Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure: A multicenter study
The COVID-19 pandemic presents a high mortality rate amongst patients who develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in COVID–19-related ARDS and identify the patients w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JTCVS open 2022-12, Vol.12, p.211-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | JTCVS open |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Vigneshwar, Navin G. Masood, Muhammad F. Vasic, Ivana Krause, Martin Bartels, Karsten Lucas, Mark T. Bronsert, Michael Selzman, Craig H. Thompson, Shaun Rove, Jessica Y. Reece, Thomas B. Cleveland, Joseph C. Pal, Jay D. Fullerton, David A. Aftab, Muhammad |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic presents a high mortality rate amongst patients who develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in COVID–19-related ARDS and identify the patients who benefit the most from this procedure.
Adult patients with COVID-19 and severe ARDS requiring VV-ECMO support at 4 academic institutions between March and October 2020 were included. Data were collected through retrospective chart reviews. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality.
Fifty-one consecutive patients underwent VV-ECMO with a mean age of 50.4 years; 64.7% were men. Survival to hospital discharge was 62.8%. Median intensive care unit and hospitalization duration were 27.4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17-37 days) and 34.5 days (IQR, 23-43 days), respectively. Survivors and nonsurvivors had a median ECMO cannulation time of 11 days (IQR, 8-18) and 17 days (IQR, 12-25 days). The average postdecannulation length of stay was 17.5 days (IQR, 12.4-25 days) for survivors and 0 days for nonsurvivors (IQR, 0-6 days). Only 1 nonsurvivor was able to be decannulated. Clinical characteristics associated with mortality between nonsurviors and survivors included increasing age (P = .0048), hemorrhagic stroke (P = .0014), and postoperative dialysis (P = .0013) were associated with mortality in a bivariate model and retained statistical significance in a multivariable model.
This multicenter study confirms the effectiveness of VV-ECMO in selected critically ill patients with COVID–19-related severe ARDS. The survival of these patients is comparable to non-COVID–19-related ARDS.
[Display omitted]
The outcomes of patients with COVID-19 undergoing VV-ECMO are favorable, and survival is comparable to patients without COVID-19 with ARDS. Clinical markers associated with mortality may help guide patient selection for VV-ECMO cannulation and prognostication. [Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.08.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714065026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2666273622003448</els_id><sourcerecordid>2714065026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d6382c7a592aae8baa2dc1a89181b9c9771173f08d77940dc9bf6233625860673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u3CAURlHVqImSvEAXFctu7FxgDHbVTTT9SaRI2STZIoyvW0a2cQEn47cvo0mrrrpAoMu5n_QdQt4zKBkwebUr9zs_lRw4L6EuAdQbcsallAVXQr79531KLmPcAQCvmKiq-h05FRIaJUV1RtYnnPxzPkukuE_BWB9mH9AMdMSxDWZC6vfrD5xMcn6icZnzd6JuonOe4JQifXHpJ93eP91-KVhDA8bZBZN8WGlv3LAE_ESv6bgMydnMY6AxLd16QU56M0S8fL3PyeO3rw_bm-Lu_vvt9vqusBuAVHRS1NwqUzXcGKxbY3hnmakbVrO2sY1SjCnRQ90p1Wygs03bSy6E5FUtQSpxTj4ec-fgfy0Ykx5dtDgMuVpurbliG5AVcJlRfkRt8DEG7PUc3GjCqhnog3W90wfr-mBdQ62z9bz04TV_aUfs_q78cZyBz0cAc8tnh0FHm8VZ7FxAm3Tn3f_yfwP2cJUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714065026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure: A multicenter study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vigneshwar, Navin G. ; Masood, Muhammad F. ; Vasic, Ivana ; Krause, Martin ; Bartels, Karsten ; Lucas, Mark T. ; Bronsert, Michael ; Selzman, Craig H. ; Thompson, Shaun ; Rove, Jessica Y. ; Reece, Thomas B. ; Cleveland, Joseph C. ; Pal, Jay D. ; Fullerton, David A. ; Aftab, Muhammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Vigneshwar, Navin G. ; Masood, Muhammad F. ; Vasic, Ivana ; Krause, Martin ; Bartels, Karsten ; Lucas, Mark T. ; Bronsert, Michael ; Selzman, Craig H. ; Thompson, Shaun ; Rove, Jessica Y. ; Reece, Thomas B. ; Cleveland, Joseph C. ; Pal, Jay D. ; Fullerton, David A. ; Aftab, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic presents a high mortality rate amongst patients who develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in COVID–19-related ARDS and identify the patients who benefit the most from this procedure.
Adult patients with COVID-19 and severe ARDS requiring VV-ECMO support at 4 academic institutions between March and October 2020 were included. Data were collected through retrospective chart reviews. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality.
Fifty-one consecutive patients underwent VV-ECMO with a mean age of 50.4 years; 64.7% were men. Survival to hospital discharge was 62.8%. Median intensive care unit and hospitalization duration were 27.4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17-37 days) and 34.5 days (IQR, 23-43 days), respectively. Survivors and nonsurvivors had a median ECMO cannulation time of 11 days (IQR, 8-18) and 17 days (IQR, 12-25 days). The average postdecannulation length of stay was 17.5 days (IQR, 12.4-25 days) for survivors and 0 days for nonsurvivors (IQR, 0-6 days). Only 1 nonsurvivor was able to be decannulated. Clinical characteristics associated with mortality between nonsurviors and survivors included increasing age (P = .0048), hemorrhagic stroke (P = .0014), and postoperative dialysis (P = .0013) were associated with mortality in a bivariate model and retained statistical significance in a multivariable model.
This multicenter study confirms the effectiveness of VV-ECMO in selected critically ill patients with COVID–19-related severe ARDS. The survival of these patients is comparable to non-COVID–19-related ARDS.
[Display omitted]
The outcomes of patients with COVID-19 undergoing VV-ECMO are favorable, and survival is comparable to patients without COVID-19 with ARDS. Clinical markers associated with mortality may help guide patient selection for VV-ECMO cannulation and prognostication. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-2736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-2736</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.08.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36097635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>COVID-19 infection ; mechanical support ; respiratory failure ; severe ARDS ; VV-ECMO</subject><ispartof>JTCVS open, 2022-12, Vol.12, p.211-220</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d6382c7a592aae8baa2dc1a89181b9c9771173f08d77940dc9bf6233625860673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d6382c7a592aae8baa2dc1a89181b9c9771173f08d77940dc9bf6233625860673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9210-9940</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vigneshwar, Navin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masood, Muhammad F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronsert, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selzman, Craig H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rove, Jessica Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Joseph C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Jay D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aftab, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><title>Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure: A multicenter study</title><title>JTCVS open</title><addtitle>JTCVS Open</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic presents a high mortality rate amongst patients who develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in COVID–19-related ARDS and identify the patients who benefit the most from this procedure.
Adult patients with COVID-19 and severe ARDS requiring VV-ECMO support at 4 academic institutions between March and October 2020 were included. Data were collected through retrospective chart reviews. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality.
Fifty-one consecutive patients underwent VV-ECMO with a mean age of 50.4 years; 64.7% were men. Survival to hospital discharge was 62.8%. Median intensive care unit and hospitalization duration were 27.4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17-37 days) and 34.5 days (IQR, 23-43 days), respectively. Survivors and nonsurvivors had a median ECMO cannulation time of 11 days (IQR, 8-18) and 17 days (IQR, 12-25 days). The average postdecannulation length of stay was 17.5 days (IQR, 12.4-25 days) for survivors and 0 days for nonsurvivors (IQR, 0-6 days). Only 1 nonsurvivor was able to be decannulated. Clinical characteristics associated with mortality between nonsurviors and survivors included increasing age (P = .0048), hemorrhagic stroke (P = .0014), and postoperative dialysis (P = .0013) were associated with mortality in a bivariate model and retained statistical significance in a multivariable model.
This multicenter study confirms the effectiveness of VV-ECMO in selected critically ill patients with COVID–19-related severe ARDS. The survival of these patients is comparable to non-COVID–19-related ARDS.
[Display omitted]
The outcomes of patients with COVID-19 undergoing VV-ECMO are favorable, and survival is comparable to patients without COVID-19 with ARDS. Clinical markers associated with mortality may help guide patient selection for VV-ECMO cannulation and prognostication. [Display omitted]</description><subject>COVID-19 infection</subject><subject>mechanical support</subject><subject>respiratory failure</subject><subject>severe ARDS</subject><subject>VV-ECMO</subject><issn>2666-2736</issn><issn>2666-2736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u3CAURlHVqImSvEAXFctu7FxgDHbVTTT9SaRI2STZIoyvW0a2cQEn47cvo0mrrrpAoMu5n_QdQt4zKBkwebUr9zs_lRw4L6EuAdQbcsallAVXQr79531KLmPcAQCvmKiq-h05FRIaJUV1RtYnnPxzPkukuE_BWB9mH9AMdMSxDWZC6vfrD5xMcn6icZnzd6JuonOe4JQifXHpJ93eP91-KVhDA8bZBZN8WGlv3LAE_ESv6bgMydnMY6AxLd16QU56M0S8fL3PyeO3rw_bm-Lu_vvt9vqusBuAVHRS1NwqUzXcGKxbY3hnmakbVrO2sY1SjCnRQ90p1Wygs03bSy6E5FUtQSpxTj4ec-fgfy0Ykx5dtDgMuVpurbliG5AVcJlRfkRt8DEG7PUc3GjCqhnog3W90wfr-mBdQ62z9bz04TV_aUfs_q78cZyBz0cAc8tnh0FHm8VZ7FxAm3Tn3f_yfwP2cJUE</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Vigneshwar, Navin G.</creator><creator>Masood, Muhammad F.</creator><creator>Vasic, Ivana</creator><creator>Krause, Martin</creator><creator>Bartels, Karsten</creator><creator>Lucas, Mark T.</creator><creator>Bronsert, Michael</creator><creator>Selzman, Craig H.</creator><creator>Thompson, Shaun</creator><creator>Rove, Jessica Y.</creator><creator>Reece, Thomas B.</creator><creator>Cleveland, Joseph C.</creator><creator>Pal, Jay D.</creator><creator>Fullerton, David A.</creator><creator>Aftab, Muhammad</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-9940</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure: A multicenter study</title><author>Vigneshwar, Navin G. ; Masood, Muhammad F. ; Vasic, Ivana ; Krause, Martin ; Bartels, Karsten ; Lucas, Mark T. ; Bronsert, Michael ; Selzman, Craig H. ; Thompson, Shaun ; Rove, Jessica Y. ; Reece, Thomas B. ; Cleveland, Joseph C. ; Pal, Jay D. ; Fullerton, David A. ; Aftab, Muhammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d6382c7a592aae8baa2dc1a89181b9c9771173f08d77940dc9bf6233625860673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 infection</topic><topic>mechanical support</topic><topic>respiratory failure</topic><topic>severe ARDS</topic><topic>VV-ECMO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vigneshwar, Navin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masood, Muhammad F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronsert, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selzman, Craig H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rove, Jessica Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Joseph C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Jay D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aftab, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JTCVS open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vigneshwar, Navin G.</au><au>Masood, Muhammad F.</au><au>Vasic, Ivana</au><au>Krause, Martin</au><au>Bartels, Karsten</au><au>Lucas, Mark T.</au><au>Bronsert, Michael</au><au>Selzman, Craig H.</au><au>Thompson, Shaun</au><au>Rove, Jessica Y.</au><au>Reece, Thomas B.</au><au>Cleveland, Joseph C.</au><au>Pal, Jay D.</au><au>Fullerton, David A.</au><au>Aftab, Muhammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure: A multicenter study</atitle><jtitle>JTCVS open</jtitle><addtitle>JTCVS Open</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>211</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>211-220</pages><issn>2666-2736</issn><eissn>2666-2736</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic presents a high mortality rate amongst patients who develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in COVID–19-related ARDS and identify the patients who benefit the most from this procedure.
Adult patients with COVID-19 and severe ARDS requiring VV-ECMO support at 4 academic institutions between March and October 2020 were included. Data were collected through retrospective chart reviews. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality.
Fifty-one consecutive patients underwent VV-ECMO with a mean age of 50.4 years; 64.7% were men. Survival to hospital discharge was 62.8%. Median intensive care unit and hospitalization duration were 27.4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17-37 days) and 34.5 days (IQR, 23-43 days), respectively. Survivors and nonsurvivors had a median ECMO cannulation time of 11 days (IQR, 8-18) and 17 days (IQR, 12-25 days). The average postdecannulation length of stay was 17.5 days (IQR, 12.4-25 days) for survivors and 0 days for nonsurvivors (IQR, 0-6 days). Only 1 nonsurvivor was able to be decannulated. Clinical characteristics associated with mortality between nonsurviors and survivors included increasing age (P = .0048), hemorrhagic stroke (P = .0014), and postoperative dialysis (P = .0013) were associated with mortality in a bivariate model and retained statistical significance in a multivariable model.
This multicenter study confirms the effectiveness of VV-ECMO in selected critically ill patients with COVID–19-related severe ARDS. The survival of these patients is comparable to non-COVID–19-related ARDS.
[Display omitted]
The outcomes of patients with COVID-19 undergoing VV-ECMO are favorable, and survival is comparable to patients without COVID-19 with ARDS. Clinical markers associated with mortality may help guide patient selection for VV-ECMO cannulation and prognostication. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36097635</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.xjon.2022.08.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-9940</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2666-2736 |
ispartof | JTCVS open, 2022-12, Vol.12, p.211-220 |
issn | 2666-2736 2666-2736 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2714065026 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 infection mechanical support respiratory failure severe ARDS VV-ECMO |
title | Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure: A multicenter study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A27%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Venovenous%20extracorporeal%20membrane%20oxygenation%20support%20in%20patients%20with%20COVID-19%20respiratory%20failure:%20A%20multicenter%20study&rft.jtitle=JTCVS%20open&rft.au=Vigneshwar,%20Navin%20G.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=211-220&rft.issn=2666-2736&rft.eissn=2666-2736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.08.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714065026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714065026&rft_id=info:pmid/36097635&rft_els_id=S2666273622003448&rfr_iscdi=true |