Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters

This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1368-1376
Hauptverfasser: Morishima, Yoshiaki, Chida, Koichi, Meguro, Takayoshi, Hirota, Morihisa, Chiba, Hiroo, Fukuda, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1376
container_issue 18
container_start_page 1368
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 198
creator Morishima, Yoshiaki
Chida, Koichi
Meguro, Takayoshi
Hirota, Morihisa
Chiba, Hiroo
Fukuda, Hiroshi
description This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck. The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncac160
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709739661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709739661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLw0AURgdRsFZX_oFZChI7r-bhTtL6gIKg7TrcTm7aSDIznUmUbv3lJtjVhY_DgXsIueXsgbNMzrwrZ0aD5jE7IxOeKBFJxeJzMmFcqShVgl2SqxC-GBNJNlcT8rtCE-jy0Nff0KDpaGkDUlvRzw6qii56X5sdXZph1tbVmn5g5-3OQ4k039sGzK62Doz2CN24u_3xkS5GSW5bB74O1tBNGC3rH0vXR4dh9I9Iix36cE0uKmgC3pzulGyel-v8NVq9v7zlT6tISym6SAITmaw41zEDHSOWILagIZ0ruU2QSZ7wFOdMoxTDJNOtSuIyS0WJUkEp5JTc_Xudt4ceQ1e0ddDYDD-g7UMhEpYlMotjPqD3_6j2NgSPVeF83YI_FpwVY-liKF2cSss_EbR0-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709739661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Morishima, Yoshiaki ; Chida, Koichi ; Meguro, Takayoshi ; Hirota, Morihisa ; Chiba, Hiroo ; Fukuda, Hiroshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Morishima, Yoshiaki ; Chida, Koichi ; Meguro, Takayoshi ; Hirota, Morihisa ; Chiba, Hiroo ; Fukuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck. The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p &lt; 0.01). For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac160</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1368-1376</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5628-2663</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morishima, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chida, Koichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguro, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><title>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><description>This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck. The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p &lt; 0.01). For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.</description><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLw0AURgdRsFZX_oFZChI7r-bhTtL6gIKg7TrcTm7aSDIznUmUbv3lJtjVhY_DgXsIueXsgbNMzrwrZ0aD5jE7IxOeKBFJxeJzMmFcqShVgl2SqxC-GBNJNlcT8rtCE-jy0Nff0KDpaGkDUlvRzw6qii56X5sdXZph1tbVmn5g5-3OQ4k039sGzK62Doz2CN24u_3xkS5GSW5bB74O1tBNGC3rH0vXR4dh9I9Iix36cE0uKmgC3pzulGyel-v8NVq9v7zlT6tISym6SAITmaw41zEDHSOWILagIZ0ruU2QSZ7wFOdMoxTDJNOtSuIyS0WJUkEp5JTc_Xudt4ceQ1e0ddDYDD-g7UMhEpYlMotjPqD3_6j2NgSPVeF83YI_FpwVY-liKF2cSss_EbR0-w</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Morishima, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Chida, Koichi</creator><creator>Meguro, Takayoshi</creator><creator>Hirota, Morihisa</creator><creator>Chiba, Hiroo</creator><creator>Fukuda, Hiroshi</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-2663</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</title><author>Morishima, Yoshiaki ; Chida, Koichi ; Meguro, Takayoshi ; Hirota, Morihisa ; Chiba, Hiroo ; Fukuda, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morishima, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chida, Koichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguro, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morishima, Yoshiaki</au><au>Chida, Koichi</au><au>Meguro, Takayoshi</au><au>Hirota, Morihisa</au><au>Chiba, Hiroo</au><au>Fukuda, Hiroshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1368</spage><epage>1376</epage><pages>1368-1376</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck. The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p &lt; 0.01). For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.</abstract><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncac160</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-2663</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1368-1376
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709739661
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lens%20Equivalent%20dose%20of%20Staff%20During%20Endoscopic%20Retrograde%20Cholangiopancreatography:%20Dose%20Comparison%20Using%20Two%20Types%20of%20Dosemeters&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Morishima,%20Yoshiaki&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1368&rft.epage=1376&rft.pages=1368-1376&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncac160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709739661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709739661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true