Reanalysis of Clementine bistatic radar data from the lunar South Pole

On April 9, 1994, the Clementine spacecraft high‐gain antenna was aimed toward the Moon's surface, and the resulting 13‐cm wavelength radio echoes were received on Earth. Using these data, we have found that the lunar surface generally follows a Lambertian bistatic scattering function σ0 = KD c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research 1999-02, Vol.104 (E2), p.3845-3862
Hauptverfasser: Simpson, Richard A., Tyler, G. Leonard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3862
container_issue E2
container_start_page 3845
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 104
creator Simpson, Richard A.
Tyler, G. Leonard
description On April 9, 1994, the Clementine spacecraft high‐gain antenna was aimed toward the Moon's surface, and the resulting 13‐cm wavelength radio echoes were received on Earth. Using these data, we have found that the lunar surface generally follows a Lambertian bistatic scattering function σ0 = KD cosθi cosθs with KD∼0.003 for the opposite (expected) sense of circular polarization and KD∼0.001 for the same (unexpected) sense. But there are important deviations (of up to 50% in some parts of the echo spectrum) from this simple form. Based on an earlier analysis of these same data, Nozette et al. [1996] claimed detection of an enhancement in echoes with the same sense circular polarization from regions near the South Pole in a near‐backscatter geometry. Such behavior would be consistent with presence of perhaps large quantities of water ice near the pole. We have been unable to reproduce that result. Although we find weak suggestions of enhanced echoes at the time of South Pole backscatter, similar features are present at earlier and later times, adjacent frequencies, and in the opposite circular polarization. If enhanced backscatter is present, it is not unique to the South Pole; if not unique to the pole, then ice appears less likely as an explanation for the enhancement.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/1998JE900038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27104009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27104009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4770-73e38561dd216e73de65bf15c4336e383aa824317a76d4c124961c1ba4a541e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP4zAQhS3ESlTAbX-AD4gTYT22YydHVJVCVcEKdoGbNXUmIuAmYKeC_vsNagWc9jTSm-97h8fYTxCnIGT5C8qymE1KIYQqdthIQm4yKYXcZSMBusiElHaPHab0NCBC50YLGLHzG8IWwzo1iXc1HwdaUts3LfFFk3rsG88jVhh5hT3yOnZL3j8SD6t2yG67Vf_If3eBDtiPGkOiw-3dZ3_PJ3_GF9n8eno5PptnXlsrMqtIFbmBqpJgyKqKTL6oIfdaKTO8FGIhtQKL1lTag9SlAQ8L1JhroELts-NN70vsXleUerdskqcQsKVulZy0ILQQ5QCebEAfu5Qi1e4lNkuMawfCfezlvu814EfbXkweQx2x9U36cizIQn5gsMHemkDr_1a62fRmUpZicLKNM-xJ758OxmdnrLK5u7-auvnFA9zfzW-dVf8Az4aFdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27104009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reanalysis of Clementine bistatic radar data from the lunar South Pole</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Simpson, Richard A. ; Tyler, G. Leonard</creator><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Richard A. ; Tyler, G. Leonard</creatorcontrib><description>On April 9, 1994, the Clementine spacecraft high‐gain antenna was aimed toward the Moon's surface, and the resulting 13‐cm wavelength radio echoes were received on Earth. Using these data, we have found that the lunar surface generally follows a Lambertian bistatic scattering function σ0 = KD cosθi cosθs with KD∼0.003 for the opposite (expected) sense of circular polarization and KD∼0.001 for the same (unexpected) sense. But there are important deviations (of up to 50% in some parts of the echo spectrum) from this simple form. Based on an earlier analysis of these same data, Nozette et al. [1996] claimed detection of an enhancement in echoes with the same sense circular polarization from regions near the South Pole in a near‐backscatter geometry. Such behavior would be consistent with presence of perhaps large quantities of water ice near the pole. We have been unable to reproduce that result. Although we find weak suggestions of enhanced echoes at the time of South Pole backscatter, similar features are present at earlier and later times, adjacent frequencies, and in the opposite circular polarization. If enhanced backscatter is present, it is not unique to the South Pole; if not unique to the pole, then ice appears less likely as an explanation for the enhancement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/1998JE900038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Features, landmarks, mineralogy, petrology, and atmosphere ; Moon ; Solar system</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999-02, Vol.104 (E2), p.3845-3862</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4770-73e38561dd216e73de65bf15c4336e383aa824317a76d4c124961c1ba4a541e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4770-73e38561dd216e73de65bf15c4336e383aa824317a76d4c124961c1ba4a541e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F1998JE900038$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F1998JE900038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1712828$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, G. Leonard</creatorcontrib><title>Reanalysis of Clementine bistatic radar data from the lunar South Pole</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>On April 9, 1994, the Clementine spacecraft high‐gain antenna was aimed toward the Moon's surface, and the resulting 13‐cm wavelength radio echoes were received on Earth. Using these data, we have found that the lunar surface generally follows a Lambertian bistatic scattering function σ0 = KD cosθi cosθs with KD∼0.003 for the opposite (expected) sense of circular polarization and KD∼0.001 for the same (unexpected) sense. But there are important deviations (of up to 50% in some parts of the echo spectrum) from this simple form. Based on an earlier analysis of these same data, Nozette et al. [1996] claimed detection of an enhancement in echoes with the same sense circular polarization from regions near the South Pole in a near‐backscatter geometry. Such behavior would be consistent with presence of perhaps large quantities of water ice near the pole. We have been unable to reproduce that result. Although we find weak suggestions of enhanced echoes at the time of South Pole backscatter, similar features are present at earlier and later times, adjacent frequencies, and in the opposite circular polarization. If enhanced backscatter is present, it is not unique to the South Pole; if not unique to the pole, then ice appears less likely as an explanation for the enhancement.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Features, landmarks, mineralogy, petrology, and atmosphere</subject><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Solar system</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFP4zAQhS3ESlTAbX-AD4gTYT22YydHVJVCVcEKdoGbNXUmIuAmYKeC_vsNagWc9jTSm-97h8fYTxCnIGT5C8qymE1KIYQqdthIQm4yKYXcZSMBusiElHaPHab0NCBC50YLGLHzG8IWwzo1iXc1HwdaUts3LfFFk3rsG88jVhh5hT3yOnZL3j8SD6t2yG67Vf_If3eBDtiPGkOiw-3dZ3_PJ3_GF9n8eno5PptnXlsrMqtIFbmBqpJgyKqKTL6oIfdaKTO8FGIhtQKL1lTag9SlAQ8L1JhroELts-NN70vsXleUerdskqcQsKVulZy0ILQQ5QCebEAfu5Qi1e4lNkuMawfCfezlvu814EfbXkweQx2x9U36cizIQn5gsMHemkDr_1a62fRmUpZicLKNM-xJ758OxmdnrLK5u7-auvnFA9zfzW-dVf8Az4aFdA</recordid><startdate>19990225</startdate><enddate>19990225</enddate><creator>Simpson, Richard A.</creator><creator>Tyler, G. Leonard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990225</creationdate><title>Reanalysis of Clementine bistatic radar data from the lunar South Pole</title><author>Simpson, Richard A. ; Tyler, G. Leonard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4770-73e38561dd216e73de65bf15c4336e383aa824317a76d4c124961c1ba4a541e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Features, landmarks, mineralogy, petrology, and atmosphere</topic><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Solar system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, G. Leonard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpson, Richard A.</au><au>Tyler, G. Leonard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reanalysis of Clementine bistatic radar data from the lunar South Pole</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>1999-02-25</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>E2</issue><spage>3845</spage><epage>3862</epage><pages>3845-3862</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>On April 9, 1994, the Clementine spacecraft high‐gain antenna was aimed toward the Moon's surface, and the resulting 13‐cm wavelength radio echoes were received on Earth. Using these data, we have found that the lunar surface generally follows a Lambertian bistatic scattering function σ0 = KD cosθi cosθs with KD∼0.003 for the opposite (expected) sense of circular polarization and KD∼0.001 for the same (unexpected) sense. But there are important deviations (of up to 50% in some parts of the echo spectrum) from this simple form. Based on an earlier analysis of these same data, Nozette et al. [1996] claimed detection of an enhancement in echoes with the same sense circular polarization from regions near the South Pole in a near‐backscatter geometry. Such behavior would be consistent with presence of perhaps large quantities of water ice near the pole. We have been unable to reproduce that result. Although we find weak suggestions of enhanced echoes at the time of South Pole backscatter, similar features are present at earlier and later times, adjacent frequencies, and in the opposite circular polarization. If enhanced backscatter is present, it is not unique to the South Pole; if not unique to the pole, then ice appears less likely as an explanation for the enhancement.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/1998JE900038</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999-02, Vol.104 (E2), p.3845-3862
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27104009
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Astronomy
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Features, landmarks, mineralogy, petrology, and atmosphere
Moon
Solar system
title Reanalysis of Clementine bistatic radar data from the lunar South Pole
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reanalysis%20of%20Clementine%20bistatic%20radar%20data%20from%20the%20lunar%20South%20Pole&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research&rft.au=Simpson,%20Richard%20A.&rft.date=1999-02-25&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=E2&rft.spage=3845&rft.epage=3862&rft.pages=3845-3862&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/1998JE900038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27104009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27104009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true