Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study

Background: Paracentesis is commonly undertaken in patients with cancer-related ascites. Aim: To systematically investigate the symptomatic benefits and harms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing paracentesis using real-world data in the palliative care setting. Design: Prospective, multis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Palliative medicine 2022-10, Vol.36 (9), p.1408-1417
Hauptverfasser: Seah, Davinia SE, Wilcock, Andrew, Chang, Sungwon, Sousa, Mariana S, Sinnarajah, Aynharan, Teoh, Cy Oun, Allan, Simon, Chye, Richard, Doogue, Matthew, Hunt, Jane, Agar, Meera, Currow, David C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1417
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1408
container_title Palliative medicine
container_volume 36
creator Seah, Davinia SE
Wilcock, Andrew
Chang, Sungwon
Sousa, Mariana S
Sinnarajah, Aynharan
Teoh, Cy Oun
Allan, Simon
Chye, Richard
Doogue, Matthew
Hunt, Jane
Agar, Meera
Currow, David C
description Background: Paracentesis is commonly undertaken in patients with cancer-related ascites. Aim: To systematically investigate the symptomatic benefits and harms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing paracentesis using real-world data in the palliative care setting. Design: Prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive cohort study. Benefits and harms of paracentesis were assessed between 01/07/2018 and 31/02/2021 as part of routine clinical assessments by treating clinicians at four timepoints: (T0) before paracentesis; (T1) once drainage ceased; (T2) 24 h after T1 and (T3) 28 days after T1 or next paracentesis, if sooner. Setting/participants: Data were collected from 11 participating sites across five countries (Australia, England, Hong Kong, Malaysia and New Zealand) on 111 patients undergoing paracentesis via a temporary (73%) or indwelling (21%) catheter: 51% male, median age 69 years, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Score 50. Results: At T1 (n = 100), symptoms had improved for most patients (81%), specifically abdominal distension (61%), abdominal pain (49%) and nausea (27%), with two-thirds experiencing improvement in ⩾2 symptoms. In the remaining patients, symptoms were unchanged (7%) or worse (12%). At least one harm occurred in 32% of patients, the most common being an ascitic leak (n = 14). By T3, 89% of patients had experienced some benefit and 36% some harm, including four patients who experienced serious harm, one of which was a fatal bowel perforation. Conclusion: Most patients obtained rapid benefits from paracentesis. Harms were less frequent and generally mild, but occasionally serious and fatal. Our findings help inform clinician-patient discussions about the potential outcomes of paracentesis in this frail population.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02692163221122326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715441738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02692163221122326</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2715441738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f364c481629652496ab3139af0d14a4b24beb6f532fb6bf19692d7128891a4593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8BLx7smknSpPW2iP9gQQ8K3kqaJtol29YkK-y3N6WCoHgamPd7j3mD0CmQBYCUl4SKkoJglAJQyqjYQzPgUmaEkdd9NBv1bAQO0VEIa0KAEcFnyD4pr7TpogltwLb3WKtOG59541Q0DVZBt0nEbYcH5VyrYvtpEuTNFV52aR2N79Ky75S7wIPvw2D0xPTvvY84xG2zO0YHVrlgTr7nHL3c3jxf32erx7uH6-Uq0xwgZpYJrnkBgpYip7wUqmbASmVJA1zxmvLa1MLmjNpa1BbKVLqRQIuiBMXzks3R-ZSbDvnYmhCrTRu0cU51pt-GikrIOQfJioSe_ULX_TZVcSNFJZMMJEkUTJROzYI3thp8u1F-VwGpxs9Xfz6fPIvJE9Sb-Un93_AFA02CaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727373170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Seah, Davinia SE ; Wilcock, Andrew ; Chang, Sungwon ; Sousa, Mariana S ; Sinnarajah, Aynharan ; Teoh, Cy Oun ; Allan, Simon ; Chye, Richard ; Doogue, Matthew ; Hunt, Jane ; Agar, Meera ; Currow, David C</creator><creatorcontrib>Seah, Davinia SE ; Wilcock, Andrew ; Chang, Sungwon ; Sousa, Mariana S ; Sinnarajah, Aynharan ; Teoh, Cy Oun ; Allan, Simon ; Chye, Richard ; Doogue, Matthew ; Hunt, Jane ; Agar, Meera ; Currow, David C</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Paracentesis is commonly undertaken in patients with cancer-related ascites. Aim: To systematically investigate the symptomatic benefits and harms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing paracentesis using real-world data in the palliative care setting. Design: Prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive cohort study. Benefits and harms of paracentesis were assessed between 01/07/2018 and 31/02/2021 as part of routine clinical assessments by treating clinicians at four timepoints: (T0) before paracentesis; (T1) once drainage ceased; (T2) 24 h after T1 and (T3) 28 days after T1 or next paracentesis, if sooner. Setting/participants: Data were collected from 11 participating sites across five countries (Australia, England, Hong Kong, Malaysia and New Zealand) on 111 patients undergoing paracentesis via a temporary (73%) or indwelling (21%) catheter: 51% male, median age 69 years, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Score 50. Results: At T1 (n = 100), symptoms had improved for most patients (81%), specifically abdominal distension (61%), abdominal pain (49%) and nausea (27%), with two-thirds experiencing improvement in ⩾2 symptoms. In the remaining patients, symptoms were unchanged (7%) or worse (12%). At least one harm occurred in 32% of patients, the most common being an ascitic leak (n = 14). By T3, 89% of patients had experienced some benefit and 36% some harm, including four patients who experienced serious harm, one of which was a fatal bowel perforation. Conclusion: Most patients obtained rapid benefits from paracentesis. Harms were less frequent and generally mild, but occasionally serious and fatal. Our findings help inform clinician-patient discussions about the potential outcomes of paracentesis in this frail population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02692163221122326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Abdominal pain ; Ascites ; Cancer ; Catheterization ; Clinical assessment ; Cohort analysis ; Frail ; Medical procedures ; Nausea ; Palliative care</subject><ispartof>Palliative medicine, 2022-10, Vol.36 (9), p.1408-1417</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f364c481629652496ab3139af0d14a4b24beb6f532fb6bf19692d7128891a4593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f364c481629652496ab3139af0d14a4b24beb6f532fb6bf19692d7128891a4593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5964-1721 ; 0000-0002-7967-159X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02692163221122326$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02692163221122326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seah, Davinia SE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Mariana S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnarajah, Aynharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teoh, Cy Oun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chye, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doogue, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agar, Meera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currow, David C</creatorcontrib><title>Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study</title><title>Palliative medicine</title><addtitle>Palliat Med</addtitle><description>Background: Paracentesis is commonly undertaken in patients with cancer-related ascites. Aim: To systematically investigate the symptomatic benefits and harms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing paracentesis using real-world data in the palliative care setting. Design: Prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive cohort study. Benefits and harms of paracentesis were assessed between 01/07/2018 and 31/02/2021 as part of routine clinical assessments by treating clinicians at four timepoints: (T0) before paracentesis; (T1) once drainage ceased; (T2) 24 h after T1 and (T3) 28 days after T1 or next paracentesis, if sooner. Setting/participants: Data were collected from 11 participating sites across five countries (Australia, England, Hong Kong, Malaysia and New Zealand) on 111 patients undergoing paracentesis via a temporary (73%) or indwelling (21%) catheter: 51% male, median age 69 years, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Score 50. Results: At T1 (n = 100), symptoms had improved for most patients (81%), specifically abdominal distension (61%), abdominal pain (49%) and nausea (27%), with two-thirds experiencing improvement in ⩾2 symptoms. In the remaining patients, symptoms were unchanged (7%) or worse (12%). At least one harm occurred in 32% of patients, the most common being an ascitic leak (n = 14). By T3, 89% of patients had experienced some benefit and 36% some harm, including four patients who experienced serious harm, one of which was a fatal bowel perforation. Conclusion: Most patients obtained rapid benefits from paracentesis. Harms were less frequent and generally mild, but occasionally serious and fatal. Our findings help inform clinician-patient discussions about the potential outcomes of paracentesis in this frail population.</description><subject>Abdominal pain</subject><subject>Ascites</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Frail</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><issn>0269-2163</issn><issn>1477-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8BLx7smknSpPW2iP9gQQ8K3kqaJtol29YkK-y3N6WCoHgamPd7j3mD0CmQBYCUl4SKkoJglAJQyqjYQzPgUmaEkdd9NBv1bAQO0VEIa0KAEcFnyD4pr7TpogltwLb3WKtOG59541Q0DVZBt0nEbYcH5VyrYvtpEuTNFV52aR2N79Ky75S7wIPvw2D0xPTvvY84xG2zO0YHVrlgTr7nHL3c3jxf32erx7uH6-Uq0xwgZpYJrnkBgpYip7wUqmbASmVJA1zxmvLa1MLmjNpa1BbKVLqRQIuiBMXzks3R-ZSbDvnYmhCrTRu0cU51pt-GikrIOQfJioSe_ULX_TZVcSNFJZMMJEkUTJROzYI3thp8u1F-VwGpxs9Xfz6fPIvJE9Sb-Un93_AFA02CaQ</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Seah, Davinia SE</creator><creator>Wilcock, Andrew</creator><creator>Chang, Sungwon</creator><creator>Sousa, Mariana S</creator><creator>Sinnarajah, Aynharan</creator><creator>Teoh, Cy