Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation
Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2022-11, Vol.183, p.55-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 183 |
creator | Rubino, Francesca Scarsini, Roberto Piccoli, Anna San Biagio, Livio Tropea, Ilaria Pighi, Michele Prati, Daniele Tavella, Domenico Pesarini, Gabriele Benfari, Giovanni Onorati, Francesco Gottin, Leonardo Faggian, Giuseppe Ribichini, Flavio Luciano |
description | Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC 0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715438780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2724640986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-a77db25752f82b36469a3c62de7901b903d9e8c0e05cdb16984af254f4e054853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1q3DAUhUVJoJM0jxAQZJONXUmWbWk5DPkpBBpKfpbijixPZGRpIskpfZU-bZRmVl1dzj3fuVw4CJ1TUlNCu-9TDfOkIQ41I4zVRNSEki9oRUUvKyppc4RWhBBWScrlV3SS0lQkpW23Qn83Yd5DhGzfDL6PYedDylbjJ3CLwWHE98WcTTYx_VOLS4V1Bv-yu5eMn4zP0erFQcTrsVAuwICtL7Fsi5fws80veD28gddmwLcGYsbXYN0SDV7_Bput3x3WDxF82jvwuYSD_4aOR3DJnB3mKXq8vnrY3FZ3P29-bNZ3laaS5Qr6ftiytm_ZKNi26XgnodEdG0wvCd1K0gzSCE0MafWwpZ0UHEbW8pGXDRdtc4ouP-_uY3hdTMpqtkkbVx4xYUmK9bTljegFKejFf-gUlujLd4VivONEiq5Q7SelY0gpmlHto50h_lGUqI_G1KQOjamPxhQRqjTWvAOKI44G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724640986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Rubino, Francesca ; Scarsini, Roberto ; Piccoli, Anna ; San Biagio, Livio ; Tropea, Ilaria ; Pighi, Michele ; Prati, Daniele ; Tavella, Domenico ; Pesarini, Gabriele ; Benfari, Giovanni ; Onorati, Francesco ; Gottin, Leonardo ; Faggian, Giuseppe ; Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Francesca ; Scarsini, Roberto ; Piccoli, Anna ; San Biagio, Livio ; Tropea, Ilaria ; Pighi, Michele ; Prati, Daniele ; Tavella, Domenico ; Pesarini, Gabriele ; Benfari, Giovanni ; Onorati, Francesco ; Gottin, Leonardo ; Faggian, Giuseppe ; Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creatorcontrib><description>Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC <1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE >0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; Cardiac catheterization ; Cardiomyopathy ; Confidence intervals ; Congestive heart failure ; Ejection fraction ; Heart failure ; Heart transplantation ; Heart transplants ; Hemodynamics ; Intubation ; Medical prognosis ; Parameters ; Pulmonary arteries ; Pulmonary artery ; Review boards ; Survival ; Thoracic surgery ; Transplantation ; Transplants & implants ; Variables ; Ventricle ; Ventricular assist devices</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2022-11, Vol.183, p.55-61</ispartof><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-a77db25752f82b36469a3c62de7901b903d9e8c0e05cdb16984af254f4e054853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2724640986?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,64374,64376,64378,72230</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Biagio, Livio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tropea, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pighi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavella, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesarini, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfari, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onorati, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottin, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faggian, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><description>Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC <1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE >0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart transplantation</subject><subject>Heart transplants</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Pulmonary artery</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular assist devices</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1q3DAUhUVJoJM0jxAQZJONXUmWbWk5DPkpBBpKfpbijixPZGRpIskpfZU-bZRmVl1dzj3fuVw4CJ1TUlNCu-9TDfOkIQ41I4zVRNSEki9oRUUvKyppc4RWhBBWScrlV3SS0lQkpW23Qn83Yd5DhGzfDL6PYedDylbjJ3CLwWHE98WcTTYx_VOLS4V1Bv-yu5eMn4zP0erFQcTrsVAuwICtL7Fsi5fws80veD28gddmwLcGYsbXYN0SDV7_Bput3x3WDxF82jvwuYSD_4aOR3DJnB3mKXq8vnrY3FZ3P29-bNZ3laaS5Qr6ftiytm_ZKNi26XgnodEdG0wvCd1K0gzSCE0MafWwpZ0UHEbW8pGXDRdtc4ouP-_uY3hdTMpqtkkbVx4xYUmK9bTljegFKejFf-gUlujLd4VivONEiq5Q7SelY0gpmlHto50h_lGUqI_G1KQOjamPxhQRqjTWvAOKI44G</recordid><startdate>20221115</startdate><enddate>20221115</enddate><creator>Rubino, Francesca</creator><creator>Scarsini, Roberto</creator><creator>Piccoli, Anna</creator><creator>San Biagio, Livio</creator><creator>Tropea, Ilaria</creator><creator>Pighi, Michele</creator><creator>Prati, Daniele</creator><creator>Tavella, Domenico</creator><creator>Pesarini, Gabriele</creator><creator>Benfari, Giovanni</creator><creator>Onorati, Francesco</creator><creator>Gottin, Leonardo</creator><creator>Faggian, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221115</creationdate><title>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</title><author>Rubino, Francesca ; Scarsini, Roberto ; Piccoli, Anna ; San Biagio, Livio ; Tropea, Ilaria ; Pighi, Michele ; Prati, Daniele ; Tavella, Domenico ; Pesarini, Gabriele ; Benfari, Giovanni ; Onorati, Francesco ; Gottin, Leonardo ; Faggian, Giuseppe ; Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-a77db25752f82b36469a3c62de7901b903d9e8c0e05cdb16984af254f4e054853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart transplantation</topic><topic>Heart transplants</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Pulmonary artery</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular assist devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Biagio, Livio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tropea, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pighi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavella, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesarini, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfari, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onorati, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottin, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faggian, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubino, Francesca</au><au>Scarsini, Roberto</au><au>Piccoli, Anna</au><au>San Biagio, Livio</au><au>Tropea, Ilaria</au><au>Pighi, Michele</au><au>Prati, Daniele</au><au>Tavella, Domenico</au><au>Pesarini, Gabriele</au><au>Benfari, Giovanni</au><au>Onorati, Francesco</au><au>Gottin, Leonardo</au><au>Faggian, Giuseppe</au><au>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><date>2022-11-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>183</volume><spage>55</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>55-61</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC <1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE >0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 2022-11, Vol.183, p.55-61 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715438780 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Blood pressure Cardiac catheterization Cardiomyopathy Confidence intervals Congestive heart failure Ejection fraction Heart failure Heart transplantation Heart transplants Hemodynamics Intubation Medical prognosis Parameters Pulmonary arteries Pulmonary artery Review boards Survival Thoracic surgery Transplantation Transplants & implants Variables Ventricle Ventricular assist devices |
title | Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A25%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Prognostic%20Value%20of%20Parameters%20of%20Pulsatile%20Right%20Ventricular%20Afterload%20in%20Patients%20With%20Advanced%20Heart%20Failure%20Awaiting%20Heart%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Rubino,%20Francesca&rft.date=2022-11-15&rft.volume=183&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=55-61&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2724640986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724640986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |