Nutrient removal in the river basin of the Ruhr : a German case study

In the catchment area of the Ruhr, restructuring and upgrading measures in the domain of wastewater and stormwater treatment have been under way since 1990 to successively implement the currently applicable legal requirements for nutrient removal. With 2.1 million inhabitants and a design capacity o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.15-24
Hauptverfasser: BODE, H, KLOPP, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 44
creator BODE, H
KLOPP, R
description In the catchment area of the Ruhr, restructuring and upgrading measures in the domain of wastewater and stormwater treatment have been under way since 1990 to successively implement the currently applicable legal requirements for nutrient removal. With 2.1 million inhabitants and a design capacity of 3.7 million population equivalents (PE), it is expected that approximately DM 2 billion still have to be invested from 2000 onward. With this it will be possible to further cut the nutrient load in the Ruhr River, that has been declining consistently since the 1970s: by about 25% for Ntotal and about 10% for Ptotal. The anticipated decrease in ammonia-nitrogen in winter is particularly important for drinking water production from the river water (bank filtration). Whether and to what an extent the expected decline in phosphorus concentrations will curb eutrophication in the Ruhr with its several impounded stretches remains to be seen. Further nutrient load reductions cannot be achieved by sewage treatment-related measures. Load balances underline the adverse impact of diffuse or non-point sources, in particular, for nitrogen. Some potential to further improve the situation is seen in minimizing the nutrient releases from agricultural practices.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.2001.0004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26872066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26872066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd05b7d0499fecbb75a967e6c4d53b05b821dfb5576615d60657f4e6fc078e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctL5TAUBvDgg_HqzHK2ElDc9c7JoyeNOxFfIAriPqRpgpU-NGkV_3tz9cKIG7MJJ_nxQfIR8pfBkjPEf69pWnIAtgQAuUEWTGsstBJ8k-wyDcA5z9MWWQBXomCcix2ym9Jj5kpI-EV2GJMa81qQs5t5iq0fJhp9P77YjrYDnR48je2Lj7S2Kc9j-Di6mx8iPaaWXvjY24E6mzxN09y8_SbbwXbJ_1nve-T-_Oz-9LK4vr24Oj25LpyEaipCA2WtGpBaB-_qWpVWo_LoZFOKOt9VnDWhLkuFyMoGAUsVpMfgQFWeiz1y9Bn7FMfn2afJ9G1yvuvs4Mc5GY6V4oD4I2TIeAUoMjz4Bh_HOQ75DYZpKQTKUsisik_l4phS9ME8xba38c0wMKtKTK7ErCoxq0qy31-nznXvm_96_e0ZHK6BTc52IdrBtelLKqtyp-IdW7OPKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943364534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient removal in the river basin of the Ruhr : a German case study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>BODE, H ; KLOPP, R</creator><contributor>van der Vlies, A (eds) ; van Loosdrecht, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>BODE, H ; KLOPP, R ; van der Vlies, A (eds) ; van Loosdrecht, M</creatorcontrib><description>In the catchment area of the Ruhr, restructuring and upgrading measures in the domain of wastewater and stormwater treatment have been under way since 1990 to successively implement the currently applicable legal requirements for nutrient removal. With 2.1 million inhabitants and a design capacity of 3.7 million population equivalents (PE), it is expected that approximately DM 2 billion still have to be invested from 2000 onward. With this it will be possible to further cut the nutrient load in the Ruhr River, that has been declining consistently since the 1970s: by about 25% for Ntotal and about 10% for Ptotal. The anticipated decrease in ammonia-nitrogen in winter is particularly important for drinking water production from the river water (bank filtration). Whether and to what an extent the expected decline in phosphorus concentrations will curb eutrophication in the Ruhr with its several impounded stretches remains to be seen. Further nutrient load reductions cannot be achieved by sewage treatment-related measures. Load balances underline the adverse impact of diffuse or non-point sources, in particular, for nitrogen. Some potential to further improve the situation is seen in minimizing the nutrient releases from agricultural practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1900222973</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781900222976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2001.0004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11496666</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WSTED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Ammonia ; Applied sciences ; Catchment areas ; Continental surface waters ; Drinking water ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Eutrophication ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; General purification processes ; Germany, Ruhr R ; Inhabitants ; Models, Theoretical ; Natural water pollution ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen - chemistry ; Nutrient loading ; Nutrient removal ; Nutrient requirements ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Phosphorus - chemistry ; Point sources ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; River basins ; Rivers ; Seasons ; Sewage ; Sewage treatment ; Stormwater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water Movements ; Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Water purification ; Water Supply ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.15-24</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd05b7d0499fecbb75a967e6c4d53b05b821dfb5576615d60657f4e6fc078e23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1018996$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11496666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>van der Vlies, A (eds)</contributor><contributor>van Loosdrecht, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>BODE, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLOPP, R</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient removal in the river basin of the Ruhr : a German case study</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>In the catchment area of the Ruhr, restructuring and upgrading measures in the domain of wastewater and stormwater treatment have been under way since 1990 to successively implement the currently applicable legal requirements for nutrient removal. With 2.1 million inhabitants and a design capacity of 3.7 million population equivalents (PE), it is expected that approximately DM 2 billion still have to be invested from 2000 onward. With this it will be possible to further cut the nutrient load in the Ruhr River, that has been declining consistently since the 1970s: by about 25% for Ntotal and about 10% for Ptotal. The anticipated decrease in ammonia-nitrogen in winter is particularly important for drinking water production from the river water (bank filtration). Whether and to what an extent the expected decline in phosphorus concentrations will curb eutrophication in the Ruhr with its several impounded stretches remains to be seen. Further nutrient load reductions cannot be achieved by sewage treatment-related measures. Load balances underline the adverse impact of diffuse or non-point sources, in particular, for nitrogen. Some potential to further improve the situation is seen in minimizing the nutrient releases from agricultural practices.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Germany, Ruhr R</subject><subject>Inhabitants</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen - chemistry</subject><subject>Nutrient loading</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Nutrient requirements</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Phosphorus - chemistry</subject><subject>Point sources</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sewage treatment</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>1900222973</isbn><isbn>9781900222976</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctL5TAUBvDgg_HqzHK2ElDc9c7JoyeNOxFfIAriPqRpgpU-NGkV_3tz9cKIG7MJJ_nxQfIR8pfBkjPEf69pWnIAtgQAuUEWTGsstBJ8k-wyDcA5z9MWWQBXomCcix2ym9Jj5kpI-EV2GJMa81qQs5t5iq0fJhp9P77YjrYDnR48je2Lj7S2Kc9j-Di6mx8iPaaWXvjY24E6mzxN09y8_SbbwXbJ_1nve-T-_Oz-9LK4vr24Oj25LpyEaipCA2WtGpBaB-_qWpVWo_LoZFOKOt9VnDWhLkuFyMoGAUsVpMfgQFWeiz1y9Bn7FMfn2afJ9G1yvuvs4Mc5GY6V4oD4I2TIeAUoMjz4Bh_HOQ75DYZpKQTKUsisik_l4phS9ME8xba38c0wMKtKTK7ErCoxq0qy31-nznXvm_96_e0ZHK6BTc52IdrBtelLKqtyp-IdW7OPKA</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>BODE, H</creator><creator>KLOPP, R</creator><general>IWA</general><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Nutrient removal in the river basin of the Ruhr : a German case study</title><author>BODE, H ; KLOPP, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd05b7d0499fecbb75a967e6c4d53b05b821dfb5576615d60657f4e6fc078e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Germany, Ruhr R</topic><topic>Inhabitants</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen - chemistry</topic><topic>Nutrient loading</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Nutrient requirements</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Phosphorus - chemistry</topic><topic>Point sources</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sewage treatment</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BODE, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLOPP, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BODE, H</au><au>KLOPP, R</au><au>van der Vlies, A (eds)</au><au>van Loosdrecht, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient removal in the river basin of the Ruhr : a German case study</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>15-24</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>1900222973</isbn><isbn>9781900222976</isbn><coden>WSTED4</coden><abstract>In the catchment area of the Ruhr, restructuring and upgrading measures in the domain of wastewater and stormwater treatment have been under way since 1990 to successively implement the currently applicable legal requirements for nutrient removal. With 2.1 million inhabitants and a design capacity of 3.7 million population equivalents (PE), it is expected that approximately DM 2 billion still have to be invested from 2000 onward. With this it will be possible to further cut the nutrient load in the Ruhr River, that has been declining consistently since the 1970s: by about 25% for Ntotal and about 10% for Ptotal. The anticipated decrease in ammonia-nitrogen in winter is particularly important for drinking water production from the river water (bank filtration). Whether and to what an extent the expected decline in phosphorus concentrations will curb eutrophication in the Ruhr with its several impounded stretches remains to be seen. Further nutrient load reductions cannot be achieved by sewage treatment-related measures. Load balances underline the adverse impact of diffuse or non-point sources, in particular, for nitrogen. Some potential to further improve the situation is seen in minimizing the nutrient releases from agricultural practices.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA</pub><pmid>11496666</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2001.0004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.15-24
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26872066
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Agricultural practices
Agriculture
Ammonia
Applied sciences
Catchment areas
Continental surface waters
Drinking water
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Eutrophication
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
General purification processes
Germany, Ruhr R
Inhabitants
Models, Theoretical
Natural water pollution
Nitrogen
Nitrogen - analysis
Nitrogen - chemistry
Nutrient loading
Nutrient removal
Nutrient requirements
Phosphorus - analysis
Phosphorus - chemistry
Point sources
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
River basins
Rivers
Seasons
Sewage
Sewage treatment
Stormwater
Wastewater treatment
Wastewaters
Water Movements
Water Pollution - prevention & control
Water purification
Water Supply
Water treatment and pollution
title Nutrient removal in the river basin of the Ruhr : a German case study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T15%3A42%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20removal%20in%20the%20river%20basin%20of%20the%20Ruhr%20:%20a%20German%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=BODE,%20H&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=15-24&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=1900222973&rft.isbn_list=9781900222976&rft.coden=WSTED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2001.0004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26872066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943364534&rft_id=info:pmid/11496666&rfr_iscdi=true