Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2

Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad in vitro screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medicinal chemistry 2022-09, Vol.65 (18), p.12403-12416
Hauptverfasser: Gebauer, Lukas, Jensen, Ole, Brockmöller, Jürgen, Dücker, Christof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12416
container_issue 18
container_start_page 12403
container_title Journal of medicinal chemistry
container_volume 65
creator Gebauer, Lukas
Jensen, Ole
Brockmöller, Jürgen
Dücker, Christof
description Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad in vitro screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us to compare the substrate spectra and to study the relationship between transport and inhibition of transport. Generally, substrates were smaller and more hydrophilic than OCT3 inhibitors. The best model-based predictor of transport was the positive charge, while the best predictor of inhibition was the aromatic ring count. OCT3 inhibition was well correlated between different model substrates. Substrates of OCT3 were mainly weak inhibitors, and the best inhibitors were not substrates. As tested with 264 substances, OCT3 transport had significantly more overlap with OCT2 than OCT1. Our data further substantiate that specificity of OCT transport varies with minor substitutions rather than with the general scaffolds of substrates.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2711309118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2711309118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-4a92238e3d52d415b6fc661fd8fe8d7ed8db3f5e9a98db99e5d965efe3a3a98e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBhx85JLinzhNjigCWqlSD5Sz5cRr4qqJg-0I8faYtlw57WhnZqX9ELqnZEEJo4-qDYt9D7rtoF-wllCyFBdoRgUjWV6S_BLNCGEsYwXj1-gmhD0hhFPGZ0i-TU2IXkUIWA0ar4fONjY6H7AzOHaAt_5DDbbFtYrWDXjn1RBG5yN4zI-V2vWj8jYk88vGDm_rHT0aSbBbdGXUIcDdec7R-8vzrl5lm-3run7aZIozEbNcVYzxErgWTOdUNIVpi4IaXRoo9RJ0qRtuBFSqSqqqQOiqEGCAK55WwOfo4XR39O5zghBlb0MLh4MawE1BsiWlnFSUliman6KtdyF4MHL0tlf-W1Iif3nKxFP-8ZRnnqlGTrWj6yY_pH_-r_wAiUx84g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711309118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Gebauer, Lukas ; Jensen, Ole ; Brockmöller, Jürgen ; Dücker, Christof</creator><creatorcontrib>Gebauer, Lukas ; Jensen, Ole ; Brockmöller, Jürgen ; Dücker, Christof</creatorcontrib><description>Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad in vitro screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us to compare the substrate spectra and to study the relationship between transport and inhibition of transport. Generally, substrates were smaller and more hydrophilic than OCT3 inhibitors. The best model-based predictor of transport was the positive charge, while the best predictor of inhibition was the aromatic ring count. OCT3 inhibition was well correlated between different model substrates. Substrates of OCT3 were mainly weak inhibitors, and the best inhibitors were not substrates. As tested with 264 substances, OCT3 transport had significantly more overlap with OCT2 than OCT1. Our data further substantiate that specificity of OCT transport varies with minor substitutions rather than with the general scaffolds of substrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-4804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2022-09, Vol.65 (18), p.12403-12416</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-4a92238e3d52d415b6fc661fd8fe8d7ed8db3f5e9a98db99e5d965efe3a3a98e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-4a92238e3d52d415b6fc661fd8fe8d7ed8db3f5e9a98db99e5d965efe3a3a98e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9903-4769 ; 0000-0003-2823-4178 ; 0000-0002-4776-138X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gebauer, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockmöller, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dücker, Christof</creatorcontrib><title>Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2</title><title>Journal of medicinal chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Med. Chem</addtitle><description>Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad in vitro screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us to compare the substrate spectra and to study the relationship between transport and inhibition of transport. Generally, substrates were smaller and more hydrophilic than OCT3 inhibitors. The best model-based predictor of transport was the positive charge, while the best predictor of inhibition was the aromatic ring count. OCT3 inhibition was well correlated between different model substrates. Substrates of OCT3 were mainly weak inhibitors, and the best inhibitors were not substrates. As tested with 264 substances, OCT3 transport had significantly more overlap with OCT2 than OCT1. Our data further substantiate that specificity of OCT transport varies with minor substitutions rather than with the general scaffolds of substrates.</description><issn>0022-2623</issn><issn>1520-4804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBhx85JLinzhNjigCWqlSD5Sz5cRr4qqJg-0I8faYtlw57WhnZqX9ELqnZEEJo4-qDYt9D7rtoF-wllCyFBdoRgUjWV6S_BLNCGEsYwXj1-gmhD0hhFPGZ0i-TU2IXkUIWA0ar4fONjY6H7AzOHaAt_5DDbbFtYrWDXjn1RBG5yN4zI-V2vWj8jYk88vGDm_rHT0aSbBbdGXUIcDdec7R-8vzrl5lm-3run7aZIozEbNcVYzxErgWTOdUNIVpi4IaXRoo9RJ0qRtuBFSqSqqqQOiqEGCAK55WwOfo4XR39O5zghBlb0MLh4MawE1BsiWlnFSUliman6KtdyF4MHL0tlf-W1Iif3nKxFP-8ZRnnqlGTrWj6yY_pH_-r_wAiUx84g</recordid><startdate>20220922</startdate><enddate>20220922</enddate><creator>Gebauer, Lukas</creator><creator>Jensen, Ole</creator><creator>Brockmöller, Jürgen</creator><creator>Dücker, Christof</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-4178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-138X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220922</creationdate><title>Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2</title><author>Gebauer, Lukas ; Jensen, Ole ; Brockmöller, Jürgen ; Dücker, Christof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-4a92238e3d52d415b6fc661fd8fe8d7ed8db3f5e9a98db99e5d965efe3a3a98e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gebauer, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockmöller, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dücker, Christof</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medicinal chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gebauer, Lukas</au><au>Jensen, Ole</au><au>Brockmöller, Jürgen</au><au>Dücker, Christof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medicinal chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Med. Chem</addtitle><date>2022-09-22</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>12403</spage><epage>12416</epage><pages>12403-12416</pages><issn>0022-2623</issn><eissn>1520-4804</eissn><abstract>Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad in vitro screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us to compare the substrate spectra and to study the relationship between transport and inhibition of transport. Generally, substrates were smaller and more hydrophilic than OCT3 inhibitors. The best model-based predictor of transport was the positive charge, while the best predictor of inhibition was the aromatic ring count. OCT3 inhibition was well correlated between different model substrates. Substrates of OCT3 were mainly weak inhibitors, and the best inhibitors were not substrates. As tested with 264 substances, OCT3 transport had significantly more overlap with OCT2 than OCT1. Our data further substantiate that specificity of OCT transport varies with minor substitutions rather than with the general scaffolds of substrates.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-4178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-138X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2623
ispartof Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2022-09, Vol.65 (18), p.12403-12416
issn 0022-2623
1520-4804
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2711309118
source ACS Publications
title Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substrates%20and%20Inhibitors%20of%20the%20Organic%20Cation%20Transporter%203%20and%20Comparison%20with%20OCT1%20and%20OCT2&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medicinal%20chemistry&rft.au=Gebauer,%20Lukas&rft.date=2022-09-22&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=12403&rft.epage=12416&rft.pages=12403-12416&rft.issn=0022-2623&rft.eissn=1520-4804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2711309118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711309118&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true