An examination of thunderstorm-charging mechanisms using a two-dimensional storm electrification model

The early, prelightning, electrification of a storm resulting from noninductive (NI) charging involving graupel, cloud ice/snow, and supercooled cloud water in a riming environment is studied using a comparative approach in a two‐dimensional storm electrification model. The primary schemes examined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research 2001-01, Vol.106 (D1), p.1165-1192
Hauptverfasser: Helsdon, John H., Wojcik, William A., Farley, Richard D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1192
container_issue D1
container_start_page 1165
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 106
creator Helsdon, John H.
Wojcik, William A.
Farley, Richard D.
description The early, prelightning, electrification of a storm resulting from noninductive (NI) charging involving graupel, cloud ice/snow, and supercooled cloud water in a riming environment is studied using a comparative approach in a two‐dimensional storm electrification model. The primary schemes examined are NI charge transfers based on the laboratory work of Takahashi [1978] and Saunders et al. [1991]. The NI mechanism, based on Takahashi's work, develops a positive dipole (positive charge above negative) and electric fields approaching 185 kV m−1 as the cloud enters the dissipating stage. Charge transfers, based on the work of Saunders and colleagues, had to be reduced in magnitude to produce electrification that is consistent with the observations. In addition, the Saunders scheme produces an initially inverted dipole (negative charge above positive) which resolves to a positive dipole in the latter part of the simulation and produces electric fields approaching 250 kV m−1. Sensitivity tests show that the NI scheme, based on Takahashi's work, is sensitive to the number concentration of ice crystals, whereas the Saunders‐based scheme is much less sensitive to ice crystal numbers. The Saunders parameterization has strong positive charging of graupel at low effective liquid water content and low temperature. This positive charging can result in an unusual cloud‐top charge structure when used at full value but is benign when the charging is reduced in magnitude. The charge structure resulting from the Saunders scheme is quite sensitive to the calculation of the effective water content, which determines the level of charge reversal. Both of the NI schemes are capable of producing electrification that approaches thunderstorm levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2000JD900532
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26882717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18498839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5080-d423e33d9ee906cdbf42029de2217773e6e668f68aecd1d5e565dbda37d4376e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LHjEQh4NU8MV66wdYEHpy7STZ_DuK1m1FLKilxUuIyaym7mY12Rf123ftivTUnmYYnucH8yPkA4V9Csx8YgBwcmQABGcbZMWokDVjwN6RFdBG18CY2iI7pfyaQWiEbICuSHeQKnxyQ0xuimOqxq6abtcpYC7TmIfa37p8E9NNNeC8pliGUq3Ly8FV0-NYhzhgKrPp-uqPUWGPfsqxi35JHMaA_Xuy2bm-4M7r3Cbfjz9fHn6pT7-1Xw8PTmsvQEMdGsaR82AQDUgfrrtm_sAEZIwqpThKlFJ3Ujv0gQaBQopwHRxXoeFKIt8mH5fc-zw-rLFMdojFY9-7hOO6WCa1Zoqq_4JUN0ZrbmZwbwF9HkvJ2Nn7HAeXny0F-1K8_bv4Gd99zXXFu77LLvlY3hxDJQgxU2yhHmOPz_9MtCft-ZEGBrNUL1IsEz69SS7fWam4EvbHWWt_mra9EhdnVvHfhrehKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18498839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An examination of thunderstorm-charging mechanisms using a two-dimensional storm electrification model</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Helsdon, John H. ; Wojcik, William A. ; Farley, Richard D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Helsdon, John H. ; Wojcik, William A. ; Farley, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><description>The early, prelightning, electrification of a storm resulting from noninductive (NI) charging involving graupel, cloud ice/snow, and supercooled cloud water in a riming environment is studied using a comparative approach in a two‐dimensional storm electrification model. The primary schemes examined are NI charge transfers based on the laboratory work of Takahashi [1978] and Saunders et al. [1991]. The NI mechanism, based on Takahashi's work, develops a positive dipole (positive charge above negative) and electric fields approaching 185 kV m−1 as the cloud enters the dissipating stage. Charge transfers, based on the work of Saunders and colleagues, had to be reduced in magnitude to produce electrification that is consistent with the observations. In addition, the Saunders scheme produces an initially inverted dipole (negative charge above positive) which resolves to a positive dipole in the latter part of the simulation and produces electric fields approaching 250 kV m−1. Sensitivity tests show that the NI scheme, based on Takahashi's work, is sensitive to the number concentration of ice crystals, whereas the Saunders‐based scheme is much less sensitive to ice crystal numbers. The Saunders parameterization has strong positive charging of graupel at low effective liquid water content and low temperature. This positive charging can result in an unusual cloud‐top charge structure when used at full value but is benign when the charging is reduced in magnitude. The charge structure resulting from the Saunders scheme is quite sensitive to the calculation of the effective water content, which determines the level of charge reversal. Both of the NI schemes are capable of producing electrification that approaches thunderstorm levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospheric electricity ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001-01, Vol.106 (D1), p.1165-1192</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5080-d423e33d9ee906cdbf42029de2217773e6e668f68aecd1d5e565dbda37d4376e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5080-d423e33d9ee906cdbf42029de2217773e6e668f68aecd1d5e565dbda37d4376e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000JD900532$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000JD900532$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=916055$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Helsdon, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojcik, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><title>An examination of thunderstorm-charging mechanisms using a two-dimensional storm electrification model</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>The early, prelightning, electrification of a storm resulting from noninductive (NI) charging involving graupel, cloud ice/snow, and supercooled cloud water in a riming environment is studied using a comparative approach in a two‐dimensional storm electrification model. The primary schemes examined are NI charge transfers based on the laboratory work of Takahashi [1978] and Saunders et al. [1991]. The NI mechanism, based on Takahashi's work, develops a positive dipole (positive charge above negative) and electric fields approaching 185 kV m−1 as the cloud enters the dissipating stage. Charge transfers, based on the work of Saunders and colleagues, had to be reduced in magnitude to produce electrification that is consistent with the observations. In addition, the Saunders scheme produces an initially inverted dipole (negative charge above positive) which resolves to a positive dipole in the latter part of the simulation and produces electric fields approaching 250 kV m−1. Sensitivity tests show that the NI scheme, based on Takahashi's work, is sensitive to the number concentration of ice crystals, whereas the Saunders‐based scheme is much less sensitive to ice crystal numbers. The Saunders parameterization has strong positive charging of graupel at low effective liquid water content and low temperature. This positive charging can result in an unusual cloud‐top charge structure when used at full value but is benign when the charging is reduced in magnitude. The charge structure resulting from the Saunders scheme is quite sensitive to the calculation of the effective water content, which determines the level of charge reversal. Both of the NI schemes are capable of producing electrification that approaches thunderstorm levels.</description><subject>Atmospheric electricity</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LHjEQh4NU8MV66wdYEHpy7STZ_DuK1m1FLKilxUuIyaym7mY12Rf123ftivTUnmYYnucH8yPkA4V9Csx8YgBwcmQABGcbZMWokDVjwN6RFdBG18CY2iI7pfyaQWiEbICuSHeQKnxyQ0xuimOqxq6abtcpYC7TmIfa37p8E9NNNeC8pliGUq3Ly8FV0-NYhzhgKrPp-uqPUWGPfsqxi35JHMaA_Xuy2bm-4M7r3Cbfjz9fHn6pT7-1Xw8PTmsvQEMdGsaR82AQDUgfrrtm_sAEZIwqpThKlFJ3Ujv0gQaBQopwHRxXoeFKIt8mH5fc-zw-rLFMdojFY9-7hOO6WCa1Zoqq_4JUN0ZrbmZwbwF9HkvJ2Nn7HAeXny0F-1K8_bv4Gd99zXXFu77LLvlY3hxDJQgxU2yhHmOPz_9MtCft-ZEGBrNUL1IsEz69SS7fWam4EvbHWWt_mra9EhdnVvHfhrehKQ</recordid><startdate>20010116</startdate><enddate>20010116</enddate><creator>Helsdon, John H.</creator><creator>Wojcik, William A.</creator><creator>Farley, Richard D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010116</creationdate><title>An examination of thunderstorm-charging mechanisms using a two-dimensional storm electrification model</title><author>Helsdon, John H. ; Wojcik, William A. ; Farley, Richard D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5080-d423e33d9ee906cdbf42029de2217773e6e668f68aecd1d5e565dbda37d4376e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric electricity</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Helsdon, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojcik, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Helsdon, John H.</au><au>Wojcik, William A.</au><au>Farley, Richard D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An examination of thunderstorm-charging mechanisms using a two-dimensional storm electrification model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2001-01-16</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>D1</issue><spage>1165</spage><epage>1192</epage><pages>1165-1192</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>The early, prelightning, electrification of a storm resulting from noninductive (NI) charging involving graupel, cloud ice/snow, and supercooled cloud water in a riming environment is studied using a comparative approach in a two‐dimensional storm electrification model. The primary schemes examined are NI charge transfers based on the laboratory work of Takahashi [1978] and Saunders et al. [1991]. The NI mechanism, based on Takahashi's work, develops a positive dipole (positive charge above negative) and electric fields approaching 185 kV m−1 as the cloud enters the dissipating stage. Charge transfers, based on the work of Saunders and colleagues, had to be reduced in magnitude to produce electrification that is consistent with the observations. In addition, the Saunders scheme produces an initially inverted dipole (negative charge above positive) which resolves to a positive dipole in the latter part of the simulation and produces electric fields approaching 250 kV m−1. Sensitivity tests show that the NI scheme, based on Takahashi's work, is sensitive to the number concentration of ice crystals, whereas the Saunders‐based scheme is much less sensitive to ice crystal numbers. The Saunders parameterization has strong positive charging of graupel at low effective liquid water content and low temperature. This positive charging can result in an unusual cloud‐top charge structure when used at full value but is benign when the charging is reduced in magnitude. The charge structure resulting from the Saunders scheme is quite sensitive to the calculation of the effective water content, which determines the level of charge reversal. Both of the NI schemes are capable of producing electrification that approaches thunderstorm levels.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000JD900532</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001-01, Vol.106 (D1), p.1165-1192
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26882717
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Atmospheric electricity
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Meteorology
title An examination of thunderstorm-charging mechanisms using a two-dimensional storm electrification model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20examination%20of%20thunderstorm-charging%20mechanisms%20using%20a%20two-dimensional%20storm%20electrification%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research&rft.au=Helsdon,%20John%20H.&rft.date=2001-01-16&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=D1&rft.spage=1165&rft.epage=1192&rft.pages=1165-1192&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000JD900532&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18498839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18498839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true