Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery

The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have ena...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2023-04, Vol.52 (4), p.476-480
Hauptverfasser: Hattori, Y., Uda, H., Niu, A., Yoshimura, K., Sugawara, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 480
container_issue 4
container_start_page 476
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 52
creator Hattori, Y.
Uda, H.
Niu, A.
Yoshimura, K.
Sugawara, Y.
description The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714390615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502722003307</els_id><sourcerecordid>2714390615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobk7_AQ-So5fWL22zpuJFhr9g4EXxGLL0y8xol5mkg_73dm569PTxwfO-8D6EXDJIGbDpzSq1K9emGWRZCiIFxo_ImOVVlQBkcEzGUAFLOGTliJyFsAKAKhflKRnlUwbAMzEmH_ftomtUdL6nQS1tjKqhYdPYSL1qu0BdiOiia_tbGqJXEZc9Nc5TXH-qtcaaetRui0NcmYiehs4vh--cnBjVBLw43Al5f3x4mz0n89enl9n9PNEFQEywNKIwPOcClVHGKKEN41ovQOQKURU5r4QopqJmDEWtdAnDcs2M0XXJyzKfkOt978a7rw5DlK0NGptGrdF1QWYlK_IKpowPaLZHtXcheDRy422rfC8ZyJ1QuZI7oXInVIKQ8BO6OvR3ixbrv8ivwQG42wM4rNxa9DJoizszdjATZe3sf_3fPAqJZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714390615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hattori, Y. ; Uda, H. ; Niu, A. ; Yoshimura, K. ; Sugawara, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Y. ; Uda, H. ; Niu, A. ; Yoshimura, K. ; Sugawara, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36100528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory surgical procedures ; Bone and Bones ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Genioplasty ; Humans ; Mandible - surgery ; One-jaw sugery ; Orthognathic surgery ; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023-04, Vol.52 (4), p.476-480</ispartof><rights>2022 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502722003307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uda, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.</description><subject>Ambulatory surgical procedures</subject><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</subject><subject>Genioplasty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>One-jaw sugery</subject><subject>Orthognathic surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sagittal split ramus osteotomy</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobk7_AQ-So5fWL22zpuJFhr9g4EXxGLL0y8xol5mkg_73dm569PTxwfO-8D6EXDJIGbDpzSq1K9emGWRZCiIFxo_ImOVVlQBkcEzGUAFLOGTliJyFsAKAKhflKRnlUwbAMzEmH_ftomtUdL6nQS1tjKqhYdPYSL1qu0BdiOiia_tbGqJXEZc9Nc5TXH-qtcaaetRui0NcmYiehs4vh--cnBjVBLw43Al5f3x4mz0n89enl9n9PNEFQEywNKIwPOcClVHGKKEN41ovQOQKURU5r4QopqJmDEWtdAnDcs2M0XXJyzKfkOt978a7rw5DlK0NGptGrdF1QWYlK_IKpowPaLZHtXcheDRy422rfC8ZyJ1QuZI7oXInVIKQ8BO6OvR3ixbrv8ivwQG42wM4rNxa9DJoizszdjATZe3sf_3fPAqJZw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Hattori, Y.</creator><creator>Uda, H.</creator><creator>Niu, A.</creator><creator>Yoshimura, K.</creator><creator>Sugawara, Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</title><author>Hattori, Y. ; Uda, H. ; Niu, A. ; Yoshimura, K. ; Sugawara, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e7f84f5358eafaffa8cf15ccb083aeea435988468d11e8dac70016c1ffcd75773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory surgical procedures</topic><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</topic><topic>Genioplasty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>One-jaw sugery</topic><topic>Orthognathic surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sagittal split ramus osteotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uda, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hattori, Y.</au><au>Uda, H.</au><au>Niu, A.</au><au>Yoshimura, K.</au><au>Sugawara, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>476-480</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) has been performed mainly on an inpatient basis because of the duration of anaesthesia and the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, advances in both surgical and anaesthetic management have enabled the reduction of these risks and shortened the length of hospital stay. Thus, the SSRO may be feasible even in the ambulatory setting in elective cases. The clinical records of all patients who underwent an outpatient SSRO between August 2011 and September 2020 at Lilla Craniofacial Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Data on age, sex, duration of surgery, operative procedures, intraoperative bleeding, and admission status were investigated. In total, 143 patients underwent a bilateral SSRO. The SSRO was performed as an isolated procedure in 73 patients and concomitantly with other surgical procedures in the remaining 70 patients. Overall, 142 of the 143 patients were discharged on the day of surgery (99.3%); only one (0.7%) required an overnight stay because of a submental haemorrhage after genioplasty. No emergency hospitalizations or readmissions occurred after discharge. Multimodal perioperative management, both surgical and anaesthetic, facilitated enhanced patient recovery after surgery, and SSRO was performed successfully and safely as an ambulatory procedure.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36100528</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023-04, Vol.52 (4), p.476-480
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714390615
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Ambulatory surgical procedures
Bone and Bones
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Genioplasty
Humans
Mandible - surgery
One-jaw sugery
Orthognathic surgery
Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods
Retrospective Studies
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy
title Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambulatory%20sagittal%20split%20ramus%20osteotomy:%20strategy%20for%20enhanced%20recovery%20after%20surgery&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Hattori,%20Y.&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=476-480&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714390615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714390615&rft_id=info:pmid/36100528&rft_els_id=S0901502722003307&rfr_iscdi=true