Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of frontoparietal theta and beta activity

Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2022-09, Vol.128 (3), p.543-555
Hauptverfasser: Wendiggensen, Paul, Adelhöfer, Nico, Jamous, Roula, Mückschel, Moritz, Takacs, Adam, Frings, Christian, Münchau, Alexander, Beste, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 555
container_issue 3
container_start_page 543
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 128
creator Wendiggensen, Paul
Adelhöfer, Nico
Jamous, Roula
Mückschel, Moritz
Takacs, Adam
Frings, Christian
Münchau, Alexander
Beste, Christian
description Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive, despite theoretical frameworks, such as the theory of event coding, describing the involved cognitive processes. In a sample of n = 40 healthy participants, we combine time-frequency decomposition and various beamforming methods to examine the neurophysiological dynamics of such action plans, with special emphasis on the interplay of theta and beta frequency activity during the processing of these plans. We show that the integration and rule-guided reactivation of embedded response plans is modulated by a complex interplay of theta and beta activity. Pretrial beta-band activity (BBA) is related to different functional neuroanatomical structures that are activated in a consecutive fashion. Enhanced preparatory activity is positively associated with higher binding-related BBA in the precuneus/parietal areas, indicating that activity in the precuneus/parietal cortex facilitates the execution of an embedded action sequence. Increased preparation subsequently leads to reduced working memory retrieval demands. A cascading pattern of interactions between pretrial and within-trial activity indicates the importance of preparatory brain activity. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00537.2021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2695285344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2695285344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-180228609ef46f77385dab2c610a8ffd83dcfb957f195a51b74b7987d560c9ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDlPAzEQhS0EEiFQ0ruk2eBjvfaWKOKSIkEBteX1AY429mI7SPvvcRKqeZr3zWjmAXCL0QpjRu63YYUQo3xFEMFnYFF7pMGsF-dggVDVFHF-Ca5y3iKEOENkAcb3FLXN2YcvGB20u8EaYw1MNk8xZAunUYUMfYa7aPajKtUbZqgC9KHYVN35MOdSDCVOKnlb1AjLdy0VquxR6OJ_fZmvwYVTY7Y3_3UJPp8eP9Yvzebt-XX9sGk0JW1psKjHig711rWd45wKZtRAdIeREs4ZQY12Q8-4wz1TDA-8HXgvuGEd0r22dAnuTnunFH_2Nhe581nbsb5i4z5L0vWMCEbbtqLNCdUp5pysk1PyO5VmiZE8pCq3QR5TlYdU6R8okWv1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2695285344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of frontoparietal theta and beta activity</title><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wendiggensen, Paul ; Adelhöfer, Nico ; Jamous, Roula ; Mückschel, Moritz ; Takacs, Adam ; Frings, Christian ; Münchau, Alexander ; Beste, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendiggensen, Paul ; Adelhöfer, Nico ; Jamous, Roula ; Mückschel, Moritz ; Takacs, Adam ; Frings, Christian ; Münchau, Alexander ; Beste, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive, despite theoretical frameworks, such as the theory of event coding, describing the involved cognitive processes. In a sample of n = 40 healthy participants, we combine time-frequency decomposition and various beamforming methods to examine the neurophysiological dynamics of such action plans, with special emphasis on the interplay of theta and beta frequency activity during the processing of these plans. We show that the integration and rule-guided reactivation of embedded response plans is modulated by a complex interplay of theta and beta activity. Pretrial beta-band activity (BBA) is related to different functional neuroanatomical structures that are activated in a consecutive fashion. Enhanced preparatory activity is positively associated with higher binding-related BBA in the precuneus/parietal areas, indicating that activity in the precuneus/parietal cortex facilitates the execution of an embedded action sequence. Increased preparation subsequently leads to reduced working memory retrieval demands. A cascading pattern of interactions between pretrial and within-trial activity indicates the importance of preparatory brain activity. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00537.2021</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2022-09, Vol.128 (3), p.543-555</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-180228609ef46f77385dab2c610a8ffd83dcfb957f195a51b74b7987d560c9ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-180228609ef46f77385dab2c610a8ffd83dcfb957f195a51b74b7987d560c9ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9069-7803 ; 0000-0002-6575-727X ; 0000-0002-7155-1067 ; 0000-0002-3219-2284 ; 0000-0002-2989-9561</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3026,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendiggensen, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelhöfer, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamous, Roula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mückschel, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takacs, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münchau, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beste, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of frontoparietal theta and beta activity</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><description>Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive, despite theoretical frameworks, such as the theory of event coding, describing the involved cognitive processes. In a sample of n = 40 healthy participants, we combine time-frequency decomposition and various beamforming methods to examine the neurophysiological dynamics of such action plans, with special emphasis on the interplay of theta and beta frequency activity during the processing of these plans. We show that the integration and rule-guided reactivation of embedded response plans is modulated by a complex interplay of theta and beta activity. Pretrial beta-band activity (BBA) is related to different functional neuroanatomical structures that are activated in a consecutive fashion. Enhanced preparatory activity is positively associated with higher binding-related BBA in the precuneus/parietal areas, indicating that activity in the precuneus/parietal cortex facilitates the execution of an embedded action sequence. Increased preparation subsequently leads to reduced working memory retrieval demands. A cascading pattern of interactions between pretrial and within-trial activity indicates the importance of preparatory brain activity. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions.</description><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkDlPAzEQhS0EEiFQ0ruk2eBjvfaWKOKSIkEBteX1AY429mI7SPvvcRKqeZr3zWjmAXCL0QpjRu63YYUQo3xFEMFnYFF7pMGsF-dggVDVFHF-Ca5y3iKEOENkAcb3FLXN2YcvGB20u8EaYw1MNk8xZAunUYUMfYa7aPajKtUbZqgC9KHYVN35MOdSDCVOKnlb1AjLdy0VquxR6OJ_fZmvwYVTY7Y3_3UJPp8eP9Yvzebt-XX9sGk0JW1psKjHig711rWd45wKZtRAdIeREs4ZQY12Q8-4wz1TDA-8HXgvuGEd0r22dAnuTnunFH_2Nhe581nbsb5i4z5L0vWMCEbbtqLNCdUp5pysk1PyO5VmiZE8pCq3QR5TlYdU6R8okWv1</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Wendiggensen, Paul</creator><creator>Adelhöfer, Nico</creator><creator>Jamous, Roula</creator><creator>Mückschel, Moritz</creator><creator>Takacs, Adam</creator><creator>Frings, Christian</creator><creator>Münchau, Alexander</creator><creator>Beste, Christian</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-7803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-727X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-1067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-2284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2989-9561</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of frontoparietal theta and beta activity</title><author>Wendiggensen, Paul ; Adelhöfer, Nico ; Jamous, Roula ; Mückschel, Moritz ; Takacs, Adam ; Frings, Christian ; Münchau, Alexander ; Beste, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-180228609ef46f77385dab2c610a8ffd83dcfb957f195a51b74b7987d560c9ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendiggensen, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelhöfer, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamous, Roula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mückschel, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takacs, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münchau, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beste, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendiggensen, Paul</au><au>Adelhöfer, Nico</au><au>Jamous, Roula</au><au>Mückschel, Moritz</au><au>Takacs, Adam</au><au>Frings, Christian</au><au>Münchau, Alexander</au><au>Beste, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of frontoparietal theta and beta activity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>543-555</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive, despite theoretical frameworks, such as the theory of event coding, describing the involved cognitive processes. In a sample of n = 40 healthy participants, we combine time-frequency decomposition and various beamforming methods to examine the neurophysiological dynamics of such action plans, with special emphasis on the interplay of theta and beta frequency activity during the processing of these plans. We show that the integration and rule-guided reactivation of embedded response plans is modulated by a complex interplay of theta and beta activity. Pretrial beta-band activity (BBA) is related to different functional neuroanatomical structures that are activated in a consecutive fashion. Enhanced preparatory activity is positively associated with higher binding-related BBA in the precuneus/parietal areas, indicating that activity in the precuneus/parietal cortex facilitates the execution of an embedded action sequence. Increased preparation subsequently leads to reduced working memory retrieval demands. A cascading pattern of interactions between pretrial and within-trial activity indicates the importance of preparatory brain activity. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Even simple actions like opening a door require integration/binding and flexible reactivation of different motor elements. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of such “embedded response plans” are largely elusive. The study shows that there are multiple roles of beta and theta oscillations associated with different functional neuroanatomical structures during the integration and reactivation of motor elements during actions.</abstract><doi>10.1152/jn.00537.2021</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-7803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-727X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-1067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-2284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2989-9561</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2022-09, Vol.128 (3), p.543-555
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2695285344
source American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of frontoparietal theta and beta activity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A51%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Processing%20of%20embedded%20response%20plans%20is%20modulated%20by%20an%20interplay%20of%20frontoparietal%20theta%20and%20beta%20activity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Wendiggensen,%20Paul&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=543-555&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00537.2021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2695285344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2695285344&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true