Determination of Entrance Surface dose for Three Common Planar Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations

Patient dose during diagnostic radiography procedures primarily depends on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the exposure area. The purpose of this study was to determine ESD for five common diagnostic X-ray examinations using dose area product and X-ray tube output. The ESDs were estimated in a s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1361-1367
Hauptverfasser: Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam, Ehalagasthanna, G P N T, Hishaam, Urshella, Satharasinghe, D M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1367
container_issue 18
container_start_page 1361
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 198
creator Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam
Ehalagasthanna, G P N T
Hishaam, Urshella
Satharasinghe, D M
description Patient dose during diagnostic radiography procedures primarily depends on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the exposure area. The purpose of this study was to determine ESD for five common diagnostic X-ray examinations using dose area product and X-ray tube output. The ESDs were estimated in a sample of 340 patients using normalised X-ray output from Philips–PrimaryDiagnost digital X-ray machine equipped with digital flat panel scintillator detector. The resultant mean ESDs for chest postero-anterior/lateral, lumbar spine antero-posterior (AP)/lateral and abdomen AP were 0.49, 2.00, 5.74, 12.79 and 4.62 mGy, respectively. The mean and third quartile ESD values of this study were significantly higher than the values found in the literature. This can be attributed to the lower tube potential (kVp) values and the higher tube current–time products (mAs). The methodology used here is a better option for low-resources countries for routine dose monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncac177
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2708258815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2708258815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-96196a438dbd23724b2700c744de701c0558ffb8d134d92d3ce09edc382710003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1KAzEYRYMoWKsrXyBLQcZ--Zkms5T-qFBQtIILIaTJFx3pTGoyBfv2jrSu7uZwuBxCLhncMKjEKG38qHXWMaWOyIApyQshYXxMBsCkLLTkcErOcv4C4Koq5YC8T7HD1NSt7erY0hjorO2SbR3Sl20Ktl8fM9IQE11-JkQ6iU3Tk09r29pEp7X9aGPuakffime7o7Mf-2_L5-Qk2HXGi8MOyet8tpzcF4vHu4fJ7aJwnMuuqMasGlsptF95LhSXK64AnJLSowLmoCx1CCvtmZC-4l44hAq9E5orBgBiSK723k2K31vMnWnq7HDdX8S4zabXaV5qzcoevd6jLsWcEwazSXVj084wMH8NTd_QHBqKX3tJZYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708258815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of Entrance Surface dose for Three Common Planar Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam ; Ehalagasthanna, G P N T ; Hishaam, Urshella ; Satharasinghe, D M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam ; Ehalagasthanna, G P N T ; Hishaam, Urshella ; Satharasinghe, D M</creatorcontrib><description>Patient dose during diagnostic radiography procedures primarily depends on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the exposure area. The purpose of this study was to determine ESD for five common diagnostic X-ray examinations using dose area product and X-ray tube output. The ESDs were estimated in a sample of 340 patients using normalised X-ray output from Philips–PrimaryDiagnost digital X-ray machine equipped with digital flat panel scintillator detector. The resultant mean ESDs for chest postero-anterior/lateral, lumbar spine antero-posterior (AP)/lateral and abdomen AP were 0.49, 2.00, 5.74, 12.79 and 4.62 mGy, respectively. The mean and third quartile ESD values of this study were significantly higher than the values found in the literature. This can be attributed to the lower tube potential (kVp) values and the higher tube current–time products (mAs). The methodology used here is a better option for low-resources countries for routine dose monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac177</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1361-1367</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-96196a438dbd23724b2700c744de701c0558ffb8d134d92d3ce09edc382710003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2896-3768 ; 0000-0002-0269-2659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehalagasthanna, G P N T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hishaam, Urshella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satharasinghe, D M</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of Entrance Surface dose for Three Common Planar Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><description>Patient dose during diagnostic radiography procedures primarily depends on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the exposure area. The purpose of this study was to determine ESD for five common diagnostic X-ray examinations using dose area product and X-ray tube output. The ESDs were estimated in a sample of 340 patients using normalised X-ray output from Philips–PrimaryDiagnost digital X-ray machine equipped with digital flat panel scintillator detector. The resultant mean ESDs for chest postero-anterior/lateral, lumbar spine antero-posterior (AP)/lateral and abdomen AP were 0.49, 2.00, 5.74, 12.79 and 4.62 mGy, respectively. The mean and third quartile ESD values of this study were significantly higher than the values found in the literature. This can be attributed to the lower tube potential (kVp) values and the higher tube current–time products (mAs). The methodology used here is a better option for low-resources countries for routine dose monitoring.</description><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kM1KAzEYRYMoWKsrXyBLQcZ--Zkms5T-qFBQtIILIaTJFx3pTGoyBfv2jrSu7uZwuBxCLhncMKjEKG38qHXWMaWOyIApyQshYXxMBsCkLLTkcErOcv4C4Koq5YC8T7HD1NSt7erY0hjorO2SbR3Sl20Ktl8fM9IQE11-JkQ6iU3Tk09r29pEp7X9aGPuakffime7o7Mf-2_L5-Qk2HXGi8MOyet8tpzcF4vHu4fJ7aJwnMuuqMasGlsptF95LhSXK64AnJLSowLmoCx1CCvtmZC-4l44hAq9E5orBgBiSK723k2K31vMnWnq7HDdX8S4zabXaV5qzcoevd6jLsWcEwazSXVj084wMH8NTd_QHBqKX3tJZYM</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam</creator><creator>Ehalagasthanna, G P N T</creator><creator>Hishaam, Urshella</creator><creator>Satharasinghe, D M</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-3768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0269-2659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>Determination of Entrance Surface dose for Three Common Planar Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations</title><author>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam ; Ehalagasthanna, G P N T ; Hishaam, Urshella ; Satharasinghe, D M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-96196a438dbd23724b2700c744de701c0558ffb8d134d92d3ce09edc382710003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehalagasthanna, G P N T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hishaam, Urshella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satharasinghe, D M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeyasugiththan, Jeyasingam</au><au>Ehalagasthanna, G P N T</au><au>Hishaam, Urshella</au><au>Satharasinghe, D M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of Entrance Surface dose for Three Common Planar Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1367</epage><pages>1361-1367</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>Patient dose during diagnostic radiography procedures primarily depends on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the exposure area. The purpose of this study was to determine ESD for five common diagnostic X-ray examinations using dose area product and X-ray tube output. The ESDs were estimated in a sample of 340 patients using normalised X-ray output from Philips–PrimaryDiagnost digital X-ray machine equipped with digital flat panel scintillator detector. The resultant mean ESDs for chest postero-anterior/lateral, lumbar spine antero-posterior (AP)/lateral and abdomen AP were 0.49, 2.00, 5.74, 12.79 and 4.62 mGy, respectively. The mean and third quartile ESD values of this study were significantly higher than the values found in the literature. This can be attributed to the lower tube potential (kVp) values and the higher tube current–time products (mAs). The methodology used here is a better option for low-resources countries for routine dose monitoring.</abstract><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncac177</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-3768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0269-2659</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2022-10, Vol.198 (18), p.1361-1367
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2708258815
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Determination of Entrance Surface dose for Three Common Planar Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20Entrance%20Surface%20dose%20for%20Three%20Common%20Planar%20Diagnostic%20X-Ray%20Examinations&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Jeyasugiththan,%20Jeyasingam&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1367&rft.pages=1361-1367&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncac177&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2708258815%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708258815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true