Validating the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) Questionnaire: An Online Self-Reported Tool for Frailty Assessment of Older Adults

Subjective health measures are often used to assess frailty, but the validity of self-reported online tools to identify frailty remains to be established. We aimed to assess concurrent, known-groups, convergent and predictive validity of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2022-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1984.e1-1984.e8
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Joshua S., Chew, Justin, Lim, Yu Rui, Ng, Wendy K.G., Yeo, Audrey J.P., Ong, Lynnett T.J., Chan, Mark P.C., Lim, Wee Shiong, Beauchet, Olivier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1984.e8
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1984.e1
container_title Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
container_volume 23
creator Lee, Joshua S.
Chew, Justin
Lim, Yu Rui
Ng, Wendy K.G.
Yeo, Audrey J.P.
Ong, Lynnett T.J.
Chan, Mark P.C.
Lim, Wee Shiong
Beauchet, Olivier
description Subjective health measures are often used to assess frailty, but the validity of self-reported online tools to identify frailty remains to be established. We aimed to assess concurrent, known-groups, convergent and predictive validity of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) questionnaire for frailty assessment of older adults in an outpatient setting. Cross-sectional analysis of 120 participants. Participants of age ≥65 were recruited from an outpatient geriatric clinic. Individuals who had severe neurological, cognitive, or motor deficits were excluded. We assessed concurrent validity with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) against the Frailty Index (FI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We analyzed known-groups validity between CESAM scores with frailty status (CFS and FI), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and modified Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (mCMMSE) using 1-way analysis of variance. We evaluated convergent validity using correlations with MBI, the Lawton index, mCMMSE, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Associations between CESAM-identified frailty for clinician-diagnosed geriatric syndromes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analyzed using regression analysis. The CESAM questionnaire demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for frailty using FI ≥0.25 (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82–0.94; P < .001) and CFS ≥4 (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68–0.88; P < .001). CESAM scores increased significantly with increasing frailty (both CFS and FI), lower MBI, and lower mCMMSE scores (all P < .001), indicating concurrent validity. The moderate-good correlation of CESAM scores with MBI (r = −0.61; P < 0.001), Lawton Index (r = −0.54; P < .001), mCMMSE (r = −0.53; P < .001) and GDS (r = 0.58; P < .001) supports convergent validity. Using a cutoff of ≥8 for frailty identification, CESAM-identified frailty was associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.7–8.2; P = .001) depression (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.7–9.6; P = .002), falls (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2–8.2; P = .021) and poorer HRQoL (β = −0.1; 95% CI: −0.2 to −0.02; P = .017). Our results support the validity of an online self-reported tool to identify frailty and geriatric syndromes in an outpatient setting, an approach that is potentially applicable for remote screening of frailty.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2702187568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525861022005035</els_id><sourcerecordid>2702187568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-396be917be9820c21e010500c19febae384fa8b249836c957c42d5fbdfba4c553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwBEjIy7JIsJ1xfpBYRKMprTTVqLSwtRz7pnjk2FPbU9GH4V3rMKXLbvwjnXOPzv0Q-khJSQmtv2zLrZy0LBlhrCR1SSr6Ch1TXrVFVzX89fxmvGhrSo7Quxi3hDBCu_otOqp4x1nD6DH6-0tao2Uy7han34CX4FIA7Ee8-qPAWnAq_xxee3cL9yY94GuwY9HrS-NMTBBA49Pl6rq__Iyv9hCT8c5JE-Ar7h3eOGscHCw_YOdDyvIb7y0efcBnQRqbJ_YxQoxTTp5zN1ZDwL3e2xTfozejtBE-PN0n6OfZ6mZ5Xqw33y-W_bpQuUkqqq4eoKNNPlpGFKNAKOGEKNqNMEio2sUo24EturaqVccbtWCaj4MeB7lQnFcn6PQwdxf83dxCTCbO9aUDv4-CNYTRtuF1m6XVQaqCjzHAKHbBTDI8CErEzEVsxT8uYuYiSC0yl-z69BSwHybQz57_ILLg20EAuea9gSCiMvPydd6lSkJ782LAI8UToJk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702187568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) Questionnaire: An Online Self-Reported Tool for Frailty Assessment of Older Adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lee, Joshua S. ; Chew, Justin ; Lim, Yu Rui ; Ng, Wendy K.G. ; Yeo, Audrey J.P. ; Ong, Lynnett T.J. ; Chan, Mark P.C. ; Lim, Wee Shiong ; Beauchet, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joshua S. ; Chew, Justin ; Lim, Yu Rui ; Ng, Wendy K.G. ; Yeo, Audrey J.P. ; Ong, Lynnett T.J. ; Chan, Mark P.C. ; Lim, Wee Shiong ; Beauchet, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Subjective health measures are often used to assess frailty, but the validity of self-reported online tools to identify frailty remains to be established. We aimed to assess concurrent, known-groups, convergent and predictive validity of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) questionnaire for frailty assessment of older adults in an outpatient setting. Cross-sectional analysis of 120 participants. Participants of age ≥65 were recruited from an outpatient geriatric clinic. Individuals who had severe neurological, cognitive, or motor deficits were excluded. We assessed concurrent validity with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) against the Frailty Index (FI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We analyzed known-groups validity between CESAM scores with frailty status (CFS and FI), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and modified Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (mCMMSE) using 1-way analysis of variance. We evaluated convergent validity using correlations with MBI, the