Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only

This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the Nat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2022-12, Vol.96 (6), p.1036-1046.e1
Hauptverfasser: Ha, Ryun Kyong, Park, Boram, Han, Kyung Su, Sohn, Dae Kyung, Hong, Chang Won, Chang Kim, Byung, Kim, Bun, Chan Park, Sung, Chang, Hee Jin, Oh, Jae Hwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1046.e1
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1036
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 96
creator Ha, Ryun Kyong
Park, Boram
Han, Kyung Su
Sohn, Dae Kyung
Hong, Chang Won
Chang Kim, Byung
Kim, Bun
Chan Park, Sung
Chang, Hee Jin
Oh, Jae Hwan
description This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation. Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively). Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2693776750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510722018338</els_id><sourcerecordid>2693776750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAey8ZJMwdpo4hRWqeElILChry3HHrUsaB09TqX-Po7JmNdKdc0f2YexGQC5AVHebfOUxlyBlDipPyQmbCJiprFJqdsomkKKsFKDO2QXRBgBqWYgJ6z6Hpg_90JqdDx03nWkP5IkHx2mIe783LfcdX_vVOouevvlCcBvaENHu0sqazmK8H9kVxgPfY6SBOHbLQDb03vKIlNDxdujawxU7c6YlvP6bl-zr-Wkxf83eP17e5o_vmS0K2GVlDaaqKtNIaNL7q8ZOEVQjcelKrJV1wk2dMVDXJgF1UTYFWCmMc7Jx07IuLtnt8W4fw8-AtNNbTxbb1nQYBtKymhVKVaqEhIojamMgiuh0H_3WxIMWoEe3eqOTWz261aB0SlLn4djB9Ie9x6jJekwqln4Uo5fB_9P-BSmshF8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693776750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ha, Ryun Kyong ; Park, Boram ; Han, Kyung Su ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Hong, Chang Won ; Chang Kim, Byung ; Kim, Bun ; Chan Park, Sung ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ha, Ryun Kyong ; Park, Boram ; Han, Kyung Su ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Hong, Chang Won ; Chang Kim, Byung ; Kim, Bun ; Chan Park, Sung ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation. Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively). Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-12, Vol.96 (6), p.1036-1046.e1</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ha, Ryun Kyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Chang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang Kim, Byung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan Park, Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><description>This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation. Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively). Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.</description><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAey8ZJMwdpo4hRWqeElILChry3HHrUsaB09TqX-Po7JmNdKdc0f2YexGQC5AVHebfOUxlyBlDipPyQmbCJiprFJqdsomkKKsFKDO2QXRBgBqWYgJ6z6Hpg_90JqdDx03nWkP5IkHx2mIe783LfcdX_vVOouevvlCcBvaENHu0sqazmK8H9kVxgPfY6SBOHbLQDb03vKIlNDxdujawxU7c6YlvP6bl-zr-Wkxf83eP17e5o_vmS0K2GVlDaaqKtNIaNL7q8ZOEVQjcelKrJV1wk2dMVDXJgF1UTYFWCmMc7Jx07IuLtnt8W4fw8-AtNNbTxbb1nQYBtKymhVKVaqEhIojamMgiuh0H_3WxIMWoEe3eqOTWz261aB0SlLn4djB9Ie9x6jJekwqln4Uo5fB_9P-BSmshF8</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Ha, Ryun Kyong</creator><creator>Park, Boram</creator><creator>Han, Kyung Su</creator><creator>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creator><creator>Hong, Chang Won</creator><creator>Chang Kim, Byung</creator><creator>Kim, Bun</creator><creator>Chan Park, Sung</creator><creator>Chang, Hee Jin</creator><creator>Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</title><author>Ha, Ryun Kyong ; Park, Boram ; Han, Kyung Su ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Hong, Chang Won ; Chang Kim, Byung ; Kim, Bun ; Chan Park, Sung ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Oh, Jae Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-580a666ab20b7796bc4e07b2edf5e87cf1f4faa088a0b7835b30c21aff2bf4583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ha, Ryun Kyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Chang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang Kim, Byung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan Park, Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ha, Ryun Kyong</au><au>Park, Boram</au><au>Han, Kyung Su</au><au>Sohn, Dae Kyung</au><au>Hong, Chang Won</au><au>Chang Kim, Byung</au><au>Kim, Bun</au><au>Chan Park, Sung</au><au>Chang, Hee Jin</au><au>Oh, Jae Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1036</spage><epage>1046.e1</epage><pages>1036-1046.e1</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to assess the long-term survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after local or surgical resection considering the type and number of risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This study included patients with high-risk T1 CRC who underwent therapeutic resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2001 and December 2014. Risk factors included positive resection margin, high-grade histology, deep submucosal invasion, vascular invasion, budding, and no background adenoma (BGA). We statistically divided the population into favorable or unfavorable subpopulations. The favorable subpopulation included the following 5 combinations of risk factors: positive margin only or unconditional for margin status, deep submucosal invasion only, budding only, no BGA only, and budding + no BGA. We analyzed the survival rate according to the resection type (local or surgical) in the total cohort and in each subpopulation. Eighty-one and 466 patients underwent local and surgical resections, respectively. The distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly high in the surgical group (hazard ratio [HR], .20; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06-.61; P = .0045 and HR, .41; 95% CI, .25-.70; P = .0010, respectively). In the favorable subpopulation, both DRFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the surgical and local groups (HR, .26; 95% CI, .02-4.19; P = .3431 and HR, .58; 95% CI, .27-1.23; P = .1534, respectively). Intensive surveillance without additional surgery may be another option in selected cases after of high-risk T1 CRC endoscopic resection.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-12, Vol.96 (6), p.1036-1046.e1
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2693776750
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
title Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subpopulation%20analysis%20of%20survival%20in%20high-risk%20T1%20colorectal%20cancer:%20surgery%20versus%20endoscopic%20resection%20only&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ha,%20Ryun%20Kyong&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1036&rft.epage=1046.e1&rft.pages=1036-1046.e1&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2693776750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693776750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016510722018338&rfr_iscdi=true