Electron Microscopy and Elemental Analysis of Defective Drysdale Nucleus Manipulator Instruments Implicated in Surgical Complications
•Reusable Drysdale manipulators are widely used in cataract surgery.•Damage or residues can accumulate with instrument reuse.•Scanning electron microscopy found sharp defects in all (5 of 5) reused instruments.•Defects had elemental composition mainly of carbon or aluminum.•Sharp defects may contrib...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 2023-01, Vol.245, p.102-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102 |
container_title | American journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 245 |
creator | Kopecny, Lloyd R. Biazik, Joanna M. Coroneo, Minas T. |
description | •Reusable Drysdale manipulators are widely used in cataract surgery.•Damage or residues can accumulate with instrument reuse.•Scanning electron microscopy found sharp defects in all (5 of 5) reused instruments.•Defects had elemental composition mainly of carbon or aluminum.•Sharp defects may contribute to complications including posterior capsule rupture.
To analyze microtopography of 5 reusable Drysdale nucleus manipulator (DNM) paddled tips for sharp defects and evaluate their elemental composition to determine probable source, investigating 2 instruments (DNM 1 and 4) implicated in causing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and 3 instruments with sharp edges identified by finger-tip interrogation intraoperatively.
Experimental laboratory investigation.
DNM paddled tips were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate for sharp surface defects (number, dimensions), and subsequently energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) performed on sharp defects to determine their elemental composition.
All reused DNMs analyzed (5 of 5) had significant structural defects on SEM analysis including sharp burrs, cavities and indentations, surface debris or residues, and roughening, compared to the new instrument (DNM 3, control) which had no defects. DNM 1 had 2 sharp defects, a larger 14 × 76-µm one and a craterlike 167 × 220-µm defect containing debris. EDS found that DNM 2 had 3 of 4 burrs composed mainly of carbon, the fourth of mixed composition (calcium, sulfur, oxygen); DNM 4 had 1 small burr, EDS significant for carbon; DNM 5 had 3 prominent burrs, the largest of 20 × 28 µm, 2 composed of aluminum, and some carbon residue. DNM 6 had 1 burr composed of aluminum and 3 prominent cavity defects, the largest covering 781 µm2.
Reusable DNMs are widely used in cataract surgery. Sharp carbon- or aluminum-containing burrs were detected on all reused instruments analyzed together with 1 burr of mixed composition, originating from (1) organic residues, (2) instrument fragments, or (3) salt and contaminant deposits. Sharp defects may contribute to capsular damage including PCR, and residues may pose other safety concerns. Therefore, we support development of a quality, reliable single-use alternative instrument and further encourage careful inspection of all reusable instruments principally by finger-tip interrogation for sharp edges preuse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714656068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000293942200352X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2714656068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-9372fd88a27f95170550439e126d323e82539aae4971bea2a031d4b02de80d5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3BBlrj0smFs55_FqdoWulILB-Bsee0JcuTEwU4q7Qfge-Nolx44cBrN6PeeNO8R8pZBwYDVH_pC96HgwHkBsgBgz8iGtY3cslay52QDAHwrhSwvyKuU-rzWTdm8JBeiZiAkwIb8vvVo5hhG-uBMDMmE6Uj1aGm-DzjO2tPrUftjcomGjt5gl3H3iPQmHpPVHumXxXhcEn3Qo5sWr-cQ6X5Mc1xWfaL7YfLO6BktdSP9tsSfefN0F853F8b0mrzotE_45jwvyY9Pt993d9v7r5_3u-v7reG1mPMrDe9s22redLJiDVQVlEIi47UVXGDLKyG1xlI27ICaaxDMlgfgFluwlRGX5OrkO8Xwa8E0q8Elg97rEcOSFG9YWVc11G1G3_-D9mGJOYqVqkRdlSBWip2oNbsUsVNTdIOOR8VArR2pXuWO1NqRAqlyR1nz7uy8HAa0T4q_pWTg4wnAHMWjw6iScTgatC7m9JUN7j_2fwAPwKKz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753654038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electron Microscopy and Elemental Analysis of Defective Drysdale Nucleus Manipulator Instruments Implicated in Surgical Complications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kopecny, Lloyd R. ; Biazik, Joanna M. ; Coroneo, Minas T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kopecny, Lloyd R. ; Biazik, Joanna M. ; Coroneo, Minas T.</creatorcontrib><description>•Reusable Drysdale manipulators are widely used in cataract surgery.•Damage or residues can accumulate with instrument reuse.•Scanning electron microscopy found sharp defects in all (5 of 5) reused instruments.•Defects had elemental composition mainly of carbon or aluminum.•Sharp defects may contribute to complications including posterior capsule rupture.
