Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation
We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey E...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality & social psychology bulletin 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.3-17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Personality & social psychology bulletin |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | DeVerna, Matthew R. Guess, Andrew M. Berinsky, Adam J. Tucker, Joshua A. Jost, John T. |
description | We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/01461672221114222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709017060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01461672221114222</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2893421839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwFvAi5et-bebXW-lWC1UxKLnJSQvNWV3U5Ms0m_v1gqC4mlg3m-GxyB0ScmEUilvCBUFLSRjjFIqBjlCI5rnLJOC82M02t-zPXCKzmLcEEJEIdgIPa_61oeIXYdXkD4A0i1eGPCNXzutGjyNu7aFFHZ7Ir0BnivX9AFw8njmQwCd8KOLrrM-tCo5352jE6uaCBffOkav87uX2UO2fLpfzKbLTHORp8wAA2lUWZVEVEKSXOVGg7RWWUk4yzVVlisD1CihTMlEDsrYwSy0NGVB-BhdH3q3wb_3EFPduqihaVQHvo81k6QiVJIv9OoXuvF96IbvalZWXDBa8mqg6IHSwccYwNbb4FoVdjUl9X7k-s_IQ2ZyyES1hp_W_wOfUBl8Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893421839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>DeVerna, Matthew R. ; Guess, Andrew M. ; Berinsky, Adam J. ; Tucker, Joshua A. ; Jost, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>DeVerna, Matthew R. ; Guess, Andrew M. ; Berinsky, Adam J. ; Tucker, Joshua A. ; Jost, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01461672221114222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Death & dying ; Families & family life ; Ideology ; Misinformation ; News ; Rumors</subject><ispartof>Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.3-17</ispartof><rights>2022 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2844-4645 ; 0000-0003-3578-8339</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01461672221114222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672221114222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,30990,33765,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeVerna, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berinsky, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</title><title>Personality & social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.</description><subject>Death & dying</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Misinformation</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>Rumors</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwFvAi5et-bebXW-lWC1UxKLnJSQvNWV3U5Ms0m_v1gqC4mlg3m-GxyB0ScmEUilvCBUFLSRjjFIqBjlCI5rnLJOC82M02t-zPXCKzmLcEEJEIdgIPa_61oeIXYdXkD4A0i1eGPCNXzutGjyNu7aFFHZ7Ir0BnivX9AFw8njmQwCd8KOLrrM-tCo5352jE6uaCBffOkav87uX2UO2fLpfzKbLTHORp8wAA2lUWZVEVEKSXOVGg7RWWUk4yzVVlisD1CihTMlEDsrYwSy0NGVB-BhdH3q3wb_3EFPduqihaVQHvo81k6QiVJIv9OoXuvF96IbvalZWXDBa8mqg6IHSwccYwNbb4FoVdjUl9X7k-s_IQ2ZyyES1hp_W_wOfUBl8Cw</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>DeVerna, Matthew R.</creator><creator>Guess, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Berinsky, Adam J.</creator><creator>Tucker, Joshua A.</creator><creator>Jost, John T.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-4645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-8339</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</title><author>DeVerna, Matthew R. ; Guess, Andrew M. ; Berinsky, Adam J. ; Tucker, Joshua A. ; Jost, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-de2e7da8980494705a5dce7ffaf70325c1af3ade1da4ad8245eadf1af6c7d8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Death & dying</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Misinformation</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>Rumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeVerna, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berinsky, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeVerna, Matthew R.</au><au>Guess, Andrew M.</au><au>Berinsky, Adam J.</au><au>Tucker, Joshua A.</au><au>Jost, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation</atitle><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>3-17</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, N = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, N = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it increased among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein’s death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01461672221114222</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-4645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-8339</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-1672 |
ispartof | Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2024-01, Vol.50 (1), p.3-17 |
issn | 0146-1672 1552-7433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2709017060 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Death & dying Families & family life Ideology Misinformation News Rumors |
title | Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rumors%20in%20Retweet:%20Ideological%20Asymmetry%20in%20the%20Failure%20to%20Correct%20Misinformation&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=DeVerna,%20Matthew%20R.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=3-17&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01461672221114222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2893421839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893421839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01461672221114222&rfr_iscdi=true |