Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey

Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. A 36-item survey was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac failure 2023-01, Vol.29 (1), p.112-115
Hauptverfasser: Chuzi, SARAH, PENSA, ANTHONY V., ALLEN, LARRY A., CROSS, SARAH H., FEDER, SHELLI L., WARRAICH, HAIDER J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115
container_issue 1
container_start_page 112
container_title Journal of cardiac failure
container_volume 29
creator Chuzi, SARAH
PENSA, ANTHONY V.
ALLEN, LARRY A.
CROSS, SARAH H.
FEDER, SHELLI L.
WARRAICH, HAIDER J.
description Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691051506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071916422005784</els_id><sourcerecordid>2691051506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c99e77bbc29e202232dd354f3192067df84a33cc0b8fb8ffb63aeb5542fb6f823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMofv8FydFL6yRp09aTsrgqCC6u4jGk6USztFtN2oX992ZZFTwJAzNh3pk38xByxiBlwOTFIjXaN1a7NuXAeQoyBQY75JDlgidlxrLdWEPBkorJ7IAchbAAgDKDYp8ciLzMOANxSN5mum2dHtwK6UR7pLb3dBbfuBwCfXXDO71D7Qc6jVajx0v6hGFsY2_q-47qv106743DYU17S6879M5oOh_9CtcnZM_qNuDpdz4mL9Ob58ld8vB4ez-5fkiMkOWQmKrCoqhrwyvc3CV404g8s4JVHGTR2DLTQhgDdWlj2FoKjXWeZzyWtuTimJxv9374_nPEMKjOBYNtq5fYj0FxWTHIWQ4ySuVWanwfgkerPrzrtF8rBmoDWS3UD2S1-YwCqSLkOHj27THWHTa_Yz9Uo-BqK8B46cqhVyFiWRpsnEczqKZ3_3l8AcL9kNM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691051506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chuzi, SARAH ; PENSA, ANTHONY V. ; ALLEN, LARRY A. ; CROSS, SARAH H. ; FEDER, SHELLI L. ; WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuzi, SARAH ; PENSA, ANTHONY V. ; ALLEN, LARRY A. ; CROSS, SARAH H. ; FEDER, SHELLI L. ; WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-9164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35842103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; Palliative Care ; Physicians ; Referral and Consultation ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiac failure, 2023-01, Vol.29 (1), p.112-115</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c99e77bbc29e202232dd354f3192067df84a33cc0b8fb8ffb63aeb5542fb6f823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c99e77bbc29e202232dd354f3192067df84a33cc0b8fb8ffb63aeb5542fb6f823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5348-2742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuzi, SARAH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENSA, ANTHONY V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, LARRY A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CROSS, SARAH H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEDER, SHELLI L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</creatorcontrib><title>Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey</title><title>Journal of cardiac failure</title><addtitle>J Card Fail</addtitle><description>Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.</description><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1071-9164</issn><issn>1532-8414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMofv8FydFL6yRp09aTsrgqCC6u4jGk6USztFtN2oX992ZZFTwJAzNh3pk38xByxiBlwOTFIjXaN1a7NuXAeQoyBQY75JDlgidlxrLdWEPBkorJ7IAchbAAgDKDYp8ciLzMOANxSN5mum2dHtwK6UR7pLb3dBbfuBwCfXXDO71D7Qc6jVajx0v6hGFsY2_q-47qv106743DYU17S6879M5oOh_9CtcnZM_qNuDpdz4mL9Ob58ld8vB4ez-5fkiMkOWQmKrCoqhrwyvc3CV404g8s4JVHGTR2DLTQhgDdWlj2FoKjXWeZzyWtuTimJxv9374_nPEMKjOBYNtq5fYj0FxWTHIWQ4ySuVWanwfgkerPrzrtF8rBmoDWS3UD2S1-YwCqSLkOHj27THWHTa_Yz9Uo-BqK8B46cqhVyFiWRpsnEczqKZ3_3l8AcL9kNM</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Chuzi, SARAH</creator><creator>PENSA, ANTHONY V.</creator><creator>ALLEN, LARRY A.</creator><creator>CROSS, SARAH H.</creator><creator>FEDER, SHELLI L.</creator><creator>WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-2742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey</title><author>Chuzi, SARAH ; PENSA, ANTHONY V. ; ALLEN, LARRY A. ; CROSS, SARAH H. ; FEDER, SHELLI L. ; WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c99e77bbc29e202232dd354f3192067df84a33cc0b8fb8ffb63aeb5542fb6f823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuzi, SARAH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENSA, ANTHONY V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, LARRY A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CROSS, SARAH H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEDER, SHELLI L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiac failure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuzi, SARAH</au><au>PENSA, ANTHONY V.</au><au>ALLEN, LARRY A.</au><au>CROSS, SARAH H.</au><au>FEDER, SHELLI L.</au><au>WARRAICH, HAIDER J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiac failure</jtitle><addtitle>J Card Fail</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>112-115</pages><issn>1071-9164</issn><eissn>1532-8414</eissn><abstract>Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians’ perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35842103</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-2742</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-9164
ispartof Journal of cardiac failure, 2023-01, Vol.29 (1), p.112-115
issn 1071-9164
1532-8414
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2691051506
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Heart Failure - therapy
Humans
Palliative Care
Physicians
Referral and Consultation
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Palliative%20Care%20for%20Patients%20With%20Heart%20Failure:%20Results%20From%20a%20Heart%20Failure%20Society%20of%20America%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiac%20failure&rft.au=Chuzi,%20SARAH&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=112-115&rft.issn=1071-9164&rft.eissn=1532-8414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2691051506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691051506&rft_id=info:pmid/35842103&rft_els_id=S1071916422005784&rfr_iscdi=true