Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self‐control
Self‐control is of vital importance for human wellbeing. Hare et al. (2009) were among the first to provide empirical evidence on the neural correlates of self‐control. This seminal study profoundly impacted theory and empirical work across multiple fields. To solidify the empirical evidence support...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human brain mapping 2022-11, Vol.43 (16), p.4995-5016 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5016 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 4995 |
container_title | Human brain mapping |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Scholz, Christin Chan, Hang‐Yee Poldrack, Russell A. Ridder, Denise T. D. Smidts, Ale Laan, Laura Nynke |
description | Self‐control is of vital importance for human wellbeing. Hare et al. (2009) were among the first to provide empirical evidence on the neural correlates of self‐control. This seminal study profoundly impacted theory and empirical work across multiple fields. To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of this work. Further, we tested the robustness of the findings across analytic strategies. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while rating 50 food items on healthiness and tastiness and making choices about food consumption. We closely replicated the original analysis pipeline and supplemented it with additional exploratory analyses to follow‐up on unexpected findings and to test the sensitivity of results to key analytical choices. Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which integrates relevant choice attributes to inform a final decision. We found that vmPFC activity was correlated with goal values regardless of the amount of self‐control and it correlated with both taste and health in self‐controllers but only taste in non‐self‐controllers. We did not find strong support for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in self‐control. The absence of statistically significant group differences in dlPFC activity during successful self‐control in our sample contrasts with the notion that dlPFC involvement is required in order to effectively integrate longer‐term goals into subjective value judgments. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.
To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of the seminal study of Hare et al. (2009). Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex but no strong support was found for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in self‐control. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hbm.26065 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2712855688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2726143301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d3eedeb5738f22e4bb585c543b15b7da2959b28255b2ce5660f94c9415c81c263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTawSOtL7DgrVI5ailTEBtaRL5MTV04c7ITq7FCfoM_YJ6nLKSyQWM0vzadvRvoRek3JMSWEnQxmPGaSSPEEHVLSNhWhLX_6kKWo2rqhB-hFzleEUCoIfY4OuCSKyZYfopuNnvA14EH_BKxxBhsnhwcIs5-2H_ApnhMk2Pq8lOGw8wnsghPMwVu9-DjhvKxuh0tYBsATrCkaH0Pcln3AI9hBTz6PGa-TgxR2RVuuhP7u1205taQYXqJnvQ4ZXj3OI_T9_Ozb5qK6_Prp8-b0srJcKVE5DuDAiIarnjGojRFKWFFzQ4VpnGataA1TTAjDLAgpSd_Wtq2psIpaJvkRerf3zin-WCEv3eizhRD0BHHNHWsoU0JIpQr69h_0Kq5pKt8Viklac05ood7vKZtizgn6bk5-1GnXUdI9FNOVYrrfxRT2zaNxNSO4v-SfJgpwsgeufYDd_03dxccve-U9AW-ZeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726143301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self‐control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Scholz, Christin ; Chan, Hang‐Yee ; Poldrack, Russell A. ; Ridder, Denise T. D. ; Smidts, Ale ; Laan, Laura Nynke</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christin ; Chan, Hang‐Yee ; Poldrack, Russell A. ; Ridder, Denise T. D. ; Smidts, Ale ; Laan, Laura Nynke</creatorcontrib><description>Self‐control is of vital importance for human wellbeing. Hare et al. (2009) were among the first to provide empirical evidence on the neural correlates of self‐control. This seminal study profoundly impacted theory and empirical work across multiple fields. To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of this work. Further, we tested the robustness of the findings across analytic strategies. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while rating 50 food items on healthiness and tastiness and making choices about food consumption. We closely replicated the original analysis pipeline and supplemented it with additional exploratory analyses to follow‐up on unexpected findings and to test the sensitivity of results to key analytical choices. Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which integrates relevant choice attributes to inform a final decision. We found that vmPFC activity was correlated with goal values regardless of the amount of self‐control and it correlated with both taste and health in self‐controllers but only taste in non‐self‐controllers. We did not find strong support for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in self‐control. The absence of statistically significant group differences in dlPFC activity during successful self‐control in our sample contrasts with the notion that dlPFC involvement is required in order to effectively integrate longer‐term goals into subjective value judgments. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.
To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of the seminal study of Hare et al. (2009). Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex but no strong support was found for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in self‐control. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36082693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain research ; Control theory ; Controllers ; Decision making ; dlPFC ; Empirical analysis ; fMRI ; Food ; Food consumption ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mathematical analysis ; Measurement techniques ; Medical imaging ; Neurobiology ; Neuroimaging ; Neurosciences ; Prefrontal cortex ; Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging ; Replication ; Self control ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Taste ; vmPFC</subject><ispartof>Human brain mapping, 2022-11, Vol.43 (16), p.4995-5016</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d3eedeb5738f22e4bb585c543b15b7da2959b28255b2ce5660f94c9415c81c263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d3eedeb5738f22e4bb585c543b15b7da2959b28255b2ce5660f94c9415c81c263</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6755-0259 ; 0000-0001-6567-7504 ; 0000-0002-8237-9506 ; 0000-0003-4307-0888 ; 0000-0001-7179-9436 ; 0000-0002-6699-1172</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhbm.26065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhbm.26065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hang‐Yee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poldrack, Russell A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridder, Denise T. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidts, Ale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laan, Laura Nynke</creatorcontrib><title>Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self‐control</title><title>Human brain mapping</title><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><description>Self‐control is of vital importance for human wellbeing. Hare et al. (2009) were among the first to provide empirical evidence on the neural correlates of self‐control. This seminal study profoundly impacted theory and empirical work across multiple fields. To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of this work. Further, we tested the robustness of the findings across analytic strategies. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while rating 50 food items on healthiness and tastiness and making choices about food consumption. We closely replicated the original analysis pipeline and supplemented it with additional exploratory analyses to follow‐up on unexpected findings and to test the sensitivity of results to key analytical choices. Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which integrates relevant choice attributes to inform a final decision. We found that vmPFC activity was correlated with goal values regardless of the amount of self‐control and it correlated with both taste and health in self‐controllers but only taste in non‐self‐controllers. We did not find strong support for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in self‐control. The absence of statistically significant group differences in dlPFC activity during successful self‐control in our sample contrasts with the notion that dlPFC involvement is required in order to effectively integrate longer‐term goals into subjective value judgments. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.
To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of the seminal study of Hare et al. (2009). Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex but no strong support was found for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in self‐control. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.</description><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Control theory</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>dlPFC</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>vmPFC</subject><issn>1065-9471</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTawSOtL7DgrVI5ailTEBtaRL5MTV04c7ITq7FCfoM_YJ6nLKSyQWM0vzadvRvoRek3JMSWEnQxmPGaSSPEEHVLSNhWhLX_6kKWo2rqhB-hFzleEUCoIfY4OuCSKyZYfopuNnvA14EH_BKxxBhsnhwcIs5-2H_ApnhMk2Pq8lOGw8wnsghPMwVu9-DjhvKxuh0tYBsATrCkaH0Pcln3AI9hBTz6PGa-TgxR2RVuuhP7u1205taQYXqJnvQ4ZXj3OI_T9_Ozb5qK6_Prp8-b0srJcKVE5DuDAiIarnjGojRFKWFFzQ4VpnGataA1TTAjDLAgpSd_Wtq2psIpaJvkRerf3zin-WCEv3eizhRD0BHHNHWsoU0JIpQr69h_0Kq5pKt8Viklac05ood7vKZtizgn6bk5-1GnXUdI9FNOVYrrfxRT2zaNxNSO4v-SfJgpwsgeufYDd_03dxccve-U9AW-ZeQ</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Scholz, Christin</creator><creator>Chan, Hang‐Yee</creator><creator>Poldrack, Russell A.</creator><creator>Ridder, Denise T. D.</creator><creator>Smidts, Ale</creator><creator>Laan, Laura Nynke</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-7504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-9506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4307-0888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6699-1172</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self‐control</title><author>Scholz, Christin ; Chan, Hang‐Yee ; Poldrack, Russell A. ; Ridder, Denise T. D. ; Smidts, Ale ; Laan, Laura Nynke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d3eedeb5738f22e4bb585c543b15b7da2959b28255b2ce5660f94c9415c81c263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Control theory</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>dlPFC</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>vmPFC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hang‐Yee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poldrack, Russell A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridder, Denise T. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidts, Ale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laan, Laura Nynke</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholz, Christin</au><au>Chan, Hang‐Yee</au><au>Poldrack, Russell A.</au><au>Ridder, Denise T. D.</au><au>Smidts, Ale</au><au>Laan, Laura Nynke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self‐control</atitle><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>4995</spage><epage>5016</epage><pages>4995-5016</pages><issn>1065-9471</issn><eissn>1097-0193</eissn><abstract>Self‐control is of vital importance for human wellbeing. Hare et al. (2009) were among the first to provide empirical evidence on the neural correlates of self‐control. This seminal study profoundly impacted theory and empirical work across multiple fields. To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of this work. Further, we tested the robustness of the findings across analytic strategies. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while rating 50 food items on healthiness and tastiness and making choices about food consumption. We closely replicated the original analysis pipeline and supplemented it with additional exploratory analyses to follow‐up on unexpected findings and to test the sensitivity of results to key analytical choices. Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which integrates relevant choice attributes to inform a final decision. We found that vmPFC activity was correlated with goal values regardless of the amount of self‐control and it correlated with both taste and health in self‐controllers but only taste in non‐self‐controllers. We did not find strong support for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in self‐control. The absence of statistically significant group differences in dlPFC activity during successful self‐control in our sample contrasts with the notion that dlPFC involvement is required in order to effectively integrate longer‐term goals into subjective value judgments. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.
To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self‐control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of the seminal study of Hare et al. (2009). Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex but no strong support was found for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in self‐control. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region‐of‐interest analysis.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36082693</pmid><doi>10.1002/hbm.26065</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-7504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-9506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4307-0888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6699-1172</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1065-9471 |
ispartof | Human brain mapping, 2022-11, Vol.43 (16), p.4995-5016 |
issn | 1065-9471 1097-0193 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2712855688 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central |
subjects | Brain research Control theory Controllers Decision making dlPFC Empirical analysis fMRI Food Food consumption Functional magnetic resonance imaging Humans Hypotheses Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mathematical analysis Measurement techniques Medical imaging Neurobiology Neuroimaging Neurosciences Prefrontal cortex Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging Replication Self control Sensitivity analysis Statistical analysis Taste vmPFC |
title | Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self‐control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20we%20have%20a%20second%20helping?%20A%20preregistered%20direct%20replication%20study%20on%20the%20neurobiological%20mechanisms%20underlying%20self%E2%80%90control&rft.jtitle=Human%20brain%20mapping&rft.au=Scholz,%20Christin&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=4995&rft.epage=5016&rft.pages=4995-5016&rft.issn=1065-9471&rft.eissn=1097-0193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hbm.26065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2726143301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726143301&rft_id=info:pmid/36082693&rfr_iscdi=true |