An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer

Patient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association. The patients diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2022-09, Vol.172 (3), p.851-858
Hauptverfasser: Melucci, Alexa D., Loria, Anthony, Ramsdale, Erika, Temple, Larissa K., Fleming, Fergal J., Aquina, Christopher T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 858
container_issue 3
container_start_page 851
container_title Surgery
container_volume 172
creator Melucci, Alexa D.
Loria, Anthony
Ramsdale, Erika
Temple, Larissa K.
Fleming, Fergal J.
Aquina, Christopher T.
description Patient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association. The patients diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were identified. The association between age and receipt of guideline-adherent care was assessed using mixed-effects multivariable analyses. Among 97,960 patients, 46.2% received guideline-adherent overall treatment and 73.3% underwent guideline-adherent surgical resection. Of those who underwent guideline-adherent surgery, 86.4% received guideline-adherent radiotherapy and 56.6% received guideline-adherent chemotherapy. After risk-adjustment, each decade increase in age was associated with 36% decreased odds of guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.65). Patients aged 58 to 59 (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.27) and 78 to 79 (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.08–1.51) had higher odds of guideline-adherent overall treatment compared with patients aged 60 and 80, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the receipt of guideline-adherent treatment between patients aged 60 vs 61–62 and 80 vs 81–82. Older patients with rectal cancer are less likely to receive guideline-adherent care, and a left-digit bias is present. Geriatric assessment-guided treatment decisions could help mitigate this bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691465085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606022003038</els_id><sourcerecordid>2691465085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a7f6f96b9e7e33d21c0b8b7e0a1acadb8a5bf13e0d50a301d6d6e966f6f14ab53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxA6y8ZJMwjhM3kdhUiJeExAbW1sSeUBc3KbYL4m_4Fr6MRIUtq9GM7hnpHsbOBOQChLpY5XEbXvICiiKHMgdZ77GZqGSRzaUS-2wGIJtMgYJDdhTjCgCaUtQz9rroOcZIMa6pT3zouKcuZda9uMRbh5G7nqcl8RQI019m8JYC32By4yHyD5eW31-bIY2bQ-8_udkGbD3xQCah5wZ7Q-GEHXToI53-zmP2fHP9dHWXPTze3l8tHjIjpUwZzjvVNaptaE5S2kIYaOt2ToACDdq2xqrthCSwFaAEYZVV1Cg1UqLEtpLH7Hz3dxOGty3FpNcuGvIeexq2UReqEaWqoJ6ixS5qwhBjoE5vgltj-NQC9GRWr_RkVk9mNZR6NDtClzuIxhLvjoKOZhRhyLqpr7aD-w__AdcAhYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691465085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Melucci, Alexa D. ; Loria, Anthony ; Ramsdale, Erika ; Temple, Larissa K. ; Fleming, Fergal J. ; Aquina, Christopher T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Melucci, Alexa D. ; Loria, Anthony ; Ramsdale, Erika ; Temple, Larissa K. ; Fleming, Fergal J. ; Aquina, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association. The patients diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were identified. The association between age and receipt of guideline-adherent care was assessed using mixed-effects multivariable analyses. Among 97,960 patients, 46.2% received guideline-adherent overall treatment and 73.3% underwent guideline-adherent surgical resection. Of those who underwent guideline-adherent surgery, 86.4% received guideline-adherent radiotherapy and 56.6% received guideline-adherent chemotherapy. After risk-adjustment, each decade increase in age was associated with 36% decreased odds of guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.65). Patients aged 58 to 59 (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.27) and 78 to 79 (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.08–1.51) had higher odds of guideline-adherent overall treatment compared with patients aged 60 and 80, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the receipt of guideline-adherent treatment between patients aged 60 vs 61–62 and 80 vs 81–82. Older patients with rectal cancer are less likely to receive guideline-adherent care, and a left-digit bias is present. Geriatric assessment-guided treatment decisions could help mitigate this bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Surgery, 2022-09, Vol.172 (3), p.851-858</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a7f6f96b9e7e33d21c0b8b7e0a1acadb8a5bf13e0d50a301d6d6e966f6f14ab53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a7f6f96b9e7e33d21c0b8b7e0a1acadb8a5bf13e0d50a301d6d6e966f6f14ab53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606022003038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melucci, Alexa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loria, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsdale, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temple, Larissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Fergal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aquina, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><title>An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer</title><title>Surgery</title><description>Patient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association. The patients diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were identified. The association between age and receipt of guideline-adherent care was assessed using mixed-effects multivariable analyses. Among 97,960 patients, 46.2% received guideline-adherent overall treatment and 73.3% underwent guideline-adherent surgical resection. Of those who underwent guideline-adherent surgery, 86.4% received guideline-adherent radiotherapy and 56.6% received guideline-adherent chemotherapy. After risk-adjustment, each decade increase in age was associated with 36% decreased odds of guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.65). Patients aged 58 to 59 (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.27) and 78 to 79 (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.08–1.51) had higher odds of guideline-adherent overall treatment compared with patients aged 60 and 80, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the receipt of guideline-adherent treatment between patients aged 60 vs 61–62 and 80 vs 81–82. Older patients with rectal cancer are less likely to receive guideline-adherent care, and a left-digit bias is present. Geriatric assessment-guided treatment decisions could help mitigate this bias.</description><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxA6y8ZJMwjhM3kdhUiJeExAbW1sSeUBc3KbYL4m_4Fr6MRIUtq9GM7hnpHsbOBOQChLpY5XEbXvICiiKHMgdZ77GZqGSRzaUS-2wGIJtMgYJDdhTjCgCaUtQz9rroOcZIMa6pT3zouKcuZda9uMRbh5G7nqcl8RQI019m8JYC32By4yHyD5eW31-bIY2bQ-8_udkGbD3xQCah5wZ7Q-GEHXToI53-zmP2fHP9dHWXPTze3l8tHjIjpUwZzjvVNaptaE5S2kIYaOt2ToACDdq2xqrthCSwFaAEYZVV1Cg1UqLEtpLH7Hz3dxOGty3FpNcuGvIeexq2UReqEaWqoJ6ixS5qwhBjoE5vgltj-NQC9GRWr_RkVk9mNZR6NDtClzuIxhLvjoKOZhRhyLqpr7aD-w__AdcAhYQ</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Melucci, Alexa D.</creator><creator>Loria, Anthony</creator><creator>Ramsdale, Erika</creator><creator>Temple, Larissa K.</creator><creator>Fleming, Fergal J.</creator><creator>Aquina, Christopher T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer</title><author>Melucci, Alexa D. ; Loria, Anthony ; Ramsdale, Erika ; Temple, Larissa K. ; Fleming, Fergal J. ; Aquina, Christopher T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a7f6f96b9e7e33d21c0b8b7e0a1acadb8a5bf13e0d50a301d6d6e966f6f14ab53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melucci, Alexa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loria, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsdale, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temple, Larissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Fergal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aquina, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melucci, Alexa D.</au><au>Loria, Anthony</au><au>Ramsdale, Erika</au><au>Temple, Larissa K.</au><au>Fleming, Fergal J.</au><au>Aquina, Christopher T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>851</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>851-858</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Patient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association. The patients diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were identified. The association between age and receipt of guideline-adherent care was assessed using mixed-effects multivariable analyses. Among 97,960 patients, 46.2% received guideline-adherent overall treatment and 73.3% underwent guideline-adherent surgical resection. Of those who underwent guideline-adherent surgery, 86.4% received guideline-adherent radiotherapy and 56.6% received guideline-adherent chemotherapy. After risk-adjustment, each decade increase in age was associated with 36% decreased odds of guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.65). Patients aged 58 to 59 (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.27) and 78 to 79 (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.08–1.51) had higher odds of guideline-adherent overall treatment compared with patients aged 60 and 80, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the receipt of guideline-adherent treatment between patients aged 60 vs 61–62 and 80 vs 81–82. Older patients with rectal cancer are less likely to receive guideline-adherent care, and a left-digit bias is present. Geriatric assessment-guided treatment decisions could help mitigate this bias.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.038</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2022-09, Vol.172 (3), p.851-858
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691465085
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T04%3A04%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20assessment%20of%20left-digit%20bias%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20older%20patients%20with%C2%A0potentially%20curable%20rectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Melucci,%20Alexa%20D.&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=851&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=851-858&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2691465085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691465085&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0039606022003038&rfr_iscdi=true