Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study

Despite evidence supporting the specificity of classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) for the diagnosis of child abuse, some medicolegal practitioners claim that CML result from rickets rather than trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2022-12, Vol.219 (6), p.962-972
Hauptverfasser: Karmazyn, Boaz, Marine, Megan B, Jones, Richard H, Pfeifer, Cory M, Chapman, Teresa, Pitt, Sunny, Shalaby-Rana, Eglal, Fadell, Michael, Forbes-Amrhein, Monica, McBee, Morgan P, Monson, Matthew, Wanner, Matthew R, Lim, Jihoon, Ewell, Joshua, Chapin, Russell W, Sandstrom, Claire K, DiMeglio, Linda A, Jennings, S Gregory, Eckert, George J, Hibbard, Roberta A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 972
container_issue 6
container_start_page 962
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 219
creator Karmazyn, Boaz
Marine, Megan B
Jones, Richard H
Pfeifer, Cory M
Chapman, Teresa
Pitt, Sunny
Shalaby-Rana, Eglal
Fadell, Michael
Forbes-Amrhein, Monica
McBee, Morgan P
Monson, Matthew
Wanner, Matthew R
Lim, Jihoon
Ewell, Joshua
Chapin, Russell W
Sandstrom, Claire K
DiMeglio, Linda A
Jennings, S Gregory
Eckert, George J
Hibbard, Roberta A
description Despite evidence supporting the specificity of classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) for the diagnosis of child abuse, some medicolegal practitioners claim that CML result from rickets rather than trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiating rickets and CML on radiographs. This retrospective seven-center study included children younger than 2 years who underwent knee radiography from January 2007 to December 2018 and who had either rickets (25-hydroxyvitamin D level < 20 ng/mL and abnormal knee radiographs) or knee CML and a diagnosis of child abuse from a child abuse pediatrician. Additional injuries were identified through medical record review. Radiographs were cropped and zoomed to present similar depictions of the knee. Eight radiologists independently interpreted radiographs for diagnoses of rickets or CML, rated confidence levels, and recorded associated radiographic signs. Seventy children (27 girls, 43 boys) had rickets; 77 children (37 girls, 40 boys) had CML. Children with CML were younger than those with rickets (mean, 3.7 vs 14.2 months, < .001; 89.6% vs 5.7% younger than 6 months; 3.9% vs 65.7% older than 1 year). All children with CML had injuries in addition to the knee CML identified at physical examination or other imaging examinations. Radiologists had almost perfect agreement for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations of rickets (κ = 0.92) and CML (κ = 0.89). Across radiologists, estimated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CML for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations were 95.1%, 97.0%, and 96.0%. Accuracy was not significantly different between pediatric and nonpediatric radiologists ( = .20) or between less experienced and more experienced radiologists ( = .57). Loss of metaphyseal zone of provisional calcification, cupping, fraying, and physeal widening were more common in rickets than CML, being detected in less than 4% of children with CML. Corner fracture, bucket-handle fracture, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, metaphyseal irregularity, and subperiosteal new bone formation were more common in CML than rickets, being detected in less than 4% of children with rickets. Radiologists had high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic performance for differentiating rickets and CML. Recognition that CML mostly occur in children younger than 6 months and are unusual in children older than 1 year may assist interpretation. Rickets and CML have distinct r
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.22.27729
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685447367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685447367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b603ca8fb43daa6a87b4624e47b88964acb37ea65f0c45a16e3824c858fe8f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtvFDEQhC0EIpvAjTPyDQ6Z4NfYHm6r5a2NQAtI3EY9nvZimB0vtuewf4DfjUkCpy6pvq6SipAnnF0JwdWL9YddFVfCGNHdIyveKt1Irvh9smJS88Yy-e2MnOf8gzFmbGcekjPZmk5waVbk9w7GEKe4D7nkZ_RVgP0ccwmOfsLkYzrA7JCGuTreY8K5BCghzjR6ugvuJ5ZMYR7pZoKc69c1Fjh-P2WEiW4xVzLTSt-07FO18ku6ptfLVCtqGCb6uSzj6RF54GHK-PjuXpCvb15_2bxrth_fvt-st40THS_NoJl0YP2g5AigwZpBaaFQmcHaTitwgzQIuvXMqRa4RmmFcra1Hq3Xnbwgz29zjyn-WjCX_hCyw2mCGeOSe6Ftq5SR2lT08hZ1Keac0PfHFA6QTj1n_d_l-7p8Ff3N8hV_epe8DAcc_8P_ppZ_ACLngJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685447367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Karmazyn, Boaz ; Marine, Megan B ; Jones, Richard H ; Pfeifer, Cory M ; Chapman, Teresa ; Pitt, Sunny ; Shalaby-Rana, Eglal ; Fadell, Michael ; Forbes-Amrhein, Monica ; McBee, Morgan P ; Monson, Matthew ; Wanner, Matthew R ; Lim, Jihoon ; Ewell, Joshua ; Chapin, Russell W ; Sandstrom, Claire K ; DiMeglio, Linda A ; Jennings, S Gregory ; Eckert, George J ; Hibbard, Roberta A</creator><creatorcontrib>Karmazyn, Boaz ; Marine, Megan B ; Jones, Richard H ; Pfeifer, Cory M ; Chapman, Teresa ; Pitt, Sunny ; Shalaby-Rana, Eglal ; Fadell, Michael ; Forbes-Amrhein, Monica ; McBee, Morgan P ; Monson, Matthew ; Wanner, Matthew R ; Lim, Jihoon ; Ewell, Joshua ; Chapin, Russell W ; Sandstrom, Claire K ; DiMeglio, Linda A ; Jennings, S Gregory ; Eckert, George J ; Hibbard, Roberta A</creatorcontrib><description>Despite evidence supporting the specificity of classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) for the diagnosis of child abuse, some medicolegal practitioners claim that CML result from rickets rather than trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiating rickets and CML on radiographs. This retrospective seven-center study included children younger than 2 years who underwent knee radiography from January 2007 to December 2018 and who had either rickets (25-hydroxyvitamin D level &lt; 20 ng/mL and abnormal knee radiographs) or knee CML and a diagnosis of child abuse from a child abuse pediatrician. Additional injuries were identified through medical record review. Radiographs were cropped and zoomed to present similar depictions of the knee. Eight radiologists independently interpreted radiographs for diagnoses of rickets or CML, rated confidence levels, and recorded associated radiographic signs. Seventy children (27 girls, 43 boys) had rickets; 77 children (37 girls, 40 boys) had CML. Children with CML were younger than those with rickets (mean, 3.7 vs 14.2 months, &lt; .001; 89.6% vs 5.7% younger than 6 months; 3.9% vs 65.7% older than 1 year). All children with CML had injuries in addition to the knee CML identified at physical examination or other imaging examinations. Radiologists had almost perfect agreement for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations of rickets (κ = 0.92) and CML (κ = 0.89). Across radiologists, estimated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CML for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations were 95.1%, 97.0%, and 96.0%. Accuracy was not significantly different between pediatric and nonpediatric radiologists ( = .20) or between less experienced and more experienced radiologists ( = .57). Loss of metaphyseal zone of provisional calcification, cupping, fraying, and physeal widening were more common in rickets than CML, being detected in less than 4% of children with CML. Corner fracture, bucket-handle fracture, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, metaphyseal irregularity, and subperiosteal new bone formation were more common in CML than rickets, being detected in less than 4% of children with rickets. Radiologists had high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic performance for differentiating rickets and CML. Recognition that CML mostly occur in children younger than 6 months and are unusual in children older than 1 year may assist interpretation. Rickets and CML have distinct radiographic signs, and radiologists can reliably differentiate these two entities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.22.27729</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35792137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones ; Child ; Child Abuse - diagnosis ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Radiography ; Radiologists ; Retrospective Studies ; Rickets - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2022-12, Vol.219 (6), p.962-972</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b603ca8fb43daa6a87b4624e47b88964acb37ea65f0c45a16e3824c858fe8f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b603ca8fb43daa6a87b4624e47b88964acb37ea65f0c45a16e3824c858fe8f693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4106,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karmazyn, Boaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marine, Megan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Richard H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Cory M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby-Rana, Eglal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadell, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes-Amrhein, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBee, Morgan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanner, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jihoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewell, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapin, Russell W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Claire K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiMeglio, Linda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, S Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, George J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibbard, Roberta A</creatorcontrib><title>Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>Despite evidence supporting the specificity of classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) for the diagnosis of child abuse, some medicolegal practitioners claim that CML result from rickets rather than trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiating rickets and CML on radiographs. This retrospective seven-center study included children younger than 2 years who underwent knee radiography from January 2007 to December 2018 and who had either rickets (25-hydroxyvitamin D level &lt; 20 ng/mL and abnormal knee radiographs) or knee CML and a diagnosis of child abuse from a child abuse pediatrician. Additional injuries were identified through medical record review. Radiographs were cropped and zoomed to present similar depictions of the knee. Eight radiologists independently interpreted radiographs for diagnoses of rickets or CML, rated confidence levels, and recorded associated radiographic signs. Seventy children (27 girls, 43 boys) had rickets; 77 children (37 girls, 40 boys) had CML. Children with CML were younger than those with rickets (mean, 3.7 vs 14.2 months, &lt; .001; 89.6% vs 5.7% younger than 6 months; 3.9% vs 65.7% older than 1 year). All children with CML had injuries in addition to the knee CML identified at physical examination or other imaging examinations. Radiologists had almost perfect agreement for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations of rickets (κ = 0.92) and CML (κ = 0.89). Across radiologists, estimated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CML for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations were 95.1%, 97.0%, and 96.0%. Accuracy was not significantly different between pediatric and nonpediatric radiologists ( = .20) or between less experienced and more experienced radiologists ( = .57). Loss of metaphyseal zone of provisional calcification, cupping, fraying, and physeal widening were more common in rickets than CML, being detected in less than 4% of children with CML. Corner fracture, bucket-handle fracture, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, metaphyseal irregularity, and subperiosteal new bone formation were more common in CML than rickets, being detected in less than 4% of children with rickets. Radiologists had high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic performance for differentiating rickets and CML. Recognition that CML mostly occur in children younger than 6 months and are unusual in children older than 1 year may assist interpretation. Rickets and CML have distinct radiographic signs, and radiologists can reliably differentiate these two entities.</description><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiologists</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rickets - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtvFDEQhC0EIpvAjTPyDQ6Z4NfYHm6r5a2NQAtI3EY9nvZimB0vtuewf4DfjUkCpy6pvq6SipAnnF0JwdWL9YddFVfCGNHdIyveKt1Irvh9smJS88Yy-e2MnOf8gzFmbGcekjPZmk5waVbk9w7GEKe4D7nkZ_RVgP0ccwmOfsLkYzrA7JCGuTreY8K5BCghzjR6ugvuJ5ZMYR7pZoKc69c1Fjh-P2WEiW4xVzLTSt-07FO18ku6ptfLVCtqGCb6uSzj6RF54GHK-PjuXpCvb15_2bxrth_fvt-st40THS_NoJl0YP2g5AigwZpBaaFQmcHaTitwgzQIuvXMqRa4RmmFcra1Hq3Xnbwgz29zjyn-WjCX_hCyw2mCGeOSe6Ftq5SR2lT08hZ1Keac0PfHFA6QTj1n_d_l-7p8Ff3N8hV_epe8DAcc_8P_ppZ_ACLngJw</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Karmazyn, Boaz</creator><creator>Marine, Megan B</creator><creator>Jones, Richard H</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Cory M</creator><creator>Chapman, Teresa</creator><creator>Pitt, Sunny</creator><creator>Shalaby-Rana, Eglal</creator><creator>Fadell, Michael</creator><creator>Forbes-Amrhein, Monica</creator><creator>McBee, Morgan P</creator><creator>Monson, Matthew</creator><creator>Wanner, Matthew R</creator><creator>Lim, Jihoon</creator><creator>Ewell, Joshua</creator><creator>Chapin, Russell W</creator><creator>Sandstrom, Claire K</creator><creator>DiMeglio, Linda A</creator><creator>Jennings, S Gregory</creator><creator>Eckert, George J</creator><creator>Hibbard, Roberta A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study</title><author>Karmazyn, Boaz ; Marine, Megan B ; Jones, Richard H ; Pfeifer, Cory M ; Chapman, Teresa ; Pitt, Sunny ; Shalaby-Rana, Eglal ; Fadell, Michael ; Forbes-Amrhein, Monica ; McBee, Morgan P ; Monson, Matthew ; Wanner, Matthew R ; Lim, Jihoon ; Ewell, Joshua ; Chapin, Russell W ; Sandstrom, Claire K ; DiMeglio, Linda A ; Jennings, S Gregory ; Eckert, George J ; Hibbard, Roberta A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b603ca8fb43daa6a87b4624e47b88964acb37ea65f0c45a16e3824c858fe8f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiologists</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rickets - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karmazyn, Boaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marine, Megan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Richard H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Cory M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby-Rana, Eglal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadell, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes-Amrhein, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBee, Morgan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanner, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jihoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewell, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapin, Russell W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Claire K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiMeglio, Linda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, S Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, George J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibbard, Roberta A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karmazyn, Boaz</au><au>Marine, Megan B</au><au>Jones, Richard H</au><au>Pfeifer, Cory M</au><au>Chapman, Teresa</au><au>Pitt, Sunny</au><au>Shalaby-Rana, Eglal</au><au>Fadell, Michael</au><au>Forbes-Amrhein, Monica</au><au>McBee, Morgan P</au><au>Monson, Matthew</au><au>Wanner, Matthew R</au><au>Lim, Jihoon</au><au>Ewell, Joshua</au><au>Chapin, Russell W</au><au>Sandstrom, Claire K</au><au>DiMeglio, Linda A</au><au>Jennings, S Gregory</au><au>Eckert, George J</au><au>Hibbard, Roberta A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>219</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>962</spage><epage>972</epage><pages>962-972</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>Despite evidence supporting the specificity of classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) for the diagnosis of child abuse, some medicolegal practitioners claim that CML result from rickets rather than trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiating rickets and CML on radiographs. This retrospective seven-center study included children younger than 2 years who underwent knee radiography from January 2007 to December 2018 and who had either rickets (25-hydroxyvitamin D level &lt; 20 ng/mL and abnormal knee radiographs) or knee CML and a diagnosis of child abuse from a child abuse pediatrician. Additional injuries were identified through medical record review. Radiographs were cropped and zoomed to present similar depictions of the knee. Eight radiologists independently interpreted radiographs for diagnoses of rickets or CML, rated confidence levels, and recorded associated radiographic signs. Seventy children (27 girls, 43 boys) had rickets; 77 children (37 girls, 40 boys) had CML. Children with CML were younger than those with rickets (mean, 3.7 vs 14.2 months, &lt; .001; 89.6% vs 5.7% younger than 6 months; 3.9% vs 65.7% older than 1 year). All children with CML had injuries in addition to the knee CML identified at physical examination or other imaging examinations. Radiologists had almost perfect agreement for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations of rickets (κ = 0.92) and CML (κ = 0.89). Across radiologists, estimated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CML for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations were 95.1%, 97.0%, and 96.0%. Accuracy was not significantly different between pediatric and nonpediatric radiologists ( = .20) or between less experienced and more experienced radiologists ( = .57). Loss of metaphyseal zone of provisional calcification, cupping, fraying, and physeal widening were more common in rickets than CML, being detected in less than 4% of children with CML. Corner fracture, bucket-handle fracture, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, metaphyseal irregularity, and subperiosteal new bone formation were more common in CML than rickets, being detected in less than 4% of children with rickets. Radiologists had high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic performance for differentiating rickets and CML. Recognition that CML mostly occur in children younger than 6 months and are unusual in children older than 1 year may assist interpretation. Rickets and CML have distinct radiographic signs, and radiologists can reliably differentiate these two entities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35792137</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.22.27729</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2022-12, Vol.219 (6), p.962-972
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685447367
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bone and Bones
Child
Child Abuse - diagnosis
Child, Preschool
Female
Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Infant
Male
Radiography
Radiologists
Retrospective Studies
Rickets - diagnostic imaging
title Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A48%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiologists'%20Diagnostic%20Performance%20in%20Differentiation%20of%20Rickets%20and%20Classic%20Metaphyseal%20Lesions%20on%20Radiographs:%20A%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Karmazyn,%20Boaz&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=219&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=962&rft.epage=972&rft.pages=962-972&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.22.27729&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2685447367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685447367&rft_id=info:pmid/35792137&rfr_iscdi=true