A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients
The last decade has seen an explosion of advanced assays for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, yet evidence‐based recommendations to inform their optimal use in the care of transplant recipients are lacking. A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) was co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2022-12, Vol.22 (12), p.3150-3169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3150 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Azar, Marwan M. Turbett, Sarah Gaston, David Gitman, Melissa Razonable, Raymund Koo, Sophia Hanson, Kimberly Kotton, Camille Silveira, Fernanda Banach, David B. Basu, Sankha S. Bhaskaran, Archana Danziger‐Isakov, Lara Bard, Jennifer Dien Gandhi, Ronak Hanisch, Benjamin John, Teny M. Odom John, Audrey R. Letourneau, Alyssa R. Luong, Me‐Linh Maron, Gabriela Miller, Steve Prinzi, Andrea Schwartz, Ilan Simner, Patricia Kumar, Deepali |
description | The last decade has seen an explosion of advanced assays for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, yet evidence‐based recommendations to inform their optimal use in the care of transplant recipients are lacking. A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) was convened on December 7, 2021, to define the utility of novel infectious disease diagnostics in organ transplant recipients. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in transplant infectious diseases, diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology from centers across North America to evaluate current uses, unmet needs, and future directions for assays in 5 categories including (1) multiplex molecular assays, (2) rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods, (3) pathogen‐specific T‐cell reactivity assays, (4) next‐generation sequencing assays, and (5) mass spectrometry‐based assays. Participants reviewed and appraised available literature, determined assay advantages and limitations, developed best practice guidance largely based on expert opinion for clinical use, and identified areas of future investigation in the setting of transplantation. In addition, attendees emphasized the need for well‐designed studies to generate high‐quality evidence needed to guide care, identified regulatory and financial barriers, and discussed the role of regulatory agencies in facilitating research and implementation of these assays. Findings and consensus statements are presented.
This meeting report summarizes findings from an AST‐sponsored consensus conference to define best practice uses, unmet needs and future directions for advanced infectious diseases diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajt.17147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2689053430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2689053430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-c8ad8d5724147f44d957fcf6efe3ea93534bb75edc5ac4f833f592e13e10dc5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFPXCEUhUmjqdZ24R8wJG7axSg8eA9mOTHV1ph0Y9eEgYsyeQMj8DST9Mf36lgXTWRzTy4fJ4ccQo45O-N4zu2qnXHFpfpADvnA2GzgUuy9adEfkE-1rhjjqtPdR3Iget11Qg6H5M-CupwqpDrVZxWgQHJAW6YeQkyo7oFOLY6xbWkO1PpHi4CnEVnXYsZ3PlawFXDau5Rri67iNa15jJ7mcmcTbcWmuhltarSAi5sIqdXPZD_YscKX13lEfl9-v734Mbv5dfXzYnEzc0JrNXPaeu171Un8YpDSz3sVXBgggAA7F72Qy6XqwbveOhm0EKGfd8AFcIY7J47I153vpuSHCWoz61gdjBgHML_pBj1n6CIYoqf_oas8lYTpTKekHJiWg0Lq245yJddaIJhNiWtbtoYz81yJwUrMSyXInrw6Tss1-DfyXwcInO-ApzjC9n0ns7i-3Vn-BR_Kl64</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2744608467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Azar, Marwan M. ; Turbett, Sarah ; Gaston, David ; Gitman, Melissa ; Razonable, Raymund ; Koo, Sophia ; Hanson, Kimberly ; Kotton, Camille ; Silveira, Fernanda ; Banach, David B. ; Basu, Sankha S. ; Bhaskaran, Archana ; Danziger‐Isakov, Lara ; Bard, Jennifer Dien ; Gandhi, Ronak ; Hanisch, Benjamin ; John, Teny M. ; Odom John, Audrey R. ; Letourneau, Alyssa R. ; Luong, Me‐Linh ; Maron, Gabriela ; Miller, Steve ; Prinzi, Andrea ; Schwartz, Ilan ; Simner, Patricia ; Kumar, Deepali</creator><creatorcontrib>Azar, Marwan M. ; Turbett, Sarah ; Gaston, David ; Gitman, Melissa ; Razonable, Raymund ; Koo, Sophia ; Hanson, Kimberly ; Kotton, Camille ; Silveira, Fernanda ; Banach, David B. ; Basu, Sankha S. ; Bhaskaran, Archana ; Danziger‐Isakov, Lara ; Bard, Jennifer Dien ; Gandhi, Ronak ; Hanisch, Benjamin ; John, Teny M. ; Odom John, Audrey R. ; Letourneau, Alyssa R. ; Luong, Me‐Linh ; Maron, Gabriela ; Miller, Steve ; Prinzi, Andrea ; Schwartz, Ilan ; Simner, Patricia ; Kumar, Deepali ; Transplant ID Diagnostics Consensus Conference Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>The last decade has seen an explosion of advanced assays for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, yet evidence‐based recommendations to inform their optimal use in the care of transplant recipients are lacking. A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) was convened on December 7, 2021, to define the utility of novel infectious disease diagnostics in organ transplant recipients. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in transplant infectious diseases, diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology from centers across North America to evaluate current uses, unmet needs, and future directions for assays in 5 categories including (1) multiplex molecular assays, (2) rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods, (3) pathogen‐specific T‐cell reactivity assays, (4) next‐generation sequencing assays, and (5) mass spectrometry‐based assays. Participants reviewed and appraised available literature, determined assay advantages and limitations, developed best practice guidance largely based on expert opinion for clinical use, and identified areas of future investigation in the setting of transplantation. In addition, attendees emphasized the need for well‐designed studies to generate high‐quality evidence needed to guide care, identified regulatory and financial barriers, and discussed the role of regulatory agencies in facilitating research and implementation of these assays. Findings and consensus statements are presented.
This meeting report summarizes findings from an AST‐sponsored consensus conference to define best practice uses, unmet needs and future directions for advanced infectious diseases diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35822346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Antimicrobial resistance ; Clinical microbiology ; clinical research/practice ; Consensus ; diagnostic techniques and imaging ; Humans ; infection and infectious agents ; infectious disease ; Infectious diseases ; Mass spectroscopy ; Medical diagnosis ; North America ; Organ Transplantation - adverse effects ; organ transplantation in general ; translational research/science ; Transplant Recipients ; Transplantation ; Transplants ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2022-12, Vol.22 (12), p.3150-3169</ispartof><rights>2022 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><rights>2022 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-c8ad8d5724147f44d957fcf6efe3ea93534bb75edc5ac4f833f592e13e10dc5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-c8ad8d5724147f44d957fcf6efe3ea93534bb75edc5ac4f833f592e13e10dc5c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4931-7805 ; 0000-0003-1961-0477 ; 0000-0003-3387-9093 ; 0000-0002-4973-7439 ; 0000-0001-5247-5399 ; 0000-0002-7522-0281 ; 0000-0002-9188-3392 ; 0000-0002-6960-0763 ; 0000-0003-2949-5484 ; 0000-0003-3756-892X ; 0000-0001-5248-0227 ; 0000-0002-7320-5635 ; 0000-0002-5691-5221 ; 0000-0001-5498-5042 ; 0000-0001-8395-8537 ; 0000-0001-9442-0396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.17147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.17147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azar, Marwan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turbett, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaston, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitman, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razonable, Raymund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotton, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banach, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Sankha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaskaran, Archana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danziger‐Isakov, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bard, Jennifer Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Ronak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Teny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odom John, Audrey R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letourneau, Alyssa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luong, Me‐Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maron, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinzi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Ilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simner, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Transplant ID Diagnostics Consensus Conference Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>The last decade has seen an explosion of advanced assays for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, yet evidence‐based recommendations to inform their optimal use in the care of transplant recipients are lacking. A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) was convened on December 7, 2021, to define the utility of novel infectious disease diagnostics in organ transplant recipients. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in transplant infectious diseases, diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology from centers across North America to evaluate current uses, unmet needs, and future directions for assays in 5 categories including (1) multiplex molecular assays, (2) rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods, (3) pathogen‐specific T‐cell reactivity assays, (4) next‐generation sequencing assays, and (5) mass spectrometry‐based assays. Participants reviewed and appraised available literature, determined assay advantages and limitations, developed best practice guidance largely based on expert opinion for clinical use, and identified areas of future investigation in the setting of transplantation. In addition, attendees emphasized the need for well‐designed studies to generate high‐quality evidence needed to guide care, identified regulatory and financial barriers, and discussed the role of regulatory agencies in facilitating research and implementation of these assays. Findings and consensus statements are presented.
This meeting report summarizes findings from an AST‐sponsored consensus conference to define best practice uses, unmet needs and future directions for advanced infectious diseases diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients.</description><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Clinical microbiology</subject><subject>clinical research/practice</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>diagnostic techniques and imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infection and infectious agents</subject><subject>infectious disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>organ transplantation in general</subject><subject>translational research/science</subject><subject>Transplant Recipients</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFPXCEUhUmjqdZ24R8wJG7axSg8eA9mOTHV1ph0Y9eEgYsyeQMj8DST9Mf36lgXTWRzTy4fJ4ccQo45O-N4zu2qnXHFpfpADvnA2GzgUuy9adEfkE-1rhjjqtPdR3Iget11Qg6H5M-CupwqpDrVZxWgQHJAW6YeQkyo7oFOLY6xbWkO1PpHi4CnEVnXYsZ3PlawFXDau5Rri67iNa15jJ7mcmcTbcWmuhltarSAi5sIqdXPZD_YscKX13lEfl9-v734Mbv5dfXzYnEzc0JrNXPaeu171Un8YpDSz3sVXBgggAA7F72Qy6XqwbveOhm0EKGfd8AFcIY7J47I153vpuSHCWoz61gdjBgHML_pBj1n6CIYoqf_oas8lYTpTKekHJiWg0Lq245yJddaIJhNiWtbtoYz81yJwUrMSyXInrw6Tss1-DfyXwcInO-ApzjC9n0ns7i-3Vn-BR_Kl64</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Azar, Marwan M.</creator><creator>Turbett, Sarah</creator><creator>Gaston, David</creator><creator>Gitman, Melissa</creator><creator>Razonable, Raymund</creator><creator>Koo, Sophia</creator><creator>Hanson, Kimberly</creator><creator>Kotton, Camille</creator><creator>Silveira, Fernanda</creator><creator>Banach, David B.</creator><creator>Basu, Sankha S.</creator><creator>Bhaskaran, Archana</creator><creator>Danziger‐Isakov, Lara</creator><creator>Bard, Jennifer Dien</creator><creator>Gandhi, Ronak</creator><creator>Hanisch, Benjamin</creator><creator>John, Teny M.</creator><creator>Odom John, Audrey R.</creator><creator>Letourneau, Alyssa R.</creator><creator>Luong, Me‐Linh</creator><creator>Maron, Gabriela</creator><creator>Miller, Steve</creator><creator>Prinzi, Andrea</creator><creator>Schwartz, Ilan</creator><creator>Simner, Patricia</creator><creator>Kumar, Deepali</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4931-7805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-0477</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-9093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-7439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-5399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-0281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-3392</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-0763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-5484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-892X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-0227</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-5635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-5221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-5042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8395-8537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9442-0396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients</title><author>Azar, Marwan M. ; Turbett, Sarah ; Gaston, David ; Gitman, Melissa ; Razonable, Raymund ; Koo, Sophia ; Hanson, Kimberly ; Kotton, Camille ; Silveira, Fernanda ; Banach, David B. ; Basu, Sankha S. ; Bhaskaran, Archana ; Danziger‐Isakov, Lara ; Bard, Jennifer Dien ; Gandhi, Ronak ; Hanisch, Benjamin ; John, Teny M. ; Odom John, Audrey R. ; Letourneau, Alyssa R. ; Luong, Me‐Linh ; Maron, Gabriela ; Miller, Steve ; Prinzi, Andrea ; Schwartz, Ilan ; Simner, Patricia ; Kumar, Deepali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-c8ad8d5724147f44d957fcf6efe3ea93534bb75edc5ac4f833f592e13e10dc5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Clinical microbiology</topic><topic>clinical research/practice</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>diagnostic techniques and imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infection and infectious agents</topic><topic>infectious disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>organ transplantation in general</topic><topic>translational research/science</topic><topic>Transplant Recipients</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azar, Marwan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turbett, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaston, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitman, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razonable, Raymund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotton, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banach, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Sankha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaskaran, Archana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danziger‐Isakov, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bard, Jennifer Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Ronak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Teny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odom John, Audrey R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letourneau, Alyssa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luong, Me‐Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maron, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinzi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Ilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simner, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Transplant ID Diagnostics Consensus Conference Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azar, Marwan M.</au><au>Turbett, Sarah</au><au>Gaston, David</au><au>Gitman, Melissa</au><au>Razonable, Raymund</au><au>Koo, Sophia</au><au>Hanson, Kimberly</au><au>Kotton, Camille</au><au>Silveira, Fernanda</au><au>Banach, David B.</au><au>Basu, Sankha S.</au><au>Bhaskaran, Archana</au><au>Danziger‐Isakov, Lara</au><au>Bard, Jennifer Dien</au><au>Gandhi, Ronak</au><au>Hanisch, Benjamin</au><au>John, Teny M.</au><au>Odom John, Audrey R.</au><au>Letourneau, Alyssa R.</au><au>Luong, Me‐Linh</au><au>Maron, Gabriela</au><au>Miller, Steve</au><au>Prinzi, Andrea</au><au>Schwartz, Ilan</au><au>Simner, Patricia</au><au>Kumar, Deepali</au><aucorp>Transplant ID Diagnostics Consensus Conference Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3150</spage><epage>3169</epage><pages>3150-3169</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>The last decade has seen an explosion of advanced assays for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, yet evidence‐based recommendations to inform their optimal use in the care of transplant recipients are lacking. A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) was convened on December 7, 2021, to define the utility of novel infectious disease diagnostics in organ transplant recipients. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in transplant infectious diseases, diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology from centers across North America to evaluate current uses, unmet needs, and future directions for assays in 5 categories including (1) multiplex molecular assays, (2) rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods, (3) pathogen‐specific T‐cell reactivity assays, (4) next‐generation sequencing assays, and (5) mass spectrometry‐based assays. Participants reviewed and appraised available literature, determined assay advantages and limitations, developed best practice guidance largely based on expert opinion for clinical use, and identified areas of future investigation in the setting of transplantation. In addition, attendees emphasized the need for well‐designed studies to generate high‐quality evidence needed to guide care, identified regulatory and financial barriers, and discussed the role of regulatory agencies in facilitating research and implementation of these assays. Findings and consensus statements are presented.
This meeting report summarizes findings from an AST‐sponsored consensus conference to define best practice uses, unmet needs and future directions for advanced infectious diseases diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>35822346</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.17147</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4931-7805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-0477</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-9093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-7439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-5399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-0281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-3392</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-0763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-5484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-892X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-0227</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-5635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-5221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-5042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8395-8537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9442-0396</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2022-12, Vol.22 (12), p.3150-3169 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2689053430 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Antimicrobial resistance Clinical microbiology clinical research/practice Consensus diagnostic techniques and imaging Humans infection and infectious agents infectious disease Infectious diseases Mass spectroscopy Medical diagnosis North America Organ Transplantation - adverse effects organ transplantation in general translational research/science Transplant Recipients Transplantation Transplants Transplants & implants |
title | A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A16%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20consensus%20conference%20to%20define%20the%20utility%20of%20advanced%20infectious%20disease%20diagnostics%20in%20solid%20organ%20transplant%20recipients&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Azar,%20Marwan%20M.&rft.aucorp=Transplant%20ID%20Diagnostics%20Consensus%20Conference%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3150&rft.epage=3169&rft.pages=3150-3169&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.17147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689053430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2744608467&rft_id=info:pmid/35822346&rfr_iscdi=true |