Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation

We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey E...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality & social psychology bulletin 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.3-17
Hauptverfasser: DeVerna, Matthew R., Guess, Andrew M., Berinsky, Adam J., Tucker, Joshua A., Jost, John T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Personality & social psychology bulletin
container_volume 50
creator DeVerna, Matthew R.
Guess, Andrew M.
Berinsky, Adam J.
Tucker, Joshua A.
Jost, John T.
description We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01461672221114222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709017060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01461672221114222</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2893421839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwFvAi5et-bebXW-lWC1UxKLnJSQvNWV3U5Ms0m_v1gqC4mlg3m-GxyB0ScmEUilvCBUFLSRjjFIqBjlCI5rnLJOC82M02t-zPXCKzmLcEEJEIdgIPa_61oeIXYdXkD4A0i1eGPCNXzutGjyNu7aFFHZ7Ir0BnivX9AFw8njmQwCd8KOLrrM-tCo5352jE6uaCBffOkav87uX2UO2fLpfzKbLTHORp8wAA2lUWZVEVEKSXOVGg7RWWUk4yzVVlisD1CihTMlEDsrYwSy0NGVB-BhdH3q3wb_3EFPduqihaVQHvo81k6QiVJIv9OoXuvF96IbvalZWXDBa8mqg6IHSwccYwNbb4FoVdjUl9X7k-s_IQ2ZyyES1hp_W_wOfUBl8Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893421839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>DeVerna, Matthew R. ; Guess, Andrew M. ; Berinsky, Adam J. ; Tucker, Joshua A. ; Jost, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>DeVerna, Matthew R. ; Guess, Andrew M. ; Berinsky, Adam J. ; Tucker, Joshua A. ; Jost, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01461672221114222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Death &amp; dying ; Families &amp; family life ; Ideology ; Misinformation ; News ; Rumors</subject><ispartof>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin, 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.3-17</ispartof><rights>2022 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2844-4645 ; 0000-0003-3578-8339</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01461672221114222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672221114222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,30990,33765,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeVerna, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berinsky, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</title><title>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.</description><subject>Death &amp; dying</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Misinformation</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>Rumors</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwFvAi5et-bebXW-lWC1UxKLnJSQvNWV3U5Ms0m_v1gqC4mlg3m-GxyB0ScmEUilvCBUFLSRjjFIqBjlCI5rnLJOC82M02t-zPXCKzmLcEEJEIdgIPa_61oeIXYdXkD4A0i1eGPCNXzutGjyNu7aFFHZ7Ir0BnivX9AFw8njmQwCd8KOLrrM-tCo5352jE6uaCBffOkav87uX2UO2fLpfzKbLTHORp8wAA2lUWZVEVEKSXOVGg7RWWUk4yzVVlisD1CihTMlEDsrYwSy0NGVB-BhdH3q3wb_3EFPduqihaVQHvo81k6QiVJIv9OoXuvF96IbvalZWXDBa8mqg6IHSwccYwNbb4FoVdjUl9X7k-s_IQ2ZyyES1hp_W_wOfUBl8Cw</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>DeVerna, Matthew R.</creator><creator>Guess, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Berinsky, Adam J.</creator><creator>Tucker, Joshua A.</creator><creator>Jost, John T.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-4645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-8339</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</title><author>DeVerna, Matthew R. ; Guess, Andrew M. ; Berinsky, Adam J. ; Tucker, Joshua A. ; Jost, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Death &amp; dying</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Misinformation</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>Rumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeVerna, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berinsky, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeVerna, Matthew R.</au><au>Guess, Andrew M.</au><au>Berinsky, Adam J.</au><au>Tucker, Joshua A.</au><au>Jost, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</atitle><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>3-17</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01461672221114222</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-4645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-8339</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-1672
ispartof Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.3-17
issn 0146-1672
1552-7433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709017060
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Death & dying
Families & family life
Ideology
Misinformation
News
Rumors
title Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rumors%20in%20Retweet:%20Ideological%20Asymmetry%20in%20the%20Failure%20to%20Correct%20Misinformation&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=DeVerna,%20Matthew%20R.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=3-17&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01461672221114222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2893421839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893421839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01461672221114222&rfr_iscdi=true