Calf‐cow and bull‐cow management in buffaloes: Effects on growth, productive and reproductive performance of mothers and their calves
The aim of the first study was to determine the influence of the calf handling (restricted or full contact) and fenceline bull stimulation on performance of mothers and their calves. The aim of the second study was to determine the relative impact of calf–bull contact, comparing the result of restri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Reproduction in domestic animals 2022-11, Vol.57 (11), p.1428-1439 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1439 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1428 |
| container_title | Reproduction in domestic animals |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Choudhary, Sanjay Kamboj, Madan Lal Ungerfeld, Rodolfo Singh, Pawan |
| description | The aim of the first study was to determine the influence of the calf handling (restricted or full contact) and fenceline bull stimulation on performance of mothers and their calves. The aim of the second study was to determine the relative impact of calf–bull contact, comparing the result of restricted calf and no bull with that of fenceline calf contact and direct bull contact on the performance of mother buffaloes and their calves. In Experiment 1, 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to three treatments: NCB (no calf–mother–bull contact), RC‐FBC (restricted calf and fenceline bull contact) and FC‐FBC (fenceline calf and fenceline bull contact). In Experiment 2, another 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to two treatments: RC‐NB (restricted calf and no bull contact) and FC‐DBC (fenceline calf and direct bull contact). In Experiment 1, average daily gain (ADG) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rda.14219 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2698633723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2698633723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-4c4caf9ef8a0b9550581378c372fa6ffd7694b664bcb200d8ae67f4494e7df373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxq2qlbpAD30DS1xAasCOHf_httoCRVoJCcHZcpwxBCXxYie72luvvfUZ-yR1dzkgpM7FM-PffDPSh9BXSs5ojvPY2DPKS6o_oBnlTBekYvQjmhHNRCGkUJ_RQUrPhNBKSTlDvxa2839-_nZhg-3Q4Hrquteyt4N9hB6GEbdD_vDedgHSBb70HtyYcBjwYwyb8ekbXsXQTG5s17BTifCmsYLoQ8xqDnDwuA_jE8S043LWRuxst4Z0hD7lBQm-vL6H6OHq8n7xo1jeXt8s5svClYLogjvurNfglSW1ripSKcqkckyW3grvGyk0r4XgtatLQhplQUjPueYgG88kO0Qne9184ssEaTR9mxx0nR0gTMmUQivBshzL6PE79DlMccjXmVIywrWqpMrU6Z5yMaQUwZtVbHsbt4YS888Uk00xO1Mye75nN20H2_-D5u77fD_xFwRpkZM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730498578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calf‐cow and bull‐cow management in buffaloes: Effects on growth, productive and reproductive performance of mothers and their calves</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Choudhary, Sanjay ; Kamboj, Madan Lal ; Ungerfeld, Rodolfo ; Singh, Pawan</creator><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Sanjay ; Kamboj, Madan Lal ; Ungerfeld, Rodolfo ; Singh, Pawan</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The aim of the first study was to determine the influence of the calf handling (restricted or full contact) and fenceline bull stimulation on performance of mothers and their calves. The aim of the second study was to determine the relative impact of calf–bull contact, comparing the result of restricted calf and no bull with that of fenceline calf contact and direct bull contact on the performance of mother buffaloes and their calves. In Experiment 1, 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to three treatments: NCB (no calf–mother–bull contact), RC‐FBC (restricted calf and fenceline bull contact) and FC‐FBC (fenceline calf and fenceline bull contact). In Experiment 2, another 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to two treatments: RC‐NB (restricted calf and no bull contact) and FC‐DBC (fenceline calf and direct bull contact). In Experiment 1, average daily gain (ADG) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves (p < .05). Average dry matter intake (DMI) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves. DMI of buffaloes was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB. Daily milk yield of buffaloes was more (p < .05) in FC‐FBC (10.2 ± 0.2 kg) than RC‐FBC (8.4 ± 0.2 kg) and RC‐FBC (7.8 ± 0.2 kg). There were no statistical differences observed in the interval from calving to first oestrus, first service, service period among three groups. In Experiment 2, ADG's and DMI were greater in FC‐FBC calves than RC‐FBC (p < .05). DMI of buffaloes was greater in FC‐DBC than RC‐NBC (p < .05). Daily milk yield of buffaloes was greater (p < .05) in FC‐DBC (11.6 ± 0.2 kg) than RC‐NBC (8.3 ± 0.2 kg). The first oestrus (51.5 ± 3.1 vs. 103.2 ± 7.2), days to first service (74.8 ± 3.5 vs.112.0 ± 7.6) and service period (78.8 ± 4.8 vs.118.9 ± 8.3 days) were lower (p < .05) in FC‐DBC than RC‐NBC buffaloes. The fenceline calf‐mother contact increased the growth rate, FCR, and feeding efficiency of buffalo calves; reduced some stress responses and improved the productive performance of buffalo mothers. Further, mother‐bull contact stimulated the post‐partum reproductive performance of buffaloes in fenceline calf contact.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.14219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>biostimulation ; Buffalo ; Calves ; calves' growth rate ; Cattle ; Dry matter ; Estrus ; Experiments ; Growth rate ; Milk ; Mothers ; post‐partum anoestrus ; post‐partum rebreeding ; Reproduction ; socio‐sexual stimuli</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2022-11, Vol.57 (11), p.1428-1439</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-4c4caf9ef8a0b9550581378c372fa6ffd7694b664bcb200d8ae67f4494e7df373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-4c4caf9ef8a0b9550581378c372fa6ffd7694b664bcb200d8ae67f4494e7df373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7375-6189 ; 0000-0001-7303-5421 ; 0000-0003-4685-2105 ; 0000-0002-4910-771X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frda.14219$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frda.14219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamboj, Madan Lal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerfeld, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Pawan</creatorcontrib><title>Calf‐cow and bull‐cow management in buffaloes: Effects on growth, productive and reproductive performance of mothers and their calves</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><description><![CDATA[The aim of the first study was to determine the influence of the calf handling (restricted or full contact) and fenceline bull stimulation on performance of mothers and their calves. The aim of the second study was to determine the relative impact of calf–bull contact, comparing the result of restricted calf and no bull with that of fenceline calf contact and direct bull contact on the performance of mother buffaloes and their calves. In Experiment 1, 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to three treatments: NCB (no calf–mother–bull contact), RC‐FBC (restricted calf and fenceline bull contact) and FC‐FBC (fenceline calf and fenceline bull contact). In Experiment 2, another 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to two treatments: RC‐NB (restricted calf and no bull contact) and FC‐DBC (fenceline calf and direct bull contact). In Experiment 1, average daily gain (ADG) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves (p < .05). Average dry matter intake (DMI) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves. DMI of buffaloes was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB. Daily milk yield of buffaloes was more (p < .05) in FC‐FBC (10.2 ± 0.2 kg) than RC‐FBC (8.4 ± 0.2 kg) and RC‐FBC (7.8 ± 0.2 kg). There were no statistical differences observed in the interval from calving to first oestrus, first service, service period among three groups. In Experiment 2, ADG's and DMI were greater in FC‐FBC calves than RC‐FBC (p < .05). DMI of buffaloes was greater in FC‐DBC than RC‐NBC (p < .05). Daily milk yield of buffaloes was greater (p < .05) in FC‐DBC (11.6 ± 0.2 kg) than RC‐NBC (8.3 ± 0.2 kg). The first oestrus (51.5 ± 3.1 vs. 103.2 ± 7.2), days to first service (74.8 ± 3.5 vs.112.0 ± 7.6) and service period (78.8 ± 4.8 vs.118.9 ± 8.3 days) were lower (p < .05) in FC‐DBC than RC‐NBC buffaloes. The fenceline calf‐mother contact increased the growth rate, FCR, and feeding efficiency of buffalo calves; reduced some stress responses and improved the productive performance of buffalo mothers. Further, mother‐bull contact stimulated the post‐partum reproductive performance of buffaloes in fenceline calf contact.]]></description><subject>biostimulation</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>calves' growth rate</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Estrus</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>post‐partum anoestrus</subject><subject>post‐partum rebreeding</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>socio‐sexual stimuli</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxq2qlbpAD30DS1xAasCOHf_httoCRVoJCcHZcpwxBCXxYie72luvvfUZ-yR1dzkgpM7FM-PffDPSh9BXSs5ojvPY2DPKS6o_oBnlTBekYvQjmhHNRCGkUJ_RQUrPhNBKSTlDvxa2839-_nZhg-3Q4Hrquteyt4N9hB6GEbdD_vDedgHSBb70HtyYcBjwYwyb8ekbXsXQTG5s17BTifCmsYLoQ8xqDnDwuA_jE8S043LWRuxst4Z0hD7lBQm-vL6H6OHq8n7xo1jeXt8s5svClYLogjvurNfglSW1ripSKcqkckyW3grvGyk0r4XgtatLQhplQUjPueYgG88kO0Qne9184ssEaTR9mxx0nR0gTMmUQivBshzL6PE79DlMccjXmVIywrWqpMrU6Z5yMaQUwZtVbHsbt4YS888Uk00xO1Mye75nN20H2_-D5u77fD_xFwRpkZM</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Choudhary, Sanjay</creator><creator>Kamboj, Madan Lal</creator><creator>Ungerfeld, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Singh, Pawan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-6189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-5421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-2105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-771X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Calf‐cow and