The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin
Purpose The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin. Materials and methods Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of prosthodontics 2023-07, Vol.32 (6), p.540-545 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 545 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 540 |
container_title | Journal of prosthodontics |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Piangsuk, Tarin Henprasert, Pantip Boonsiriphant, Piriya Lindquist, Terry J. |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin.
Materials and methods
Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy.
Results
The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p < 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p < 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1).
Conclusion
3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jopr.13594 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707614151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2707614151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlY3PoAE3IgwNWcy16XUO4WKVOguZDKnOmU6GZMOtTsfwWf0SUyd1oULs0lyzsfPz0fIMbA-uHMx07XpAw_TYId0IeS-lwTpZNe9WZh6aQCTDjmwdsYYQJjAPunwiLGEh3GXyPErUqlUY6RaUaXntTSF1RXVU8qvvj4-a1NUC8xpre2Cyip3jEHa2KJ6oUrahcxKpAbdv91uR0v53o4Pyd5UlhaPNnePPN9cjwd33nB0ez-4HHrKFQk8SDiTUyYlS1ztMONBGvt-jjyHxFecu20CMfIk41HgM4kZhhwhAkzzKI9S3iNnbW5t9FuDdiHmhVVYlrJC3VjhxyyOIIAQHHr6B53pxlSunfCdFkjjKIgddd5SymhrDU6FczGXZiWAibV4sRYvfsQ7-GQT2WRzzH_RrWkHQAssixJX_0SJh9HjUxv6DTSYjZ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835197647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Piangsuk, Tarin ; Henprasert, Pantip ; Boonsiriphant, Piriya ; Lindquist, Terry J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piangsuk, Tarin ; Henprasert, Pantip ; Boonsiriphant, Piriya ; Lindquist, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin.
Materials and methods
Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy.
Results
The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p < 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p < 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1).
Conclusion
3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36008357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Accuracy ; accuracy of post and core ; Computer-Aided Design ; Crowns ; customized post and core ; Dental Impression Materials ; Endodontics ; Incisor ; Incisors ; Polymerization ; post and core ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Root canals ; Tooth Crown</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (6), p.540-545</ispartof><rights>2022 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2023 American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8021-2868 ; 0000-0002-9705-4085</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjopr.13594$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjopr.13594$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piangsuk, Tarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henprasert, Pantip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindquist, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin.
Materials and methods
Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy.
Results
The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p < 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p < 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1).
Conclusion
3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>accuracy of post and core</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>customized post and core</subject><subject>Dental Impression Materials</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Incisor</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>post and core</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Tooth Crown</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlY3PoAE3IgwNWcy16XUO4WKVOguZDKnOmU6GZMOtTsfwWf0SUyd1oULs0lyzsfPz0fIMbA-uHMx07XpAw_TYId0IeS-lwTpZNe9WZh6aQCTDjmwdsYYQJjAPunwiLGEh3GXyPErUqlUY6RaUaXntTSF1RXVU8qvvj4-a1NUC8xpre2Cyip3jEHa2KJ6oUrahcxKpAbdv91uR0v53o4Pyd5UlhaPNnePPN9cjwd33nB0ez-4HHrKFQk8SDiTUyYlS1ztMONBGvt-jjyHxFecu20CMfIk41HgM4kZhhwhAkzzKI9S3iNnbW5t9FuDdiHmhVVYlrJC3VjhxyyOIIAQHHr6B53pxlSunfCdFkjjKIgddd5SymhrDU6FczGXZiWAibV4sRYvfsQ7-GQT2WRzzH_RrWkHQAssixJX_0SJh9HjUxv6DTSYjZ4</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Piangsuk, Tarin</creator><creator>Henprasert, Pantip</creator><creator>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</creator><creator>Lindquist, Terry J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-2868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-4085</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</title><author>Piangsuk, Tarin ; Henprasert, Pantip ; Boonsiriphant, Piriya ; Lindquist, Terry J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-1830af0aa081055b349722de3d182c3330a817e38b36420aebe53e161e9d6d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>accuracy of post and core</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>customized post and core</topic><topic>Dental Impression Materials</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Incisor</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>post and core</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Tooth Crown</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piangsuk, Tarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henprasert, Pantip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindquist, Terry J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piangsuk, Tarin</au><au>Henprasert, Pantip</au><au>Boonsiriphant, Piriya</au><au>Lindquist, Terry J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>540</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>540-545</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of three‐dimensionally (3D) printed post and core fabricated with two different materials: reinforced wax and castable resin.
Materials and methods
Fifteen extracted single root central incisors were selected. Root canal treatment and tooth preparation for crown were performed on all teeth. Eleven millimeters post space was created with standardized prefabricated fiber post drill. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used for root canal impressions. Each impression was then 3D scanned using an extraoral scanner and cast posts and cores were designed using 3Shape software. The digitally designed post and cores were 3D printed with two different materials: castable wax resin and castable resin. The castable resin patterns were scanned before and after complete polymerization. The wax patterns were also scanned. Digital volumetric measurement using Geomagic® Control X™ software was performed to determine accuracy.
Results
The printed post and core had reduced volume (16.09 ± 3.839 mm3) compared to the digital design (17.828 ± 3.904, p < 0.05). Before complete polymerization, the accuracy of 3D printed resin pattern (16.464 ± 3.017) was found to be superior to post and core printed with wax (16.193 ± 3.018, p < 0.05). However, no volume difference was found between completely polymerized resin (16.09 ± 3.839) and wax (16.044 ± 3.834, p = 1).
Conclusion
3D printed post and core showed significant volume shrinkage from the digital files used to create them. However, different materials had no effect on the accuracy of 3D printed post and core.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36008357</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.13594</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-2868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-4085</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-941X |
ispartof | Journal of prosthodontics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (6), p.540-545 |
issn | 1059-941X 1532-849X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2707614151 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | 3D printing Accuracy accuracy of post and core Computer-Aided Design Crowns customized post and core Dental Impression Materials Endodontics Incisor Incisors Polymerization post and core Printing, Three-Dimensional Root canals Tooth Crown |
title | The accuracy comparison of 3D‐printed post and core using castable resin and castable wax resin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A07%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20comparison%20of%203D%E2%80%90printed%20post%20and%20core%20using%20castable%20resin%20and%20castable%20wax%20resin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Piangsuk,%20Tarin&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=540-545&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.13594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2707614151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835197647&rft_id=info:pmid/36008357&rfr_iscdi=true |