A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis
We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients treated for thoracolumbar burst fractures via temporary percutaneous osteosynthesis or open definitive arthrodesis. A retrospective case-control study was performed including patients treated between 2017 and 2019 for a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2022-10, Vol.166, p.e419-e426 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e426 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | e419 |
| container_title | World neurosurgery |
| container_volume | 166 |
| creator | Süner, Halil Ibrahim Pérez, Rafael Luque Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel Marín, Marta Echevarría Pérez, Jose Luis Domínguez, Ignacio |
| description | We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients treated for thoracolumbar burst fractures via temporary percutaneous osteosynthesis or open definitive arthrodesis.
A retrospective case-control study was performed including patients treated between 2017 and 2019 for a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junction, either with percutaneous osteosynthesis (case group) or open arthrodesis (control group). Clinical, functional, and radiographic results were analyzed and compared between treatment groups.
We included 112 patients (56 osteosynthesis/56 arthrodesis, P = 1) in our study. The mean follow-up and mean age were 20 ± 3 months (20 ± 2/20 ± 3, P = 1), and 41 ± 10 years (40 ± 11/42 ± 10, P = 0.3), respectively. Fracture level was L1/L2 in 75% and T11/T12 in 25% of patients. The osteosynthesis group showed significantly shorter operative times (104 ± 20 minutes/176 ± 18 minutes, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.028 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691051759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875022009652</els_id><sourcerecordid>2691051759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-1e75a913290a2c0523c7984d7be6da6f69f9e0f21c366964e3baf1819653e4ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-CAfOSSxR-7_kBcQkQpUqUeCGfL8c4SR7vr1OMF9d_jKKXH-jKe0TOvNA8h7zlrOOPq06H5O8PSCCZEw3TDhHlFLrnRZmW0sq-f_x27INeIB1af5K3R8i25kJ1pBdftJXlY002ajj5HTDNNAxX055J_x-BHus3gywRzQTqkTLf7lH1I4zLtfKZfl4yF3tRJWTLgZ7qF6ViB_EjvsUDCx7nsASNSP_d0ncs-p_7UvyNvBj8iXD_VK_Lr5tt2c7u6u__-Y7O-WwVhVFlx0J23XArLvAisEzJoa9pe70D1Xg3KDhbYIHiQSlnVgtz5gRtuVSehBZBX5OM595jTwwJY3BQxwDj6GdKCTijLWcd1ZysqzmjICTHD4I45TvUUx5k72XYHd7LtTrYd067arksfnvKX3QT988p_txX4cgagXvknQnYYIswB-pghFNen-FL-P9C_kf8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691051759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Süner, Halil Ibrahim ; Pérez, Rafael Luque ; Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel ; Marín, Marta Echevarría ; Pérez, Jose Luis ; Domínguez, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Süner, Halil Ibrahim ; Pérez, Rafael Luque ; Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel ; Marín, Marta Echevarría ; Pérez, Jose Luis ; Domínguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients treated for thoracolumbar burst fractures via temporary percutaneous osteosynthesis or open definitive arthrodesis.
A retrospective case-control study was performed including patients treated between 2017 and 2019 for a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junction, either with percutaneous osteosynthesis (case group) or open arthrodesis (control group). Clinical, functional, and radiographic results were analyzed and compared between treatment groups.
We included 112 patients (56 osteosynthesis/56 arthrodesis, P = 1) in our study. The mean follow-up and mean age were 20 ± 3 months (20 ± 2/20 ± 3, P = 1), and 41 ± 10 years (40 ± 11/42 ± 10, P = 0.3), respectively. Fracture level was L1/L2 in 75% and T11/T12 in 25% of patients. The osteosynthesis group showed significantly shorter operative times (104 ± 20 minutes/176 ± 18 minutes, P < 0.01) and inpatient stays (11.6 ± 1.5 days/15.6 ± 3.8 days, P < 0.01). Both groups showed similar correction over kyphosis angle at final follow-up (5.8° ± 2.8°/6° ± 0.2°, P = 0.57), but the osteosynthesis group showed increased segment mobility after hardware removal (3.8° ± 1.2°/0.9° ± 0.3°, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in complications, although the osteosynthesis group showed a significantly lower need for blood transfusion (21%/43%, P = 0.02).
Both methods of treatment yielded good clinical and radiological results with similar complication rates. Temporary osteosynthesis seems to be more beneficial than open arthrodesis because it requires shorter operative time and hospitalization, causes less bleeding, and facilitates spinal movement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35842174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthrodesis ; Case-Control Studies ; Fracture ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures, Comminuted ; Fractures, Compression - surgery ; Humans ; Infant ; Instrumentation ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Osteosynthesis ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries ; Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery ; Thoracolumbar ; Trauma ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2022-10, Vol.166, p.e419-e426</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-1e75a913290a2c0523c7984d7be6da6f69f9e0f21c366964e3baf1819653e4ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-1e75a913290a2c0523c7984d7be6da6f69f9e0f21c366964e3baf1819653e4ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8658-2600 ; 0000-0002-5957-8611 ; 0000-0003-4596-0008 ; 0000-0002-3228-0487 ; 0000-0001-5134-6966 ; 0000-0003-2725-2016</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Süner, Halil Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Rafael Luque</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marín, Marta Echevarría</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domínguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients treated for thoracolumbar burst fractures via temporary percutaneous osteosynthesis or open definitive arthrodesis.
A retrospective case-control study was performed including patients treated between 2017 and 2019 for a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junction, either with percutaneous osteosynthesis (case group) or open arthrodesis (control group). Clinical, functional, and radiographic results were analyzed and compared between treatment groups.
We included 112 patients (56 osteosynthesis/56 arthrodesis, P = 1) in our study. The mean follow-up and mean age were 20 ± 3 months (20 ± 2/20 ± 3, P = 1), and 41 ± 10 years (40 ± 11/42 ± 10, P = 0.3), respectively. Fracture level was L1/L2 in 75% and T11/T12 in 25% of patients. The osteosynthesis group showed significantly shorter operative times (104 ± 20 minutes/176 ± 18 minutes, P < 0.01) and inpatient stays (11.6 ± 1.5 days/15.6 ± 3.8 days, P < 0.01). Both groups showed similar correction over kyphosis angle at final follow-up (5.8° ± 2.8°/6° ± 0.2°, P = 0.57), but the osteosynthesis group showed increased segment mobility after hardware removal (3.8° ± 1.2°/0.9° ± 0.3°, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in complications, although the osteosynthesis group showed a significantly lower need for blood transfusion (21%/43%, P = 0.02).
