Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only
This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the Nat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2022-12, Vol.96 (6), p.1036-1046.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1046.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1036 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Ha, Ryun Kyong Park, Boram Han, Kyung Su Sohn, Dae Kyung Hong, Chang Won Chang Kim, Byung Kim, Bun Chan Park, Sung Chang, Hee Jin Oh, Jae Hwan |
description | This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis.
This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation.
Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively).
Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2693776750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510722018338</els_id><sourcerecordid>2693776750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAey8ZJMwdpo4hRWqeElILChry3HHrUsaB09TqX-Po7JmNdKdc0f2YexGQC5AVHebfOUxlyBlDipPyQmbCJiprFJqdsomkKKsFKDO2QXRBgBqWYgJ6z6Hpg_90JqdDx03nWkP5IkHx2mIe783LfcdX_vVOouevvlCcBvaENHu0sqazmK8H9kVxgPfY6SBOHbLQDb03vKIlNDxdujawxU7c6YlvP6bl-zr-Wkxf83eP17e5o_vmS0K2GVlDaaqKtNIaNL7q8ZOEVQjcelKrJV1wk2dMVDXJgF1UTYFWCmMc7Jx07IuLtnt8W4fw8-AtNNbTxbb1nQYBtKymhVKVaqEhIojamMgiuh0H_3WxIMWoEe3eqOTWz261aB0SlLn4djB9Ie9x6jJekwqln4Uo5fB_9P-BSmshF8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693776750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ha, Ryun Kyong ; Park, Boram ; Han, Kyung Su ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Hong, Chang Won ; Chang Kim, Byung ; Kim, Bun ; Chan Park, Sung ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ha, Ryun Kyong ; Park, Boram ; Han, Kyung Su ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Hong, Chang Won ; Chang Kim, Byung ; Kim, Bun ; Chan Park, Sung ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis.
This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation.
Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively).
Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-12, Vol.96 (6), p.1036-1046.e1</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ha, Ryun Kyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Chang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang Kim, Byung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan Park, Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><description>This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis.
This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation.
Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively).
Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.</description><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAey8ZJMwdpo4hRWqeElILChry3HHrUsaB09TqX-Po7JmNdKdc0f2YexGQC5AVHebfOUxlyBlDipPyQmbCJiprFJqdsomkKKsFKDO2QXRBgBqWYgJ6z6Hpg_90JqdDx03nWkP5IkHx2mIe783LfcdX_vVOouevvlCcBvaENHu0sqazmK8H9kVxgPfY6SBOHbLQDb03vKIlNDxdujawxU7c6YlvP6bl-zr-Wkxf83eP17e5o_vmS0K2GVlDaaqKtNIaNL7q8ZOEVQjcelKrJV1wk2dMVDXJgF1UTYFWCmMc7Jx07IuLtnt8W4fw8-AtNNbTxbb1nQYBtKymhVKVaqEhIojamMgiuh0H_3WxIMWoEe3eqOTWz261aB0SlLn4djB9Ie9x6jJekwqln4Uo5fB_9P-BSmshF8</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Ha, Ryun Kyong</creator><creator>Park, Boram</creator><creator>Han, Kyung Su</creator><creator>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creator><creator>Hong, Chang Won</creator><creator>Chang Kim, Byung</creator><creator>Kim, Bun</creator><creator>Chan Park, Sung</creator><creator>Chang, Hee Jin</creator><creator>Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</title><author>Ha, Ryun Kyong ; Park, Boram ; Han, Kyung Su ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Hong, Chang Won ; Chang Kim, Byung ; Kim, Bun ; Chan Park, Sung ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Oh, Jae Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ha, Ryun Kyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Chang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang Kim, Byung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan Park, Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ha, Ryun Kyong</au><au>Park, Boram</au><au>Han, Kyung Su</au><au>Sohn, Dae Kyung</au><au>Hong, Chang Won</au><au>Chang Kim, Byung</au><au>Kim, Bun</au><au>Chan Park, Sung</au><au>Chang, Hee Jin</au><au>Oh, Jae Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1036</spage><epage>1046.e1</epage><pages>1036-1046.e1</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis.
This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation.
Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively).
Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-12, Vol.96 (6), p.1036-1046.e1 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2693776750 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
title | Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subpopulation%20analysis%20of%20survival%20in%20high-risk%20T1%20colorectal%20cancer:%20surgery%20versus%20endoscopic%20resection%20only&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ha,%20Ryun%20Kyong&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1036&rft.epage=1046.e1&rft.pages=1036-1046.e1&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2693776750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693776750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016510722018338&rfr_iscdi=true |