LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study
Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2023-03, Vol.57 (3), p.930-938 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 938 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 930 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Hwang, Jeong Ah Lee, Sunyoung Lee, Ji Eun Yoon, Jongjin Choi, Seo‐Yeon Shin, Jaeseung |
description | Background
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study.
Purpose
To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients.
Study Type
Retrospective, multicenter.
Subjects
A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021.
Filed Strength/Sequence
A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent.
Assessment
MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features.
Statistical Tests
Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of 3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively).
Data Conclusion
Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M.
Evidence Level
3
Technical Efficacy
Stage 2 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.28354 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2689672743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2689672743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEYhYMozkU3PoAE3MhAjakklYu7or2V9CD0KC5Dkkp1p6mq9CRVSC0EH8Fn9EnMTI8uXLj6fw4fhwMfAM9KdFkihF_th-gvsSAVfQBOywrjAleCPcw_qkhRCsRPwFlKe4SQlLR6DE5IJQjhUpyC7-vm14-fm_rNNVzpyW1DXGAY4dWmgU2CdUrB-py38KufdnDj7ByjG62DoYPNOEW9cwc9eQtXu9DrceuD1dH6MQwa1t3kIrye49bF5TWs4dXcZ9SNd_E0t8sT8KjTfXJP7-85-PLu7efVh2L96X2zqteFJRWnBTfcOUOY62ypTddKQZglqDWCGN1aygSjHZfatkYiIUVLjeSacsS0Lpmh5By8PPYeYriZXZrU4JN1fV7swpwUZkIyjjklGX3xD7oPcxzzOoU555hwwlmmLo6UjSGl6Dp1iH7QcVElUrdS1K0UdSclw8_vK2czuPYv-sdCBsoj8M33bvlPlfqYxRxLfwPeK5ib</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777237376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hwang, Jeong Ah ; Lee, Sunyoung ; Lee, Ji Eun ; Yoon, Jongjin ; Choi, Seo‐Yeon ; Shin, Jaeseung</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jeong Ah ; Lee, Sunyoung ; Lee, Ji Eun ; Yoon, Jongjin ; Choi, Seo‐Yeon ; Shin, Jaeseung</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study.
Purpose
To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients.
Study Type
Retrospective, multicenter.
Subjects
A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021.
Filed Strength/Sequence
A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent.
Assessment
MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features.
Statistical Tests
Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR‐M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR‐4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR‐M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096–58.931) and a tumor size >3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively).
Data Conclusion
Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M.
Evidence Level
3
Technical Efficacy
Stage 2</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28354</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35833798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery ; Confidence intervals ; Contrast agents ; Contrast Media ; Evaluation ; Female ; Health hazards ; Humans ; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ; Liver ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging ; Patients ; prognosis ; Rank tests ; recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Statistical tests ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2023-03, Vol.57 (3), p.930-938</ispartof><rights>2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6893-3136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.28354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.28354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jeong Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sunyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jongjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jaeseung</creatorcontrib><title>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Background
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study.
Purpose
To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients.
Study Type
Retrospective, multicenter.
Subjects
A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021.
Filed Strength/Sequence
A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent.
Assessment
MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features.
Statistical Tests
Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR‐M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR‐4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR‐M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096–58.931) and a tumor size >3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively).
Data Conclusion
Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M.
Evidence Level
3
Technical Efficacy
Stage 2</description><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEYhYMozkU3PoAE3MhAjakklYu7or2V9CD0KC5Dkkp1p6mq9CRVSC0EH8Fn9EnMTI8uXLj6fw4fhwMfAM9KdFkihF_th-gvsSAVfQBOywrjAleCPcw_qkhRCsRPwFlKe4SQlLR6DE5IJQjhUpyC7-vm14-fm_rNNVzpyW1DXGAY4dWmgU2CdUrB-py38KufdnDj7ByjG62DoYPNOEW9cwc9eQtXu9DrceuD1dH6MQwa1t3kIrye49bF5TWs4dXcZ9SNd_E0t8sT8KjTfXJP7-85-PLu7efVh2L96X2zqteFJRWnBTfcOUOY62ypTddKQZglqDWCGN1aygSjHZfatkYiIUVLjeSacsS0Lpmh5By8PPYeYriZXZrU4JN1fV7swpwUZkIyjjklGX3xD7oPcxzzOoU555hwwlmmLo6UjSGl6Dp1iH7QcVElUrdS1K0UdSclw8_vK2czuPYv-sdCBsoj8M33bvlPlfqYxRxLfwPeK5ib</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Hwang, Jeong Ah</creator><creator>Lee, Sunyoung</creator><creator>Lee, Ji Eun</creator><creator>Yoon, Jongjin</creator><creator>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</creator><creator>Shin, Jaeseung</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-3136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</title><author>Hwang, Jeong Ah ; Lee, Sunyoung ; Lee, Ji Eun ; Yoon, Jongjin ; Choi, Seo‐Yeon ; Shin, Jaeseung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-7b7eeb36efc1abfd9836c30db83badc46864f79acdb90898d4b97a4706aa16b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jeong Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sunyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jongjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jaeseung</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Jeong Ah</au><au>Lee, Sunyoung</au><au>Lee, Ji Eun</au><au>Yoon, Jongjin</au><au>Choi, Seo‐Yeon</au><au>Shin, Jaeseung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>930</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>930-938</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Background
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI‐RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study.
Purpose
To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence‐free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI‐RADS category in at‐risk patients.
Study Type
Retrospective, multicenter.
Subjects
A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment‐naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021.
Filed Strength/Sequence
A 3 T dual gradient‐echo T1WI with in‐ and opposed‐phase, turbo spin‐echo T2WI, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images, and three‐dimensional gradient‐echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent.
Assessment
MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI‐RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features.
Statistical Tests
Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan–Meier method, and log‐rank test. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR‐M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR‐4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR‐M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096–58.931) and a tumor size >3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319–5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5‐year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR‐M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively).
Data Conclusion
Patients with iCCA categorized as LR‐4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR‐M.
Evidence Level
3
Technical Efficacy
Stage 2</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35833798</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.28354</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-3136</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2023-03, Vol.57 (3), p.930-938 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2689672743 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bile Duct Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology Cholangiocarcinoma Cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery Confidence intervals Contrast agents Contrast Media Evaluation Female Health hazards Humans intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Liver Liver Neoplasms - pathology Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging Patients prognosis Rank tests recurrence Retrospective Studies Statistical analysis Statistical models Statistical tests Surgery Tumors |
title | LI‐RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A01%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LI%E2%80%90RADS%20Category%20on%20MRI%20Is%20Associated%20With%20Recurrence%20of%20Intrahepatic%20Cholangiocarcinoma%20After%20Surgery:%20A%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Hwang,%20Jeong%20Ah&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=930&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=930-938&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.28354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689672743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777237376&rft_id=info:pmid/35833798&rfr_iscdi=true |