The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture
Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture (DRF). Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with DRF who performed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within six months before or after the DRF and fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and mineral metabolism 2022-09, Vol.40 (5), p.853-859 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 859 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 853 |
container_title | Journal of bone and mineral metabolism |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Lim, Eic Ju Lee, Sunhyung Kim, Jae Kwang Kim, Huijeong Shin, Young Ho |
description | Introduction
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture (DRF).
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with DRF who performed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within six months before or after the DRF and followed more than 12 months. We identified patients with subsequent fractures and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted with demographic information, underlying disease status, and bone fragility parameters at the time of DRF to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures.
Results
Subsequent fractures occurred in 56 patients (7.9% of 705 patients) with 65 fractures at a mean time of 33.5 months after DRF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (OR 1.032; 95% CI, 1.001–1.064,
p
= 0.044), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.663; 95% CI, 1.429–4.963,
p
= 0.002) and previous fracture history (OR 1.917; 95% CI, 1.019–3.607,
p
= 0.043), and low total hip BMD (OR 1.410; 95% CI, 1.083–1.836,
p
= 0.011) were significant risk factors for the occurrence of subsequent fractures.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that older age, DM, previous fracture history and low hip BMD are the risk factors for subsequent fractures after DRF. Active glycemic control would have a role in patients with DM and a more aggressive treat-to-target approach may be necessary for patients with low BMDs to prevent subsequent fractures after DRF. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2700315087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2890052633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8fb5c2098dd2b6c99211e537c47cc804023c4e3a0d99d8d77f64e1b90121411a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8FL16qM_nTNEdZXBUWvKznkKapdu22a6Y9-O2Nrih48DIDM7_3eDzGzhGuEEBfUxpa5sB5DiiUyvGAzVAKlasC5CGbgUGZl1qbY3ZCtAFArTTO2HL9ErLY0mvWOD8OkbJmiBlNFYW3KfRj1sR0n2KgzDVjiFnd0ui6LLq6nejne8qOGtdROPvec_a0vF0v7vPV493D4maVe670mJdNpTwHU9Y1rwpvDEcMSmgvtfclSODCyyAc1MbUZa11U8iAlQHkKBGdmLPLve8uDikfjXbbkg9d5_owTGS5BhCooNQJvfiDboYp9imd5aUBULwQIlF8T_k4EMXQ2F1sty6-WwT7Wa3dV2tTtfarWotJJPYiSnD_HOKv9T-qDwxXers</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890052633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lim, Eic Ju ; Lee, Sunhyung ; Kim, Jae Kwang ; Kim, Huijeong ; Shin, Young Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Eic Ju ; Lee, Sunhyung ; Kim, Jae Kwang ; Kim, Huijeong ; Shin, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture (DRF).
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with DRF who performed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within six months before or after the DRF and followed more than 12 months. We identified patients with subsequent fractures and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted with demographic information, underlying disease status, and bone fragility parameters at the time of DRF to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures.
Results
Subsequent fractures occurred in 56 patients (7.9% of 705 patients) with 65 fractures at a mean time of 33.5 months after DRF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (OR 1.032; 95% CI, 1.001–1.064,
p
= 0.044), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.663; 95% CI, 1.429–4.963,
p
= 0.002) and previous fracture history (OR 1.917; 95% CI, 1.019–3.607,
p
= 0.043), and low total hip BMD (OR 1.410; 95% CI, 1.083–1.836,
p
= 0.011) were significant risk factors for the occurrence of subsequent fractures.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that older age, DM, previous fracture history and low hip BMD are the risk factors for subsequent fractures after DRF. Active glycemic control would have a role in patients with DM and a more aggressive treat-to-target approach may be necessary for patients with low BMDs to prevent subsequent fractures after DRF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-8779</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Diabetes mellitus ; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Fractures ; Hip ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metabolic Diseases ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Radius ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2022-09, Vol.40 (5), p.853-859</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society Bone and Mineral Research 2022</rights><rights>The Japanese Society Bone and Mineral Research 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8fb5c2098dd2b6c99211e537c47cc804023c4e3a0d99d8d77f64e1b90121411a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9388-9720</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Eic Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sunhyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae Kwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Huijeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><title>The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral metabolism</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Metab</addtitle><description>Introduction
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture (DRF).
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with DRF who performed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within six months before or after the DRF and followed more than 12 months. We identified patients with subsequent fractures and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted with demographic information, underlying disease status, and bone fragility parameters at the time of DRF to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures.
