Assessing tests of animal consciousness

•An abundance of tests of animal consciousness has been proposed in the literature.•Attributions of consciousness differ depending on the tests which are preferred.•This paper proposes desiderata for the evaluation of tests of animal consciousness. Which animals have conscious experiences? Many diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Consciousness and cognition 2022-10, Vol.105, p.103410-103410, Article 103410
1. Verfasser: Dung, Leonard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103410
container_issue
container_start_page 103410
container_title Consciousness and cognition
container_volume 105
creator Dung, Leonard
description •An abundance of tests of animal consciousness has been proposed in the literature.•Attributions of consciousness differ depending on the tests which are preferred.•This paper proposes desiderata for the evaluation of tests of animal consciousness. Which animals have conscious experiences? Many different, diverse and unrelated behaviors and cognitive capacities have been proposed as tests of the presence of consciousness in an animal. It is unclear which of these tests, if any, are valid. To remedy this problem, I develop a list consisting of eight desiderata which can be used to assess putative tests of animal consciousness. These desiderata are based either on detailed analogies between consciousness-linked human behavior and non-human behavior, on theories of consciousness or on methods from human consciousness science. If a test or set of tests satisfies more of these desiderata, passing it provides stronger evidence of consciousness. Moreover, one can design future tests of animal consciousness with the intention of satisfying these desiderata to ensure their evidential strength.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715441222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053810022001428</els_id><sourcerecordid>2715441222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-aab95fe84164883c1d6ff7ed6275ab107bd28aa5f38e7e4abf41da3bdc09937c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcje9LI1k2Q32YtQil9Q8KLnkE0mZct2tyZbwX9vylaPniYMz8y8eQi5BjoHCuX9Zm77zvbrOaOMpRYXQE_IFGhFc8ZleXp4FzxXQOmEXMS4oZQqKYpzMuElQMGBTcntIkaMsenW2YBxiFnvM9M1W9NmaX20Tb-PXQIuyZk3bcSrY52Rj6fH9-VLvnp7fl0uVrkVVA25MXVVeFQCSqEUt-BK7yW6ksnC1EBl7ZgypvBcoURhai_AGV47S6uKS8tn5G7cuwv95z4l0tsmWmxb02GKopmEQghgjCVUjKgNfYwBvd6FFDx8a6D6oEhv9KhIHxTpUVEauzle2NdbdH9Dv04S8DACmP751WDQSQN2Fl0T0A7a9c3_F34AL5x4kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715441222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing tests of animal consciousness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Dung, Leonard</creator><creatorcontrib>Dung, Leonard</creatorcontrib><description>•An abundance of tests of animal consciousness has been proposed in the literature.•Attributions of consciousness differ depending on the tests which are preferred.•This paper proposes desiderata for the evaluation of tests of animal consciousness. Which animals have conscious experiences? Many different, diverse and unrelated behaviors and cognitive capacities have been proposed as tests of the presence of consciousness in an animal. It is unclear which of these tests, if any, are valid. To remedy this problem, I develop a list consisting of eight desiderata which can be used to assess putative tests of animal consciousness. These desiderata are based either on detailed analogies between consciousness-linked human behavior and non-human behavior, on theories of consciousness or on methods from human consciousness science. If a test or set of tests satisfies more of these desiderata, passing it provides stronger evidence of consciousness. Moreover, one can design future tests of animal consciousness with the intention of satisfying these desiderata to ensure their evidential strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36115312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal consciousness ; Animals ; Consciousness ; Evidence of consciousness ; Global-workspace theory ; Humans ; Measuring consciousness ; Newton’s Principle ; Phenomenal consciousness</subject><ispartof>Consciousness and cognition, 2022-10, Vol.105, p.103410-103410, Article 103410</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-aab95fe84164883c1d6ff7ed6275ab107bd28aa5f38e7e4abf41da3bdc09937c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-aab95fe84164883c1d6ff7ed6275ab107bd28aa5f38e7e4abf41da3bdc09937c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4154-5560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103410$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36115312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dung, Leonard</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing tests of animal consciousness</title><title>Consciousness and cognition</title><addtitle>Conscious Cogn</addtitle><description>•An abundance of tests of animal consciousness has been proposed in the literature.•Attributions of consciousness differ depending on the tests which are preferred.•This paper proposes desiderata for the evaluation of tests of animal consciousness. Which animals have conscious experiences? Many different, diverse and unrelated behaviors and cognitive capacities have been proposed as tests of the presence of consciousness in an animal. It is unclear which of these tests, if any, are valid. To remedy this problem, I develop a list consisting of eight desiderata which can be used to assess putative tests of animal consciousness. These desiderata are based either on detailed analogies between consciousness-linked human behavior and non-human behavior, on theories of consciousness or on methods from human consciousness science. If a test or set of tests satisfies more of these desiderata, passing it provides stronger evidence of consciousness. Moreover, one can design future tests of animal consciousness with the intention of satisfying these desiderata to ensure their evidential strength.</description><subject>Animal consciousness</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Evidence of consciousness</subject><subject>Global-workspace theory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measuring consciousness</subject><subject>Newton’s Principle</subject><subject>Phenomenal consciousness</subject><issn>1053-8100</issn><issn>1090-2376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcje9LI1k2Q32YtQil9Q8KLnkE0mZct2tyZbwX9vylaPniYMz8y8eQi5BjoHCuX9Zm77zvbrOaOMpRYXQE_IFGhFc8ZleXp4FzxXQOmEXMS4oZQqKYpzMuElQMGBTcntIkaMsenW2YBxiFnvM9M1W9NmaX20Tb-PXQIuyZk3bcSrY52Rj6fH9-VLvnp7fl0uVrkVVA25MXVVeFQCSqEUt-BK7yW6ksnC1EBl7ZgypvBcoURhai_AGV47S6uKS8tn5G7cuwv95z4l0tsmWmxb02GKopmEQghgjCVUjKgNfYwBvd6FFDx8a6D6oEhv9KhIHxTpUVEauzle2NdbdH9Dv04S8DACmP751WDQSQN2Fl0T0A7a9c3_F34AL5x4kw</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Dung, Leonard</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-5560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Assessing tests of animal consciousness</title><author>Dung, Leonard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-aab95fe84164883c1d6ff7ed6275ab107bd28aa5f38e7e4abf41da3bdc09937c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal consciousness</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Evidence of consciousness</topic><topic>Global-workspace theory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measuring consciousness</topic><topic>Newton’s Principle</topic><topic>Phenomenal consciousness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dung, Leonard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dung, Leonard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing tests of animal consciousness</atitle><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Conscious Cogn</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>105</volume><spage>103410</spage><epage>103410</epage><pages>103410-103410</pages><artnum>103410</artnum><issn>1053-8100</issn><eissn>1090-2376</eissn><abstract>•An abundance of tests of animal consciousness has been proposed in the literature.•Attributions of consciousness differ depending on the tests which are preferred.•This paper proposes desiderata for the evaluation of tests of animal consciousness. Which animals have conscious experiences? Many different, diverse and unrelated behaviors and cognitive capacities have been proposed as tests of the presence of consciousness in an animal. It is unclear which of these tests, if any, are valid. To remedy this problem, I develop a list consisting of eight desiderata which can be used to assess putative tests of animal consciousness. These desiderata are based either on detailed analogies between consciousness-linked human behavior and non-human behavior, on theories of consciousness or on methods from human consciousness science. If a test or set of tests satisfies more of these desiderata, passing it provides stronger evidence of consciousness. Moreover, one can design future tests of animal consciousness with the intention of satisfying these desiderata to ensure their evidential strength.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36115312</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.concog.2022.103410</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-5560</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8100
ispartof Consciousness and cognition, 2022-10, Vol.105, p.103410-103410, Article 103410
issn 1053-8100
1090-2376
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715441222
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animal consciousness
Animals
Consciousness
Evidence of consciousness
Global-workspace theory
Humans
Measuring consciousness
Newton’s Principle
Phenomenal consciousness
title Assessing tests of animal consciousness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A13%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20tests%20of%20animal%20consciousness&rft.jtitle=Consciousness%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Dung,%20Leonard&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=103410&rft.epage=103410&rft.pages=103410-103410&rft.artnum=103410&rft.issn=1053-8100&rft.eissn=1090-2376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715441222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715441222&rft_id=info:pmid/36115312&rft_els_id=S1053810022001428&rfr_iscdi=true