Oun</creator><creator>Allan, Simon</creator><creator>Chye, Richard</creator><creator>Doogue, Matthew</creator><creator>Hunt, Jane</creator><creator>Agar, Meera</creator><creator>Currow, David C</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-1721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-159X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study</title><author>Seah, Davinia SE ; Wilcock, Andrew ; Chang, Sungwon ; Sousa, Mariana S ; Sinnarajah, Aynharan ; Teoh, Cy Oun ; Allan, Simon ; Chye, Richard ; Doogue, Matthew ; Hunt, Jane ; Agar, Meera ; Currow, David C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f364c481629652496ab3139af0d14a4b24beb6f532fb6bf19692d7128891a4593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal pain</topic><topic>Ascites</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Frail</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seah, Davinia SE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Mariana S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnarajah, Aynharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teoh, Cy Oun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chye, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doogue, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agar, Meera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currow, David C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Palliative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seah, Davinia SE</au><au>Wilcock, Andrew</au><au>Chang, Sungwon</au><au>Sousa, Mariana S</au><au>Sinnarajah, Aynharan</au><au>Teoh, Cy Oun</au><au>Allan, Simon</au><au>Chye, Richard</au><au>Doogue, Matthew</au><au>Hunt, Jane</au><au>Agar, Meera</au><au>Currow, David C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Palliative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Palliat Med</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1408</spage><epage>1417</epage><pages>1408-1417</pages><issn>0269-2163</issn><eissn>1477-030X</eissn><abstract>Background: Paracentesis is commonly undertaken in patients with cancer-related ascites. Aim: To systematically investigate the symptomatic benefits and harms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing paracentesis using real-world data in the palliative care setting. Design: Prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive cohort study. Benefits and harms of paracentesis were assessed between 01/07/2018 and 31/02/2021 as part of routine clinical assessments by treating clinicians at four timepoints: (T0) before paracentesis; (T1) once drainage ceased; (T2) 24 h after T1 and (T3) 28 days after T1 or next paracentesis, if sooner. Setting/participants: Data were collected from 11 participating sites across five countries (Australia, England, Hong Kong, Malaysia and New Zealand) on 111 patients undergoing paracentesis via a temporary (73%) or indwelling (21%) catheter: 51% male, median age 69 years, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Score 50. Results: At T1 (n = 100), symptoms had improved for most patients (81%), specifically abdominal distension (61%), abdominal pain (49%) and nausea (27%), with two-thirds experiencing improvement in ⩾2 symptoms. In the remaining patients, symptoms were unchanged (7%) or worse (12%). At least one harm occurred in 32% of patients, the most common being an ascitic leak (n = 14). By T3, 89% of patients had experienced some benefit and 36% some harm, including four patients who experienced serious harm, one of which was a fatal bowel perforation. Conclusion: Most patients obtained rapid benefits from paracentesis. Harms were less frequent and generally mild, but occasionally serious and fatal. Our findings help inform clinician-patient discussions about the potential outcomes of paracentesis in this frail population.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02692163221122326</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-1721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-159X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2163
ispartof Palliative medicine, 2022-10, Vol.36 (9), p.1408-1417
issn 0269-2163
1477-030X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715441738
source Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Abdominal pain
Ascites
Cancer
Catheterization
Clinical assessment
Cohort analysis
Frail
Medical procedures
Nausea
Palliative care
title Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A12%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paracentesis%20for%20cancer-related%20ascites%20in%20palliative%20care:%20An%20international,%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20medicine&rft.au=Seah,%20Davinia%20SE&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1408&rft.epage=1417&rft.pages=1408-1417&rft.issn=0269-2163&rft.eissn=1477-030X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02692163221122326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715441738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727373170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02692163221122326&rfr_iscdi=true