Motion resilience of the balanced steady‐state free precession geometric solution

Purpose Many MRI sequences are sensitive to motion and its associated artifacts. The linearized geometric solution (LGS), a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) off‐resonance signal demodulation technique, is evaluated with respect to motion artifact resilience. Theory and Methods The mecha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2023-01, Vol.89 (1), p.192-204
Hauptverfasser: Hoff, Michael N., Xiang, Qing‐San, Cross, Nathan M., Hippe, Daniel, Andre, Jalal B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 204
container_issue 1
container_start_page 192
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 89
creator Hoff, Michael N.
Xiang, Qing‐San
Cross, Nathan M.
Hippe, Daniel
Andre, Jalal B.
description Purpose Many MRI sequences are sensitive to motion and its associated artifacts. The linearized geometric solution (LGS), a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) off‐resonance signal demodulation technique, is evaluated with respect to motion artifact resilience. Theory and Methods The mechanism and extent of LGS motion artifact resilience is examined in simulated, flow phantom, and in vivo clinical imaging. Motion artifact correction capabilities are decoupled from susceptibility artifact correction when feasible to permit controlled analysis of motion artifact correction when comparing the LGS with standard and phase‐cycle‐averaged (complex sum) bSSFP imaging. Results Simulations reveal that the LGS demonstrates motion artifact reduction capabilities similar to standard clinical bSSFP imaging techniques, with slightly greater resilience in high SNR regions and for shorter‐duration motion. Flow phantom experiments assert that the LGS reduces shorter‐duration motion artifact error by ∼24%–65% relative to the complex sum, whereas reconstructions exhibit similar error reduction for constant motion. In vivo analysis demonstrates that in the internal auditory canal/orbits, the LGS was deemed to have less artifact in 24%/49% and similar artifact in 76%/51% of radiological assessments relative to the complex sum, and the LGS had less artifact in 97%/81% and similar artifact in 3%/16% of assessments relative to standard bSSFP. Only 2 of 63 assessments deemed the LGS inferior to either complex sum or standard bSSFP in terms of artifact reduction. Conclusion The LGS provides sufficient bSSFP motion artifact resilience to permit robust elimination of susceptibility artifacts, inspiring its use in a wide variety of applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.29438
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2713305370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2713305370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-57e7f16cf75fd901129ee1018e7d7e2c4ed5b93a694821ae2c57294d5a43daf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yDgRhfT5reZLKX4By2CP-uQZm50ykxTkynSnY_gM_okpo4rwdXlXr5zOPcgdErJiBLCxm1sR0wLXu6hAZWMFUxqsY8GRAlScKrFITpKaUkI0VqJAXqch64OKxwh1U0NKwc4eNy9Al7Yxua1wqkDW22_Pj5TZzvAPgLgdQQHKe2ULxBa6GLtcArNZmd2jA68bRKc_M4her6-epreFrP7m7vp5axwnMmykAqUpxPnlfSVJpQyDUAJLUFVCpgTUMmF5naiRcmozRep8muVtIJX1nM-ROe97zqGtw2kzrR1ctDk3BA2yTBFOSeSK5LRsz_oMmziKqfLFNOT3IXWmbroKRdDShG8Wce6tXFrKDG7ek2u1_zUm9lxz77XDWz_B838Yd4rvgHcQH0v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729697499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motion resilience of the balanced steady‐state free precession geometric solution</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hoff, Michael N. ; Xiang, Qing‐San ; Cross, Nathan M. ; Hippe, Daniel ; Andre, Jalal B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Michael N. ; Xiang, Qing‐San ; Cross, Nathan M. ; Hippe, Daniel ; Andre, Jalal B.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Many MRI sequences are sensitive to motion and its associated artifacts. The linearized geometric solution (LGS), a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) off‐resonance signal demodulation technique, is evaluated with respect to motion artifact resilience. Theory and Methods The mechanism and extent of LGS motion artifact resilience is examined in simulated, flow phantom, and in vivo clinical imaging. Motion artifact correction capabilities are decoupled from susceptibility artifact correction when feasible to permit controlled analysis of motion artifact correction when comparing the LGS with standard and phase‐cycle‐averaged (complex sum) bSSFP imaging. Results Simulations reveal that the LGS demonstrates motion artifact reduction capabilities similar to standard clinical bSSFP imaging techniques, with slightly greater resilience in high SNR regions and for shorter‐duration motion. Flow phantom experiments assert that the LGS reduces shorter‐duration motion artifact error by ∼24%–65% relative to the complex sum, whereas reconstructions exhibit similar error reduction for constant motion. In vivo analysis demonstrates that in the internal auditory canal/orbits, the LGS was deemed to have less artifact in 24%/49% and similar artifact in 76%/51% of radiological assessments relative to the complex sum, and the LGS had less artifact in 97%/81% and similar artifact in 3%/16% of assessments relative to standard bSSFP. Only 2 of 63 assessments deemed the LGS inferior to either complex sum or standard bSSFP in terms of artifact reduction. Conclusion The LGS provides sufficient bSSFP motion artifact resilience to permit robust elimination of susceptibility artifacts, inspiring its use in a wide variety of applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Assessments ; banding artifact ; bSSFP imaging ; Demodulation ; Ear ; Ear canal ; Error reduction ; Imaging techniques ; linearized geometric solution ; motion artifact ; phase cycling ; Precession ; Resilience</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023-01, Vol.89 (1), p.192-204</ispartof><rights>2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-57e7f16cf75fd901129ee1018e7d7e2c4ed5b93a694821ae2c57294d5a43daf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3498-0591</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.29438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.29438$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Michael N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Qing‐San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Nathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hippe, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andre, Jalal B.</creatorcontrib><title>Motion resilience of the balanced steady‐state free precession geometric solution</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><description>Purpose Many MRI sequences are sensitive to motion and its associated artifacts. The linearized geometric solution (LGS), a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) off‐resonance signal demodulation technique, is evaluated with respect to motion artifact resilience. Theory and Methods The mechanism and extent of LGS motion artifact resilience is examined in simulated, flow phantom, and in vivo clinical imaging. Motion artifact correction capabilities are decoupled from susceptibility artifact correction when feasible to permit controlled analysis of motion artifact correction when comparing the LGS with standard and phase‐cycle‐averaged (complex sum) bSSFP imaging. Results Simulations reveal that the LGS demonstrates motion artifact reduction capabilities similar to standard clinical bSSFP imaging techniques, with slightly greater resilience in high SNR regions and for shorter‐duration motion. Flow phantom experiments assert that the LGS reduces shorter‐duration motion artifact error by ∼24%–65% relative to the complex sum, whereas reconstructions exhibit similar error reduction for constant motion. In vivo analysis demonstrates that in the internal auditory canal/orbits, the LGS was deemed to have less artifact in 24%/49% and similar artifact in 76%/51% of radiological assessments relative to the complex sum, and the LGS had less artifact in 97%/81% and similar artifact in 3%/16% of assessments relative to standard bSSFP. Only 2 of 63 assessments deemed the LGS inferior to either complex sum or standard bSSFP in terms of artifact reduction. Conclusion The LGS provides sufficient bSSFP motion artifact resilience to permit robust elimination of susceptibility artifacts, inspiring its use in a wide variety of applications.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>banding artifact</subject><subject>bSSFP imaging</subject><subject>Demodulation</subject><subject>Ear</subject><subject>Ear canal</subject><subject>Error reduction</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>linearized geometric solution</subject><subject>motion artifact</subject><subject>phase cycling</subject><subject>Precession</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yDgRhfT5reZLKX4By2CP-uQZm50ykxTkynSnY_gM_okpo4rwdXlXr5zOPcgdErJiBLCxm1sR0wLXu6hAZWMFUxqsY8GRAlScKrFITpKaUkI0VqJAXqch64OKxwh1U0NKwc4eNy9Al7Yxua1wqkDW22_Pj5TZzvAPgLgdQQHKe2ULxBa6GLtcArNZmd2jA68bRKc_M4her6-epreFrP7m7vp5axwnMmykAqUpxPnlfSVJpQyDUAJLUFVCpgTUMmF5naiRcmozRep8muVtIJX1nM-ROe97zqGtw2kzrR1ctDk3BA2yTBFOSeSK5LRsz_oMmziKqfLFNOT3IXWmbroKRdDShG8Wce6tXFrKDG7ek2u1_zUm9lxz77XDWz_B838Yd4rvgHcQH0v</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Hoff, Michael N.</creator><creator>Xiang, Qing‐San</creator><creator>Cross, Nathan M.</creator><creator>Hippe, Daniel</creator><creator>Andre, Jalal B.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-0591</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Motion resilience of the balanced steady‐state free precession geometric solution</title><author>Hoff, Michael N. ; Xiang, Qing‐San ; Cross, Nathan M. ; Hippe, Daniel ; Andre, Jalal B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-57e7f16cf75fd901129ee1018e7d7e2c4ed5b93a694821ae2c57294d5a43daf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>banding artifact</topic><topic>bSSFP imaging</topic><topic>Demodulation</topic><topic>Ear</topic><topic>Ear canal</topic><topic>Error reduction</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>linearized geometric solution</topic><topic>motion artifact</topic><topic>phase cycling</topic><topic>Precession</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Michael N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Qing‐San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Nathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hippe, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andre, Jalal B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoff, Michael N.</au><au>Xiang, Qing‐San</au><au>Cross, Nathan M.</au><au>Hippe, Daniel</au><au>Andre, Jalal B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motion resilience of the balanced steady‐state free precession geometric solution</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>192-204</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Purpose Many MRI sequences are sensitive to motion and its associated artifacts. The linearized geometric solution (LGS), a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) off‐resonance signal demodulation technique, is evaluated with respect to motion artifact resilience. Theory and Methods The mechanism and extent of LGS motion artifact resilience is examined in simulated, flow phantom, and in vivo clinical imaging. Motion artifact correction capabilities are decoupled from susceptibility artifact correction when feasible to permit controlled analysis of motion artifact correction when comparing the LGS with standard and phase‐cycle‐averaged (complex sum) bSSFP imaging. Results Simulations reveal that the LGS demonstrates motion artifact reduction capabilities similar to standard clinical bSSFP imaging techniques, with slightly greater resilience in high SNR regions and for shorter‐duration motion. Flow phantom experiments assert that the LGS reduces shorter‐duration motion artifact error by ∼24%–65% relative to the complex sum, whereas reconstructions exhibit similar error reduction for constant motion. In vivo analysis demonstrates that in the internal auditory canal/orbits, the LGS was deemed to have less artifact in 24%/49% and similar artifact in 76%/51% of radiological assessments relative to the complex sum, and the LGS had less artifact in 97%/81% and similar artifact in 3%/16% of assessments relative to standard bSSFP. Only 2 of 63 assessments deemed the LGS inferior to either complex sum or standard bSSFP in terms of artifact reduction. Conclusion The LGS provides sufficient bSSFP motion artifact resilience to permit robust elimination of susceptibility artifacts, inspiring its use in a wide variety of applications.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/mrm.29438</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-0591</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023-01, Vol.89 (1), p.192-204
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2713305370
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Assessments
banding artifact
bSSFP imaging
Demodulation
Ear
Ear canal
Error reduction
Imaging techniques
linearized geometric solution
motion artifact
phase cycling
Precession
Resilience
title Motion resilience of the balanced steady‐state free precession geometric solution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T17%3A51%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motion%20resilience%20of%20the%20balanced%20steady%E2%80%90state%20free%20precession%20geometric%20solution&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Hoff,%20Michael%20N.&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=192-204&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.29438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2713305370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729697499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true