To analyze microtopography of 5 reusable Drysdale nucleus manipulator (DNM) paddled tips for sharp defects and evaluate their elemental composition to determine probable source, investigating 2 instruments (DNM 1 and 4) implicated in causing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and 3 instruments with sharp edges identified by finger-tip interrogation intraoperatively.
Experimental laboratory investigation.
DNM paddled tips were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate for sharp surface defects (number, dimensions), and subsequently energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) performed on sharp defects to determine their elemental composition.
All reused DNMs analyzed (5 of 5) had significant structural defects on SEM analysis including sharp burrs, cavities and indentations, surface debris or residues, and roughening, compared to the new instrument (DNM 3, control) which had no defects. DNM 1 had 2 sharp defects, a larger 14 × 76-µm one and a craterlike 167 × 220-µm defect containing debris. EDS found that DNM 2 had 3 of 4 burrs composed mainly of carbon, the fourth of mixed composition (calcium, sulfur, oxygen); DNM 4 had 1 small burr, EDS significant for carbon; DNM 5 had 3 prominent burrs, the largest of 20 × 28 µm, 2 composed of aluminum, and some carbon residue. DNM 6 had 1 burr composed of aluminum and 3 prominent cavity defects, the largest covering 781 µm2.
Reusable DNMs are widely used in cataract surgery. Sharp carbon- or aluminum-containing burrs were detected on all reused instruments analyzed together with 1 burr of mixed composition, originating from (1) organic residues, (2) instrument fragments, or (3) salt and contaminant deposits. Sharp defects may contribute to capsular damage including PCR, and residues may pose other safety concerns. Therefore, we support development of a quality, reliable single-use alternative instrument and further encourage careful inspection of all reusable instruments principally by finger-tip interrogation for sharp edges preuse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36103900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Carbon ; Cataracts ; Defects ; Humans ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Morphology ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission ; Surgeons ; Titanium alloys</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2023-01, Vol.245, p.102-114</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-9372fd88a27f95170550439e126d323e82539aae4971bea2a031d4b02de80d5c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3061-2011 ; 0000-0003-1946-9936</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kopecny, Lloyd R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biazik, Joanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coroneo, Minas T.</creatorcontrib><title>Electron Microscopy and Elemental Analysis of Defective Drysdale Nucleus Manipulator Instruments Implicated in Surgical Complications</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>•Reusable Drysdale manipulators are widely used in cataract surgery.•Damage or residues can accumulate with instrument reuse.•Scanning electron microscopy found sharp defects in all (5 of 5) reused instruments.•Defects had elemental composition mainly of carbon or aluminum.•Sharp defects may contribute to complications including posterior capsule rupture.
To analyze microtopography of 5 reusable Drysdale nucleus manipulator (DNM) paddled tips for sharp defects and evaluate their elemental composition to determine probable source, investigating 2 instruments (DNM 1 and 4) implicated in causing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and 3 instruments with sharp edges identified by finger-tip interrogation intraoperatively.
Experimental laboratory investigation.
DNM paddled tips were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate for sharp surface defects (number, dimensions), and subsequently energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) performed on sharp defects to determine their elemental composition.
All reused DNMs analyzed (5 of 5) had significant structural defects on SEM analysis including sharp burrs, cavities and indentations, surface debris or residues, and roughening, compared to the new instrument (DNM 3, control) which had no defects. DNM 1 had 2 sharp defects, a larger 14 × 76-µm one and a craterlike 167 × 220-µm defect containing debris. EDS found that DNM 2 had 3 of 4 burrs composed mainly of carbon, the fourth of mixed composition (calcium, sulfur, oxygen); DNM 4 had 1 small burr, EDS significant for carbon; DNM 5 had 3 prominent burrs, the largest of 20 × 28 µm, 2 composed of aluminum, and some carbon residue. DNM 6 had 1 burr composed of aluminum and 3 prominent cavity defects, the largest covering 781 µm2.
Reusable DNMs are widely used in cataract surgery. Sharp carbon- or aluminum-containing burrs were detected on all reused instruments analyzed together with 1 burr of mixed composition, originating from (1) organic residues, (2) instrument fragments, or (3) salt and contaminant deposits. Sharp defects may contribute to capsular damage including PCR, and residues may pose other safety concerns. Therefore, we support development of a quality, reliable single-use alternative instrument and further encourage careful inspection of all reusable instruments principally by finger-tip interrogation for sharp edges preuse.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3BBlrj0smFs55_FqdoWulILB-Bsee0JcuTEwU4q7Qfge-Nolx44cBrN6PeeNO8R8pZBwYDVH_pC96HgwHkBsgBgz8iGtY3cslay52QDAHwrhSwvyKuU-rzWTdm8JBeiZiAkwIb8vvVo5hhG-uBMDMmE6Uj1aGm-DzjO2tPrUftjcomGjt5gl3H3iPQmHpPVHumXxXhcEn3Qo5sWr-cQ6X5Mc1xWfaL7YfLO6BktdSP9tsSfefN0F853F8b0mrzotE_45jwvyY9Pt993d9v7r5_3u-v7reG1mPMrDe9s22redLJiDVQVlEIi47UVXGDLKyG1xlI27ICaaxDMlgfgFluwlRGX5OrkO8Xwa8E0q8Elg97rEcOSFG9YWVc11G1G3_-D9mGJOYqVqkRdlSBWip2oNbsUsVNTdIOOR8VArR2pXuWO1NqRAqlyR1nz7uy8HAa0T4q_pWTg4wnAHMWjw6iScTgatC7m9JUN7j_2fwAPwKKz</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Kopecny, Lloyd R.</creator><creator>Biazik, Joanna M.</creator><creator>Coroneo, Minas T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-2011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1946-9936</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Electron Microscopy and Elemental Analysis of Defective Drysdale Nucleus Manipulator Instruments Implicated in Surgical Complications</title><author>Kopecny, Lloyd R. ; Biazik, Joanna M. ; Coroneo, Minas T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-9372fd88a27f95170550439e126d323e82539aae4971bea2a031d4b02de80d5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kopecny, Lloyd R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biazik, Joanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coroneo, Minas T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kopecny, Lloyd R.</au><au>Biazik, Joanna M.</au><au>Coroneo, Minas T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electron Microscopy and Elemental Analysis of Defective Drysdale Nucleus Manipulator Instruments Implicated in Surgical Complications</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>245</volume><spage>102</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>102-114</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><abstract>•Reusable Drysdale manipulators are widely used in cataract surgery.•Damage or residues can accumulate with instrument reuse.•Scanning electron microscopy found sharp defects in all (5 of 5) reused instruments.•Defects had elemental composition mainly of carbon or aluminum.•Sharp defects may contribute to complications including posterior capsule rupture.
To analyze microtopography of 5 reusable Drysdale nucleus manipulator (DNM) paddled tips for sharp defects and evaluate their elemental composition to determine probable source, investigating 2 instruments (DNM 1 and 4) implicated in causing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and 3 instruments with sharp edges identified by finger-tip interrogation intraoperatively.
Experimental laboratory investigation.
DNM paddled tips were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate for sharp surface defects (number, dimensions), and subsequently energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) performed on sharp defects to determine their elemental composition.
All reused DNMs analyzed (5 of 5) had significant structural defects on SEM analysis including sharp burrs, cavities and indentations, surface debris or residues, and roughening, compared to the new instrument (DNM 3, control) which had no defects. DNM 1 had 2 sharp defects, a larger 14 × 76-µm one and a craterlike 167 × 220-µm defect containing debris. EDS found that DNM 2 had 3 of 4 burrs composed mainly of carbon, the fourth of mixed composition (calcium, sulfur, oxygen); DNM 4 had 1 small burr, EDS significant for carbon; DNM 5 had 3 prominent burrs, the largest of 20 × 28 µm, 2 composed of aluminum, and some carbon residue. DNM 6 had 1 burr composed of aluminum and 3 prominent cavity defects, the largest covering 781 µm2.
Reusable DNMs are widely used in cataract surgery. Sharp carbon- or aluminum-containing burrs were detected on all reused instruments analyzed together with 1 burr of mixed composition, originating from (1) organic residues, (2) instrument fragments, or (3) salt and contaminant deposits. Sharp defects may contribute to capsular damage including PCR, and residues may pose other safety concerns. Therefore, we support development of a quality, reliable single-use alternative instrument and further encourage careful inspection of all reusable instruments principally by finger-tip interrogation for sharp edges preuse.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36103900</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-2011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1946-9936</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9394 |
ispartof | American journal of ophthalmology, 2023-01, Vol.245, p.102-114 |
issn | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714656068 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aluminum Carbon Cataracts Defects Humans Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Morphology Scanning electron microscopy Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission Surgeons Titanium alloys |
title | Electron Microscopy and Elemental Analysis of Defective Drysdale Nucleus Manipulator Instruments Implicated in Surgical Complications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A36%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electron%20Microscopy%20and%20Elemental%20Analysis%20of%20Defective%20Drysdale%20Nucleus%20Manipulator%20Instruments%20Implicated%20in%20Surgical%20Complications&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Kopecny,%20Lloyd%20R.&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=245&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=102-114&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714656068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753654038&rft_id=info:pmid/36103900&rft_els_id=S000293942200352X&rfr_iscdi=true |