Bariatric Surgery Conversions in MBSAQIP Centers: Current Indications and Outcomes
Background The demand for revisional bariatric surgery has increased, and bariatric conversions (BC) to a different procedure represent most of the revisional cases. The 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditfnation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was expanded to include ad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery 2022-10, Vol.32 (10), p.3248-3256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3256 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3248 |
container_title | Obesity surgery |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Vanetta, Carolina Dreifuss, Nicolás H. Schlottmann, Francisco Baz, Carolina Masrur, Mario A. |
description | Background
The demand for revisional bariatric surgery has increased, and bariatric conversions (BC) to a different procedure represent most of the revisional cases. The 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditfnation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was expanded to include additional variables on BC. This study aims to analyze the indications and outcomes of BC.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP database was performed. Patients who underwent BC were included in the analysis. Index procedures, rates, and indications for BC of the different bariatric operations were described. Outcomes of the most frequent BC were analyzed.
Results
A total of 168,548 bariatric surgeries were done; 20,387 (12.1%) were revisional, and from those 15,031 (73.7%) were BC. The most converted index operations were sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (49.3%) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (45.9%). The most frequent conversions were SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (40.3%) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (54.2%) and weight loss failure (WLF) (35.8%), AGB to SG (27%) or RYGB (16.2%) for WLF (67% and 61.3%, respectively), and SG to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (3.2%) or single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (2%) for WLF (91.2% and 92.4%, respectively). Postoperative overall morbidity, serious morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates ranged from 5.3 to 20.8%, 2.3 to 19.2%, 1.5 to 10%, and 0 to 0.8%, respectively.
Conclusions
BC represents the most frequent revisional bariatric procedure. GERD and WLF are the main causes for BC. Further research is needed to define the ideal BC according to the index procedure and indication.
Graphical abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2697672086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2721075189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-534ca189d278a05e76d35bf21ff537f8335fdccea0ac08f3ff239815ca02f7ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAi5fVyaTZZL3p4kdB8aN6DjGbyEqb1WRXsL_e2AqCB08zDM_7MjyE7DM4YgDyODFWVqIAxAJKxKpYbpARk6AKmKDaJCOoSihUhXyb7KT0CoAscyPycGZia_rYWjob4ouLn7TuwoeLqe1Com2gN2ez0_vpHa1d6PP5hNZDjHmn09C01vQrzoSG3g697RYu7ZItb-bJ7f3MMXm6OH-sr4rr28tpfXpdWC6wLwSfWMNU1aBUBoSTZcPFs0fmveDSK86Fb6x1BowF5bn3yCvFhDWAXjrDx-Rw3fsWu_fBpV4v2mTdfG6C64aksaxkKRFUmdGDP-hrN8SQv9MokYEU-ZFM4ZqysUspOq_fYrsw8VMz0N-a9Vqzzpr1SrNe5hBfh1KGQxb4W_1P6gsFaYAp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2721075189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bariatric Surgery Conversions in MBSAQIP Centers: Current Indications and Outcomes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vanetta, Carolina ; Dreifuss, Nicolás H. ; Schlottmann, Francisco ; Baz, Carolina ; Masrur, Mario A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanetta, Carolina ; Dreifuss, Nicolás H. ; Schlottmann, Francisco ; Baz, Carolina ; Masrur, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The demand for revisional bariatric surgery has increased, and bariatric conversions (BC) to a different procedure represent most of the revisional cases. The 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditfnation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was expanded to include additional variables on BC. This study aims to analyze the indications and outcomes of BC.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP database was performed. Patients who underwent BC were included in the analysis. Index procedures, rates, and indications for BC of the different bariatric operations were described. Outcomes of the most frequent BC were analyzed.
Results
A total of 168,548 bariatric surgeries were done; 20,387 (12.1%) were revisional, and from those 15,031 (73.7%) were BC. The most converted index operations were sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (49.3%) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (45.9%). The most frequent conversions were SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (40.3%) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (54.2%) and weight loss failure (WLF) (35.8%), AGB to SG (27%) or RYGB (16.2%) for WLF (67% and 61.3%, respectively), and SG to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (3.2%) or single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (2%) for WLF (91.2% and 92.4%, respectively). Postoperative overall morbidity, serious morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates ranged from 5.3 to 20.8%, 2.3 to 19.2%, 1.5 to 10%, and 0 to 0.8%, respectively.
Conclusions
BC represents the most frequent revisional bariatric procedure. GERD and WLF are the main causes for BC. Further research is needed to define the ideal BC according to the index procedure and indication.
Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Contributions ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2022-10, Vol.32 (10), p.3248-3256</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-534ca189d278a05e76d35bf21ff537f8335fdccea0ac08f3ff239815ca02f7ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-534ca189d278a05e76d35bf21ff537f8335fdccea0ac08f3ff239815ca02f7ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2941-8745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanetta, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreifuss, Nicolás H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlottmann, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baz, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masrur, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><title>Bariatric Surgery Conversions in MBSAQIP Centers: Current Indications and Outcomes</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><description>Background
The demand for revisional bariatric surgery has increased, and bariatric conversions (BC) to a different procedure represent most of the revisional cases. The 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditfnation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was expanded to include additional variables on BC. This study aims to analyze the indications and outcomes of BC.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP database was performed. Patients who underwent BC were included in the analysis. Index procedures, rates, and indications for BC of the different bariatric operations were described. Outcomes of the most frequent BC were analyzed.
Results
A total of 168,548 bariatric surgeries were done; 20,387 (12.1%) were revisional, and from those 15,031 (73.7%) were BC. The most converted index operations were sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (49.3%) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (45.9%). The most frequent conversions were SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (40.3%) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (54.2%) and weight loss failure (WLF) (35.8%), AGB to SG (27%) or RYGB (16.2%) for WLF (67% and 61.3%, respectively), and SG to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (3.2%) or single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (2%) for WLF (91.2% and 92.4%, respectively). Postoperative overall morbidity, serious morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates ranged from 5.3 to 20.8%, 2.3 to 19.2%, 1.5 to 10%, and 0 to 0.8%, respectively.
Conclusions
BC represents the most frequent revisional bariatric procedure. GERD and WLF are the main causes for BC. Further research is needed to define the ideal BC according to the index procedure and indication.
Graphical abstract</description><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAi5fVyaTZZL3p4kdB8aN6DjGbyEqb1WRXsL_e2AqCB08zDM_7MjyE7DM4YgDyODFWVqIAxAJKxKpYbpARk6AKmKDaJCOoSihUhXyb7KT0CoAscyPycGZia_rYWjob4ouLn7TuwoeLqe1Com2gN2ez0_vpHa1d6PP5hNZDjHmn09C01vQrzoSG3g697RYu7ZItb-bJ7f3MMXm6OH-sr4rr28tpfXpdWC6wLwSfWMNU1aBUBoSTZcPFs0fmveDSK86Fb6x1BowF5bn3yCvFhDWAXjrDx-Rw3fsWu_fBpV4v2mTdfG6C64aksaxkKRFUmdGDP-hrN8SQv9MokYEU-ZFM4ZqysUspOq_fYrsw8VMz0N-a9Vqzzpr1SrNe5hBfh1KGQxb4W_1P6gsFaYAp</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Vanetta, Carolina</creator><creator>Dreifuss, Nicolás H.</creator><creator>Schlottmann, Francisco</creator><creator>Baz, Carolina</creator><creator>Masrur, Mario A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-8745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Bariatric Surgery Conversions in MBSAQIP Centers: Current Indications and Outcomes</title><author>Vanetta, Carolina ; Dreifuss, Nicolás H. ; Schlottmann, Francisco ; Baz, Carolina ; Masrur, Mario A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-534ca189d278a05e76d35bf21ff537f8335fdccea0ac08f3ff239815ca02f7ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanetta, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreifuss, Nicolás H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlottmann, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baz, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masrur, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanetta, Carolina</au><au>Dreifuss, Nicolás H.</au><au>Schlottmann, Francisco</au><au>Baz, Carolina</au><au>Masrur, Mario A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bariatric Surgery Conversions in MBSAQIP Centers: Current Indications and Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3248</spage><epage>3256</epage><pages>3248-3256</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background
The demand for revisional bariatric surgery has increased, and bariatric conversions (BC) to a different procedure represent most of the revisional cases. The 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditfnation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was expanded to include additional variables on BC. This study aims to analyze the indications and outcomes of BC.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP database was performed. Patients who underwent BC were included in the analysis. Index procedures, rates, and indications for BC of the different bariatric operations were described. Outcomes of the most frequent BC were analyzed.
Results
A total of 168,548 bariatric surgeries were done; 20,387 (12.1%) were revisional, and from those 15,031 (73.7%) were BC. The most converted index operations were sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (49.3%) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (45.9%). The most frequent conversions were SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (40.3%) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (54.2%) and weight loss failure (WLF) (35.8%), AGB to SG (27%) or RYGB (16.2%) for WLF (67% and 61.3%, respectively), and SG to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (3.2%) or single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (2%) for WLF (91.2% and 92.4%, respectively). Postoperative overall morbidity, serious morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates ranged from 5.3 to 20.8%, 2.3 to 19.2%, 1.5 to 10%, and 0 to 0.8%, respectively.
Conclusions
BC represents the most frequent revisional bariatric procedure. GERD and WLF are the main causes for BC. Further research is needed to define the ideal BC according to the index procedure and indication.
Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-8745</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8923 |
ispartof | Obesity surgery, 2022-10, Vol.32 (10), p.3248-3256 |
issn | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2697672086 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Gastroesophageal reflux Gastrointestinal surgery Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Contributions Surgery |
title | Bariatric Surgery Conversions in MBSAQIP Centers: Current Indications and Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bariatric%20Surgery%20Conversions%20in%20MBSAQIP%20Centers:%20Current%20Indications%20and%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Vanetta,%20Carolina&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3248&rft.epage=3256&rft.pages=3248-3256&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2721075189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2721075189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |