Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters
This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1368-1376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 1368 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Morishima, Yoshiaki Chida, Koichi Meguro, Takayoshi Hirota, Morihisa Chiba, Hiroo Fukuda, Hiroshi |
description | This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement.
LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck.
The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/ncac160 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709739661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709739661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLw0AURgdRsFZX_oFZChI7r-bhTtL6gIKg7TrcTm7aSDIznUmUbv3lJtjVhY_DgXsIueXsgbNMzrwrZ0aD5jE7IxOeKBFJxeJzMmFcqShVgl2SqxC-GBNJNlcT8rtCE-jy0Nff0KDpaGkDUlvRzw6qii56X5sdXZph1tbVmn5g5-3OQ4k039sGzK62Doz2CN24u_3xkS5GSW5bB74O1tBNGC3rH0vXR4dh9I9Iix36cE0uKmgC3pzulGyel-v8NVq9v7zlT6tISym6SAITmaw41zEDHSOWILagIZ0ruU2QSZ7wFOdMoxTDJNOtSuIyS0WJUkEp5JTc_Xudt4ceQ1e0ddDYDD-g7UMhEpYlMotjPqD3_6j2NgSPVeF83YI_FpwVY-liKF2cSss_EbR0-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709739661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Morishima, Yoshiaki ; Chida, Koichi ; Meguro, Takayoshi ; Hirota, Morihisa ; Chiba, Hiroo ; Fukuda, Hiroshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Morishima, Yoshiaki ; Chida, Koichi ; Meguro, Takayoshi ; Hirota, Morihisa ; Chiba, Hiroo ; Fukuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement.
LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck.
The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p < 0.01).
For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac160</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1368-1376</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5628-2663</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morishima, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chida, Koichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguro, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><title>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><description>This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement.
LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck.
The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p < 0.01).
For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.</description><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLw0AURgdRsFZX_oFZChI7r-bhTtL6gIKg7TrcTm7aSDIznUmUbv3lJtjVhY_DgXsIueXsgbNMzrwrZ0aD5jE7IxOeKBFJxeJzMmFcqShVgl2SqxC-GBNJNlcT8rtCE-jy0Nff0KDpaGkDUlvRzw6qii56X5sdXZph1tbVmn5g5-3OQ4k039sGzK62Doz2CN24u_3xkS5GSW5bB74O1tBNGC3rH0vXR4dh9I9Iix36cE0uKmgC3pzulGyel-v8NVq9v7zlT6tISym6SAITmaw41zEDHSOWILagIZ0ruU2QSZ7wFOdMoxTDJNOtSuIyS0WJUkEp5JTc_Xudt4ceQ1e0ddDYDD-g7UMhEpYlMotjPqD3_6j2NgSPVeF83YI_FpwVY-liKF2cSss_EbR0-w</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Morishima, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Chida, Koichi</creator><creator>Meguro, Takayoshi</creator><creator>Hirota, Morihisa</creator><creator>Chiba, Hiroo</creator><creator>Fukuda, Hiroshi</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-2663</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</title><author>Morishima, Yoshiaki ; Chida, Koichi ; Meguro, Takayoshi ; Hirota, Morihisa ; Chiba, Hiroo ; Fukuda, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-3a0293f11c60ac6eeda2baca8543b7e031718e50ce3254338b476d982de34ad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morishima, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chida, Koichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguro, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morishima, Yoshiaki</au><au>Chida, Koichi</au><au>Meguro, Takayoshi</au><au>Hirota, Morihisa</au><au>Chiba, Hiroo</au><au>Fukuda, Hiroshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1368</spage><epage>1376</epage><pages>1368-1376</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement.
LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck.
The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p < 0.01).
For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.</abstract><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncac160</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-2663</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1368-1376 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709739661 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Lens Equivalent dose of Staff During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dose Comparison Using Two Types of Dosemeters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lens%20Equivalent%20dose%20of%20Staff%20During%20Endoscopic%20Retrograde%20Cholangiopancreatography:%20Dose%20Comparison%20Using%20Two%20Types%20of%20Dosemeters&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Morishima,%20Yoshiaki&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1368&rft.epage=1376&rft.pages=1368-1376&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncac160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709739661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709739661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |