Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model
BACKGROUNDTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions. METHODSPharmacodynamic studies...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2022-10, Vol.77 (11), p.3187-3193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3187 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Lasko, Maxwell J Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L Nicolau, David P Kuti, Joseph L |
description | BACKGROUNDTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions. METHODSPharmacodynamic studies were conducted using the in vitro chemostat model over 24 h against three trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-susceptible S. maltophilia isolates with MICs from 0.25/4.75 to 2/38 mg/L. The primary endpoint was the change in cfu at 24 h relative to baseline. The log ratio of the area under the cfu curve (LR AUcfu) was a secondary endpoint. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole exposures required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reduction were determined. RESULTSTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exposures achieved stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions in 9/16 (56%) and 2/16 (13%) of experiments. Both the fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC were identified as equivalent pharmacodynamic drivers, with stasis achieved at an fAUC/MIC of 67.4 and 30.0 for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Clinically meaningful exposures required to achieve 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions were not quantifiable. The LR AUcfu analysis supported the lack of overall bacterial burden reduction against S. maltophilia. CONCLUSIONSIn this in vitro chemostat model, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, even at higher doses, achieved limited activity against susceptible S. maltophilia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/dkac304 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714389525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2714389525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-6d0972f6eb695bc13455f00fb245e554b4ab13354f729d9a52a5050bfbef78293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtKAzEYRoMoWKsrXyBLQcbmPs1SijcouLCuh38yiZM6mdRJKtand2q7Onxw-BYHoWtK7ijRfLYGM2s-wXAiTtCECkUKRjQ9RRPCiSxKIfk5ukhpTQhRUs0nKK0GH2xu42bkLG07B__zB35jZ_GmhSGAic2uh-BNwvABvk8Zv2XbxzzETRtD7CHhAF0el-88YN_j3No9vv3oYNPaEFOGjENsbHeJzhx0yV4dOUXvjw-rxXOxfH16WdwvC8OUyoVqiC6ZU7ZWWtaGciGlI8TVTEgrpagF1JRzKVzJdKNBMpBEktrV1pVzpvkU3Rx-N0P82tqUq-CTsV0HvY3bVLGSCj7XkslRvT2oZogpDdZV-x4w7CpKqn3aakxbHdPyP2wvcQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714389525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lasko, Maxwell J ; Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L ; Nicolau, David P ; Kuti, Joseph L</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasko, Maxwell J ; Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L ; Nicolau, David P ; Kuti, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions. METHODSPharmacodynamic studies were conducted using the in vitro chemostat model over 24 h against three trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-susceptible S. maltophilia isolates with MICs from 0.25/4.75 to 2/38 mg/L. The primary endpoint was the change in cfu at 24 h relative to baseline. The log ratio of the area under the cfu curve (LR AUcfu) was a secondary endpoint. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole exposures required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reduction were determined. RESULTSTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exposures achieved stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions in 9/16 (56%) and 2/16 (13%) of experiments. Both the fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC were identified as equivalent pharmacodynamic drivers, with stasis achieved at an fAUC/MIC of 67.4 and 30.0 for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Clinically meaningful exposures required to achieve 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions were not quantifiable. The LR AUcfu analysis supported the lack of overall bacterial burden reduction against S. maltophilia. CONCLUSIONSIn this in vitro chemostat model, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, even at higher doses, achieved limited activity against susceptible S. maltophilia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac304</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022-10, Vol.77 (11), p.3187-3193</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-6d0972f6eb695bc13455f00fb245e554b4ab13354f729d9a52a5050bfbef78293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-6d0972f6eb695bc13455f00fb245e554b4ab13354f729d9a52a5050bfbef78293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6036-3263</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasko, Maxwell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolau, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuti, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><title>Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><description>BACKGROUNDTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions. METHODSPharmacodynamic studies were conducted using the in vitro chemostat model over 24 h against three trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-susceptible S. maltophilia isolates with MICs from 0.25/4.75 to 2/38 mg/L. The primary endpoint was the change in cfu at 24 h relative to baseline. The log ratio of the area under the cfu curve (LR AUcfu) was a secondary endpoint. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole exposures required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reduction were determined. RESULTSTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exposures achieved stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions in 9/16 (56%) and 2/16 (13%) of experiments. Both the fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC were identified as equivalent pharmacodynamic drivers, with stasis achieved at an fAUC/MIC of 67.4 and 30.0 for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Clinically meaningful exposures required to achieve 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions were not quantifiable. The LR AUcfu analysis supported the lack of overall bacterial burden reduction against S. maltophilia. CONCLUSIONSIn this in vitro chemostat model, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, even at higher doses, achieved limited activity against susceptible S. maltophilia.</description><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtKAzEYRoMoWKsrXyBLQcbmPs1SijcouLCuh38yiZM6mdRJKtand2q7Onxw-BYHoWtK7ijRfLYGM2s-wXAiTtCECkUKRjQ9RRPCiSxKIfk5ukhpTQhRUs0nKK0GH2xu42bkLG07B__zB35jZ_GmhSGAic2uh-BNwvABvk8Zv2XbxzzETRtD7CHhAF0el-88YN_j3No9vv3oYNPaEFOGjENsbHeJzhx0yV4dOUXvjw-rxXOxfH16WdwvC8OUyoVqiC6ZU7ZWWtaGciGlI8TVTEgrpagF1JRzKVzJdKNBMpBEktrV1pVzpvkU3Rx-N0P82tqUq-CTsV0HvY3bVLGSCj7XkslRvT2oZogpDdZV-x4w7CpKqn3aakxbHdPyP2wvcQs</recordid><startdate>20221028</startdate><enddate>20221028</enddate><creator>Lasko, Maxwell J</creator><creator>Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Nicolau, David P</creator><creator>Kuti, Joseph L</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-3263</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221028</creationdate><title>Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model</title><author>Lasko, Maxwell J ; Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L ; Nicolau, David P ; Kuti, Joseph L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-6d0972f6eb695bc13455f00fb245e554b4ab13354f729d9a52a5050bfbef78293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasko, Maxwell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolau, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuti, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasko, Maxwell J</au><au>Tabor-Rennie, Jennifer L</au><au>Nicolau, David P</au><au>Kuti, Joseph L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><date>2022-10-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3187</spage><epage>3193</epage><pages>3187-3193</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions. METHODSPharmacodynamic studies were conducted using the in vitro chemostat model over 24 h against three trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-susceptible S. maltophilia isolates with MICs from 0.25/4.75 to 2/38 mg/L. The primary endpoint was the change in cfu at 24 h relative to baseline. The log ratio of the area under the cfu curve (LR AUcfu) was a secondary endpoint. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole exposures required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reduction were determined. RESULTSTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exposures achieved stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions in 9/16 (56%) and 2/16 (13%) of experiments. Both the fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC were identified as equivalent pharmacodynamic drivers, with stasis achieved at an fAUC/MIC of 67.4 and 30.0 for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Clinically meaningful exposures required to achieve 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions were not quantifiable. The LR AUcfu analysis supported the lack of overall bacterial burden reduction against S. maltophilia. CONCLUSIONSIn this in vitro chemostat model, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, even at higher doses, achieved limited activity against susceptible S. maltophilia.</abstract><doi>10.1093/jac/dkac304</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-3263</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022-10, Vol.77 (11), p.3187-3193 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714389525 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
title | Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A08%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole%20pharmacodynamics%20against%20Stenotrophomonas%20maltophilia%20in%20the%20in%20vitro%20chemostat%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Lasko,%20Maxwell%20J&rft.date=2022-10-28&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3187&rft.epage=3193&rft.pages=3187-3193&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkac304&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714389525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714389525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |