Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non‐subungual acral melanocytic lesions

Background The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cutaneous pathology 2022-10, Vol.49 (10), p.859-867
Hauptverfasser: Rothrock, Aimi T., Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A., Milton, Denái R., Cho, Woo Cheal, Nagarajan, Priyadharsini, Vanderbeck, Kaitlin, Curry, Jonathan L., Ivan, Doina, Prieto, Victor G., Aung, Phyu P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 867
container_issue 10
container_start_page 859
container_title Journal of cutaneous pathology
container_volume 49
creator Rothrock, Aimi T.
Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A.
Milton, Denái R.
Cho, Woo Cheal
Nagarajan, Priyadharsini
Vanderbeck, Kaitlin
Curry, Jonathan L.
Ivan, Doina
Prieto, Victor G.
Aung, Phyu P.
description Background The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non‐subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN). Methods Twenty‐two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti‐PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%–25%, 1+; 26%–50%, 2+; 51%–75%, 3+; and >75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. Results Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse. Conclusions In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME‐negative melanomas and PRAME‐positive nevi.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cup.14290
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2686058276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2686058276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4190-fca125cb21f550712765192fcb80a56484fc38e544e0c95f7288c9d2485372a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFTEYhoO02GN10RsogW50Me2Xv5nMshyPWmixiF2HTE6mTZlJjskEnZ2X4DV6JeZ42lIEs8gHHw9PXvIidETglJRzZvLmlHDawgu0IDVABaKGPbQABqyqW9kcoFcp3QOQWtbiJTpgoml5zdkCze-dvvUhTc7gPLnBTTMOPb7-cn61wvbHJtqUXPC4m7Ebx-zDnUtTMHd2LDOWpccpd9nfZj1g7dfYB__7569nOxPLPdpB-2Dm7TOD3RrTa7Tf6yHZNw_zEN18WH1dfqouP3-8WJ5fVoaTFqreaEKF6SjphYCG0KYWpKW96SRoUXPJe8OkFZxbMK3oGyqladeUS8EaqoEdorc77yaGb9mmSZXoxg4lkA05KVr-BIQs3oKe_IPehxx9SadoQwTjTNCt8N2OMjGkFG2vNtGNOs6KgNr2oUof6m8fhT1-MOZutOsn8rGAApztgO9usPP_TWp5c71T_gF8HZZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715343520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non‐subungual acral melanocytic lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rothrock, Aimi T. ; Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A. ; Milton, Denái R. ; Cho, Woo Cheal ; Nagarajan, Priyadharsini ; Vanderbeck, Kaitlin ; Curry, Jonathan L. ; Ivan, Doina ; Prieto, Victor G. ; Aung, Phyu P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Aimi T. ; Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A. ; Milton, Denái R. ; Cho, Woo Cheal ; Nagarajan, Priyadharsini ; Vanderbeck, Kaitlin ; Curry, Jonathan L. ; Ivan, Doina ; Prieto, Victor G. ; Aung, Phyu P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non‐subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN). Methods Twenty‐two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti‐PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%–25%, 1+; 26%–50%, 2+; 51%–75%, 3+; and &gt;75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. Results Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse. Conclusions In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME‐negative melanomas and PRAME‐positive nevi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-6987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cup.14290</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35794643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acral ; Antigens, Neoplasm ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Melanoma ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant ; Nail Diseases - diagnosis ; nevus ; Nevus - pathology ; Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell ; PRAME ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; subungual</subject><ispartof>Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2022-10, Vol.49 (10), p.859-867</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4190-fca125cb21f550712765192fcb80a56484fc38e544e0c95f7288c9d2485372a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4190-fca125cb21f550712765192fcb80a56484fc38e544e0c95f7288c9d2485372a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5867-1403 ; 0000-0002-3398-0573 ; 0000-0002-5346-2669 ; 0000-0002-4703-7009</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcup.14290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcup.14290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35794643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Aimi T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milton, Denái R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Woo Cheal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajan, Priyadharsini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderbeck, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivan, Doina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Victor G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aung, Phyu P.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non‐subungual acral melanocytic lesions</title><title>Journal of cutaneous pathology</title><addtitle>J Cutan Pathol</addtitle><description>Background The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non‐subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN). Methods Twenty‐two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti‐PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%–25%, 1+; 26%–50%, 2+; 51%–75%, 3+; and &gt;75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. Results Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse. Conclusions In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME‐negative melanomas and PRAME‐positive nevi.</description><subject>acral</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant</subject><subject>Nail Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>nevus</subject><subject>Nevus - pathology</subject><subject>Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell</subject><subject>PRAME</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>subungual</subject><issn>0303-6987</issn><issn>1600-0560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFTEYhoO02GN10RsogW50Me2Xv5nMshyPWmixiF2HTE6mTZlJjskEnZ2X4DV6JeZ42lIEs8gHHw9PXvIidETglJRzZvLmlHDawgu0IDVABaKGPbQABqyqW9kcoFcp3QOQWtbiJTpgoml5zdkCze-dvvUhTc7gPLnBTTMOPb7-cn61wvbHJtqUXPC4m7Ebx-zDnUtTMHd2LDOWpccpd9nfZj1g7dfYB__7569nOxPLPdpB-2Dm7TOD3RrTa7Tf6yHZNw_zEN18WH1dfqouP3-8WJ5fVoaTFqreaEKF6SjphYCG0KYWpKW96SRoUXPJe8OkFZxbMK3oGyqladeUS8EaqoEdorc77yaGb9mmSZXoxg4lkA05KVr-BIQs3oKe_IPehxx9SadoQwTjTNCt8N2OMjGkFG2vNtGNOs6KgNr2oUof6m8fhT1-MOZutOsn8rGAApztgO9usPP_TWp5c71T_gF8HZZC</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Rothrock, Aimi T.</creator><creator>Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A.</creator><creator>Milton, Denái R.</creator><creator>Cho, Woo Cheal</creator><creator>Nagarajan, Priyadharsini</creator><creator>Vanderbeck, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Curry, Jonathan L.</creator><creator>Ivan, Doina</creator><creator>Prieto, Victor G.</creator><creator>Aung, Phyu P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-1403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3398-0573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-7009</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non‐subungual acral melanocytic lesions</title><author>Rothrock, Aimi T. ; Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A. ; Milton, Denái R. ; Cho, Woo Cheal ; Nagarajan, Priyadharsini ; Vanderbeck, Kaitlin ; Curry, Jonathan L. ; Ivan, Doina ; Prieto, Victor G. ; Aung, Phyu P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4190-fca125cb21f550712765192fcb80a56484fc38e544e0c95f7288c9d2485372a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>acral</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant</topic><topic>Nail Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>nevus</topic><topic>Nevus - pathology</topic><topic>Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell</topic><topic>PRAME</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>subungual</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Aimi T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milton, Denái R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Woo Cheal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajan, Priyadharsini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderbeck, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivan, Doina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Victor G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aung, Phyu P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cutaneous pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rothrock, Aimi T.</au><au>Torres‐Cabala, Carlos A.</au><au>Milton, Denái R.</au><au>Cho, Woo Cheal</au><au>Nagarajan, Priyadharsini</au><au>Vanderbeck, Kaitlin</au><au>Curry, Jonathan L.</au><au>Ivan, Doina</au><au>Prieto, Victor G.</au><au>Aung, Phyu P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non‐subungual acral melanocytic lesions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cutaneous pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cutan Pathol</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>859</spage><epage>867</epage><pages>859-867</pages><issn>0303-6987</issn><eissn>1600-0560</eissn><abstract>Background The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non‐subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN). Methods Twenty‐two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti‐PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%–25%, 1+; 26%–50%, 2+; 51%–75%, 3+; and &gt;75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. Results Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse. Conclusions In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME‐negative melanomas and PRAME‐positive nevi.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35794643</pmid><doi>10.1111/cup.14290</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-1403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3398-0573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-7009</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-6987
ispartof Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2022-10, Vol.49 (10), p.859-867
issn 0303-6987
1600-0560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2686058276
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects acral
Antigens, Neoplasm
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Melanoma
Melanoma - pathology
Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
Nail Diseases - diagnosis
nevus
Nevus - pathology
Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell
PRAME
Skin Neoplasms - pathology
subungual
title Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non‐subungual acral melanocytic lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20utility%20of%20PRAME%20expression%20by%20immunohistochemistry%20in%20subungual%20and%20non%E2%80%90subungual%20acral%20melanocytic%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cutaneous%20pathology&rft.au=Rothrock,%20Aimi%20T.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=859&rft.epage=867&rft.pages=859-867&rft.issn=0303-6987&rft.eissn=1600-0560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cup.14290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2686058276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715343520&rft_id=info:pmid/35794643&rfr_iscdi=true