Mass trends of parabens, triclocarban and triclosan in Arizona wastewater collected after the 2017 FDA ban on antimicrobials and during the COVID-19 pandemic
•Comprehensive study (n = 1514) on TCC, TCS & parabens before and during the pandemic.•Antimicrobial consumption increased by 56% during the pandemic.•The mass loading of Methylparaben increased by 55% during the pandemic.•After the 2017 FDA ban, consumption of triclosan (−89%) and triclocarban...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2022-08, Vol.222, p.118894-118894, Article 118894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 118894 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 118894 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 222 |
creator | Adhikari, Sangeet Kumar, Rahul Driver, Erin M. Perleberg, Tyler D. Yanez, Allan Johnston, Bridger Halden, Rolf U. |
description | •Comprehensive study (n = 1514) on TCC, TCS & parabens before and during the pandemic.•Antimicrobial consumption increased by 56% during the pandemic.•The mass loading of Methylparaben increased by 55% during the pandemic.•After the 2017 FDA ban, consumption of triclosan (−89%) and triclocarban (−80%) decreased.
Antimicrobials like parabens, triclosan (TCS), and triclocarban (TCC) are of public health concern worldwide due to their endocrine-disrupting properties and ability to promote antimicrobial drug resistance in human pathogens. The overall use of antimicrobials presumably has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas TCS and TCC may have experienced reductions in use due to their recent ban from thousands of over-the-counter (OTC) personal care products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). No quantitative data are available on the use of parabens or the impact the FDA ban had on TCC and TCS. Here, we use wastewater samples (n = 1514) from 10 different communities in Arizona to measure the presence of the six different antimicrobial products (TCS, TCC, and four alkylated parabens [methylparaben (MePb), ethylparaben (EtPb), propylparaben (PrPb), butylparaben (BuPb)]) collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using a combination of solid-phase extraction, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and isotope dilution for absolute quantitation. The average mass loadings of all antimicrobials combined (1,431 ± 22 mg/day per 1,000 people) after the onset of the local epidemic (March 2020 - October 2020) were significantly higher (945 ± 62 mg/day per 1,000 people; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118894 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2697675715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135422008417</els_id><sourcerecordid>2697675715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a2d7500336199ca0676fe44ec0a6af3da9fa1f926a2a24ea019d0526007c90023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EEqHlH3DwkQOb-mu98QUpSj-lVr0AV2tiz4KjjR3sTSP4L_xXvN2ee7Jm9LyvZ-Yl5BNnS864vtgtTzBmLEvBhFhyvloZ9YYs-KozjVBq9ZYsGFOy4bJV78mHUnaMVVKaBfn3AKXQKo6-0NTTA2TYYixfai-4ITnIW4gUon9plFqFSNc5_E0R6AnKiPV3zNSlYUA3oqfQT_X4C6lgvKPXl2s6maTJZwz74HLaBhjKs60_5hB_PtObxx93lw03dYrosXLn5F1fOfz48p6R79dX3za3zf3jzd1mfd84Kc3YgPBdy5iUmhvjgOlO96gUOgYaeunB9MB7IzQIEAqBceNZKzRjnTP1EvKMfJ59Dzn9PmIZ7T4Uh8MAEdOxWKFNp7u2421F1YzWJUrJ2NtDDnvIfyxndkrD7uychp3SsHMaVfZ1lmFd4ylgtsUFjA59yPVo1qfwusF_PRaVgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697675715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mass trends of parabens, triclocarban and triclosan in Arizona wastewater collected after the 2017 FDA ban on antimicrobials and during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Adhikari, Sangeet ; Kumar, Rahul ; Driver, Erin M. ; Perleberg, Tyler D. ; Yanez, Allan ; Johnston, Bridger ; Halden, Rolf U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Sangeet ; Kumar, Rahul ; Driver, Erin M. ; Perleberg, Tyler D. ; Yanez, Allan ; Johnston, Bridger ; Halden, Rolf U.</creatorcontrib><description>•Comprehensive study (n = 1514) on TCC, TCS & parabens before and during the pandemic.•Antimicrobial consumption increased by 56% during the pandemic.•The mass loading of Methylparaben increased by 55% during the pandemic.•After the 2017 FDA ban, consumption of triclosan (−89%) and triclocarban (−80%) decreased.
Antimicrobials like parabens, triclosan (TCS), and triclocarban (TCC) are of public health concern worldwide due to their endocrine-disrupting properties and ability to promote antimicrobial drug resistance in human pathogens. The overall use of antimicrobials presumably has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas TCS and TCC may have experienced reductions in use due to their recent ban from thousands of over-the-counter (OTC) personal care products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). No quantitative data are available on the use of parabens or the impact the FDA ban had on TCC and TCS. Here, we use wastewater samples (n = 1514) from 10 different communities in Arizona to measure the presence of the six different antimicrobial products (TCS, TCC, and four alkylated parabens [methylparaben (MePb), ethylparaben (EtPb), propylparaben (PrPb), butylparaben (BuPb)]) collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using a combination of solid-phase extraction, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and isotope dilution for absolute quantitation. The average mass loadings of all antimicrobials combined (1,431 ± 22 mg/day per 1,000 people) after the onset of the local epidemic (March 2020 - October 2020) were significantly higher (945 ± 62 mg/day per 1,000 people; p < 0.05) than before the pandemic (January 2019 - February 2020). Overall, parabens (∑Pbs = 999 ± 16 mg/day per 1,000 people) were the most used antimicrobials, followed by TCS (117 ± 14 mg/day per 1,000 people) and TCC (117 ± 14 mg/day per 1,000 people). After the 2017 U.S. FDA ban, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the mass loadings of TCS (-89%) and TCC (-80%) but a rise in paraben use (+72%). Mass flows of 3 of a total of 4 parabens (MePb, EtPb, and PrPb) in wastewater were significantly higher upon the onset of the epidemic locally (p < 0.05). This is the first longitudinal study investigating the use of antimicrobials during the COVID-19 pandemic by employing wastewater-based epidemiology. Whereas an overall increase in the use of antimicrobials was evident from analyzing Arizona wastewater, a notable reduction in the use of TCS and TCC was evident during the pandemic, triggered by the U.S. FDA ban.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>LC-MS/MS ; Pandemic ; Parabens ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Triclocarban ; Triclosan ; Wastewater</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2022-08, Vol.222, p.118894-118894, Article 118894</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a2d7500336199ca0676fe44ec0a6af3da9fa1f926a2a24ea019d0526007c90023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a2d7500336199ca0676fe44ec0a6af3da9fa1f926a2a24ea019d0526007c90023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4162-0105 ; 0000-0002-2137-4939 ; 0000-0002-6891-3688 ; 0000-0001-9675-9764 ; 0000-0001-5232-7361 ; 0000-0002-1002-6314</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118894$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Sangeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perleberg, Tyler D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanez, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Bridger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halden, Rolf U.</creatorcontrib><title>Mass trends of parabens, triclocarban and triclosan in Arizona wastewater collected after the 2017 FDA ban on antimicrobials and during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>•Comprehensive study (n = 1514) on TCC, TCS & parabens before and during the pandemic.•Antimicrobial consumption increased by 56% during the pandemic.•The mass loading of Methylparaben increased by 55% during the pandemic.•After the 2017 FDA ban, consumption of triclosan (−89%) and triclocarban (−80%) decreased.