bull‐cow management in buffaloes: Effects on growth, productive and reproductive performance of mothers and their calves</title><author>Choudhary, Sanjay ; Kamboj, Madan Lal ; Ungerfeld, Rodolfo ; Singh, Pawan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-4c4caf9ef8a0b9550581378c372fa6ffd7694b664bcb200d8ae67f4494e7df373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>biostimulation</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>calves' growth rate</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Estrus</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>post‐partum anoestrus</topic><topic>post‐partum rebreeding</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>socio‐sexual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamboj, Madan Lal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerfeld, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Pawan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choudhary, Sanjay</au><au>Kamboj, Madan Lal</au><au>Ungerfeld, Rodolfo</au><au>Singh, Pawan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calf‐cow and bull‐cow management in buffaloes: Effects on growth, productive and reproductive performance of mothers and their calves</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1428</spage><epage>1439</epage><pages>1428-1439</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The aim of the first study was to determine the influence of the calf handling (restricted or full contact) and fenceline bull stimulation on performance of mothers and their calves. The aim of the second study was to determine the relative impact of calf–bull contact, comparing the result of restricted calf and no bull with that of fenceline calf contact and direct bull contact on the performance of mother buffaloes and their calves. In Experiment 1, 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to three treatments: NCB (no calf–mother–bull contact), RC‐FBC (restricted calf and fenceline bull contact) and FC‐FBC (fenceline calf and fenceline bull contact). In Experiment 2, another 24 mother–calf dyads were allocated to two treatments: RC‐NB (restricted calf and no bull contact) and FC‐DBC (fenceline calf and direct bull contact). In Experiment 1, average daily gain (ADG) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves (p < .05). Average dry matter intake (DMI) was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB calves. DMI of buffaloes was greater in FC‐FBC than RC‐FBC and NCB. Daily milk yield of buffaloes was more (p < .05) in FC‐FBC (10.2 ± 0.2 kg) than RC‐FBC (8.4 ± 0.2 kg) and RC‐FBC (7.8 ± 0.2 kg). There were no statistical differences observed in the interval from calving to first oestrus, first service, service period among three groups. In Experiment 2, ADG's and DMI were greater in FC‐FBC calves than RC‐FBC (p < .05). DMI of buffaloes was greater in FC‐DBC than RC‐NBC (p < .05). Daily milk yield of buffaloes was greater (p < .05) in FC‐DBC (11.6 ± 0.2 kg) than RC‐NBC (8.3 ± 0.2 kg). The first oestrus (51.5 ± 3.1 vs. 103.2 ± 7.2), days to first service (74.8 ± 3.5 vs.112.0 ± 7.6) and service period (78.8 ± 4.8 vs.118.9 ± 8.3 days) were lower (p < .05) in FC‐DBC than RC‐NBC buffaloes. The fenceline calf‐mother contact increased the growth rate, FCR, and feeding efficiency of buffalo calves; reduced some stress responses and improved the productive performance of buffalo mothers. Further, mother‐bull contact stimulated the post‐partum reproductive performance of buffaloes in fenceline calf contact.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/rda.14219</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-6189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-5421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-2105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-771X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0936-6768 |
| ispartof | Reproduction in domestic animals, 2022-11, Vol.57 (11), p.1428-1439 |
| issn | 0936-6768 1439-0531 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2698633723 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | biostimulation Buffalo Calves calves' growth rate Cattle Dry matter Estrus Experiments Growth rate Milk Mothers post‐partum anoestrus post‐partum rebreeding Reproduction socio‐sexual stimuli |
| title | Calf‐cow and bull‐cow management in buffaloes: Effects on growth, productive and reproductive performance of mothers and their calves |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calf%E2%80%90cow%20and%20bull%E2%80%90cow%20management%20in%20buffaloes:%20Effects%20on%20growth,%20productive%20and%20reproductive%20performance%20of%20mothers%20and%20their%20calves&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Choudhary,%20Sanjay&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1428&rft.epage=1439&rft.pages=1428-1439&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.14219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2698633723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730498578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |