Intracerebral hemorrhage markers on non-contrast computed tomography as predictors of the dynamic spot sign on CT perfusion and associations with hematoma expansion and outcome

Purpose To assess the association between non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) hematoma markers and the dynamic spot sign on computed tomography perfusion (CTP), and their associations with hematoma expansion, clinical outcome, and in-hospital mortality. Methods Patients who presented with intrac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroradiology 2022-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2135-2144
Hauptverfasser: Truong, Michael Quangminh, Metcalfe, Andrew Viggo, Ovenden, Christopher Dillon, Kleinig, Timothy John, Barras, Christen David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To assess the association between non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) hematoma markers and the dynamic spot sign on computed tomography perfusion (CTP), and their associations with hematoma expansion, clinical outcome, and in-hospital mortality. Methods Patients who presented with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to a stroke center over an 18-month period and underwent baseline NCCT and CTP, and a follow-up NCCT within 24 h after the baseline scan were included. The initial and follow-up hematoma volumes were calculated. Two raters independently assessed the baseline NCCT for hematoma markers and concurrently assessed the CTP for the dynamic spot sign. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between the hematoma markers and the dynamic spot sign, adjusting for known ICH expansion predictors. Results Eighty-five patients were included in our study and 55 patients were suitable for expansion analysis. Heterogeneous density was the only NCCT hematoma marker to be associated with the dynamic spot sign after multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 58.61; 95% confidence interval, 9.13–376.05; P  
ISSN:0028-3940
1432-1920
DOI:10.1007/s00234-022-03032-6