Branded Care: The Policy Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry-Funded Nursing Care Related to Specialty Medicines
An increasing proportion of new drugs approved for market worldwide are now high cost, specialty medicines. Pharmaceutical marketers face the challenge of convincing payers, prescribers, and patients that the cost and complexity of care associated with specialty medicines is worth the trouble, and n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Policy, politics & nursing practice politics & nursing practice, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.67-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Policy, politics & nursing practice |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Grundy, Quinn Huyer, Larkin Davenport Parker, Lisa Bero, Lisa |
description | An increasing proportion of new drugs approved for market worldwide are now high cost, specialty medicines. Pharmaceutical marketers face the challenge of convincing payers, prescribers, and patients that the cost and complexity of care associated with specialty medicines is worth the trouble, and now offer patient support programs, free of charge, to patients prescribed their drug. We conducted a secondary, qualitative, interpretive analysis of 24 interviews with leaders of patient groups and members of hospital formulary committees in Australia to describe the work of pharmaceutical company-employed or contracted nurses who provide support to patients prescribed specialty medicines, and to prompt discussion around the policy implications of relying on industry-funded nursing care within publicly funded health systems. Participants affirmed the value of specialist, holistic, person-centered nursing care, but perceived gaps within the public health system related to the availability and provision of nursing care for people living with chronic disease. Consequently, participants described the pharmaceutical industry as addressing health system gaps through sponsorship or direct provision of medication-related nursing care, but recognized that care was contingent on commercial interest. Participants highlighted a number of ethical and policy concerns stemming from industry-funded nursing care of people prescribed specialty medicines related to patient safety, continuity of care, inducement to prescribe, and health equity. This analysis suggests that outsourcing necessary medication-related care to pharmaceutical companies has implications for the health system and equitable, sustainable pharmaceutical policy that extend far beyond the care encounter. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15271544221121749 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2711309896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15271544221121749</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2760479352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6f24c6506713192640b52f7ae4e8f640b8c2bd1a5ce9766c32e225320b3c16713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOwzAQRS0E4v0BbJAlNmxSPE5sJ-ygolCpQAVlHbnOBILyKHay6N_jtAUkEN6MPTr3ejSXkBNgAwClLkBwBSKKOAfgoKJki-yDEDxQkYy3-ztXQQ_skQPn3pk_sYJdshdKJhMmxT5x11bXGWZ0qC1e0tkb0mlTFmZJx9XCV90WTe1ok9Ppm7aVNti1vlvScZ11rrXLYNSt9A-ddUX9uvKhT1jq1jfbhj4v0BS6bJf0HrPCFDW6I7KT69Lh8aYekpfRzWx4F0web8fDq0lgeBK3gcx5ZKRgUkEICZcRmwueK40Rxnn_ig2fZ6CFwURJaUKOnIuQs3looBcdkvO178I2Hx26Nq0KZ7AsdY1N51K_PAhZEifSo2e_0Pems7WfzlOSRSoJBfcUrCljG-cs5unCFpW2yxRY2ieS_knEa043zt28wuxb8RWBBwZrwOlX_Pn2f8dP1FeRiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760479352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Branded Care: The Policy Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry-Funded Nursing Care Related to Specialty Medicines</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Grundy, Quinn ; Huyer, Larkin Davenport ; Parker, Lisa ; Bero, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Grundy, Quinn ; Huyer, Larkin Davenport ; Parker, Lisa ; Bero, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>An increasing proportion of new drugs approved for market worldwide are now high cost, specialty medicines. Pharmaceutical marketers face the challenge of convincing payers, prescribers, and patients that the cost and complexity of care associated with specialty medicines is worth the trouble, and now offer patient support programs, free of charge, to patients prescribed their drug. We conducted a secondary, qualitative, interpretive analysis of 24 interviews with leaders of patient groups and members of hospital formulary committees in Australia to describe the work of pharmaceutical company-employed or contracted nurses who provide support to patients prescribed specialty medicines, and to prompt discussion around the policy implications of relying on industry-funded nursing care within publicly funded health systems. Participants affirmed the value of specialist, holistic, person-centered nursing care, but perceived gaps within the public health system related to the availability and provision of nursing care for people living with chronic disease. Consequently, participants described the pharmaceutical industry as addressing health system gaps through sponsorship or direct provision of medication-related nursing care, but recognized that care was contingent on commercial interest. Participants highlighted a number of ethical and policy concerns stemming from industry-funded nursing care of people prescribed specialty medicines related to patient safety, continuity of care, inducement to prescribe, and health equity. This analysis suggests that outsourcing necessary medication-related care to pharmaceutical companies has implications for the health system and equitable, sustainable pharmaceutical policy that extend far beyond the care encounter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-1544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15271544221121749</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36069065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Australia ; Chronic illnesses ; Continuity of care ; Drug Industry ; Drugs ; Health disparities ; Humans ; Nurse led services ; Nursing ; Nursing Care ; Outsourcing ; Patient safety ; Patient-centered care ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Policy ; Public health ; Sponsorship</subject><ispartof>Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.67-75</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6f24c6506713192640b52f7ae4e8f640b8c2bd1a5ce9766c32e225320b3c16713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6f24c6506713192640b52f7ae4e8f640b8c2bd1a5ce9766c32e225320b3c16713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7640-8614</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15271544221121749$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15271544221121749$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grundy, Quinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huyer, Larkin Davenport</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bero, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Branded Care: The Policy Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry-Funded Nursing Care Related to Specialty Medicines</title><title>Policy, politics & nursing practice</title><addtitle>Policy Polit Nurs Pract</addtitle><description>An increasing proportion of new drugs approved for market worldwide are now high cost, specialty medicines. Pharmaceutical marketers face the challenge of convincing payers, prescribers, and patients that the cost and complexity of care associated with specialty medicines is worth the trouble, and now offer patient support programs, free of charge, to patients prescribed their drug. We conducted a secondary, qualitative, interpretive analysis of 24 interviews with leaders of patient groups and members of hospital formulary committees in Australia to describe the work of pharmaceutical company-employed or contracted nurses who provide support to patients prescribed specialty medicines, and to prompt discussion around the policy implications of relying on industry-funded nursing care within publicly funded health systems. Participants affirmed the value of specialist, holistic, person-centered nursing care, but perceived gaps within the public health system related to the availability and provision of nursing care for people living with chronic disease. Consequently, participants described the pharmaceutical industry as addressing health system gaps through sponsorship or direct provision of medication-related nursing care, but recognized that care was contingent on commercial interest. Participants highlighted a number of ethical and policy concerns stemming from industry-funded nursing care of people prescribed specialty medicines related to patient safety, continuity of care, inducement to prescribe, and health equity. This analysis suggests that outsourcing necessary medication-related care to pharmaceutical companies has implications for the health system and equitable, sustainable pharmaceutical policy that extend far beyond the care encounter.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Drug Industry</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nurse led services</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Care</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Sponsorship</subject><issn>1527-1544</issn><issn>1552-7468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOwzAQRS0E4v0BbJAlNmxSPE5sJ-ygolCpQAVlHbnOBILyKHay6N_jtAUkEN6MPTr3ejSXkBNgAwClLkBwBSKKOAfgoKJki-yDEDxQkYy3-ztXQQ_skQPn3pk_sYJdshdKJhMmxT5x11bXGWZ0qC1e0tkb0mlTFmZJx9XCV90WTe1ok9Ppm7aVNti1vlvScZ11rrXLYNSt9A-ddUX9uvKhT1jq1jfbhj4v0BS6bJf0HrPCFDW6I7KT69Lh8aYekpfRzWx4F0web8fDq0lgeBK3gcx5ZKRgUkEICZcRmwueK40Rxnn_ig2fZ6CFwURJaUKOnIuQs3looBcdkvO178I2Hx26Nq0KZ7AsdY1N51K_PAhZEifSo2e_0Pems7WfzlOSRSoJBfcUrCljG-cs5unCFpW2yxRY2ieS_knEa043zt28wuxb8RWBBwZrwOlX_Pn2f8dP1FeRiw</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Grundy, Quinn</creator><creator>Huyer, Larkin Davenport</creator><creator>Parker, Lisa</creator><creator>Bero, Lisa</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-8614</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Branded Care: The Policy Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry-Funded Nursing Care Related to Specialty Medicines</title><author>Grundy, Quinn ; Huyer, Larkin Davenport ; Parker, Lisa ; Bero, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6f24c6506713192640b52f7ae4e8f640b8c2bd1a5ce9766c32e225320b3c16713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Drug Industry</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nurse led services</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Care</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Sponsorship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grundy, Quinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huyer, Larkin Davenport</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bero, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Policy, politics & nursing practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grundy, Quinn</au><au>Huyer, Larkin Davenport</au><au>Parker, Lisa</au><au>Bero, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Branded Care: The Policy Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry-Funded Nursing Care Related to Specialty Medicines</atitle><jtitle>Policy, politics & nursing practice</jtitle><addtitle>Policy Polit Nurs Pract</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>67-75</pages><issn>1527-1544</issn><eissn>1552-7468</eissn><abstract>An increasing proportion of new drugs approved for market worldwide are now high cost, specialty medicines. Pharmaceutical marketers face the challenge of convincing payers, prescribers, and patients that the cost and complexity of care associated with specialty medicines is worth the trouble, and now offer patient support programs, free of charge, to patients prescribed their drug. We conducted a secondary, qualitative, interpretive analysis of 24 interviews with leaders of patient groups and members of hospital formulary committees in Australia to describe the work of pharmaceutical company-employed or contracted nurses who provide support to patients prescribed specialty medicines, and to prompt discussion around the policy implications of relying on industry-funded nursing care within publicly funded health systems. Participants affirmed the value of specialist, holistic, person-centered nursing care, but perceived gaps within the public health system related to the availability and provision of nursing care for people living with chronic disease. Consequently, participants described the pharmaceutical industry as addressing health system gaps through sponsorship or direct provision of medication-related nursing care, but recognized that care was contingent on commercial interest. Participants highlighted a number of ethical and policy concerns stemming from industry-funded nursing care of people prescribed specialty medicines related to patient safety, continuity of care, inducement to prescribe, and health equity. This analysis suggests that outsourcing necessary medication-related care to pharmaceutical companies has implications for the health system and equitable, sustainable pharmaceutical policy that extend far beyond the care encounter.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36069065</pmid><doi>10.1177/15271544221121749</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-8614</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-1544 |
ispartof | Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.67-75 |
issn | 1527-1544 1552-7468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2711309896 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Australia Chronic illnesses Continuity of care Drug Industry Drugs Health disparities Humans Nurse led services Nursing Nursing Care Outsourcing Patient safety Patient-centered care Patients Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceutical Preparations Policy Public health Sponsorship |
title | Branded Care: The Policy Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry-Funded Nursing Care Related to Specialty Medicines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Branded%20Care:%20The%20Policy%20Implications%20of%20Pharmaceutical%20Industry-Funded%20Nursing%20Care%20Related%20to%20Specialty%20Medicines&rft.jtitle=Policy,%20politics%20&%20nursing%20practice&rft.au=Grundy,%20Quinn&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=67-75&rft.issn=1527-1544&rft.eissn=1552-7468&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15271544221121749&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760479352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760479352&rft_id=info:pmid/36069065&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15271544221121749&rfr_iscdi=true |