Assessing the adequacy of ground tests

Prior to a missile flight test, ground tests are performed to give confidence that the ensuing mission will be successful. It can be difficult, however, to determine if a given set of ground tests is comprehensive enough to cover all mission requirements. It is also important to know if a successful...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Johns Hopkins APL technical digest 2001-07, Vol.22 (3), p.311-323
1. Verfasser: Rogers, S B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 3
container_start_page 311
container_title Johns Hopkins APL technical digest
container_volume 22
creator Rogers, S B
description Prior to a missile flight test, ground tests are performed to give confidence that the ensuing mission will be successful. It can be difficult, however, to determine if a given set of ground tests is comprehensive enough to cover all mission requirements. It is also important to know if a successful ground test indeed indicates a high probability of a successful flight test. This article describes an objective formal systems engineering process developed by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) to assess the comprehensiveness and adequacy of a system-wide ground test program. To illustrate the process, ground tests for the Navy Theater Wide Aegis Lightweight Exo-atmospheric Projectile Intercept Project are assessed. (Author)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26981128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26981128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p184t-e82630d8b3254f6236d2f2b300ec93d6e025193567977c0185f04b71a19727803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzbtuwkAQQNEtiBQC-Yet6CzNznhfJUJ5SUhpoEZr7ywhMjYwdpG_T6Kkut09MzUH9FBZNPW9ehD5BEBrKMzVai3CIqf-qMcP1inzdUrtlx6KPt6Gqc96ZBllqe5K6oQf_7tQ--en3ea12r6_vG3W2-piQj1WHNAR5NAQ2ro4JJexYEMA3EbKjn_ZSNb56H0LJtgCdeNNMtGjD0ALtfr7Xm7DdfqRD-eTtNx1qedhkgO6GIzBQN-geTqd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26981128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the adequacy of ground tests</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Rogers, S B</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogers, S B</creatorcontrib><description>Prior to a missile flight test, ground tests are performed to give confidence that the ensuing mission will be successful. It can be difficult, however, to determine if a given set of ground tests is comprehensive enough to cover all mission requirements. It is also important to know if a successful ground test indeed indicates a high probability of a successful flight test. This article describes an objective formal systems engineering process developed by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) to assess the comprehensiveness and adequacy of a system-wide ground test program. To illustrate the process, ground tests for the Navy Theater Wide Aegis Lightweight Exo-atmospheric Projectile Intercept Project are assessed. (Author)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-5214</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, 2001-07, Vol.22 (3), p.311-323</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogers, S B</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the adequacy of ground tests</title><title>Johns Hopkins APL technical digest</title><description>Prior to a missile flight test, ground tests are performed to give confidence that the ensuing mission will be successful. It can be difficult, however, to determine if a given set of ground tests is comprehensive enough to cover all mission requirements. It is also important to know if a successful ground test indeed indicates a high probability of a successful flight test. This article describes an objective formal systems engineering process developed by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) to assess the comprehensiveness and adequacy of a system-wide ground test program. To illustrate the process, ground tests for the Navy Theater Wide Aegis Lightweight Exo-atmospheric Projectile Intercept Project are assessed. (Author)</description><issn>0270-5214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzbtuwkAQQNEtiBQC-Yet6CzNznhfJUJ5SUhpoEZr7ywhMjYwdpG_T6Kkut09MzUH9FBZNPW9ehD5BEBrKMzVai3CIqf-qMcP1inzdUrtlx6KPt6Gqc96ZBllqe5K6oQf_7tQ--en3ea12r6_vG3W2-piQj1WHNAR5NAQ2ro4JJexYEMA3EbKjn_ZSNb56H0LJtgCdeNNMtGjD0ALtfr7Xm7DdfqRD-eTtNx1qedhkgO6GIzBQN-geTqd</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Rogers, S B</creator><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Assessing the adequacy of ground tests</title><author>Rogers, S B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p184t-e82630d8b3254f6236d2f2b300ec93d6e025193567977c0185f04b71a19727803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogers, S B</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Johns Hopkins APL technical digest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogers, S B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the adequacy of ground tests</atitle><jtitle>Johns Hopkins APL technical digest</jtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>311-323</pages><issn>0270-5214</issn><abstract>Prior to a missile flight test, ground tests are performed to give confidence that the ensuing mission will be successful. It can be difficult, however, to determine if a given set of ground tests is comprehensive enough to cover all mission requirements. It is also important to know if a successful ground test indeed indicates a high probability of a successful flight test. This article describes an objective formal systems engineering process developed by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) to assess the comprehensiveness and adequacy of a system-wide ground test program. To illustrate the process, ground tests for the Navy Theater Wide Aegis Lightweight Exo-atmospheric Projectile Intercept Project are assessed. (Author)</abstract><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-5214
ispartof Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, 2001-07, Vol.22 (3), p.311-323
issn 0270-5214
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26981128
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Assessing the adequacy of ground tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A30%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20adequacy%20of%20ground%20tests&rft.jtitle=Johns%20Hopkins%20APL%20technical%20digest&rft.au=Rogers,%20S%20B&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=311-323&rft.issn=0270-5214&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E26981128%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26981128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true