Left ventricular assist device-related infections and the risk of cerebrovascular accidents: a EUROMACS study

OBJECTIVESIn patients supported by a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), infections are a frequently reported adverse event with increased morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible association between infections and thromboembolic events, most nota...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2022-10, Vol.62 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Zijderhand, Casper F, Antonides, Christiaan F J, Veen, Kevin M, Verkaik, Nelianne J, Schoenrath, Felix, Gummert, Jan, Nemec, Petr, Merkely, Béla, Musumeci, Francesco, Meyns, Bart, de By, Theo M M H, Bogers, Ad J J C, Caliskan, Kadir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVESIn patients supported by a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), infections are a frequently reported adverse event with increased morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible association between infections and thromboembolic events, most notable cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), in LVAD patients. METHODSAn analysis of the multicentre European Registry for Patients Assisted with Mechanical Circulatory Support was performed. Infections were categorized as VAD-specific infections, VAD-related infections and non-VAD-related infections. An extended Kaplan-Meier analysis for the risk of CVA with infection as a time-dependent covariate and a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were performed. RESULTSFor this analysis, 3282 patients with an LVAD were included with the majority of patients being male (83.1%). During follow-up, 1262 patients suffered from infection, and 457 patients had a CVA. Cox regression analysis with first infection as time-dependent covariate revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for CVA of 1.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55-2.33; P 
ISSN:1873-734X
1873-734X
DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezac421