LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2023-03, Vol.57 (3), p.930-938
Hauptverfasser: Hwang, Jeong Ah, Lee, Sunyoung, Lee, Ji Eun, Yoon, Jongjin, Choi, Seo‐Yeon, Shin, Jaeseung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 938
container_issue 3
container_start_page 930
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 57
creator Hwang, Jeong Ah
Lee, Sunyoung
Lee, Ji Eun
Yoon, Jongjin
Choi, Seo‐Yeon
Shin, Jaeseung
description Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study. Purpose To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients. Study Type Retrospective, multicenter. Subjects A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021. Filed Strength/Sequence A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent. Assessment MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features. Statistical Tests Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of 3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively). Data Conclusion Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.28354
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2689672743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2689672743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEYhYMozkU3PoAE3MhAjakklYu7or2V9CD0KC5Dkkp1p6mq9CRVSC0EH8Fn9EnMTI8uXLj6fw4fhwMfAM9KdFkihF_th-gvsSAVfQBOywrjAleCPcw_qkhRCsRPwFlKe4SQlLR6DE5IJQjhUpyC7-vm14-fm_rNNVzpyW1DXGAY4dWmgU2CdUrB-py38KufdnDj7ByjG62DoYPNOEW9cwc9eQtXu9DrceuD1dH6MQwa1t3kIrye49bF5TWs4dXcZ9SNd_E0t8sT8KjTfXJP7-85-PLu7efVh2L96X2zqteFJRWnBTfcOUOY62ypTddKQZglqDWCGN1aygSjHZfatkYiIUVLjeSacsS0Lpmh5By8PPYeYriZXZrU4JN1fV7swpwUZkIyjjklGX3xD7oPcxzzOoU555hwwlmmLo6UjSGl6Dp1iH7QcVElUrdS1K0UdSclw8_vK2czuPYv-sdCBsoj8M33bvlPlfqYxRxLfwPeK5ib</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777237376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hwang, Jeong Ah ; Lee, Sunyoung ; Lee, Ji Eun ; Yoon, Jongjin ; Choi, Seo‐Yeon ; Shin, Jaeseung</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jeong Ah ; Lee, Sunyoung ; Lee, Ji Eun ; Yoon, Jongjin ; Choi, Seo‐Yeon ; Shin, Jaeseung</creatorcontrib><description>Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study. Purpose To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients. Study Type Retrospective, multicenter. Subjects A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021. Filed Strength/Sequence A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent. Assessment MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features. Statistical Tests Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR‐M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR‐4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR‐M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096–58.931) and a tumor size &gt;3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively). Data Conclusion Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28354</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35833798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery ; Confidence intervals ; Contrast agents ; Contrast Media ; Evaluation ; Female ; Health hazards ; Humans ; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ; Liver ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging ; Patients ; prognosis ; Rank tests ; recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Statistical tests ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2023-03, Vol.57 (3), p.930-938</ispartof><rights>2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6893-3136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.28354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.28354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jeong Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sunyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jongjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jaeseung</creatorcontrib><title>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study. Purpose To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients. Study Type Retrospective, multicenter. Subjects A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021. Filed Strength/Sequence A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent. Assessment MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features. Statistical Tests Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR‐M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR‐4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR‐M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096–58.931) and a tumor size &gt;3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively). Data Conclusion Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2</description><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEYhYMozkU3PoAE3MhAjakklYu7or2V9CD0KC5Dkkp1p6mq9CRVSC0EH8Fn9EnMTI8uXLj6fw4fhwMfAM9KdFkihF_th-gvsSAVfQBOywrjAleCPcw_qkhRCsRPwFlKe4SQlLR6DE5IJQjhUpyC7-vm14-fm_rNNVzpyW1DXGAY4dWmgU2CdUrB-py38KufdnDj7ByjG62DoYPNOEW9cwc9eQtXu9DrceuD1dH6MQwa1t3kIrye49bF5TWs4dXcZ9SNd_E0t8sT8KjTfXJP7-85-PLu7efVh2L96X2zqteFJRWnBTfcOUOY62ypTddKQZglqDWCGN1aygSjHZfatkYiIUVLjeSacsS0Lpmh5By8PPYeYriZXZrU4JN1fV7swpwUZkIyjjklGX3xD7oPcxzzOoU555hwwlmmLo6UjSGl6Dp1iH7QcVElUrdS1K0UdSclw8_vK2czuPYv-sdCBsoj8M33bvlPlfqYxRxLfwPeK5ib</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Hwang, Jeong Ah</creator><creator>Lee, Sunyoung</creator><creator>Lee, Ji Eun</creator><creator>Yoon, Jongjin</creator><creator>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</creator><creator>Shin, Jaeseung</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-3136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</title><author>Hwang, Jeong Ah ; Lee, Sunyoung ; Lee, Ji Eun ; Yoon, Jongjin ; Choi, Seo‐Yeon ; Shin, Jaeseung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jeong Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sunyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jongjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jaeseung</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Jeong Ah</au><au>Lee, Sunyoung</au><au>Lee, Ji Eun</au><au>Yoon, Jongjin</au><au>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</au><au>Shin, Jaeseung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>930</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>930-938</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study. Purpose To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients. Study Type Retrospective, multicenter. Subjects A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021. Filed Strength/Sequence A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent. Assessment MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features. Statistical Tests Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR‐M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR‐4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR‐M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096–58.931) and a tumor size &gt;3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively). Data Conclusion Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35833798</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.28354</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-3136</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2023-03, Vol.57 (3), p.930-938
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2689672743
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging
Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery
Confidence intervals
Contrast agents
Contrast Media
Evaluation
Female
Health hazards
Humans
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Liver
Liver Neoplasms - pathology
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medical imaging
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging
Patients
prognosis
Rank tests
recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
Statistical tests
Surgery
Tumors
title LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A01%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LI%E2%80%90RADS%20Category%20on%20MRI%20Is%20Associated%20With%20Recurrence%20of%20Intrahepatic%20Cholangiocarcinoma%20After%20Surgery:%20A%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Hwang,%20Jeong%20Ah&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=930&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=930-938&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.28354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689672743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777237376&rft_id=info:pmid/35833798&rfr_iscdi=true