Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation

Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2022-11, Vol.183, p.55-61
Hauptverfasser: Rubino, Francesca, Scarsini, Roberto, Piccoli, Anna, San Biagio, Livio, Tropea, Ilaria, Pighi, Michele, Prati, Daniele, Tavella, Domenico, Pesarini, Gabriele, Benfari, Giovanni, Onorati, Francesco, Gottin, Leonardo, Faggian, Giuseppe, Ribichini, Flavio Luciano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue
container_start_page 55
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 183
creator Rubino, Francesca
Scarsini, Roberto
Piccoli, Anna
San Biagio, Livio
Tropea, Ilaria
Pighi, Michele
Prati, Daniele
Tavella, Domenico
Pesarini, Gabriele
Benfari, Giovanni
Onorati, Francesco
Gottin, Leonardo
Faggian, Giuseppe
Ribichini, Flavio Luciano
description Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC 0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715438780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2724640986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-a77db25752f82b36469a3c62de7901b903d9e8c0e05cdb16984af254f4e054853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1q3DAUhUVJoJM0jxAQZJONXUmWbWk5DPkpBBpKfpbijixPZGRpIskpfZU-bZRmVl1dzj3fuVw4CJ1TUlNCu-9TDfOkIQ41I4zVRNSEki9oRUUvKyppc4RWhBBWScrlV3SS0lQkpW23Qn83Yd5DhGzfDL6PYedDylbjJ3CLwWHE98WcTTYx_VOLS4V1Bv-yu5eMn4zP0erFQcTrsVAuwICtL7Fsi5fws80veD28gddmwLcGYsbXYN0SDV7_Bput3x3WDxF82jvwuYSD_4aOR3DJnB3mKXq8vnrY3FZ3P29-bNZ3laaS5Qr6ftiytm_ZKNi26XgnodEdG0wvCd1K0gzSCE0MafWwpZ0UHEbW8pGXDRdtc4ouP-_uY3hdTMpqtkkbVx4xYUmK9bTljegFKejFf-gUlujLd4VivONEiq5Q7SelY0gpmlHto50h_lGUqI_G1KQOjamPxhQRqjTWvAOKI44G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724640986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Rubino, Francesca ; Scarsini, Roberto ; Piccoli, Anna ; San Biagio, Livio ; Tropea, Ilaria ; Pighi, Michele ; Prati, Daniele ; Tavella, Domenico ; Pesarini, Gabriele ; Benfari, Giovanni ; Onorati, Francesco ; Gottin, Leonardo ; Faggian, Giuseppe ; Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Francesca ; Scarsini, Roberto ; Piccoli, Anna ; San Biagio, Livio ; Tropea, Ilaria ; Pighi, Michele ; Prati, Daniele ; Tavella, Domenico ; Pesarini, Gabriele ; Benfari, Giovanni ; Onorati, Francesco ; Gottin, Leonardo ; Faggian, Giuseppe ; Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creatorcontrib><description>Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC &lt;1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE &gt;0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; Cardiac catheterization ; Cardiomyopathy ; Confidence intervals ; Congestive heart failure ; Ejection fraction ; Heart failure ; Heart transplantation ; Heart transplants ; Hemodynamics ; Intubation ; Medical prognosis ; Parameters ; Pulmonary arteries ; Pulmonary artery ; Review boards ; Survival ; Thoracic surgery ; Transplantation ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Variables ; Ventricle ; Ventricular assist devices</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2022-11, Vol.183, p.55-61</ispartof><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-a77db25752f82b36469a3c62de7901b903d9e8c0e05cdb16984af254f4e054853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2724640986?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,64374,64376,64378,72230</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Biagio, Livio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tropea, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pighi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavella, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesarini, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfari, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onorati, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottin, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faggian, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><description>Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC &lt;1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE &gt;0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart transplantation</subject><subject>Heart transplants</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Pulmonary artery</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular assist