Retention of phosphorus in soils receiving bunker silo effluent

The eutrophication of freshwater systems is a pervasive issue in North America and elsewhere, which has been linked to elevated phosphorus (P) loading from watersheds. Most excess P is thought to originate from non-point agricultural sources, and less attention has been given to small rural point so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2022-12, Vol.323, p.116147-116147, Article 116147
Hauptverfasser: Pluer, W.T., Plach, J.M., Hassan, A., Price, D., Macrae, M.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116147
container_issue
container_start_page 116147
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 323
creator Pluer, W.T.
Plach, J.M.
Hassan, A.
Price, D.
Macrae, M.L.
description The eutrophication of freshwater systems is a pervasive issue in North America and elsewhere, which has been linked to elevated phosphorus (P) loading from watersheds. Most excess P is thought to originate from non-point agricultural sources, and less attention has been given to small rural point sources, such as bunker silos on livestock farms. Sophisticated management practices are rarely used to attenuate nutrients from bunker silo effluent, leaving simple vegetated buffer strips or riparian zones to protect surface water; however, the efficacy of these systems or larger constructed treatment systems is unclear. This study compared two systems receiving bunker silo effluent, one a natural riparian system with a vegetated buffer strip that is the most common practice and the other a constructed treatment system with a forebay, slag filter, and swale. The study quantified P retention within various subsections of each system and characterized the forms of stored P to infer the potential for remobilization. Results indicate that soils receiving bunker silo effluent represent considerable stores of legacy P in the landscape (750 and 3400 kg ha−1), the majority of which is stored in labile forms that may be vulnerable to remobilization under the waterlogged conditions that often occur in management practices and riparian zones. Some areas of the systems were able to store considerably more P than others, with the slag filter showing the greatest treatment efficacy. Spatial variability in stored P was apparent, where sections of the systems that directly received effluent retained more P than sections located farther away from bunker silos (indirect inputs). Results indicate that passive treatment systems become P saturated over time, limiting their longterm P removal efficacy. The efficacy of these systems may be improved with the inclusion of sorptive materials as a slag filter within the constructed treatment system significantly increased the life expectancy of that system. Greater understanding of both quantity and forms of P retained in systems and soils receiving bunker silo effluent will help develop management strategies that are more effective and longer-lasting for reducing excess P losses to surface water bodies. •BMPs stored large quantities of P (750–3400 kg ha−1) from bunker silo runoff.•Most P was stored in forms vulnerable to remobilization under common conditions.•Directly impacted soils retained more P but became P saturated, limiting effic
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714655668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479722017200</els_id><sourcerecordid>2714655668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-10d87db4edabddb49adf69a1ce75b3b0933c13aa72dd5b9a6854979894fc75413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMoOI7-BCFLN61J0yTNahDxCwYE0XVIk1dN7SRj0g747-0ws3fxuJt7LryD0DUlJSVU3PZlD2G3MaGsSFWVlApayxO0oETxohGMnKIFYYQWtVTyHF3k3BNCWEXlAq3eYIQw-hhw7PD2K-b50pSxDzhHP2ScwILf-fCJ2yl8Q8LZDxFD1w3TDF6is84MGa6OuUQfjw_v98_F-vXp5f5uXdhKkbGgxDXStTU407o5lXGdUIZakLxlLVGMWcqMkZVzvFVGNLxWUjWq7qzkNWVLdHPY3ab4M0Ee9cZnC8NgAsQp60rSWnAuRDNX-aFqU8w5Qae3yW9M-tWU6L0w3eujML0Xpg_CZm514GD-Y-ch6Ww9BAvOzw5G7aL_Z-EPQHh3hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714655668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention of phosphorus in soils receiving bunker silo effluent</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pluer, W.T. ; Plach, J.M. ; Hassan, A. ; Price, D. ; Macrae, M.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pluer, W.T. ; Plach, J.M. ; Hassan, A. ; Price, D. ; Macrae, M.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The eutrophication of freshwater systems is a pervasive issue in North America and elsewhere, which has been linked to elevated phosphorus (P) loading from watersheds. Most excess P is thought to originate from non-point agricultural sources, and less attention has been given to small rural point sources, such as bunker silos on livestock farms. Sophisticated management practices are rarely used to attenuate nutrients from bunker silo effluent, leaving simple vegetated buffer strips or riparian zones to protect surface water; however, the efficacy of these systems or larger constructed treatment systems is unclear. This study compared two systems receiving bunker silo effluent, one a natural riparian system with a vegetated buffer strip that is the most common practice and the other a constructed treatment system with a forebay, slag filter, and swale. The study quantified P