Lawton index, mCMMSE, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Associations between CESAM-identified frailty for clinician-diagnosed geriatric syndromes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analyzed using regression analysis. The CESAM questionnaire demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for frailty using FI ≥0.25 (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82–0.94; P < .001) and CFS ≥4 (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68–0.88; P < .001). CESAM scores increased significantly with increasing frailty (both CFS and FI), lower MBI, and lower mCMMSE scores (all P < .001), indicating concurrent validity. The moderate-good correlation of CESAM scores with MBI (r = −0.61; P < 0.001), Lawton Index (r = −0.54; P < .001), mCMMSE (r = −0.53; P < .001) and GDS (r = 0.58; P < .001) supports convergent validity. Using a cutoff of ≥8 for frailty identification, CESAM-identified frailty was associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.7–8.2; P = .001) depression (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.7–9.6; P = .002), falls (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2–8.2; P = .021) and poorer HRQoL (β = −0.1; 95% CI: −0.2 to −0.02; P = .017). Our results support the validity of an online self-reported tool to identify frailty and geriatric syndromes in an outpatient setting, an approach that is potentially applicable for remote screening of frailty.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-8610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35952721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; comprehensive geriatric assessment ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Frailty ; Humans ; older adult ; Quality of Life ; Self Report ; Syndrome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1984.e1-1984.e8</ispartof><rights>2022 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-396be917be9820c21e010500c19febae384fa8b249836c957c42d5fbdfba4c553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-396be917be9820c21e010500c19febae384fa8b249836c957c42d5fbdfba4c553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861022005035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joshua S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Yu Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Wendy K.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Audrey J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Lynnett T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Mark P.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wee Shiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchet, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>Validating the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) Questionnaire: An Online Self-Reported Tool for Frailty Assessment of Older Adults</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</title><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Subjective health measures are often used to assess frailty, but the validity of self-reported online tools to identify frailty remains to be established. We aimed to assess concurrent, known-groups, convergent and predictive validity of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) questionnaire for frailty assessment of older adults in an outpatient setting. Cross-sectional analysis of 120 participants. Participants of age ≥65 were recruited from an outpatient geriatric clinic. Individuals who had severe neurological, cognitive, or motor deficits were excluded. We assessed concurrent validity with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) against the Frailty Index (FI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We analyzed known-groups validity between CESAM scores with frailty status (CFS and FI), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and modified Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (mCMMSE) using 1-way analysis of variance. We evaluated convergent validity using correlations with MBI, the Lawton index, mCMMSE, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Associations between CESAM-identified frailty for clinician-diagnosed geriatric syndromes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analyzed using regression analysis. The CESAM questionnaire demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for frailty using FI ≥0.25 (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82–0.94; P < .001) and CFS ≥4 (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68–0.88; P < .001). CESAM scores increased significantly with increasing frailty (both CFS and FI), lower MBI, and lower mCMMSE scores (all P < .001), indicating concurrent validity. The moderate-good correlation of CESAM scores with MBI (r = −0.61; P < 0.001), Lawton Index (r = −0.54; P < .001), mCMMSE (r = −0.53; P < .001) and GDS (r = 0.58; P < .001) supports convergent validity. Using a cutoff of ≥8 for frailty identification, CESAM-identified frailty was associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.7–8.2; P = .001) depression (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.7–9.6; P = .002), falls (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2–8.2; P = .021) and poorer HRQoL (β = −0.1; 95% CI: −0.2 to −0.02; P = .017). Our results support the validity of an online self-reported tool to identify frailty and geriatric syndromes in an outpatient setting, an approach that is potentially applicable for remote screening of frailty.]]></description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>comprehensive geriatric assessment</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>older adult</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><issn>1525-8610</issn><issn>1538-9375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwBEjIy7JIsJ1xfpBYRKMprTTVqLSwtRz7pnjk2FPbU9GH4V3rMKXLbvwjnXOPzv0Q-khJSQmtv2zLrZy0LBlhrCR1SSr6Ch1TXrVFVzX89fxmvGhrSo7Quxi3hDBCu_otOqp4x1nD6DH6-0tao2Uy7han34CX4FIA7Ee8-qPAWnAq_xxee3cL9yY94GuwY9HrS-NMTBBA49Pl6rq__Iyv9hCT8c5JE-Ar7h3eOGscHCw_YOdDyvIb7y0efcBnQRqbJ_YxQoxTTp5zN1ZDwL3e2xTfozejtBE-PN0n6OfZ6mZ5Xqw33y-W_bpQuUkqqq4eoKNNPlpGFKNAKOGEKNqNMEio2sUo24EturaqVccbtWCaj4MeB7lQnFcn6PQwdxf83dxCTCbO9aUDv4-CNYTRtuF1m6XVQaqCjzHAKHbBTDI8CErEzEVsxT8uYuYiSC0yl-z69BSwHybQz57_ILLg20EAuea9gSCiMvPydd6lSkJ782LAI8UToJk</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Lee, Joshua S.</creator><creator>Chew, Justin</creator><creator>Lim, Yu Rui</creator><creator>Ng, Wendy K.G.</creator><creator>Yeo, Audrey J.P.</creator><creator>Ong, Lynnett T.J.</creator><creator>Chan, Mark P.C.</creator><creator>Lim, Wee Shiong</creator><creator>Beauchet, Olivier</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Validating the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) Questionnaire: An Online Self-Reported Tool for Frailty Assessment of Older Adults</title><author>Lee, Joshua S. ; Chew, Justin ; Lim, Yu Rui ; Ng, Wendy K.G. ; Yeo, Audrey J.P. ; Ong, Lynnett T.J. ; Chan, Mark P.C. ; Lim, Wee Shiong ; Beauchet, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-396be917be9820c21e010500c19febae384fa8b249836c957c42d5fbdfba4c553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>comprehensive geriatric assessment</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>older adult</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joshua S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Yu Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Wendy K.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Audrey J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Lynnett T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Mark P.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wee Shiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchet, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Joshua S.</au><au>Chew, Justin</au><au>Lim, Yu Rui</au><au>Ng, Wendy K.G.</au><au>Yeo, Audrey J.P.</au><au>Ong, Lynnett T.J.</au><au>Chan, Mark P.C.</au><au>Lim, Wee Shiong</au><au>Beauchet, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) Questionnaire: An Online Self-Reported Tool for Frailty Assessment of Older Adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1984.e1</spage><epage>1984.e8</epage><pages>1984.e1-1984.e8</pages><issn>1525-8610</issn><eissn>1538-9375</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Subjective health measures are often used to assess frailty, but the validity of self-reported online tools to identify frailty remains to be established. We aimed to assess concurrent, known-groups, convergent and predictive validity of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) questionnaire for frailty assessment of older adults in an outpatient setting. Cross-sectional analysis of 120 participants. Participants of age ≥65 were recruited from an outpatient geriatric clinic. Individuals who had severe neurological, cognitive, or motor deficits were excluded. We assessed concurrent validity with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) against the Frailty Index (FI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We analyzed known-groups validity between CESAM scores with frailty status (CFS and FI), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and modified Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (mCMMSE) using 1-way analysis of variance. We evaluated convergent validity using correlations with MBI, the Lawton index, mCMMSE, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Associations between CESAM-identified frailty for clinician-diagnosed geriatric syndromes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analyzed using regression analysis. The CESAM questionnaire demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for frailty using FI ≥0.25 (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82–0.94; P < .001) and CFS ≥4 (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68–0.88; P < .001). CESAM scores increased significantly with increasing frailty (both CFS and FI), lower MBI, and lower mCMMSE scores (all P < .001), indicating concurrent validity. The moderate-good correlation of CESAM scores with MBI (r = −0.61; P < 0.001), Lawton Index (r = −0.54; P < .001), mCMMSE (r = −0.53; P < .001) and GDS (r = 0.58; P < .001) supports convergent validity. Using a cutoff of ≥8 for frailty identification, CESAM-identified frailty was associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.7–8.2; P = .001) depression (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.7–9.6; P = .002), falls (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2–8.2; P = .021) and poorer HRQoL (β = −0.1; 95% CI: −0.2 to −0.02; P = .017). Our results support the validity of an online self-reported tool to identify frailty and geriatric syndromes in an outpatient setting, an approach that is potentially applicable for remote screening of frailty.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35952721</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.031</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-8610
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1984.e1-1984.e8
issn 1525-8610
1538-9375
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2702187568
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
comprehensive geriatric assessment
Cross-Sectional Studies
Frailty
Humans
older adult
Quality of Life
Self Report
Syndrome
title Validating the Centre of Excellence on Longevity Self-AdMinistered (CESAM) Questionnaire: An Online Self-Reported Tool for Frailty Assessment of Older Adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A47%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20the%20Centre%20of%20Excellence%20on%20Longevity%20Self-AdMinistered%20(CESAM)%20Questionnaire:%20An%20Online%20Self-Reported%20Tool%20for%20Frailty%20Assessment%20of%20Older%20Adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Directors%20Association&rft.au=Lee,%20Joshua%20S.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1984.e1&rft.epage=1984.e8&rft.pages=1984.e1-1984.e8&rft.issn=1525-8610&rft.eissn=1538-9375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2702187568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702187568&rft_id=info:pmid/35952721&rft_els_id=S1525861022005035&rfr_iscdi=true