Both methods of treatment yielded good clinical and radiological results with similar complication rates. Temporary osteosynthesis seems to be more beneficial than open arthrodesis because it requires shorter operative time and hospitalization, causes less bleeding, and facilitates spinal movement.</description><subject>Arthrodesis</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Fracture</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Comminuted</subject><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Osteosynthesis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Thoracolumbar</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-CAfOSSxR-7_kBcQkQpUqUeCGfL8c4SR7vr1OMF9d_jKKXH-jKe0TOvNA8h7zlrOOPq06H5O8PSCCZEw3TDhHlFLrnRZmW0sq-f_x27INeIB1af5K3R8i25kJ1pBdftJXlY002ajj5HTDNNAxX055J_x-BHus3gywRzQTqkTLf7lH1I4zLtfKZfl4yF3tRJWTLgZ7qF6ViB_EjvsUDCx7nsASNSP_d0ncs-p_7UvyNvBj8iXD_VK_Lr5tt2c7u6u__-Y7O-WwVhVFlx0J23XArLvAisEzJoa9pe70D1Xg3KDhbYIHiQSlnVgtz5gRtuVSehBZBX5OM595jTwwJY3BQxwDj6GdKCTijLWcd1ZysqzmjICTHD4I45TvUUx5k72XYHd7LtTrYd067arksfnvKX3QT988p_txX4cgagXvknQnYYIswB-pghFNen-FL-P9C_kf8</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Süner, Halil Ibrahim</creator><creator>Pérez, Rafael Luque</creator><creator>Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel</creator><creator>Marín, Marta Echevarría</creator><creator>Pérez, Jose Luis</creator><creator>Domínguez, Ignacio</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-2600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-8611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-0008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-0487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-6966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-2016</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis</title><author>Süner, Halil Ibrahim ; Pérez, Rafael Luque ; Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel ; Marín, Marta Echevarría ; Pérez, Jose Luis ; Domínguez, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-1e75a913290a2c0523c7984d7be6da6f69f9e0f21c366964e3baf1819653e4ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthrodesis</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Fracture</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Comminuted</topic><topic>Fractures, Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Osteosynthesis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Thoracolumbar</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Süner, Halil Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Rafael Luque</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marín, Marta Echevarría</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domínguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Süner, Halil Ibrahim</au><au>Pérez, Rafael Luque</au><au>Garríguez-Pérez, Daniel</au><au>Marín, Marta Echevarría</au><au>Pérez, Jose Luis</au><au>Domínguez, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>e419</spage><epage>e426</epage><pages>e419-e426</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients treated for thoracolumbar burst fractures via temporary percutaneous osteosynthesis or open definitive arthrodesis.
A retrospective case-control study was performed including patients treated between 2017 and 2019 for a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junction, either with percutaneous osteosynthesis (case group) or open arthrodesis (control group). Clinical, functional, and radiographic results were analyzed and compared between treatment groups.
We included 112 patients (56 osteosynthesis/56 arthrodesis, P = 1) in our study. The mean follow-up and mean age were 20 ± 3 months (20 ± 2/20 ± 3, P = 1), and 41 ± 10 years (40 ± 11/42 ± 10, P = 0.3), respectively. Fracture level was L1/L2 in 75% and T11/T12 in 25% of patients. The osteosynthesis group showed significantly shorter operative times (104 ± 20 minutes/176 ± 18 minutes, P < 0.01) and inpatient stays (11.6 ± 1.5 days/15.6 ± 3.8 days, P < 0.01). Both groups showed similar correction over kyphosis angle at final follow-up (5.8° ± 2.8°/6° ± 0.2°, P = 0.57), but the osteosynthesis group showed increased segment mobility after hardware removal (3.8° ± 1.2°/0.9° ± 0.3°, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in complications, although the osteosynthesis group showed a significantly lower need for blood transfusion (21%/43%, P = 0.02).
Both methods of treatment yielded good clinical and radiological results with similar complication rates. Temporary osteosynthesis seems to be more beneficial than open arthrodesis because it requires shorter operative time and hospitalization, causes less bleeding, and facilitates spinal movement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35842174</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.028</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-2600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-8611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-0008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-0487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-6966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-2016</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
| ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2022-10, Vol.166, p.e419-e426 |
| issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691051759 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Arthrodesis Case-Control Studies Fracture Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fractures, Comminuted Fractures, Compression - surgery Humans Infant Instrumentation Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Osteosynthesis Retrospective Studies Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging Spinal Fractures - surgery Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery Thoracolumbar Trauma Treatment Outcome |
| title | A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A50%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%202%20Surgical%20Treatments%20for%20Thoracolumbar%20Burst%20Fractures:%20Temporary%20Osteosynthesis%20and%20Arthrodesis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=S%C3%BCner,%20Halil%20Ibrahim&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=e419&rft.epage=e426&rft.pages=e419-e426&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2691051759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691051759&rft_id=info:pmid/35842174&rft_els_id=S1878875022009652&rfr_iscdi=true |