devices</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1q3DAUhUVJoJM0jxAQZJONXUmWbWk5DPkpBBpKfpbijixPZGRpIskpfZU-bZRmVl1dzj3fuVw4CJ1TUlNCu-9TDfOkIQ41I4zVRNSEki9oRUUvKyppc4RWhBBWScrlV3SS0lQkpW23Qn83Yd5DhGzfDL6PYedDylbjJ3CLwWHE98WcTTYx_VOLS4V1Bv-yu5eMn4zP0erFQcTrsVAuwICtL7Fsi5fws80veD28gddmwLcGYsbXYN0SDV7_Bput3x3WDxF82jvwuYSD_4aOR3DJnB3mKXq8vnrY3FZ3P29-bNZ3laaS5Qr6ftiytm_ZKNi26XgnodEdG0wvCd1K0gzSCE0MafWwpZ0UHEbW8pGXDRdtc4ouP-_uY3hdTMpqtkkbVx4xYUmK9bTljegFKejFf-gUlujLd4VivONEiq5Q7SelY0gpmlHto50h_lGUqI_G1KQOjamPxhQRqjTWvAOKI44G</recordid><startdate>20221115</startdate><enddate>20221115</enddate><creator>Rubino, Francesca</creator><creator>Scarsini, Roberto</creator><creator>Piccoli, Anna</creator><creator>San Biagio, Livio</creator><creator>Tropea, Ilaria</creator><creator>Pighi, Michele</creator><creator>Prati, Daniele</creator><creator>Tavella, Domenico</creator><creator>Pesarini, Gabriele</creator><creator>Benfari, Giovanni</creator><creator>Onorati, Francesco</creator><creator>Gottin, Leonardo</creator><creator>Faggian, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221115</creationdate><title>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</title><author>Rubino, Francesca ; Scarsini, Roberto ; Piccoli, Anna ; San Biagio, Livio ; Tropea, Ilaria ; Pighi, Michele ; Prati, Daniele ; Tavella, Domenico ; Pesarini, Gabriele ; Benfari, Giovanni ; Onorati, Francesco ; Gottin, Leonardo ; Faggian, Giuseppe ; Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-a77db25752f82b36469a3c62de7901b903d9e8c0e05cdb16984af254f4e054853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart transplantation</topic><topic>Heart transplants</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Pulmonary artery</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular assist devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccoli, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Biagio, Livio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tropea, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pighi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavella, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesarini, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfari, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onorati, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottin, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faggian, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubino, Francesca</au><au>Scarsini, Roberto</au><au>Piccoli, Anna</au><au>San Biagio, Livio</au><au>Tropea, Ilaria</au><au>Pighi, Michele</au><au>Prati, Daniele</au><au>Tavella, Domenico</au><au>Pesarini, Gabriele</au><au>Benfari, Giovanni</au><au>Onorati, Francesco</au><au>Gottin, Leonardo</au><au>Faggian, Giuseppe</au><au>Ribichini, Flavio Luciano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><date>2022-11-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>183</volume><spage>55</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>55-61</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT).A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC &lt;1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE &gt;0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2022-11, Vol.183, p.55-61
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2715438780
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central
subjects Blood pressure
Cardiac catheterization
Cardiomyopathy
Confidence intervals
Congestive heart failure
Ejection fraction
Heart failure
Heart transplantation
Heart transplants
Hemodynamics
Intubation
Medical prognosis
Parameters
Pulmonary arteries
Pulmonary artery
Review boards
Survival
Thoracic surgery
Transplantation
Transplants & implants
Variables
Ventricle
Ventricular assist devices
title Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A25%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Prognostic%20Value%20of%20Parameters%20of%20Pulsatile%20Right%20Ventricular%20Afterload%20in%20Patients%20With%20Advanced%20Heart%20Failure%20Awaiting%20Heart%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Rubino,%20Francesca&rft.date=2022-11-15&rft.volume=183&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=55-61&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2724640986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724640986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true