Construction of a unified, high-resolution nitrous oxide data set for ER-2 flights during SOLVE
Four nitrous oxide (N2O) instruments were part of the NASA ER‐2 aircraft payload during the 2000 SAGE‐III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). Coincident data from the three in situ instruments and a whole air sampler are compared. Agreement between these instruments was typically good; how...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2002-10, Vol.107 (D20), p.SOL 13-1-SOL 13-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | SOL 13-13 |
---|---|
container_issue | D20 |
container_start_page | SOL 13-1 |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Hurst, Dale F. Schauffler, Sue M. Greenblatt, Jeffery B. Jost, Hansjürg Herman, Robert L. Elkins, James W. Romashkin, Pavel A. Atlas, Elliot L. Donnelly, Stephen G. Podolske, James R. Loewenstein, Max Webster, Christopher R. Flesch, Gregory J. Scott, David C. |
description | Four nitrous oxide (N2O) instruments were part of the NASA ER‐2 aircraft payload during the 2000 SAGE‐III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). Coincident data from the three in situ instruments and a whole air sampler are compared. Agreement between these instruments was typically good; however, there are several types of important differences between the data sets. These differences prompted a collaborative effort to combine data from the three in situ instruments, using an objective method, to produce a self‐consistent, high‐resolution, unified N2O data set for each SOLVE flight. The construction method developed by the four N2O instrument teams is described in detail. An important step in this method is the evaluation and reduction of bias in each of the in situ data sets before they are combined. The quality of unified N2O data is examined through its agreement with high‐accuracy and high‐precision N2O data from whole air samples collected from the ER‐2 during SOLVE flights. Typical agreement between these two data sets is 2.9 ppb (1.5%), better than the typical agreement between any pair of N2O instruments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2001JD000417 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27087241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18700753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-c4e93efb63666b195024c8400b1bf46211ccc1ae9d72318b1f5230bc8d2be1433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQha2qlboCbv0BPvVE2pmxYyfHane77WoFEi2Um5U4NriEGOxEhX_PLlshTu1pDu_7nkaPsQ8InxCo_kwAuF4AgET9hs0IS1UQAb1lM0BZFUCk37OjnH_DDiqVBJwxM49DHtNkxxAHHj1v-DQEH1x3zK_D1XWRXI799JwOYUxxyjw-hM7xrhkbnt3IfUx8eVYQ9_1WGDPvphSGK_7jdHOxPGTvfNNnd_T3HrDzr8uf82_F5nT1ff5lU1ghlSqsdLVwvlVCKdViXQJJW0mAFlsvFSFaa7FxdadJYNWiL0lAa6uOWodSiAP2cd97l-L95PJobkO2ru-bwW1_NqSh0iTxvyBWGkCXu8bjPWhTzDk5b-5SuG3So0Ewu8XN68W3OO3xP6F3j_9kzXp1tqh0rbZSsZdCHt3Di9SkG6O00KX5dbIyAIvVZbVGcymeAEcgjuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18700753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction of a unified, high-resolution nitrous oxide data set for ER-2 flights during SOLVE</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hurst, Dale F. ; Schauffler, Sue M. ; Greenblatt, Jeffery B. ; Jost, Hansjürg ; Herman, Robert L. ; Elkins, James W. ; Romashkin, Pavel A. ; Atlas, Elliot L. ; Donnelly, Stephen G. ; Podolske, James R. ; Loewenstein, Max ; Webster, Christopher R. ; Flesch, Gregory J. ; Scott, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Dale F. ; Schauffler, Sue M. ; Greenblatt, Jeffery B. ; Jost, Hansjürg ; Herman, Robert L. ; Elkins, James W. ; Romashkin, Pavel A. ; Atlas, Elliot L. ; Donnelly, Stephen G. ; Podolske, James R. ; Loewenstein, Max ; Webster, Christopher R. ; Flesch, Gregory J. ; Scott, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Four nitrous oxide (N2O) instruments were part of the NASA ER‐2 aircraft payload during the 2000 SAGE‐III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). Coincident data from the three in situ instruments and a whole air sampler are compared. Agreement between these instruments was typically good; however, there are several types of important differences between the data sets. These differences prompted a collaborative effort to combine data from the three in situ instruments, using an objective method, to produce a self‐consistent, high‐resolution, unified N2O data set for each SOLVE flight. The construction method developed by the four N2O instrument teams is described in detail. An important step in this method is the evaluation and reduction of bias in each of the in situ data sets before they are combined. The quality of unified N2O data is examined through its agreement with high‐accuracy and high‐precision N2O data from whole air samples collected from the ER‐2 during SOLVE flights. Typical agreement between these two data sets is 2.9 ppb (1.5%), better than the typical agreement between any pair of N2O instruments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2001JD000417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>data combination method ; ER-2 ; nitrous oxide ; SOLVE ; stratosphere</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2002-10, Vol.107 (D20), p.SOL 13-1-SOL 13-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-c4e93efb63666b195024c8400b1bf46211ccc1ae9d72318b1f5230bc8d2be1433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-c4e93efb63666b195024c8400b1bf46211ccc1ae9d72318b1f5230bc8d2be1433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2001JD000417$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2001JD000417$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Dale F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauffler, Sue M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenblatt, Jeffery B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, Hansjürg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkins, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romashkin, Pavel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atlas, Elliot L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podolske, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewenstein, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flesch, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Construction of a unified, high-resolution nitrous oxide data set for ER-2 flights during SOLVE</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Four nitrous oxide (N2O) instruments were part of the NASA ER‐2 aircraft payload during the 2000 SAGE‐III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). Coincident data from the three in situ instruments and a whole air sampler are compared. Agreement between these instruments was typically good; however, there are several types of important differences between the data sets. These differences prompted a collaborative effort to combine data from the three in situ instruments, using an objective method, to produce a self‐consistent, high‐resolution, unified N2O data set for each SOLVE flight. The construction method developed by the four N2O instrument teams is described in detail. An important step in this method is the evaluation and reduction of bias in each of the in situ data sets before they are combined. The quality of unified N2O data is examined through its agreement with high‐accuracy and high‐precision N2O data from whole air samples collected from the ER‐2 during SOLVE flights. Typical agreement between these two data sets is 2.9 ppb (1.5%), better than the typical agreement between any pair of N2O instruments.</description><subject>data combination method</subject><subject>ER-2</subject><subject>nitrous oxide</subject><subject>SOLVE</subject><subject>stratosphere</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQha2qlboCbv0BPvVE2pmxYyfHane77WoFEi2Um5U4NriEGOxEhX_PLlshTu1pDu_7nkaPsQ8InxCo_kwAuF4AgET9hs0IS1UQAb1lM0BZFUCk37OjnH_DDiqVBJwxM49DHtNkxxAHHj1v-DQEH1x3zK_D1XWRXI799JwOYUxxyjw-hM7xrhkbnt3IfUx8eVYQ9_1WGDPvphSGK_7jdHOxPGTvfNNnd_T3HrDzr8uf82_F5nT1ff5lU1ghlSqsdLVwvlVCKdViXQJJW0mAFlsvFSFaa7FxdadJYNWiL0lAa6uOWodSiAP2cd97l-L95PJobkO2ru-bwW1_NqSh0iTxvyBWGkCXu8bjPWhTzDk5b-5SuG3So0Ewu8XN68W3OO3xP6F3j_9kzXp1tqh0rbZSsZdCHt3Di9SkG6O00KX5dbIyAIvVZbVGcymeAEcgjuQ</recordid><startdate>20021027</startdate><enddate>20021027</enddate><creator>Hurst, Dale F.</creator><creator>Schauffler, Sue M.</creator><creator>Greenblatt, Jeffery B.</creator><creator>Jost, Hansjürg</creator><creator>Herman, Robert L.</creator><creator>Elkins, James W.</creator><creator>Romashkin, Pavel A.</creator><creator>Atlas, Elliot L.</creator><creator>Donnelly, Stephen G.</creator><creator>Podolske, James R.</creator><creator>Loewenstein, Max</creator><creator>Webster, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Flesch, Gregory J.</creator><creator>Scott, David C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021027</creationdate><title>Construction of a unified, high-resolution nitrous oxide data set for ER-2 flights during SOLVE</title><author>Hurst, Dale F. ; Schauffler, Sue M. ; Greenblatt, Jeffery B. ; Jost, Hansjürg ; Herman, Robert L. ; Elkins, James W. ; Romashkin, Pavel A. ; Atlas, Elliot L. ; Donnelly, Stephen G. ; Podolske, James R. ; Loewenstein, Max ; Webster, Christopher R. ; Flesch, Gregory J. ; Scott, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-c4e93efb63666b195024c8400b1bf46211ccc1ae9d72318b1f5230bc8d2be1433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>data combination method</topic><topic>ER-2</topic><topic>nitrous oxide</topic><topic>SOLVE</topic><topic>stratosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Dale F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauffler, Sue M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenblatt, Jeffery B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, Hansjürg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkins, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romashkin, Pavel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atlas, Elliot L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podolske, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewenstein, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flesch, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurst, Dale F.</au><au>Schauffler, Sue M.</au><au>Greenblatt, Jeffery B.</au><au>Jost, Hansjürg</au><au>Herman, Robert L.</au><au>Elkins, James W.</au><au>Romashkin, Pavel A.</au><au>Atlas, Elliot L.</au><au>Donnelly, Stephen G.</au><au>Podolske, James R.</au><au>Loewenstein, Max</au><au>Webster, Christopher R.</au><au>Flesch, Gregory J.</au><au>Scott, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction of a unified, high-resolution nitrous oxide data set for ER-2 flights during SOLVE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2002-10-27</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>D20</issue><spage>SOL 13-1</spage><epage>SOL 13-13</epage><pages>SOL 13-1-SOL 13-13</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Four nitrous oxide (N2O) instruments were part of the NASA ER‐2 aircraft payload during the 2000 SAGE‐III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). Coincident data from the three in situ instruments and a whole air sampler are compared. Agreement between these instruments was typically good; however, there are several types of important differences between the data sets. These differences prompted a collaborative effort to combine data from the three in situ instruments, using an objective method, to produce a self‐consistent, high‐resolution, unified N2O data set for each SOLVE flight. The construction method developed by the four N2O instrument teams is described in detail. An important step in this method is the evaluation and reduction of bias in each of the in situ data sets before they are combined. The quality of unified N2O data is examined through its agreement with high‐accuracy and high‐precision N2O data from whole air samples collected from the ER‐2 during SOLVE flights. Typical agreement between these two data sets is 2.9 ppb (1.5%), better than the typical agreement between any pair of N2O instruments.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2001JD000417</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2002-10, Vol.107 (D20), p.SOL 13-1-SOL 13-13 |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27087241 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | data combination method ER-2 nitrous oxide SOLVE stratosphere |
title | Construction of a unified, high-resolution nitrous oxide data set for ER-2 flights during SOLVE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A25%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20of%20a%20unified,%20high-resolution%20nitrous%20oxide%20data%20set%20for%20ER-2%20flights%20during%20SOLVE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Hurst,%20Dale%20F.&rft.date=2002-10-27&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=D20&rft.spage=SOL%2013-1&rft.epage=SOL%2013-13&rft.pages=SOL%2013-1-SOL%2013-13&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2001JD000417&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18700753%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18700753&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |