Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis
Carvedilol induces stronger decreases in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than conventional nonselective β-blockers (ie, propranolol). Limited data exist on the efficacy of carvedilol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Patients undergoing paired HVPG measurements for guiding secon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2023-08, Vol.21 (9), p.2318-2326.e7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2326.e7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2318 |
container_title | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Jachs, Mathias Hartl, Lukas Simbrunner, Benedikt Bauer, David Paternostro, Rafael Balcar, Lorenz Hofer, Benedikt Pfisterer, Nikolaus Schwarz, Michael Scheiner, Bernhard Stättermayer, Albert F. Pinter, Matthias Trauner, Michael Mandorfer, Mattias Reiberger, Thomas |
description | Carvedilol induces stronger decreases in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than conventional nonselective β-blockers (ie, propranolol). Limited data exist on the efficacy of carvedilol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.
Patients undergoing paired HVPG measurements for guiding secondary prophylaxis with either carvedilol or propranolol were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients also underwent band ligation. Changes in HVPG and systemic hemodynamics were compared between the 2 groups. Long-term follow-up data on rebleeding, acute kidney injury, nonbleeding decompensation, and liver-related death were analyzed applying competing risk regression.
Eighty-seven patients (carvedilol/propranolol, n = 45/42) were included in our study. The median baseline HVPG was 21 mm Hg (interquartile range, 18–24 mm Hg), and 39.1%/48.3%/12.6% had Child–Turcotte–Pugh A/B/C cirrhosis, respectively. Upon nonselective β-blocker initiation, HVPG decreased more strongly in carvedilol users (median relative decrease, -20% [interquartile range: -29% to -10%] vs -11% [-22% to -5%] for propranolol; P = .027), who also achieved chronic HVPG response more often (53.3% vs 28.6%; P = .034). Cumulative incidences for rebleeding (Gray test, P = .027) and liver-related death (P = .036) were significantly lower in patients taking carvedilol compared with propranolol. Notably, ascites development/worsening also was observed less commonly in carvedilol patients (P = .012). Meanwhile, acute kidney injury rates did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .255). Stratifying patients by HVPG response status yielded similar results. The prognostic value of carvedilol intake was confirmed in competing risk regression models.
Carvedilol induces more marked reductions in HVPG than propranolol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and thus is associated with lower rates of rebleeding, liver-related death, and further nonbleeding decompensation.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691051895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1542356522006425</els_id><sourcerecordid>2691051895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d8efa0a2084ce2d537b9ece08f3e0da7c240ed53859f134efbea112f5577796b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFv2zAMhYVhxdJm-wG7FDruEk-SLctGT0WwLgUCtEjTsyBLdKzAljLJyZp_P2XJduyJBPneA_kh9JWSjBJaft9metNljDCWkTIjRHxA15QXbCYELT5e-pyXfIJuYtwSwuqiFp_QJOdVwSitrtE4V-EAxva-x_e6s3CAiBd200HACxi8OTo1WI1XEHfeRcDKGbz0v9N6BU0Pyeo2eKXGZFt3yuHn4HdBOX8KtA6_gPbOqHD8u-iOvXqz8TO6alUf4culTtHrw4_1fDFbPv18nN8vZzqvy3FmKmgVUYxUhQZmeC6aGjSQqs2BGCU0KwikccXrluYFtA0oSlnLuRCiLpt8ir6dc3fB_9pDHOVgo4a-Vw78PkpW1pRwWtU8SelZqoOPMUArd8EO6W5JiTzBlluZYMsTbElKmWAnz-0lft8MYP47_tFNgruzANKTBwtBRm3B6QQtgB6l8fad-D_c1ZFi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691051895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jachs, Mathias ; Hartl, Lukas ; Simbrunner, Benedikt ; Bauer, David ; Paternostro, Rafael ; Balcar, Lorenz ; Hofer, Benedikt ; Pfisterer, Nikolaus ; Schwarz, Michael ; Scheiner, Bernhard ; Stättermayer, Albert F. ; Pinter, Matthias ; Trauner, Michael ; Mandorfer, Mattias ; Reiberger, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Jachs, Mathias ; Hartl, Lukas ; Simbrunner, Benedikt ; Bauer, David ; Paternostro, Rafael ; Balcar, Lorenz ; Hofer, Benedikt ; Pfisterer, Nikolaus ; Schwarz, Michael ; Scheiner, Bernhard ; Stättermayer, Albert F. ; Pinter, Matthias ; Trauner, Michael ; Mandorfer, Mattias ; Reiberger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Carvedilol induces stronger decreases in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than conventional nonselective β-blockers (ie, propranolol). Limited data exist on the efficacy of carvedilol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.
Patients undergoing paired HVPG measurements for guiding secondary prophylaxis with either carvedilol or propranolol were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients also underwent band ligation. Changes in HVPG and systemic hemodynamics were compared between the 2 groups. Long-term follow-up data on rebleeding, acute kidney injury, nonbleeding decompensation, and liver-related death were analyzed applying competing risk regression.
Eighty-seven patients (carvedilol/propranolol, n = 45/42) were included in our study. The median baseline HVPG was 21 mm Hg (interquartile range, 18–24 mm Hg), and 39.1%/48.3%/12.6% had Child–Turcotte–Pugh A/B/C cirrhosis, respectively. Upon nonselective β-blocker initiation, HVPG decreased more strongly in carvedilol users (median relative decrease, -20% [interquartile range: -29% to -10%] vs -11% [-22% to -5%] for propranolol; P = .027), who also achieved chronic HVPG response more often (53.3% vs 28.6%; P = .034). Cumulative incidences for rebleeding (Gray test, P = .027) and liver-related death (P = .036) were significantly lower in patients taking carvedilol compared with propranolol. Notably, ascites development/worsening also was observed less commonly in carvedilol patients (P = .012). Meanwhile, acute kidney injury rates did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .255). Stratifying patients by HVPG response status yielded similar results. The prognostic value of carvedilol intake was confirmed in competing risk regression models.
Carvedilol induces more marked reductions in HVPG than propranolol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and thus is associated with lower rates of rebleeding, liver-related death, and further nonbleeding decompensation.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-3565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35842118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cirrhosis ; Nonselective β-Blocker ; Portal Pressure ; Variceal Bleeding</subject><ispartof>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023-08, Vol.21 (9), p.2318-2326.e7</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d8efa0a2084ce2d537b9ece08f3e0da7c240ed53859f134efbea112f5577796b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d8efa0a2084ce2d537b9ece08f3e0da7c240ed53859f134efbea112f5577796b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4590-3583</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842118$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jachs, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartl, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simbrunner, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paternostro, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcar, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfisterer, Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stättermayer, Albert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinter, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trauner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandorfer, Mattias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiberger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis</title><title>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Carvedilol induces stronger decreases in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than conventional nonselective β-blockers (ie, propranolol). Limited data exist on the efficacy of carvedilol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.
Patients undergoing paired HVPG measurements for guiding secondary prophylaxis with either carvedilol or propranolol were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients also underwent band ligation. Changes in HVPG and systemic hemodynamics were compared between the 2 groups. Long-term follow-up data on rebleeding, acute kidney injury, nonbleeding decompensation, and liver-related death were analyzed applying competing risk regression.
Eighty-seven patients (carvedilol/propranolol, n = 45/42) were included in our study. The median baseline HVPG was 21 mm Hg (interquartile range, 18–24 mm Hg), and 39.1%/48.3%/12.6% had Child–Turcotte–Pugh A/B/C cirrhosis, respectively. Upon nonselective β-blocker initiation, HVPG decreased more strongly in carvedilol users (median relative decrease, -20% [interquartile range: -29% to -10%] vs -11% [-22% to -5%] for propranolol; P = .027), who also achieved chronic HVPG response more often (53.3% vs 28.6%; P = .034). Cumulative incidences for rebleeding (Gray test, P = .027) and liver-related death (P = .036) were significantly lower in patients taking carvedilol compared with propranolol. Notably, ascites development/worsening also was observed less commonly in carvedilol patients (P = .012). Meanwhile, acute kidney injury rates did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .255). Stratifying patients by HVPG response status yielded similar results. The prognostic value of carvedilol intake was confirmed in competing risk regression models.
Carvedilol induces more marked reductions in HVPG than propranolol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and thus is associated with lower rates of rebleeding, liver-related death, and further nonbleeding decompensation.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Cirrhosis</subject><subject>Nonselective β-Blocker</subject><subject>Portal Pressure</subject><subject>Variceal Bleeding</subject><issn>1542-3565</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFv2zAMhYVhxdJm-wG7FDruEk-SLctGT0WwLgUCtEjTsyBLdKzAljLJyZp_P2XJduyJBPneA_kh9JWSjBJaft9metNljDCWkTIjRHxA15QXbCYELT5e-pyXfIJuYtwSwuqiFp_QJOdVwSitrtE4V-EAxva-x_e6s3CAiBd200HACxi8OTo1WI1XEHfeRcDKGbz0v9N6BU0Pyeo2eKXGZFt3yuHn4HdBOX8KtA6_gPbOqHD8u-iOvXqz8TO6alUf4culTtHrw4_1fDFbPv18nN8vZzqvy3FmKmgVUYxUhQZmeC6aGjSQqs2BGCU0KwikccXrluYFtA0oSlnLuRCiLpt8ir6dc3fB_9pDHOVgo4a-Vw78PkpW1pRwWtU8SelZqoOPMUArd8EO6W5JiTzBlluZYMsTbElKmWAnz-0lft8MYP47_tFNgruzANKTBwtBRm3B6QQtgB6l8fad-D_c1ZFi</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Jachs, Mathias</creator><creator>Hartl, Lukas</creator><creator>Simbrunner, Benedikt</creator><creator>Bauer, David</creator><creator>Paternostro, Rafael</creator><creator>Balcar, Lorenz</creator><creator>Hofer, Benedikt</creator><creator>Pfisterer, Nikolaus</creator><creator>Schwarz, Michael</creator><creator>Scheiner, Bernhard</creator><creator>Stättermayer, Albert F.</creator><creator>Pinter, Matthias</creator><creator>Trauner, Michael</creator><creator>Mandorfer, Mattias</creator><creator>Reiberger, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-3583</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis</title><author>Jachs, Mathias ; Hartl, Lukas ; Simbrunner, Benedikt ; Bauer, David ; Paternostro, Rafael ; Balcar, Lorenz ; Hofer, Benedikt ; Pfisterer, Nikolaus ; Schwarz, Michael ; Scheiner, Bernhard ; Stättermayer, Albert F. ; Pinter, Matthias ; Trauner, Michael ; Mandorfer, Mattias ; Reiberger, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d8efa0a2084ce2d537b9ece08f3e0da7c240ed53859f134efbea112f5577796b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cirrhosis</topic><topic>Nonselective β-Blocker</topic><topic>Portal Pressure</topic><topic>Variceal Bleeding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jachs, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartl, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simbrunner, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paternostro, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcar, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfisterer, Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stättermayer, Albert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinter, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trauner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandorfer, Mattias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiberger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jachs, Mathias</au><au>Hartl, Lukas</au><au>Simbrunner, Benedikt</au><au>Bauer, David</au><au>Paternostro, Rafael</au><au>Balcar, Lorenz</au><au>Hofer, Benedikt</au><au>Pfisterer, Nikolaus</au><au>Schwarz, Michael</au><au>Scheiner, Bernhard</au><au>Stättermayer, Albert F.</au><au>Pinter, Matthias</au><au>Trauner, Michael</au><au>Mandorfer, Mattias</au><au>Reiberger, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2318</spage><epage>2326.e7</epage><pages>2318-2326.e7</pages><issn>1542-3565</issn><eissn>1542-7714</eissn><abstract>Carvedilol induces stronger decreases in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than conventional nonselective β-blockers (ie, propranolol). Limited data exist on the efficacy of carvedilol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.
Patients undergoing paired HVPG measurements for guiding secondary prophylaxis with either carvedilol or propranolol were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients also underwent band ligation. Changes in HVPG and systemic hemodynamics were compared between the 2 groups. Long-term follow-up data on rebleeding, acute kidney injury, nonbleeding decompensation, and liver-related death were analyzed applying competing risk regression.
Eighty-seven patients (carvedilol/propranolol, n = 45/42) were included in our study. The median baseline HVPG was 21 mm Hg (interquartile range, 18–24 mm Hg), and 39.1%/48.3%/12.6% had Child–Turcotte–Pugh A/B/C cirrhosis, respectively. Upon nonselective β-blocker initiation, HVPG decreased more strongly in carvedilol users (median relative decrease, -20% [interquartile range: -29% to -10%] vs -11% [-22% to -5%] for propranolol; P = .027), who also achieved chronic HVPG response more often (53.3% vs 28.6%; P = .034). Cumulative incidences for rebleeding (Gray test, P = .027) and liver-related death (P = .036) were significantly lower in patients taking carvedilol compared with propranolol. Notably, ascites development/worsening also was observed less commonly in carvedilol patients (P = .012). Meanwhile, acute kidney injury rates did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .255). Stratifying patients by HVPG response status yielded similar results. The prognostic value of carvedilol intake was confirmed in competing risk regression models.
Carvedilol induces more marked reductions in HVPG than propranolol in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and thus is associated with lower rates of rebleeding, liver-related death, and further nonbleeding decompensation.
[Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35842118</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.007</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-3583</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1542-3565 |
ispartof | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023-08, Vol.21 (9), p.2318-2326.e7 |
issn | 1542-3565 1542-7714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691051895 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Cirrhosis Nonselective β-Blocker Portal Pressure Variceal Bleeding |
title | Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A29%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carvedilol%20Achieves%20Higher%20Hemodynamic%20Response%20and%20Lower%20Rebleeding%20Rates%20Than%20Propranolol%20in%20Secondary%20Prophylaxis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Jachs,%20Mathias&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2318&rft.epage=2326.e7&rft.pages=2318-2326.e7&rft.issn=1542-3565&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2691051895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691051895&rft_id=info:pmid/35842118&rft_els_id=S1542356522006425&rfr_iscdi=true |