Antimicrobials like parabens, triclosan (TCS), and triclocarban (TCC) are of public health concern worldwide due to their endocrine-disrupting properties and ability to promote antimicrobial drug resistance in human pathogens. The overall use of antimicrobials presumably has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas TCS and TCC may have experienced reductions in use due to their recent ban from thousands of over-the-counter (OTC) personal care products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). No quantitative data are available on the use of parabens or the impact the FDA ban had on TCC and TCS. Here, we use wastewater samples (n = 1514) from 10 different communities in Arizona to measure the presence of the six different antimicrobial products (TCS, TCC, and four alkylated parabens [methylparaben (MePb), ethylparaben (EtPb), propylparaben (PrPb), butylparaben (BuPb)]) collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using a combination of solid-phase extraction, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and isotope dilution for absolute quantitation. The average mass loadings of all antimicrobials combined (1,431 ± 22 mg/day per 1,000 people) after the onset of the local epidemic (March 2020 - October 2020) were significantly higher (945 ± 62 mg/day per 1,000 people; p < 0.05) than before the pandemic (January 2019 - February 2020). Overall, parabens (∑Pbs = 999 ± 16 mg/day per 1,000 people) were the most used antimicrobials, followed by TCS (117 ± 14 mg/day per 1,000 people) and TCC (117 ± 14 mg/day per 1,000 people). After the 2017 U.S. FDA ban, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the mass loadings of TCS (-89%) and TCC (-80%) but a rise in paraben use (+72%). Mass flows of 3 of a total of 4 parabens (MePb, EtPb, and PrPb) in wastewater were significantly higher upon the onset of the epidemic locally (p < 0.05). This is the first longitudinal study investigating the use of antimicrobials during the COVID-19 pandemic by employing wastewater-based epidemiology. Whereas an overall increase in the use of antimicrobials was evident from analyzing Arizona wastewater, a notable reduction in the use of TCS and TCC was evident during the pandemic, triggered by the U.S. FDA ban.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>LC-MS/MS</subject><subject>Pandemic</subject><subject>Parabens</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Triclocarban</subject><subject>Triclosan</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EEqHlH3DwkQOb-mu98QUpSj-lVr0AV2tiz4KjjR3sTSP4L_xXvN2ee7Jm9LyvZ-Yl5BNnS864vtgtTzBmLEvBhFhyvloZ9YYs-KozjVBq9ZYsGFOy4bJV78mHUnaMVVKaBfn3AKXQKo6-0NTTA2TYYixfai-4ITnIW4gUon9plFqFSNc5_E0R6AnKiPV3zNSlYUA3oqfQT_X4C6lgvKPXl2s6maTJZwz74HLaBhjKs60_5hB_PtObxx93lw03dYrosXLn5F1fOfz48p6R79dX3za3zf3jzd1mfd84Kc3YgPBdy5iUmhvjgOlO96gUOgYaeunB9MB7IzQIEAqBceNZKzRjnTP1EvKMfJ59Dzn9PmIZ7T4Uh8MAEdOxWKFNp7u2421F1YzWJUrJ2NtDDnvIfyxndkrD7uychp3SsHMaVfZ1lmFd4ylgtsUFjA59yPVo1qfwusF_PRaVgQ</recordid><startdate>20220815</startdate><enddate>20220815</enddate><creator>Adhikari, Sangeet</creator><creator>Kumar, Rahul</creator><creator>Driver, Erin M.</creator><creator>Perleberg, Tyler D.</creator><creator>Yanez, Allan</creator><creator>Johnston, Bridger</creator><creator>Halden, Rolf U.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-0105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-4939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-3688</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9675-9764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-7361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-6314</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220815</creationdate><title>Mass trends of parabens, triclocarban and triclosan in Arizona wastewater collected after the 2017 FDA ban on antimicrobials and during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><author>Adhikari, Sangeet ; Kumar, Rahul ; Driver, Erin M. ; Perleberg, Tyler D. ; Yanez, Allan ; Johnston, Bridger ; Halden, Rolf U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-a2d7500336199ca0676fe44ec0a6af3da9fa1f926a2a24ea019d0526007c90023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>LC-MS/MS</topic><topic>Pandemic</topic><topic>Parabens</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Triclocarban</topic><topic>Triclosan</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Sangeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perleberg, Tyler D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanez, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Bridger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halden, Rolf U.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adhikari, Sangeet</au><au>Kumar, Rahul</au><au>Driver, Erin M.</au><au>Perleberg, Tyler D.</au><au>Yanez, Allan</au><au>Johnston, Bridger</au><au>Halden, Rolf U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mass trends of parabens, triclocarban and triclosan in Arizona wastewater collected after the 2017 FDA ban on antimicrobials and during the COVID-19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2022-08-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>222</volume><spage>118894</spage><epage>118894</epage><pages>118894-118894</pages><artnum>118894</artnum><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>•Comprehensive study (n = 1514) on TCC, TCS & parabens before and during the pandemic.•Antimicrobial consumption increased by 56% during the pandemic.•The mass loading of Methylparaben increased by 55% during the pandemic.•After the 2017 FDA ban, consumption of triclosan (−89%) and triclocarban (−80%) decreased.
Antimicrobials like parabens, triclosan (TCS), and triclocarban (TCC) are of public health concern worldwide due to their endocrine-disrupting properties and ability to promote antimicrobial drug resistance in human pathogens. The overall use of antimicrobials presumably has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas TCS and TCC may have experienced reductions in use due to their recent ban from thousands of over-the-counter (OTC) personal care products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). No quantitative data are available on the use of parabens or the impact the FDA ban had on TCC and TCS. Here, we use wastewater samples (n = 1514) from 10 different communities in Arizona to measure the presence of the six different antimicrobial products (TCS, TCC, and four alkylated parabens [methylparaben (MePb), ethylparaben (EtPb), propylparaben (PrPb), butylparaben (BuPb)]) collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using a combination of solid-phase extraction, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and isotope dilution for absolute quantitation. The average mass loadings of all antimicrobials combined (1,431 ± 22 mg/day per 1,000 people) after the onset of the local epidemic (March 2020 - October 2020) were significantly higher (945 ± 62 mg/day per 1,000 people; p < 0.05) than before the pandemic (January 2019 - February 2020). Overall, parabens (∑Pbs = 999 ± 16 mg/day per 1,000 people) were the most used antimicrobials, followed by TCS (117 ± 14 mg/day per 1,000 people) and TCC (117 ± 14 mg/day per 1,000 people). After the 2017 U.S. FDA ban, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the mass loadings of TCS (-89%) and TCC (-80%) but a rise in paraben use (+72%). Mass flows of 3 of a total of 4 parabens (MePb, EtPb, and PrPb) in wastewater were significantly higher upon the onset of the epidemic locally (p < 0.05). This is the first longitudinal study investigating the use of antimicrobials during the COVID-19 pandemic by employing wastewater-based epidemiology. Whereas an overall increase in the use of antimicrobials was evident from analyzing Arizona wastewater, a notable reduction in the use of TCS and TCC was evident during the pandemic, triggered by the U.S. FDA ban.
[Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2022.118894</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-0105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-4939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-3688</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9675-9764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-7361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-6314</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2022-08, Vol.222, p.118894-118894, Article 118894 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2697675715 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | LC-MS/MS Pandemic Parabens SARS-CoV-2 Triclocarban Triclosan Wastewater |
title | Mass trends of parabens, triclocarban and triclosan in Arizona wastewater collected after the 2017 FDA ban on antimicrobials and during the COVID-19 pandemic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mass%20trends%20of%20parabens,%20triclocarban%20and%20triclosan%20in%20Arizona%20wastewater%20collected%20after%20the%202017%20FDA%20ban%20on%20antimicrobials%20and%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Adhikari,%20Sangeet&rft.date=2022-08-15&rft.volume=222&rft.spage=118894&rft.epage=118894&rft.pages=118894-118894&rft.artnum=118894&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2697675715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697675715&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0043135422008417&rfr_iscdi=true |