retention within various subsections of each system and characterized the forms of stored P to infer the potential for remobilization. Results indicate that soils receiving bunker silo effluent represent considerable stores of legacy P in the landscape (750 and 3400 kg ha−1), the majority of which is stored in labile forms that may be vulnerable to remobilization under the waterlogged conditions that often occur in management practices and riparian zones. Some areas of the systems were able to store considerably more P than others, with the slag filter showing the greatest treatment efficacy. Spatial variability in stored P was apparent, where sections of the systems that directly received effluent retained more P than sections located farther away from bunker silos (indirect inputs). Results indicate that passive treatment systems become P saturated over time, limiting their longterm P removal efficacy. The efficacy of these systems may be improved with the inclusion of sorptive materials as a slag filter within the constructed treatment system significantly increased the life expectancy of that system. Greater understanding of both quantity and forms of P retained in systems and soils receiving bunker silo effluent will help develop management strategies that are more effective and longer-lasting for reducing excess P losses to surface water bodies. •BMPs stored large quantities of P (750–3400 kg ha−1) from bunker silo runoff.•Most P was stored in forms vulnerable to remobilization under common conditions.•Directly impacted soils retained more P but became P saturated, limiting efficacy.•Slag retained the most total P per mass while still being the least P saturated.•Spatial analyses of retained P concentrations did not indicate distinct flowpaths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>BMP ; Effluent ; Phosphorus ; Retention ; Saturation ; Soil</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-12, Vol.323, p.116147-116147, Article 116147</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-10d87db4edabddb49adf69a1ce75b3b0933c13aa72dd5b9a6854979894fc75413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3606-4201 ; 0000-0003-3296-3103</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722017200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pluer, W.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plach, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrae, M.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Retention of phosphorus in soils receiving bunker silo effluent</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>The eutrophication of freshwater systems is a pervasive issue in North America and elsewhere, which has been linked to elevated phosphorus (P) loading from watersheds. Most excess P is thought to originate from non-point agricultural sources, and less attention has been given to small rural point sources, such as bunker silos on livestock farms. Sophisticated management practices are rarely used to attenuate nutrients from bunker silo effluent, leaving simple vegetated buffer strips or riparian zones to protect surface water; however, the efficacy of these systems or larger constructed treatment systems is unclear. This study compared two systems receiving bunker silo effluent, one a natural riparian system with a vegetated buffer strip that is the most common practice and the other a constructed treatment system with a forebay, slag filter, and swale. The study quantified P retention within various subsections of each system and characterized the forms of stored P to infer the potential for remobilization. Results indicate that soils receiving bunker silo effluent represent considerable stores of legacy P in the landscape (750 and 3400 kg ha−1), the majority of which is stored in labile forms that may be vulnerable to remobilization under the waterlogged conditions that often occur in management practices and riparian zones. Some areas of the systems were able to store considerably more P than others, with the slag filter showing the greatest treatment efficacy. Spatial variability in stored P was apparent, where sections of the systems that directly received effluent retained more P than sections located farther away from bunker silos (indirect inputs). Results indicate that passive treatment systems become P saturated over time, limiting their longterm P removal efficacy. The efficacy of these systems may be improved with the inclusion of sorptive materials as a slag filter within the constructed treatment system significantly increased the life expectancy of that system. Greater understanding of both quantity and forms of P retained in systems and soils receiving bunker silo effluent will help develop management strategies that are more effective and longer-lasting for reducing excess P losses to surface water bodies. •BMPs stored large quantities of P (750–3400 kg ha−1) from bunker silo runoff.•Most P was stored in forms vulnerable to remobilization under common conditions.•Directly impacted soils retained more P but became P saturated, limiting efficacy.•Slag retained the most total P per mass while still being the least P saturated.•Spatial analyses of retained P concentrations did not indicate distinct flowpaths.</description><subject>BMP</subject><subject>Effluent</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMoOI7-BCFLN61J0yTNahDxCwYE0XVIk1dN7SRj0g747-0ws3fxuJt7LryD0DUlJSVU3PZlD2G3MaGsSFWVlApayxO0oETxohGMnKIFYYQWtVTyHF3k3BNCWEXlAq3eYIQw-hhw7PD2K-b50pSxDzhHP2ScwILf-fCJ2yl8Q8LZDxFD1w3TDF6is84MGa6OuUQfjw_v98_F-vXp5f5uXdhKkbGgxDXStTU407o5lXGdUIZakLxlLVGMWcqMkZVzvFVGNLxWUjWq7qzkNWVLdHPY3ab4M0Ee9cZnC8NgAsQp60rSWnAuRDNX-aFqU8w5Qae3yW9M-tWU6L0w3eujML0Xpg_CZm514GD-Y-ch6Ww9BAvOzw5G7aL_Z-EPQHh3hg</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Pluer, W.T.</creator><creator>Plach, J.M.</creator><creator>Hassan, A.</creator><creator>Price, D.</creator><creator>Macrae, M.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-3103</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Retention of phosphorus in soils receiving bunker silo effluent</title><author>Pluer, W.T. ; Plach, J.M. ; Hassan, A. ; Price, D. ; Macrae, M.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-10d87db4edabddb49adf69a1ce75b3b0933c13aa72dd5b9a6854979894fc75413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>BMP</topic><topic>Effluent</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pluer, W.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plach, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrae, M.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pluer, W.T.</au><au>Plach, J.M.</au><au>Hassan, A.</au><au>Price, D.</au><au>Macrae, M.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention of phosphorus in soils receiving bunker silo effluent</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>323</volume><spage>116147</spage><epage>116147</epage><pages>116147-116147</pages><artnum>116147</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>The eutrophication of freshwater systems is a pervasive issue in North America and elsewhere, which has been linked to elevated phosphorus (P) loading from watersheds. Most excess P is thought to originate from non-point agricultural sources, and less attention has been given to small rural point sources, such as bunker silos on livestock farms. Sophisticated management practices are rarely used to attenuate nutrients from bunker silo effluent, leaving simple vegetated buffer strips or riparian zones to protect surface water; however, the efficacy of these systems or larger constructed treatment systems is unclear. This study compared two systems receiving bunker silo effluent, one a natural riparian system with a vegetated buffer strip that is the most common practice and the other a constructed treatment system with a forebay, slag filter, and swale. The study quantified P retention within various subsections of each system and characterized the forms of stored P to infer the potential for remobilization. Results indicate that soils receiving bunker silo effluent represent considerable stores of legacy P in the landscape (750 and 3400 kg ha−1), the majority of which is stored in labile forms that may be vulnerable to remobilization under the waterlogged conditions that often occur in management practices and riparian zones. Some areas of the systems were able to store considerably more P than others, with the slag filter showing the greatest treatment efficacy. Spatial variability in stored P was apparent, where sections of the systems that directly received effluent retained more P than sections located farther away from bunker silos (indirect inputs). Results indicate that passive treatment systems become P saturated over time, limiting their longterm P removal efficacy. The efficacy of these systems may be improved with the inclusion of sorptive materials as a slag filter within the constructed treatment system significantly increased the life expectancy of that system. Greater understanding of both quantity and forms of P retained in systems and soils receiving bunker silo effluent will help develop management strategies that are more effective and longer-lasting for reducing excess P losses to surface water bodies. •BMPs stored large quantities of P (750–3400 kg ha−1) from bunker silo runoff.•Most P was stored in forms vulnerable to remobilization under common conditions.•Directly impacted soils retained more P but became P saturated, limiting efficacy.•Slag retained the most total P per mass while still being the least P saturated.•Spatial analyses of retained P concentrations did not indicate distinct flowpaths.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116147</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-3103</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2022-12, Vol.323, p.116147-116147, Article 116147
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714655668
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects BMP
Effluent
Phosphorus
Retention
Saturation
Soil
title Retention of phosphorus in soils receiving bunker silo effluent
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20of%20phosphorus%20in%20soils%20receiving%20bunker%20silo%20effluent&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Pluer,%20W.T.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=323&rft.spage=116147&rft.epage=116147&rft.pages=116147-116147&rft.artnum=116147&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714655668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714655668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301479722017200&rfr_iscdi=true