Results
Subsequent fractures occurred in 56 patients (7.9% of 705 patients) with 65 fractures at a mean time of 33.5 months after DRF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (OR 1.032; 95% CI, 1.001–1.064,
p
= 0.044), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.663; 95% CI, 1.429–4.963,
p
= 0.002) and previous fracture history (OR 1.917; 95% CI, 1.019–3.607,
p
= 0.043), and low total hip BMD (OR 1.410; 95% CI, 1.083–1.836,
p
= 0.011) were significant risk factors for the occurrence of subsequent fractures.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that older age, DM, previous fracture history and low hip BMD are the risk factors for subsequent fractures after DRF. Active glycemic control would have a role in patients with DM and a more aggressive treat-to-target approach may be necessary for patients with low BMDs to prevent subsequent fractures after DRF.</description><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Radius</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><issn>0914-8779</issn><issn>1435-5604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8FL16qM_nTNEdZXBUWvKznkKapdu22a6Y9-O2Nrih48DIDM7_3eDzGzhGuEEBfUxpa5sB5DiiUyvGAzVAKlasC5CGbgUGZl1qbY3ZCtAFArTTO2HL9ErLY0mvWOD8OkbJmiBlNFYW3KfRj1sR0n2KgzDVjiFnd0ui6LLq6nejne8qOGtdROPvec_a0vF0v7vPV493D4maVe670mJdNpTwHU9Y1rwpvDEcMSmgvtfclSODCyyAc1MbUZa11U8iAlQHkKBGdmLPLve8uDikfjXbbkg9d5_owTGS5BhCooNQJvfiDboYp9imd5aUBULwQIlF8T_k4EMXQ2F1sty6-WwT7Wa3dV2tTtfarWotJJPYiSnD_HOKv9T-qDwxXers</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Lim, Eic Ju</creator><creator>Lee, Sunhyung</creator><creator>Kim, Jae Kwang</creator><creator>Kim, Huijeong</creator><creator>Shin, Young Ho</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-9720</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture</title><author>Lim, Eic Ju ; Lee, Sunhyung ; Kim, Jae Kwang ; Kim, Huijeong ; Shin, Young Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8fb5c2098dd2b6c99211e537c47cc804023c4e3a0d99d8d77f64e1b90121411a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Radius</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Eic Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sunhyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae Kwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Huijeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Eic Ju</au><au>Lee, Sunhyung</au><au>Kim, Jae Kwang</au><au>Kim, Huijeong</au><au>Shin, Young Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral metabolism</jtitle><stitle>J Bone Miner Metab</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>853</spage><epage>859</epage><pages>853-859</pages><issn>0914-8779</issn><eissn>1435-5604</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture (DRF).
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with DRF who performed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within six months before or after the DRF and followed more than 12 months. We identified patients with subsequent fractures and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted with demographic information, underlying disease status, and bone fragility parameters at the time of DRF to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent fractures.
Results
Subsequent fractures occurred in 56 patients (7.9% of 705 patients) with 65 fractures at a mean time of 33.5 months after DRF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (OR 1.032; 95% CI, 1.001–1.064,
p
= 0.044), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.663; 95% CI, 1.429–4.963,
p
= 0.002) and previous fracture history (OR 1.917; 95% CI, 1.019–3.607,
p
= 0.043), and low total hip BMD (OR 1.410; 95% CI, 1.083–1.836,
p
= 0.011) were significant risk factors for the occurrence of subsequent fractures.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that older age, DM, previous fracture history and low hip BMD are the risk factors for subsequent fractures after DRF. Active glycemic control would have a role in patients with DM and a more aggressive treat-to-target approach may be necessary for patients with low BMDs to prevent subsequent fractures after DRF.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-9720</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0914-8779 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2022-09, Vol.40 (5), p.853-859 |
issn | 0914-8779 1435-5604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2700315087 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Diabetes mellitus Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Fractures Hip Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metabolic Diseases Original Article Orthopedics Radius Regression analysis Risk factors |
title | The risk factors for subsequent fractures after distal radius fracture |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T01%3A34%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20risk%20factors%20for%20subsequent%20fractures%20after%20distal%20radius%20fracture&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20metabolism&rft.au=Lim,%20Eic%20Ju&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=853&rft.epage=859&rft.pages=853-859&rft.issn=0914-8779&rft.eissn=1435-5604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00774-022-01355-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2890052633%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890052633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |