The Enactment Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Patient Studies

The enactment effect is the phenomenon that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase (e.g., clap, clap your hands) results in better memory than does simply reading it. We examined data from three different methodological approaches to provide a comprehensive review of the ena...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.397-434
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, Brady R. T., MacLeod, Colin M., Fernandes, Myra A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 397
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 148
creator Roberts, Brady R. T.
MacLeod, Colin M.
Fernandes, Myra A.
description The enactment effect is the phenomenon that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase (e.g., clap, clap your hands) results in better memory than does simply reading it. We examined data from three different methodological approaches to provide a comprehensive review of the enactment effect across 145 behavioral, 7 neuroimaging, and 31 neurological patient studies. Boosts in memory performance following execution of a physical action were compared to those produced by reading words or phrases, by watching an experimenter perform actions, or by engaging in self-generated imagery. Across the behavioral studies, we employed random-effects meta-regression with robust variance estimation (RVE) to reveal an average enactment effect size of g = 1.23. Further meta-analyses revealed that variations in study design and comparison task reliably influence the size of the enactment effect, whereas four other experiment factors-test format, learning instruction type, retention interval, and the presence of objects during encoding-likely do not influence the effect. Neuroimaging studies demonstrated enactment-related activation to be prevalent in the motor cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Patient studies indicated that, regardless of whether impairments of memory (e.g., Alzheimer's) or of motor capability (e.g., Parkinson's) were present, patients were able to benefit from enactment. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight two components accounting for the memory benefit from enactment: a primary mental contribution relating to planning the action and a secondary physical contribution of the action itself. Public Significance Statement The enactment effect is the finding that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase leads to enhanced memory for that information relative to simply reading it. This review integrates evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and patient studies to highlight the utility of encoding multiple facets of an item or an event to enhance its retention. Enactment was found to be a reliable and effective mnemonic tool for both neurotypical and patient populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/bul0000360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2694966832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2694966832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-30da44df18560a5c9b92595166862d12d58794900a000a7daeabb25af7c84b6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERZeWCz8AWeJSoaa149iJuW2rLVQqH6LlbE2cSZsqH4vtFO2_Z7ZbQOKAL5asZx553pex11KcSKHK03ruBR1lxDO2kFbZTBZaP2cLelNZboXdZy9jvCem1Ea9YPtKV2UlTLlg_c0d8tUIPg04Jr5qW_TpPV_y601MOEDqPP-GDx3-5DA2_BMmyJYj9JvYRT61_Azv4KGbAvTH_DPOYeoGuO3G2-NH_CvNb7XXaW46jIdsr4U-4qun-4B9v1jdnH_Mrr58uDxfXmVQyCplSjRQFE0rK20EaG9rm2urpTGVyRuZN_R7W1ghgDaCsgGEus41tKWvitqgOmBHO-86TD9mjMkNXfTY9zDiNEeXGxonm8oJffsPej_NgRYkqlS51raiRP9HGQrcamsLot7tKB-mGAO2bh0ojrBxUrhtU-5vUwS_eVLO9YDNH_R3NQSc7ABYg1vHjYdAZfQY_RwChbqVOVlUTjvjlC3VL_wlnFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693995994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Enactment Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Patient Studies</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Roberts, Brady R. T. ; MacLeod, Colin M. ; Fernandes, Myra A.</creator><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Brady R. T. ; MacLeod, Colin M. ; Fernandes, Myra A. ; Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><description>The enactment effect is the phenomenon that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase (e.g., clap, clap your hands) results in better memory than does simply reading it. We examined data from three different methodological approaches to provide a comprehensive review of the enactment effect across 145 behavioral, 7 neuroimaging, and 31 neurological patient studies. Boosts in memory performance following execution of a physical action were compared to those produced by reading words or phrases, by watching an experimenter perform actions, or by engaging in self-generated imagery. Across the behavioral studies, we employed random-effects meta-regression with robust variance estimation (RVE) to reveal an average enactment effect size of g = 1.23. Further meta-analyses revealed that variations in study design and comparison task reliably influence the size of the enactment effect, whereas four other experiment factors-test format, learning instruction type, retention interval, and the presence of objects during encoding-likely do not influence the effect. Neuroimaging studies demonstrated enactment-related activation to be prevalent in the motor cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Patient studies indicated that, regardless of whether impairments of memory (e.g., Alzheimer's) or of motor capability (e.g., Parkinson's) were present, patients were able to benefit from enactment. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight two components accounting for the memory benefit from enactment: a primary mental contribution relating to planning the action and a secondary physical contribution of the action itself. Public Significance Statement The enactment effect is the finding that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase leads to enhanced memory for that information relative to simply reading it. This review integrates evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and patient studies to highlight the utility of encoding multiple facets of an item or an event to enhance its retention. Enactment was found to be a reliable and effective mnemonic tool for both neurotypical and patient populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/bul0000360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35878067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Action ; Averages ; Behavior ; Cortex ; Enactment ; Enactments ; Encoding ; Estimation ; Human ; Humans ; Imagery ; Learning ; Medical imaging ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Meta-analysis ; Nervous System Disorders ; Neuroimaging ; Parietal Lobe ; Patients ; Reading ; Retention ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.397-434</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May/Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-30da44df18560a5c9b92595166862d12d58794900a000a7daeabb25af7c84b6e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2228-8805 ; 0000-0002-8350-7362 ; 0000-0002-1467-0342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Brady R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Myra A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Enactment Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Patient Studies</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>The enactment effect is the phenomenon that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase (e.g., clap, clap your hands) results in better memory than does simply reading it. We examined data from three different methodological approaches to provide a comprehensive review of the enactment effect across 145 behavioral, 7 neuroimaging, and 31 neurological patient studies. Boosts in memory performance following execution of a physical action were compared to those produced by reading words or phrases, by watching an experimenter perform actions, or by engaging in self-generated imagery. Across the behavioral studies, we employed random-effects meta-regression with robust variance estimation (RVE) to reveal an average enactment effect size of g = 1.23. Further meta-analyses revealed that variations in study design and comparison task reliably influence the size of the enactment effect, whereas four other experiment factors-test format, learning instruction type, retention interval, and the presence of objects during encoding-likely do not influence the effect. Neuroimaging studies demonstrated enactment-related activation to be prevalent in the motor cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Patient studies indicated that, regardless of whether impairments of memory (e.g., Alzheimer's) or of motor capability (e.g., Parkinson's) were present, patients were able to benefit from enactment. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight two components accounting for the memory benefit from enactment: a primary mental contribution relating to planning the action and a secondary physical contribution of the action itself. Public Significance Statement The enactment effect is the finding that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase leads to enhanced memory for that information relative to simply reading it. This review integrates evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and patient studies to highlight the utility of encoding multiple facets of an item or an event to enhance its retention. Enactment was found to be a reliable and effective mnemonic tool for both neurotypical and patient populations.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cortex</subject><subject>Enactment</subject><subject>Enactments</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nervous System Disorders</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERZeWCz8AWeJSoaa149iJuW2rLVQqH6LlbE2cSZsqH4vtFO2_Z7ZbQOKAL5asZx553pex11KcSKHK03ruBR1lxDO2kFbZTBZaP2cLelNZboXdZy9jvCem1Ea9YPtKV2UlTLlg_c0d8tUIPg04Jr5qW_TpPV_y601MOEDqPP-GDx3-5DA2_BMmyJYj9JvYRT61_Azv4KGbAvTH_DPOYeoGuO3G2-NH_CvNb7XXaW46jIdsr4U-4qun-4B9v1jdnH_Mrr58uDxfXmVQyCplSjRQFE0rK20EaG9rm2urpTGVyRuZN_R7W1ghgDaCsgGEus41tKWvitqgOmBHO-86TD9mjMkNXfTY9zDiNEeXGxonm8oJffsPej_NgRYkqlS51raiRP9HGQrcamsLot7tKB-mGAO2bh0ojrBxUrhtU-5vUwS_eVLO9YDNH_R3NQSc7ABYg1vHjYdAZfQY_RwChbqVOVlUTjvjlC3VL_wlnFU</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Roberts, Brady R. T.</creator><creator>MacLeod, Colin M.</creator><creator>Fernandes, Myra A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-8805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1467-0342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>The Enactment Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Patient Studies</title><author>Roberts, Brady R. T. ; MacLeod, Colin M. ; Fernandes, Myra A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-30da44df18560a5c9b92595166862d12d58794900a000a7daeabb25af7c84b6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cortex</topic><topic>Enactment</topic><topic>Enactments</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nervous System Disorders</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Brady R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Myra A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Brady R. T.</au><au>MacLeod, Colin M.</au><au>Fernandes, Myra A.</au><au>Johnson, Blair T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Enactment Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Patient Studies</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>397-434</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>The enactment effect is the phenomenon that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase (e.g., clap, clap your hands) results in better memory than does simply reading it. We examined data from three different methodological approaches to provide a comprehensive review of the enactment effect across 145 behavioral, 7 neuroimaging, and 31 neurological patient studies. Boosts in memory performance following execution of a physical action were compared to those produced by reading words or phrases, by watching an experimenter perform actions, or by engaging in self-generated imagery. Across the behavioral studies, we employed random-effects meta-regression with robust variance estimation (RVE) to reveal an average enactment effect size of g = 1.23. Further meta-analyses revealed that variations in study design and comparison task reliably influence the size of the enactment effect, whereas four other experiment factors-test format, learning instruction type, retention interval, and the presence of objects during encoding-likely do not influence the effect. Neuroimaging studies demonstrated enactment-related activation to be prevalent in the motor cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Patient studies indicated that, regardless of whether impairments of memory (e.g., Alzheimer's) or of motor capability (e.g., Parkinson's) were present, patients were able to benefit from enactment. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight two components accounting for the memory benefit from enactment: a primary mental contribution relating to planning the action and a secondary physical contribution of the action itself. Public Significance Statement The enactment effect is the finding that physically performing an action represented by a word or phrase leads to enhanced memory for that information relative to simply reading it. This review integrates evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and patient studies to highlight the utility of encoding multiple facets of an item or an event to enhance its retention. Enactment was found to be a reliable and effective mnemonic tool for both neurotypical and patient populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35878067</pmid><doi>10.1037/bul0000360</doi><tpages>38</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-8805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1467-0342</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.397-434
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2694966832
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE
subjects Action
Averages
Behavior
Cortex
Enactment
Enactments
Encoding
Estimation
Human
Humans
Imagery
Learning
Medical imaging
Memory
Memory - physiology
Mental Recall - physiology
Meta-analysis
Nervous System Disorders
Neuroimaging
Parietal Lobe
Patients
Reading
Retention
Systematic review
title The Enactment Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Patient Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Enactment%20Effect:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Behavioral,%20Neuroimaging,%20and%20Patient%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Roberts,%20Brady%20R.%20T.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=397-434&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/bul0000360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2694966832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693995994&rft_id=info:pmid/35878067&rfr_iscdi=true