Midterm postoperative results of mid‐urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures

Introduction Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2022-11, Vol.41 (8), p.1834-1843
Hauptverfasser: Escura, Sílvia, Ros, Cristina, Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia, Bataller, Eduardo, Sánchez, Emília, Carmona, Francisco, Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1843
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1834
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 41
creator Escura, Sílvia
Ros, Cristina
Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia
Bataller, Eduardo
Sánchez, Emília
Carmona, Francisco
Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat
description Introduction Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS can be determined by pelvic floor ultrasound (PF‐US). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF‐US in patients with persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after MUS surgery for SUI with a midterm follow‐up. Materials and Methods A historical cohort study including women undergoing MUS surgery for SUI between 2013 and 2015 was designed. The primary outcome was to correlate the sonographic parameters of MUS with SUI cure (negative International Continence Society‐Uniform Cough Stress Test, Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.25032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709743941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2730235438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e3cda4e016e9739dd0b488e76db153781d0fde33451d8498f870f36b4f8edf633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFu1DAQBmALgehSOPACKBIXOGQ7zjixc6wqCkgFJETPkTceF6-cONgxtDcegWfkSXDZwgGJkw_zza-Rf8aecthygOZk1nnbtIDNPbbhbQN1J6W8zzYgEetGdPKIPUppDwAKRf-QHWEHrewVbNj-nTMrxalaQlrDQlGv7itVkVL2a6qCrSZnfn7_kSOtn6P2VfJuvkrb6mPwdDsuLOoU8mwqN1d0vXjt5kKqlOOVG8uG1c6X9fSYPbDaJ3py9x6zy_NXn87e1BcfXr89O72oR2yxqQlHowUB76iX2BsDO6EUyc7seItScQPWEKJouVGiV1ZJsNjthFVkbId4zF4ccpcYvmRK6zC5NJL3eqaQ09BI6KXAXvBCn_9D9yHHuVxXFEKDrUBV1MuDGmNIKZIdlugmHW8GDsNtAUMpYPhdQLHP7hLzbiLzV_758QJODuCb83Tz_6Th_enlIfIXRLaRYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730235438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midterm postoperative results of mid‐urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Escura, Sílvia ; Ros, Cristina ; Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia ; Bataller, Eduardo ; Sánchez, Emília ; Carmona, Francisco ; Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</creator><creatorcontrib>Escura, Sílvia ; Ros, Cristina ; Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia ; Bataller, Eduardo ; Sánchez, Emília ; Carmona, Francisco ; Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS can be determined by pelvic floor ultrasound (PF‐US). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF‐US in patients with persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after MUS surgery for SUI with a midterm follow‐up. Materials and Methods A historical cohort study including women undergoing MUS surgery for SUI between 2013 and 2015 was designed. The primary outcome was to correlate the sonographic parameters of MUS with SUI cure (negative International Continence Society‐Uniform Cough Stress Test, Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form &lt; 5 points and no symptoms of SUI), at 5 years postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were changes of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) at 1 and 5 years after surgery. Results Eighty‐seven patients (80 transobturator‐MUS, 7 retropubic‐MUS) were included. At 5 years all patients referred improvement of UI and objective cure of SUI was demonstrated in 81.2%. The MUS was sonographically correct in 67 (98.5%) of the 68 patients with cure of SUI. The MUS was considered incorrectly placed in only 4 (28.6%) of the 14 patients with noncured SUI. MUCP decreased from 61.9 to 48.8 cmH2O at 5 years of follow‐up (p &lt; 0.01) and up to 53% of women had UUI symptoms after surgery, with a nonsignificant decrease compared to baseline. Conclusion Patients cured of SUI had sonographically correct MUS by PF‐US. Less than one‐third of cases of SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS surgery could be explained by a sonographically incorrect sling. Low urethral resistance and/or UUI symptoms could help to explain the remaining failures. Complete functional and anatomic studies, including urodynamics and PF‐US, should be performed before deciding on the next management strategy in patients with SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.25032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36057980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cohort Studies ; Cough ; Female ; Humans ; mid‐urethral sling ; Patients ; persistent stress urinary incontinence ; recurrent stress urinary incontinence ; stress urinary incontinence ; Suburethral Slings ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; urethral profile ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - surgery ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - complications ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2022-11, Vol.41 (8), p.1834-1843</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e3cda4e016e9739dd0b488e76db153781d0fde33451d8498f870f36b4f8edf633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e3cda4e016e9739dd0b488e76db153781d0fde33451d8498f870f36b4f8edf633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4423-3650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.25032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.25032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Escura, Sílvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bataller, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Emília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><title>Midterm postoperative results of mid‐urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><description>Introduction Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS can be determined by pelvic floor ultrasound (PF‐US). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF‐US in patients with persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after MUS surgery for SUI with a midterm follow‐up. Materials and Methods A historical cohort study including women undergoing MUS surgery for SUI between 2013 and 2015 was designed. The primary outcome was to correlate the sonographic parameters of MUS with SUI cure (negative International Continence Society‐Uniform Cough Stress Test, Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form &lt; 5 points and no symptoms of SUI), at 5 years postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were changes of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) at 1 and 5 years after surgery. Results Eighty‐seven patients (80 transobturator‐MUS, 7 retropubic‐MUS) were included. At 5 years all patients referred improvement of UI and objective cure of SUI was demonstrated in 81.2%. The MUS was sonographically correct in 67 (98.5%) of the 68 patients with cure of SUI. The MUS was considered incorrectly placed in only 4 (28.6%) of the 14 patients with noncured SUI. MUCP decreased from 61.9 to 48.8 cmH2O at 5 years of follow‐up (p &lt; 0.01) and up to 53% of women had UUI symptoms after surgery, with a nonsignificant decrease compared to baseline. Conclusion Patients cured of SUI had sonographically correct MUS by PF‐US. Less than one‐third of cases of SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS surgery could be explained by a sonographically incorrect sling. Low urethral resistance and/or UUI symptoms could help to explain the remaining failures. Complete functional and anatomic studies, including urodynamics and PF‐US, should be performed before deciding on the next management strategy in patients with SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS.</description><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mid‐urethral sling</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>persistent stress urinary incontinence</subject><subject>recurrent stress urinary incontinence</subject><subject>stress urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Suburethral Slings</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>urethral profile</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - complications</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFu1DAQBmALgehSOPACKBIXOGQ7zjixc6wqCkgFJETPkTceF6-cONgxtDcegWfkSXDZwgGJkw_zza-Rf8aecthygOZk1nnbtIDNPbbhbQN1J6W8zzYgEetGdPKIPUppDwAKRf-QHWEHrewVbNj-nTMrxalaQlrDQlGv7itVkVL2a6qCrSZnfn7_kSOtn6P2VfJuvkrb6mPwdDsuLOoU8mwqN1d0vXjt5kKqlOOVG8uG1c6X9fSYPbDaJ3py9x6zy_NXn87e1BcfXr89O72oR2yxqQlHowUB76iX2BsDO6EUyc7seItScQPWEKJouVGiV1ZJsNjthFVkbId4zF4ccpcYvmRK6zC5NJL3eqaQ09BI6KXAXvBCn_9D9yHHuVxXFEKDrUBV1MuDGmNIKZIdlugmHW8GDsNtAUMpYPhdQLHP7hLzbiLzV_758QJODuCb83Tz_6Th_enlIfIXRLaRYg</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Escura, Sílvia</creator><creator>Ros, Cristina</creator><creator>Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia</creator><creator>Bataller, Eduardo</creator><creator>Sánchez, Emília</creator><creator>Carmona, Francisco</creator><creator>Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-3650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Midterm postoperative results of mid‐urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures</title><author>Escura, Sílvia ; Ros, Cristina ; Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia ; Bataller, Eduardo ; Sánchez, Emília ; Carmona, Francisco ; Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e3cda4e016e9739dd0b488e76db153781d0fde33451d8498f870f36b4f8edf633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mid‐urethral sling</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>persistent stress urinary incontinence</topic><topic>recurrent stress urinary incontinence</topic><topic>stress urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Suburethral Slings</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>urethral profile</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - complications</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Escura, Sílvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bataller, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Emília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Escura, Sílvia</au><au>Ros, Cristina</au><au>Anglès‐Acedo, Sònia</au><au>Bataller, Eduardo</au><au>Sánchez, Emília</au><au>Carmona, Francisco</au><au>Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midterm postoperative results of mid‐urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1834</spage><epage>1843</epage><pages>1834-1843</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Introduction Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS can be determined by pelvic floor ultrasound (PF‐US). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF‐US in patients with persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after MUS surgery for SUI with a midterm follow‐up. Materials and Methods A historical cohort study including women undergoing MUS surgery for SUI between 2013 and 2015 was designed. The primary outcome was to correlate the sonographic parameters of MUS with SUI cure (negative International Continence Society‐Uniform Cough Stress Test, Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form &lt; 5 points and no symptoms of SUI), at 5 years postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were changes of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) at 1 and 5 years after surgery. Results Eighty‐seven patients (80 transobturator‐MUS, 7 retropubic‐MUS) were included. At 5 years all patients referred improvement of UI and objective cure of SUI was demonstrated in 81.2%. The MUS was sonographically correct in 67 (98.5%) of the 68 patients with cure of SUI. The MUS was considered incorrectly placed in only 4 (28.6%) of the 14 patients with noncured SUI. MUCP decreased from 61.9 to 48.8 cmH2O at 5 years of follow‐up (p &lt; 0.01) and up to 53% of women had UUI symptoms after surgery, with a nonsignificant decrease compared to baseline. Conclusion Patients cured of SUI had sonographically correct MUS by PF‐US. Less than one‐third of cases of SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS surgery could be explained by a sonographically incorrect sling. Low urethral resistance and/or UUI symptoms could help to explain the remaining failures. Complete functional and anatomic studies, including urodynamics and PF‐US, should be performed before deciding on the next management strategy in patients with SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36057980</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.25032</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-3650</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2022-11, Vol.41 (8), p.1834-1843
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709743941
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Cohort Studies
Cough
Female
Humans
mid‐urethral sling
Patients
persistent stress urinary incontinence
recurrent stress urinary incontinence
stress urinary incontinence
Suburethral Slings
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
urethral profile
Urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence - surgery
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - complications
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
title Midterm postoperative results of mid‐urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midterm%20postoperative%20results%20of%20mid%E2%80%90urethral%20slings.%20Role%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20explaining%20surgical%20failures&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Escura,%20S%C3%ADlvia&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1834&rft.epage=1843&rft.pages=1834-1843&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.25032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2730235438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730235438&rft_id=info:pmid/36057980&rfr_iscdi=true