Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery
The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have ena...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2023-04, Vol.52 (4), p.476-480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 476 |
container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Hattori, Y. Uda, H. Niu, A. Yoshimura, K. Sugawara, Y. |
description | The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714390615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502722003307</els_id><sourcerecordid>2714390615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobk7_AQ-So5fWL22zpuJFhr9g4EXxGLL0y8xol5mkg_73dm569PTxwfO-8D6EXDJIGbDpzSq1K9emGWRZCiIFxo_ImOVVlQBkcEzGUAFLOGTliJyFsAKAKhflKRnlUwbAMzEmH_ftomtUdL6nQS1tjKqhYdPYSL1qu0BdiOiia_tbGqJXEZc9Nc5TXH-qtcaaetRui0NcmYiehs4vh--cnBjVBLw43Al5f3x4mz0n89enl9n9PNEFQEywNKIwPOcClVHGKKEN41ovQOQKURU5r4QopqJmDEWtdAnDcs2M0XXJyzKfkOt978a7rw5DlK0NGptGrdF1QWYlK_IKpowPaLZHtXcheDRy422rfC8ZyJ1QuZI7oXInVIKQ8BO6OvR3ixbrv8ivwQG42wM4rNxa9DJoizszdjATZe3sf_3fPAqJZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714390615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hattori, Y. ; Uda, H. ; Niu, A. ; Yoshimura, K. ; Sugawara, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Y. ; Uda, H. ; Niu, A. ; Yoshimura, K. ; Sugawara, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36100528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory surgical procedures ; Bone and Bones ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Genioplasty ; Humans ; Mandible - surgery ; One-jaw sugery ; Orthognathic surgery ; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023-04, Vol.52 (4), p.476-480</ispartof><rights>2022 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502722003307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uda, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.</description><subject>Ambulatory surgical procedures</subject><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</subject><subject>Genioplasty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>One-jaw sugery</subject><subject>Orthognathic surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sagittal split ramus osteotomy</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobk7_AQ-So5fWL22zpuJFhr9g4EXxGLL0y8xol5mkg_73dm569PTxwfO-8D6EXDJIGbDpzSq1K9emGWRZCiIFxo_ImOVVlQBkcEzGUAFLOGTliJyFsAKAKhflKRnlUwbAMzEmH_ftomtUdL6nQS1tjKqhYdPYSL1qu0BdiOiia_tbGqJXEZc9Nc5TXH-qtcaaetRui0NcmYiehs4vh--cnBjVBLw43Al5f3x4mz0n89enl9n9PNEFQEywNKIwPOcClVHGKKEN41ovQOQKURU5r4QopqJmDEWtdAnDcs2M0XXJyzKfkOt978a7rw5DlK0NGptGrdF1QWYlK_IKpowPaLZHtXcheDRy422rfC8ZyJ1QuZI7oXInVIKQ8BO6OvR3ixbrv8ivwQG42wM4rNxa9DJoizszdjATZe3sf_3fPAqJZw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Hattori, Y.</creator><creator>Uda, H.</creator><creator>Niu, A.</creator><creator>Yoshimura, K.</creator><creator>Sugawara, Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</title><author>Hattori, Y. ; Uda, H. ; Niu, A. ; Yoshimura, K. ; Sugawara, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory surgical procedures</topic><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</topic><topic>Genioplasty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>One-jaw sugery</topic><topic>Orthognathic surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sagittal split ramus osteotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uda, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hattori, Y.</au><au>Uda, H.</au><au>Niu, A.</au><au>Yoshimura, K.</au><au>Sugawara, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>476-480</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36100528</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023-04, Vol.52 (4), p.476-480 |
issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714390615 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Ambulatory surgical procedures Bone and Bones Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Genioplasty Humans Mandible - surgery One-jaw sugery Orthognathic surgery Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods Retrospective Studies Sagittal split ramus osteotomy |
title | Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambulatory%20sagittal%20split%20ramus%20osteotomy:%20strategy%20for%20enhanced%20recovery%20after%20surgery&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Hattori,%20Y.&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=476-480&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714390615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714390615&rft_id=info:pmid/36100528&rft_els_id=S0901502722003307&rfr_iscdi=true |