in poorly managed pasturelands. A noteworthy case is located in the Upper Taquari River Basin (UTRB), as part of the Upper Paraguay Basin on the plateau with drainage waters for the Taquari megafan in the Brazilian Pantanal. Here we combine slope (S-factor), erodibility (E-factor), rainfall-rainy day ratio (R-factor), and vegetation and soil indices (C-factor) to locate erosion risk and prioritize eco-engineering interventions via palisades and small dams in UTRB. The method consisted of assessing distinct weights between Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) factors in a GIS platform, providing 35 combinations of classes as low, moderate, high, and very high erosive risk. The validation of the method was based on the ravine and plain ground truths obtained from high-resolution raster data. The best weight of USLE factors aids to locate critical erosive sites and vegetation patterns. Then, erosion risk and interventions were analyzed according to land use and rural property sizes in the government's Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) database. Overall, the natural factors of slope and erodibility in a proportion of 25% and 75% in GIS algebra provided the best mapping accuracy result. About 65% of the UTRB has high or very high erosion risks, and 70% of the available area can be acknowledged as degraded pasturelands. A total of 4744 erosion interventions were recorded, with an accuracy of 65.28% and 61.15% for check dams and palisades interventions, respectively. The number of necessary interventions in areas of native vegetation was almost 50% higher than in pasturelands. Even though micro landowners occupy most of the watershed, large properties have about ten times as many areas at high risk of erosion. The mutual cooperation between properties, independently of size, is supported by governmental public policies like incentives for ecosystem services restoration of critical gullies, with CAR compliance and fiscalization. •Soil loss compromises rural production in the savanna of the Pantanal's headwaters.•A method of soil loss risk to locate areas for recovery priorities is presented.•Highest demands for recovery priorities are found in native vegetation areas.•Micro farms are a majority, but large farms hold the greatest area of soil risk.•Planning actions should balance social engagement and spatial scale gains.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116219</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-7332</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2022-12, Vol.323, p.116219-116219, Article 116219
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715442091
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Agrarian structure
Check dams
Gullies
Palisades
Soil erosion
USLE
title Priority setting for restoration in surrounding savannic areas of the Brazilian Pantanal based on soil loss risk and agrarian structure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A28%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Priority%20setting%20for%20restoration%20in%20surrounding%20savannic%20areas%20of%20the%20Brazilian%20Pantanal%20based%20on%20soil%20loss%20risk%20and%20agrarian%20structure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Louzada,%20R%C3%B4mullo%20O.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=323&rft.spage=116219&rft.epage=116219&rft.pages=116219-116219&rft.artnum=116219&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715442091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715442091&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301479722017923&rfr_iscdi=true