Dislodgement pushout resistance of five bioceramic root-end filling materials
This study evaluated the dislodgement push-out resistance of five bioceramic materials. One hundred single-rooted teeth with one canal had the apical 3 mm and crown resected to create a 14 mm standardized length. The canals were instrumented to an apical size 80 with a 3 mm root-end preparation made...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dental Materials Journal 2022/11/25, Vol.41(6), pp.843-849 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 849 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 843 |
| container_title | Dental Materials Journal |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | MASON, Jared KIRKPATRICK, Timothy ROBERTS, Howard W. |
| description | This study evaluated the dislodgement push-out resistance of five bioceramic materials. One hundred single-rooted teeth with one canal had the apical 3 mm and crown resected to create a 14 mm standardized length. The canals were instrumented to an apical size 80 with a 3 mm root-end preparation made with ultrasonic diamonds. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 5 root-end restorative groups (n=20). ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, EndoSequence Root Repair Material, EndoSequence Fast Set Putty, and EndoSequence BC Sealer with each material placed following manufacturer’s instructions and stored at 100% humidity for 2 weeks. An apical-to-coronal static testing load with the identified dislodgement force converted into MPa with mean results analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). ProRoot MTA and Biodentine displayed similar push-out stress resistance and exhibited significantly greater stress resistance than the similar Endosequence materials. However, all materials failed cohesively and were not dislodged from the root canal surface. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4012/dmj.2022-058 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2699956444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2699956444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c632t-eb23af6c12788229f8d261f15ff783a57d67aa1f1d94a6095858760a8318abec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIJIbAjg9oiQ0LOvj9WEKABClRNmFteezyxKNue7C7I-XvcTMwSCyyqSu5TtUt-XbdW4zOGcLko5_25wQRMiCunnUbrBQeMBX4ebdBRMmBcSZfdq9q3SPEtFBq0918iXXMfgcTpLk_LPU-L3NfoMY62-Sgz6EP8QH6bcwOip2i60vO8wDJt8Y4xrTrJztDiXasr7sXoQm8-aNn3Y9vX-8urobr28vvF5-uBycoabNbQm0QDhOpFCE6KE8EDpiHIBW1XHohrW0PXjMrkOaKKymQVRQruwVHz7r3x72Hkn8uUGczxepgHG2CvFRDhNaaC8ZYQ9_9h-7zUlK7zhApBWWcEP40xSTCUjDdqA9HypVca4FgDiVOtjwajMyagGkJmDUB0xJo-OURn8BHZ8ec2m_Bv83-EXlIpwnEMBJNpEGK0bVohjHSdDX-fNy0b6ns4GRryxzdCL9tGTZiLX_tT013b4uBRH8Bl-Glpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747017649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dislodgement pushout resistance of five bioceramic root-end filling materials</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MASON, Jared ; KIRKPATRICK, Timothy ; ROBERTS, Howard W.</creator><creatorcontrib>MASON, Jared ; KIRKPATRICK, Timothy ; ROBERTS, Howard W. ; th Medical Group ; Dental Biomaterials Research ; University of Kentucky College of Dentistry ; Dental Services ; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston ; Department of Endodontics</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the dislodgement push-out resistance of five bioceramic materials. One hundred single-rooted teeth with one canal had the apical 3 mm and crown resected to create a 14 mm standardized length. The canals were instrumented to an apical size 80 with a 3 mm root-end preparation made with ultrasonic diamonds. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 5 root-end restorative groups (n=20). ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, EndoSequence Root Repair Material, EndoSequence Fast Set Putty, and EndoSequence BC Sealer with each material placed following manufacturer’s instructions and stored at 100% humidity for 2 weeks. An apical-to-coronal static testing load with the identified dislodgement force converted into MPa with mean results analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). ProRoot MTA and Biodentine displayed similar push-out stress resistance and exhibited significantly greater stress resistance than the similar Endosequence materials. However, all materials failed cohesively and were not dislodged from the root canal surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0287-4547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-1361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2022-058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices</publisher><subject>Bioceramics ; Dental roots ; Dentistry ; Diamonds ; Endodontic apical surgery ; Hydraulic cements ; Push out resistance ; Root canals ; Root end filling ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Dental Materials Journal, 2022/11/25, Vol.41(6), pp.843-849</ispartof><rights>2022 The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c632t-eb23af6c12788229f8d261f15ff783a57d67aa1f1d94a6095858760a8318abec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c632t-eb23af6c12788229f8d261f15ff783a57d67aa1f1d94a6095858760a8318abec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MASON, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRKPATRICK, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, Howard W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>th Medical Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dental Biomaterials Research</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Kentucky College of Dentistry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dental Services</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Endodontics</creatorcontrib><title>Dislodgement pushout resistance of five bioceramic root-end filling materials</title><title>Dental Materials Journal</title><addtitle>Dent. Mater. J.</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the dislodgement push-out resistance of five bioceramic materials. One hundred single-rooted teeth with one canal had the apical 3 mm and crown resected to create a 14 mm standardized length. The canals were instrumented to an apical size 80 with a 3 mm root-end preparation made with ultrasonic diamonds. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 5 root-end restorative groups (n=20). ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, EndoSequence Root Repair Material, EndoSequence Fast Set Putty, and EndoSequence BC Sealer with each material placed following manufacturer’s instructions and stored at 100% humidity for 2 weeks. An apical-to-coronal static testing load with the identified dislodgement force converted into MPa with mean results analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). ProRoot MTA and Biodentine displayed similar push-out stress resistance and exhibited significantly greater stress resistance than the similar Endosequence materials. However, all materials failed cohesively and were not dislodged from the root canal surface.</description><subject>Bioceramics</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diamonds</subject><subject>Endodontic apical surgery</subject><subject>Hydraulic cements</subject><subject>Push out resistance</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Root end filling</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0287-4547</issn><issn>1881-1361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIJIbAjg9oiQ0LOvj9WEKABClRNmFteezyxKNue7C7I-XvcTMwSCyyqSu5TtUt-XbdW4zOGcLko5_25wQRMiCunnUbrBQeMBX4ebdBRMmBcSZfdq9q3SPEtFBq0918iXXMfgcTpLk_LPU-L3NfoMY62-Sgz6EP8QH6bcwOip2i60vO8wDJt8Y4xrTrJztDiXasr7sXoQm8-aNn3Y9vX-8urobr28vvF5-uBycoabNbQm0QDhOpFCE6KE8EDpiHIBW1XHohrW0PXjMrkOaKKymQVRQruwVHz7r3x72Hkn8uUGczxepgHG2CvFRDhNaaC8ZYQ9_9h-7zUlK7zhApBWWcEP40xSTCUjDdqA9HypVca4FgDiVOtjwajMyagGkJmDUB0xJo-OURn8BHZ8ec2m_Bv83-EXlIpwnEMBJNpEGK0bVohjHSdDX-fNy0b6ns4GRryxzdCL9tGTZiLX_tT013b4uBRH8Bl-Glpg</recordid><startdate>20221125</startdate><enddate>20221125</enddate><creator>MASON, Jared</creator><creator>KIRKPATRICK, Timothy</creator><creator>ROBERTS, Howard W.</creator><general>The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices</general><general>Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221125</creationdate><title>Dislodgement pushout resistance of five bioceramic root-end filling materials</title><author>MASON, Jared ; KIRKPATRICK, Timothy ; ROBERTS, Howard W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c632t-eb23af6c12788229f8d261f15ff783a57d67aa1f1d94a6095858760a8318abec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bioceramics</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diamonds</topic><topic>Endodontic apical surgery</topic><topic>Hydraulic cements</topic><topic>Push out resistance</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Root end filling</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MASON, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRKPATRICK, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, Howard W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>th Medical Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dental Biomaterials Research</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Kentucky College of Dentistry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dental Services</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Endodontics</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental Materials Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MASON, Jared</au><au>KIRKPATRICK, Timothy</au><au>ROBERTS, Howard W.</au><aucorp>th Medical Group</aucorp><aucorp>Dental Biomaterials Research</aucorp><aucorp>University of Kentucky College of Dentistry</aucorp><aucorp>Dental Services</aucorp><aucorp>University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Endodontics</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dislodgement pushout resistance of five bioceramic root-end filling materials</atitle><jtitle>Dental Materials Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dent. Mater. J.</addtitle><date>2022-11-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>849</epage><pages>843-849</pages><artnum>2022-058</artnum><issn>0287-4547</issn><eissn>1881-1361</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the dislodgement push-out resistance of five bioceramic materials. One hundred single-rooted teeth with one canal had the apical 3 mm and crown resected to create a 14 mm standardized length. The canals were instrumented to an apical size 80 with a 3 mm root-end preparation made with ultrasonic diamonds. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 5 root-end restorative groups (n=20). ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, EndoSequence Root Repair Material, EndoSequence Fast Set Putty, and EndoSequence BC Sealer with each material placed following manufacturer’s instructions and stored at 100% humidity for 2 weeks. An apical-to-coronal static testing load with the identified dislodgement force converted into MPa with mean results analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). ProRoot MTA and Biodentine displayed similar push-out stress resistance and exhibited significantly greater stress resistance than the similar Endosequence materials. However, all materials failed cohesively and were not dislodged from the root canal surface.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices</pub><doi>10.4012/dmj.2022-058</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0287-4547 |
| ispartof | Dental Materials Journal, 2022/11/25, Vol.41(6), pp.843-849 |
| issn | 0287-4547 1881-1361 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2699956444 |
| source | J-STAGE Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Bioceramics Dental roots Dentistry Diamonds Endodontic apical surgery Hydraulic cements Push out resistance Root canals Root end filling Teeth |
| title | Dislodgement pushout resistance of five bioceramic root-end filling materials |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A56%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dislodgement%20pushout%20resistance%20of%20five%20bioceramic%20root-end%20filling%20materials&rft.jtitle=Dental%20Materials%20Journal&rft.au=MASON,%20Jared&rft.aucorp=th%20Medical%20Group&rft.date=2022-11-25&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=849&rft.pages=843-849&rft.artnum=2022-058&rft.issn=0287-4547&rft.eissn=1881-1361&rft_id=info:doi/10.4012/dmj.2022-058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2699956444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747017649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |